BC Open Textbooks:
Khan Academy
MIT Open Courseware
Open Yale courses
Open.Michigan
Pixabay
Pexels.com
Flickr.com
Locate possible leads from this list: or search
|
After completing your initial research, you may have a number of OERs that are relevant to your course and align with the learning outcomes. The next step is to pre-vet these resources to make sure that they meet your institution’s requirements with respect to open licensing, ADA compliance, and OER quality objectives.
This section is designed to provide you with practical steps to follow when executing this pre-vetting process. While there are additional accessibility compliance requirements, the focus here is on reviewing your OERs to ensure the following:
The OERs are openly licensed (i.e., are published under a Creative Commons license) or are in the public domain.
All of the third-party content in the resource is openly licensed.
Let's look at these factors one at a time.
There are six types of CC licenses that are important to know when identifying usable OERs, and all the licenses require attribution. Most OERs clearly display the CC license symbol or license text (with a link to the specific license deed) on the first page of the resource. However, it is not unusual to have to search for the license in the document or web page if the license is not prominently displayed.
Before reviewing some examples of how to find the CC license within a resource, take a moment to review the six types of CC licenses. The order of the licenses starts with the most open, progressing to less open and the last two with ND (no derivatives) considered as not open.
|
A license to use the content without any restrictions. As with all CC licenses, attribution is required. |
|
A license that requires that all subsequent versions of the original work be published under the same CC BY-SA license. Attribution is also required. |
|
A license to use the work for noncommercial purposes only. Attribution is also required. |
|
A license to use the work for noncommercial purposes and that all subsequent versions of the original work must be published under the same CC BY-NC-SA license. Attribution is also required. |
|
A "no derivatives" license. The "no derivatives" restriction means that the original work must be published "as is," in its entirety, with no modifications. Attribution is also required. UMGC does not allow the use of content with this license (see reference below). |
|
A license to use the work for noncommercial purposes and with no modifications. Attribution is also required. This is the most restrictive of the six CC license types. Again, UMGC does not allow the use of content with this license (see reference below). |
|
|
|
|
|
You can view this video clip for a summary of the range of Creative Commons licensing from most open to most restrictive.
Creative Commons Kiwi by Creative Commons Aotearoa New Zealand is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 New Zealand license . UMGC has modified this work and it is available under the original license.
The "ND" (or no derivatives) restriction in a CC license simply means that the resource must be used "as is" with no modifications and must be redistributed in its entirety, as originally published.
This restriction may not be viable for some since modifications may be needed to the OER to fully comply with ADA accessibility requirements. Also, you will need to remove third-party content that is not openly licensed. These types of changes are not permitted with OERs published under an ND CC license.
Typically, public domain, or PD, resources are materials published by the US government and/or one of its departments or agencies (such as the US Department of Justice or the Environmental Protection Agency). Other PD resources include works that were once under copyright but whose copyright protection has lapsed and are now in the public domain.
An example of a public domain resource is a report from the Department of Education, Reimagining the Role of Technology in Higher Education . You can find the licensing and permissions information on page 3 of the report.
Perhaps one of the trickiest issues when vetting OERs deals with third-party content included in a resource that has a viable CC license. Many OERs include third-party content--images, videos, tables, and other graphic elements--that is copyrighted/closed and used with the permission of the rights holder.
When you are pre-vetting an OER for DR compliance, you will need to evaluate the resource carefully to identify if any content such as an image includes a copyright symbol or notice, or the words "used with permission" or "courtesy of." Some may include a date and name of the copyright owner. Any materials that are copyrighted with all rights reserved cannot be shared without the copyright holder's permission.
At this stage, you are pre-vetting the OERs to make sure that they meet the baseline criteria discussed above. You can then perform a more extensive vetting of the resources to ensure that each one is licensed under Creative Commons, that all closed/copyrighted third-party content has been removed from the resource, and that each OER fully complies with ADA accessibility standards.
|
If you created educational content and wanted to publish it under an open license, which CC license would you choose that requires that the work is attributed to you but would not have any other restrictions?
CC BY
CC BY-NC
CC BY-NC-SA
CC BY-SA
Answer: Option 1: CC BY: A license to use the content without any restrictions. As with all CC licenses, attribution is required.
Select the best explanation of an open license that you might share with your colleagues and students.
Open licenses enable creators to share their work freely with others who may then reuse, revise, improve upon, or create new work based on the original work. Creative Commons (CC) licenses are the legal tools that make the 5Rs possible.
Open licenses are the same as public domain, allowing free access to the materials and do not require attribution.
Open licenses are reserved for educational materials that can be shared and used for teaching and learning purposes only.
Answer: Option 1. Open licenses enable creators to share their work freely with others who may then reuse, revise, improve upon, or create new work based on the original work. Creative Commons (CC) licenses are the legal tools that make the 5Rs possible.
US Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2017). Reimagining the role of technology in higher education: A supplement to the National Education Technology Plan.
In an educational setting, ensuring accessibility means removing barriers from physical spaces and instructional materials to enable all students equal access, including individuals with hearing and vision impairments, as well as physical and cognitive disabilities. When you explore these accessibility requirements in more detail, there are two definitions to keep in mind.
Accessibility, as defined by the US Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights, means providing students the opportunity to acquire the same information, engage in the same interactions, and enjoy the same services as students without disabilities with substantially equivalent ease of use. |
With advances in technology and the global reliance on the internet, the concept of accessibility has expanded to include digital content, which requires specific technology-based solutions to address what is known as digital accessibility.
Digital accessibility refers to the ability of all users to easily navigate digital content including websites, online classrooms, and mobile apps, and also have an equal opportunity to the educational benefits and opportunities afforded by these technologies. |
Individuals with disabilities may use assistive technologies such as screen readers and modified keyboards to help them access and navigate digital content. Some examples of digital accessibility features and tools include:
videos with captions and transcripts for users with hearing impairments
images with alternative text (alt text) for users with visual impairments
screen readers to convert on-screen information into speech for users with visual impairments
keyboard navigation on websites for users with physical impairments
As higher education increasingly expands its digital content and tools for students and faculty, it is critical to adhere to federal and state laws and industry standards to ensure all learners can benefit from these opportunities. Digital accessibility also enhances the overall user experience and contributes to a universal design that benefits all students and staff members.
The primary laws and standards that apply to digital accessibility, and are especially important for educational institutions, include the following:
| A that requires state and local governments to give people with disabilities an equal opportunity to benefit from all of their programs, services, and activities. These areas include, but are not limited to: |
| Section 508 is a and requires that all digital/electronic content created, developed, purchased, maintained, or used freely by a federal agency or institution must be made accessible to all users regardless of their disability. Digital content includes, but is not limited to: |
| As part of the , the Web Accessibility Initiative has developed standards to help people understand and implement accessibility more easily. |
There are many reasons why accessibility is important to all individuals, not only to protect their civil rights but also to enhance their quality of life. Designing for accessibility using universal design principles benefits all students regardless of their ability. For example, providing closed captions for videos support students who are deaf or hard-of-hearing, and also supports diverse learning styles and nonnative language speakers. Here is a video on accessibility.
Portland Community College/UMGC is available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license. UMGC has modified this work and it is available under the original license.
In this section, we will focus on accessibility in the higher education sector and highlight essential aspects of an institution’s mission and overall approach to supporting student success.
With the rapid pace of technology advancements and the expanding global economy, the number of students seeking higher education, including students with disabilities, has increased in recent years. To serve this diverse student population, higher education institutions must provide inclusive learning environments with comprehensive accessibility policies and procedures, as well as the technology infrastructure to continually enhance their digital accessibility.
Accessibility for all students is supported in the following ways:
Inclusive education: As an inclusive education provider, it is important to provide all content in a format that is accessible for everyone who attends, works in, or is interested in getting information about their institution.
Mission and core values: Ensuring accessibility is an integral part of an educational institution’s mission as well as its teaching and learning philosophy.
Equitable learning community: Accessibility ensures that everyone is treated fairly and creates an environment suitable for learning. It also enriches the student population, providing different backgrounds, perspectives, and talents.
Legal requirements: Accessibility is the law. Public colleges and universities that fail to resolve issues of equal access face penalties and fines, as well as loss of federal funding and accreditation.
To reinforce your learning, answer the following reflective questions.
The terms "accessibility" and "digital accessibility" address different aspects of describing equitable access to educational opportunities. How would you describe these terms and highlight the differences?
Answer: The concept of accessibility has its roots in the earliest efforts to protect individuals' civil rights by providing accommodations for physical accessibility to public places. To address evolving technology advancement, digital accessibility focuses on the standards to ensure equitable access to web-based content.
While the increase in online learning in higher education has expanded opportunities for diverse learners, it also brings challenges to ensuring the digital content is accessible by all learners. To address accessibility, two US laws were passed that prohibit discrimination of individuals with disabilities and govern how universities provide their educational programs.
Identify the two specific laws and reflect on how they are different, especially with regards to digital accessibility.
Answer: The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is broader in scope, protecting an individual's civil rights in all areas of public life, while Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act is more specific to technology accessibility to ensure it can be used effectively by those with disabilities.
Center on Technology and Disability. (2016, October). Digital accessibility toolkit: What education leaders need to know. http://www.ctdinstitute.org/sites/default/files/file_attachments/ AccessibilityToolkit-508_FINAL_100616.pdf
National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, National Survey of College Graduates, 2017.
US Department of Education, Office of Civil Rights. (n.d.). Resolution agreement: CR Compliance Review No. 11-11-6002. https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/ investigations/11116002-b.html
US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). Postsecondary education. In Digest of Education Statistics, 2015 (2016-014). https://nces.ed.gov/ programs/digest/d15/ch_3.asp
Web Accessibility Initiative. (2016, May). Accessibility, usability, and inclusion: Related aspects of a web for all. https://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/usable
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. © 2020, UM GC .
Using reflective assignments can be a great way of synthesising learning and challenging the status quo. This page outlines some of the things to keep in mind when posing reflective assignments.
In higher education or professional develop initiatives it is very common to have some sort of assignment. These are typically written but can also take other forms. This page will go through the main considerations for posing reflective assignments.
The main points covered are:
It should be clear to participants or students what the purpose of the assignment is. Why are you asking them to do this particular assignment? You will have had to think about the value of it.
This value can be described in the guidelines of the reflective assignment where you communicate how it will help reflectors either evidence their learning or obtain learning outcomes. From the guidelines it should be clear to students what the value of completing and doing well on the assignment is.
When posing a reflective assignment it is very important that you know from the beginning exactly what you are asking. Reflective writing/responses can typically take on two distinct forms:
The distinction between the two is vital when deciding the type of assignment you want to pose. These are outlined below.
If you want to see the detailed aspects of reflectors’ thought processes, and want to follow each step in their reasoning, concerns, and learnings, ask the reflectors to submit their actual reflections.
The benefits is that you ensure that reflectors go through the process themselves and you can directly assess the quality. As this is the actual process we want the reflectors to complete, asking for raw reflections is the easiest way to ensure or get evidence that the process is happening.
One challenge when posing this kind of assignment is that some people might find it too personal to share this intimate process – it can become self-disclosure. A personal reflective account can be uncomfortable to show to anyone, and even more so to someone who is in a position of authority.
In contrast, ‘evidence of reflection’ is documenting the effects of reflection, but does not require documenting the process explicitly.
Hence, rather than writing the thoughts and feelings of a situation, the reflector will state the context and what learning they found in the experience. In the purest form, there is no need to document any challenging or self-disclosing feelings. It is more akin to describing the effects of a reflection and rationally, in contrast to emotionally, explaining why the learning is valuable.
The benefit of this is that reflectors are less likely to feel that they are self-disclosing. However, when we are looking at evidence of reflection rather than reflection itself, it is more difficult to assess the reflectors ability to actually reflect. Therefore, good evidence of reflection is when learning is explicitly stated and it is highlighted how the learning will be used in the future.
It is important to be aware that there is a risk, albeit minimal, that a reflector can produce good evidence of reflection, without having done any reflection. For example, a reflector may write that they learned to start assignments earlier and will do so in the future, without actually having engaged with reflection at all – they might just guess that ‘starting assignments earlier’ is a possible conclusion you want to see.
In reality, very few assignments will be a either pure ‘reflection’ or ‘evidence of reflection’. The goal for you is to find the right balance. Once you know what you want, you should be clear to reflectors about what being successful in the assignment looks like.
The easiest way to demonstrate what good looks like is to provide the reflectors with clear guidelines and examples of the type of reflections you are looking for. You can either write examples yourself or have a look through the Reflectors’ Toolkit, where each of the models have at least one example. You will likely find an example there that can be helpful for you.
List of tools for reflection (in Reflectors’ Toolkit) (LINK)
The need for clear assignment directions is essential in all areas of higher education, however having the discussion specifically for reflection is important. This is because when posing a reflective assignment it can feel easy to consider reflection as ‘special’ and separate from common ‘good academic practice’ and therefore that it does not require the same levels of direction as a general assignment. Reflection should be considered on equal terms with general academic practice and will often require more support as many reflectors are new to the concept.
One reason vague reflection assignments are easy to pose is that they do not seem to restrict the reflectors’ freedom about how to reflect. In contrast, if we provide them with clear requirements and directions it might seem that we do restrict reflection. There is an element of truth in that. If we require as written assignment using a specific model of reflection, we do take some freedom away from the reflectors, at least in how they present their reflections to us. In practice, they can easily produce a private reflection and restructure it according to your question and requirements.
If we do not give the reflectors the structure they need, one challenge is that a high proportion of them might produce reflections not meeting our ideas of sufficient or good.
Posing a reflective assignment saying ‘Reflect on your development and learning in the course in 1000 words’ might seem like a fair question to ask. But compare that to asking them to ‘write an academic essay about the concepts you learned in this course in 1000 words’ and it should be clear why guidelines are important. It is easy to imagine how students would struggle to prioritise and produce an essay with relevant content from the vague essay prompt. This is similar for a vaguely posed reflective assignment without accompanying clear guidelines. How are the reflectors going to guess what we expect from them?
In higher education, most people have an idea of what an essay is supposed to look like because we are taught essay writing from an early age in school. In contrast, most people have never done structured reflection before university, and then are not likely to be thoroughly instructed in how to do or present it. It follows that if we are vague in our instructions we may receive assignments of very varying qualities.
Thus, to be fair to the reflectors and to us as facilitators, be clear and have clear guidelines available. You can ask very broad reflective questions, but you should be ready to support the reflectors and both your criteria and rubrics (if you chose to assess) should be extremely robust.
As most people are new to reflection starting in university, when you introduce reflection it can helpful to: provide a thorough written guide of what reflection is, provide people with resources (for example the Reflectors’ Toolkit), and/or spend time in person introducing reflectors to structured reflection and what you expect from reflections.
Once you have a clear assignment, it is important you think about what you want to measure it against, i.e. the criteria. This discussion is also highlighted in the ‘Assessing reflection’ section of the Facilitators’ Toolkit with specific criteria as suggestions.
Moreover, if you decide to use summative assessment for the assignments, you will need to have a clear rubric (criteria broken down into levels of performance). It is good practice to publish both the criteria and rubric to the reflectors prior to assessing them.
To see at what point criteria and rubrics become essential, see ‘Should I assess?’
Assessing reflection (within the Facilitators’ Toolkit)
Should I assess? (within the Facilitators’ Toolkit)
Back to 'How do I introduce reflection?'
Teaching in Higher Ed
With jeremy caplan.
| June 17, 2021 | X Facebook LinkedIn Email
Play in new window | Download | Transcript
Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | RSS | How do I listen to a podcast?
Jeremy Caplan on episode 366 of the Teaching in Higher Ed podcast.
Sometimes the tool isn’t the most important thing. -Jeremy Caplan
The really important thing is that we are engaging people. -Jeremy Caplan
Sometimes an investment in trying a new tool can open up some advantages. -Jeremy Caplan
On this episode.
I'm Director of Teaching and Learning at CUNY's Newmark Graduate School of Journalism in New York City. I teach classes, workshops and now webinars on entrepreneurial and digital journalism. I love learning new ways to learn, teach, or create new things. And I love finding new ways to help teachers and journalists. Wonder is what drives me. I share what I love by teaching and writing. I grew up in Boston with a violin in one hand and a catcher's mitt on the other. I was an admirer of both Heifetz and the Chicago Cubs. During my time at Princeton I served during the winter as concertmaster for the International Symphony Orchestra in Jerusalem. I moved to New York to work for The Paris Review, Yahoo! Internet Life, and then Newsweek. After writing for Time for Kids I worked at Time Magazine where I contributed articles about Google, Apple and Yahoo. In addition to tech and business topics, I wrote about trends ranging from carrotmobs and cereal cafes to mini-lit and life-hacking. Here are more of my Time Magazine stories. I was a Ford Fellow in Entrepreneurial Journalism at the Poynter Institute, a Wiegers Fellow at Columbia Business School, where I completed my MBA, and a Knight-Bagehot Fellow at the Columbia Journalism School, where I earned an M.S. in Journalism. I live in New York City with my wife and two daughters.
Bonni Stachowiak is the producer and host of the Teaching in Higher Ed podcast, which has been airing weekly since June of 2014. Bonni is the Dean of Teaching and Learning at Vanguard University of Southern California. She’s also a full Professor of Business and Management. She’s been teaching in-person, blended, and online courses throughout her entire career in higher education. Bonni and her husband, Dave, are parents to two curious kids, who regularly shape their perspectives on teaching and learning.
Join over 4,000 educators.
Receive a free Educational Technology Essentials Guide and weekly update.
.
[00:00:00] Bonni Stachowiak: Today on episode number 366 of the Teaching in Higher Ed Podcast, Jeremy Caplan tells us how to create a digital teaching toolkit.
[00:00:14] Production Credit: Produced by Innovate Learning, maximizing human potential.
[00:00:22] Bonni: Welcome to this episode of Teaching in Higher Ed . I’m Bonni Stachowiak, and this is the space where we explore the art and science of being more effective at facilitating learning. We also share ways to improve our productivity approaches, so we can have more peace in our lives and be even more present for our students.
I’m so excited to have today’s guest joining me, his name is Jeremy Caplan. He’s the Director of Teaching and Learning at CUNY’s Newmark Journalism School. He’s a reader, learner, and questioner, journalist and educator, teacher and writer, dad of two girls, violinist, and chamber music lover. He teaches graduate courses, leads workshops, and helps journalists develop new ventures. Jeremy, today’s guest, was introduced to me through Geoff Decker at ACUE, the Association of College and University Educators.
They were part of knowing each other through an educational experience as you’ll hear about. I wanted to share my gratitude with ACUE for sending me guests and for our partnership for all these years. ACUE’s courses and community site feature many of teaching and learning staff experts, faculty developers, and practitioners to show evidence-based teaching practices. For all these years, ACUE has connected me with great guests for the show. I’m thankful for the introduction to today’s guest.
Jeremy, welcome to Teaching in Higher Ed .
[00:02:03] Jeremy Caplan: Hello. Great to be here.
[00:02:05] Bonni: I’m glad that we get this opportunity to have a second conversation today or actually, this might even be a third. The first time you’re coming on the show and I’m excited for us to get an opportunity to learn from you today. You’re going to be sharing with us how to craft a custom toolkit that has different kinds of digital teaching tools.
Before you do that, would you talk about four ways that you group these tools together in terms of thinking about the affordances of them and how we might go about using types of digital teaching tools?
[00:02:39] Jeremy: Sure, absolutely. We often want to show things to our students and that it might be slides, it might be information, so show is the first part. We definitely want to ask things of our students. We want to engage with them and interact with them, learn from them. Asking is the second key part of the toolkit. Gathering is another key element, not just asking questions but gathering actual materials with students. Then finally, co-creating. We want to co-create as a collective group new information, new ideas, new projects.
Those are the four key elements; showing, asking, gathering, and co-creating.
[00:03:18] Bonni: For each of these categories, we’re going to talk a little bit about what they’re good at doing for us and maybe some either limitations of the tools or approach or just limitations that you find many of us have as we’re attempting to make use of them and really be able to leverage those. When we talk about show when we think about using digital tools for presenting, what do you think of as some of the affordances of the tools in this space?
[00:03:47] Jeremy: Well, one nice thing is that we can convey things in multiple ways. Students are hearing us either live in person or over a Zoom session. They’re also potentially seeing our facial expressions. When we use slides, we can add other elements. We can add GIFs. We can add visuals. We can add large text. We can add charts or graphics.
For different kinds of learners or to highlight different aspects of what we’re teaching, it’s really great to be able to show things visually in a way that connects with the teaching message and the learning outcomes for that session.
[00:04:21] Bonni: When you think about the challenges that many of us have when we attempt to use tools that fall under the show category we’re trying to present in this visual way that you described, what are a couple of the challenges that we tend to run into?
[00:04:37] Jeremy: We’ve all probably been, at some point in our careers, in some PowerPoint training session where there’s tons of bullet points, things are hard to see or just lots of text on the screen that’s complicated and confusing or unrelated to the core message and we want to avoid that. We want to present students with clear, simple information, ideas, concepts, frameworks, and visuals. We want to find tools that allow us to do that simply and to not have to devote many, many hours to preparation on that just on the visual side because, as teachers, we have so much other work to be doing.
We want to make use of tools that are both easy to use for us and also render really, really nicely and enjoyably for our learners.
[00:05:27] Bonni: What has been your experience with regard to either perceived or real need to have my notes with me? I find there’s just this constant rustle between, “Wait, I need a lot of stuff on my slides. I need those bullet points. If I don’t have those bullet points, I might forget something,” or “If I don’t have those, I’m going to lose my place or I won’t remember things.” What’s been your experience with that? Do you categorize that as a real need? Then, therefore, how do you resolve it or do you categorize that as a perceived need?
I realize any time you give someone dichotomous choices, there’s probably 40 other options that you might think about in terms of this whole domain.
[00:06:08] Jeremy: I think there are packers and then there are spacers. The packers like to pack a lot into slides and spacers like to put one core message and a big visual. I think people have different personality styles and different meanings, and different needs. By the way, I think that approach also applies to how we structure our lessons, our lesson plans. Some people pack in a hundred different points in a lesson and try to move really quickly through a lot of stuff to be exciting and inspiring.
Other people will space things out and there just three core messages for today. Both of those have value at different times and both of them are inclinations that different teachers have. I think it’s important to identify what works for you, what’s your gem, what flows for you as a teacher and then to secondarily make sure that that’s in accordance with what will resonates with students. In general, I think the spacing approach for visuals on a slide tends to be a little bit more manageable for students because it doesn’t ask them to read a lot on the screen at the same time.
It allows you to focus on one point at a time which is one of the nice things about slides is it allows you to move sequentially through ideas or concepts or information and to take as much time as you need to on a given point. I tend to prefer not to use the slide as my own notes or to remind me because I want it to be really the visual that comes across the students that we’re all focusing on. Then I can use other supporting elements to help me remember whether it’s a post-it or a note by my desk or whether it’s slide notes that’s within the tool that I’m using.
[00:07:49] Bonni: What I’m hearing so much from what you said is just thinking about the purpose of it. The purpose of this category of tools is to show things to learners, not to yourself. [laughs] If what you need to do is show something to yourself, there’s other ways like you mentioned, the note space that’s in all of the presentation tools I’m familiar with or having something even printed out. I’ll often print out a slide deck with nine slides on a page. Then that way, if anything were to happen technologically, I have a backup plan.
Then I also find them better with transitions. I see that next slide that’s coming which, again, many of the presentation tools will provide that for you in some type of a presenter view. I find I’m better if I’m moving around the room, I’m not locked to my laptop and then I can be looking at where’s my next transition. Sometimes I’ll even build in blank slides that, for me, are my little reminder of, “Okay, this is your transition,” and just mixing things up that way can be really helpful. All right. What is a show tool that you want to share with us that we might consider building into our toolbox?
[00:08:57] Jeremy: Sure. The first one I’ll mention and I read about this on my Wonder Tools newsletter, it’s called pitch.com. For now, it’s completely free for anyone to use including teachers. It just makes slides look beautiful. If you’re familiar with Google Slides, it’s web-based in the same way. Unlike Google Slides which has a more PowerPoint-like interface and a little bit more traditional bullet points-style design, pitch.com is made to really be elegant, enjoyable to look at, easy to work with from the editing perspective, and flexible.
You can use it to put a couple of images on the screen at a time, to put a couple of bullet points if you really want to. Whatever you put, the templates that pitch.com provides you with makes sure that it’s going to look really professional, really clean, really polished, really engaging for students. It allows you to collaborate with colleagues if you enjoy doing that. It allows you to present in a variety of different ways if you’re presenting online or in person. It works well for all of those teaching scenarios. I really am enjoying that as a pretty new presentation tool.
I have some others that are good for other circumstances. If you are somebody who teaches Science or Math or other technical subjects engineering, and you use a lot of numbers or graphics or charts in your presentations, there’s a wonderful tool called beautiful.ai. It has an amazing array of templates that are pre-made that are really elegant for any kind of data, any kind of visual, any kind of chart or graphic that you might use. You can simply select one and replace the data, update it with your appropriate information.
One thing that’s really amazing and unique about that tool is, it’ll adapt to the number or size of information you have, so if you have two bullet points, the webpage will essentially reflow to show those elegantly. If you have on one particular slide, a couple more points to make, it’ll resize the font, It’ll reflow the text in a way that naturally just works. A lot of people, when they end up editing slides, they end up spending a lot of time moving things around, changing font size. That’s actually where a lot of the time gets spent on creating presentations, for some people it’s on those minutiae.
Beautiful.ai takes that work out of your time spent and makes it a lot more efficient. One other one I’ll mention, which is also free at the moment it’s called Projector. This is also a new one this past year, and it’s a little bit hipper and cooler. If you’re someone who likes that hip, avant-garde style, or fresh graphics, and you like to embed a lot of GIFs or even videos into your slides, images, stickers, Projector is a easy way to do that. You don’t have to hunt around the web for your images and videos and GIFs. It’s all included in the Projector interface.
You can just drag and drop things into your slides. Again, like pitch.com, it has beautiful templates. You don’t have to redesign something from scratch. You basically just pick a template that resonates with you, replace the text, add a couple of images, and you’re good to go. Students really respond to the strong visuals, I find. It feels fresh, it’s easy to create it’s fast and it makes a strong impression when you’re teaching, which allows you to focus on the core message, which is what you’re trying to focus on the teaching and learning topics.
[00:12:21] Bonni: When we talked about show, we talked about presenting, we talked about some of the things it lets us do and also some of the hindrances. One hindrances we didn’t mention is that that’s often where some of us stop. We’ve got three more categories of tools to look at that can really help make learning a lot more engaging. What can you tell us about ask?
[00:12:42] Jeremy: Well, one of the most important things that teachers can do in my view is to start with the bang, start with engagement. We don’t want to start just by talking at students for a lengthy period of time, because that’s easiest way to get them disengaged as many of us know. We want to ask something and we to ask quickly, easily, and rate from the start of a session in many cases, and often at the end of the session, as well as we’re concluding and synthesizing.
Sometimes we also want to use ask as a quick intermediary step in the middle of a lesson to re-engage people, and also to see where people are at in terms of how they’re feeling about a topic, what their opinion is, what their view, what their experiences, what their personal experiences, how it connects to their lives, all of these kinds of things. We can ask them to draw out students and really re-engage them. Engage them and then re-engage them because we want to continually cultivate their attention as James Lang talks about, we want to re-cultivate their attention throughout.
We can use tools like Slido, which is one I love. It’s a simple polling tool, and you can use this in a live teaching situation in person or in a remote situation in place of the typical Zoom polls, which are only multiple choice. What Slido allows you to do is create a word cloud poll, for example. I often will ask students, “How are you feeling today? What’s one word that describes how you’re feeling at the moment.” That’s a nice way to give them a chance to check in with themselves and to check in with each other.
We get a quick word cloud that shows that, hey, a lot of people are feeling some anxiety today, or a lot of people are feeling excited about this new topic, or a lot of people are curious. That’s a nice starter, I find. Other times we’ll ask an open text question. What’s your experience with this topic that we’re talking about? What’s the biggest question that’s on your mind? What are you curious about today, or what’s one thing you hope to learn? Any kind of open-ended question works well with Slido.
One of the advantages of these kinds of tools, as opposed to using just the Zoom chat or whatever built-in chat that some people may use, is that this can be anonymous. Students may not feel comfortable saying out loud that they have a certain feeling or that they have a certain opinion, but with these polling tools, you can allow them that freedom of anonymity. You can still moderate, if you’re concerned about inappropriate things, you can still do some moderation if you need to, but I haven’t found that to be a big concern.
Slido is a great tool for that and even has ranking polls, so if you want to ask students, which of these three issues do you think is the most important cause of this issue that happened, or which is most important to you, or you can have them rank things. You can even use it for a game. It has a Kahoot-like function, which is a quiz, a game that they can win. You can use Slido in multiple different ways. One of the things I love about it is that you can just improvise as you go if you need to.
You can plan it in advance, but I often will use the Chrome browser and just type in poll.new, P-O-L-L.new, and it will launch and open up a Slido poll immediately. I can quickly type in the question if I have something that comes up in the class that I want to ask about, and then I can show the results by sharing screen, which allows everyone to see what the results are in a nice, beautifully presented way. They also, once they’ve answered the question can see the results on their own screen.
It’s really a nice way to get everyone on the same page, get people engaged in the topic, get them thinking about the topic in advance of discussing it or after discussing it to warm up the room at the beginning of the session, and then to synthesize things at the end of the session.
[00:16:09] Bonni: When we think about the downsides or some of the friction points of ask tools, or really actually I think this probably refers to all of the rest of the categories of tools is that now you are engaging people. There are increasingly tools that will integrate and be baked into synchronous web tools like Zoom or like Teams, but we’re not really there yet. Most of these are still– I don’t know what word you’re used to hearing for this Jeremy, but I was thinking like a second window. That can sometimes be, “Hey, pick up your cell phone if you’ve got a second device there or open up a new browser.”
I found that the friction went down once the whole world seemed like it started hopping on the Teams and Zooms of this world, WebEx, what have you, but it’s still present. How do you advise us the smoothest most seamless way to get around these friction points anytime you introduce a new second screen or second device, what’s your guidance to us?
[00:17:17] Jeremy: I think that’s a really important point. You want to make it as easy as possible for students and students have different levels, just like we all do on the tech familiarity. A few thoughts, first, the nice thing about it, as you said, when you’re on Zoom or on Meter or any other platform, Teams, you can just paste a link into the chat. That’s very simple that students just click the link and then the poll question pops up. There’s no complex things to install, nothing to download, nothing to register for, they just literally click the link.
I find that that’s very easy in a remote setting. Second thing is that, I do think it’s helpful the first time you use something to just give a quick walkthrough, there’s three steps to this, click the link, fill in your answer, and then hit submit. Even though that may seem obvious, for a student, if they’re encountering it for the first time it might be helpful. They may not realize they have to click submit, for example. I do just walk them through very, very quickly what that step is. The third point I’d make is that in many cases, we’re working with students on an ongoing basis.
There might be a little bit of the first time you use something say, “Hey, this is Slido, this is a poll tool, you just click the link and answer the question and then hit submit, and then we can see the shared results.” Once you’ve done it the first time, the second time I find students are just like, “Oh yeah, of course, we’ve done that.” It’s very familiar and it’s very comfortable. It might be a little investment upfront, but as long as you explain how it works.
I also like to explain why we’re doing it, and this is something I think we sometimes lose sight of that we teach and we do all these things, or we use certain tools and sometimes it’s not clear to students, “Why are you doing that? Why aren’t you just using the Zoom poll? Why are we doing polling at all?” I like to say to them, “Look, I want to hear what you have to say, I’m curious your thoughts about this. I think this might help us set up the next topic we’re going to talk about.” I even give them the meta-conversation about learning and pedagogy and what we’ve learned about the science of learning.
I’ll tell them if you predict what you think the most likely cause is, you’re actually going to be more receptive and more able to learn what the actual cause is than if we hadn’t even discussed it beforehand. Or if you synthesize this information now and put it in your own words at the end of the session, research shows your recall is going to be better. You’re going to have an easier time down the road, and you’re going to be able to use this information more comfortably. I’ll try to give them a little bit of that explanation of how the tool works and why we’re doing this and why this is a good approach that we’ve chosen.
Then I find they’re like, “Oh, okay, that makes sense”. They’re more likely to be on board with it. One last point in this area, sometimes the tool isn’t really the most important thing and in many cases. If you’re in person and you want to use an index card to do an ask, or you want to use a– you want to show a big piece of paper or a big sign or a big post-it on the wall instead of using a digital tech tool to show something like, I think all of those are great. It’s just a question of, in what context are we in and what’s the simplest way to achieve our objective and the most enjoyable one?
If it’s a matter of handing out an index card or even using the chat. If somebody doesn’t want to use a digital polling tool, they just want to use the chat, you can do that as well because I think the really important thing is that we’re engaging people and we’re not talking at them and we’re really working with them and interacting. Whatever’s the easiest way is often the best way, but I do think that sometimes an investment in trying a new tool can really open up some nice advantages like the ones we’re talking about today.
[00:20:34] Bonni: What I also am hearing in what you shared is that sometimes the added complexity is going to be worth it in the long run. We’ll get through that friction together such that it really does just become completely normal. We’ve all collectively built a new set of skills in and a new set of norms. I like your idea of definitely saying the why is, “Why are we doing this? We’re also going to be using this tool or a series of tools that all work in similar ways.” You just talked about those steps, Jeremy. Those steps are the same for practically any tool I can think of in terms of that second screen or the second device.
I’m going to be putting a link in the show notes to a video from Teddy Svoronos at Harvard. He makes a really short but very detailed video for his students of how he recommends that they set up their Zoom because there’s some default settings in there that he wants them to be familiar with and even some different views that you can create. He’ll talk about, “There’s going to be really two main ways I’m going to teach. Sometimes, you’ll just hear me talking, and then sometimes I’ll be working with the whiteboard, and here’s what I suggest.” It’s so concise.
I’m making it longer than I even need to. It’s so concise, but a really good way of laying down that foundation. What can you tell us about the kinds of ways that having tools that help us gather can benefit us?
[00:22:01] Jeremy: Some of these tools will be useful in live sessions. Some of them are useful in between classes as well. Some of them you can use in either. Some examples of tools that I use for gathering include Google Photos, which is a really simple one and basically it allows you to create a shared album that all students can add to. They can add images or videos. It’s very familiar to people because they use Google tools often and they have it on their phone and/or their desktop. It works well. It’s fast. It has no storage limit. It’s completely free to use.
You can give students a link to that shared Google Photos album. Once you’ve made it publicly editable or editable by the group, as you choose, they can then add their materials to it. Then, the second step is they can then comment on each other’s contributions. Depending on what kind of class you’re doing, the images that you’re using might be very different, but you can always have this kind of interaction where people are commenting on each other’s images and creating a collaborative album really by gathering all this information.
Another one that I find useful is sendtodropbox.com. This is a tool and there are others like it where you can basically have people send something into a shared dropbox, and then you can either have only access to it yourself if you’re just gathering things from students and then showing them selections, or you can make the access shared. One other additional way to do this is to do this through multimedia like through audio. You can use something like Google Voice, which allows anyone to create a free– It’s basically a digital phone number, but it’s the same as a regular phone number in the sense that anyone can dial it and then leave a voice message.
You can have your students record any message on that and gather their input on something, and then you can embed those into a webpage or into a learning management system. It’s a nice way to gather people’s different voices on that subject much like you might use VoiceThread or even something like Flipgrid. Both of those can be used in this way too, to gather student voices. One last one that I’ll mention is called SpeakPipe. This is if you have a webpage or an LMS where you want to have students record an audio message and gather their ideas.
Typically between sessions, gather their input or thoughts like an audio discussion board almost, or a video discussion board in the case of Flipgrid to again, gather different voices and have people contribute their own thoughts in their own words in their own way.
[00:24:20] Bonni: What challenges do you see people having when they start to use gather tools?
[00:24:26] Jeremy: There are some people who are using unusual devices. My daughters are in Zoom School, they’re five and eight at the moment. They have classmates who are on every known device you could imagine. Some students are on a Chromebook, some are on an iPad, some are on an Android tablet and some are even on a Kindle tablet, for example. That means that not everyone has the same interface when they’re trying to share something, whether it’s a file or a photo, or a video.
Fortunately, some of these like Google Voice just requires access to a phone number. Anyone who can call anything can call a Google Voice number and leave a voice message as part of this activity. Some of them get around that complexity a little bit. For other ones, there might be a little bit of figuring out the time that that’s required at the beginning to figure out, for example, how to upload something to a shared Google Photos album if you haven’t used that before. Some people prefer to use a public tool like Pinterest for this kind of thing too.
Pinterest allows you to create public shared pages or editable pages that are editable by a group like your students. That can be another alternative for that as well if it’s easier for someone.
[00:25:37] Bonni: I think so often about the friction of it. One of the nice things that you’ve described here is that there’s such little friction for many of them, but whenever we think about the lowered friction, that means lowered friction for anyone, not necessarily just our students. I always want to caution people that you wouldn’t want to put out on Twitter, for example, the link to your Google Photos album where anyone could put stuff up there if it wasn’t protected in some way. Keeping those links that are really, really open and allow someone to contribute without having to log in or being logged in, is going to be important not to put those in public spaces.
I don’t know if you have any other warnings like that for us.
[00:26:17] Jeremy: I think a lot of times these can be– You can invite people individually, so you don’t have to necessarily make the link totally public depending on the particular tool in that case. I agree that in some cases we want to make sure not to make the link available in public spaces just as you wouldn’t put your private phone number on a public Craigslist page or something. We want to be careful about that as well.
[00:26:42] Bonni: What can co-create tools allow us to do?
[00:26:47] Jeremy: This is where we can really make exciting things together as a group. This can be in a live session, in person, or online, or it can be something we do collaboratively over the course of a week, in between classes, or over the course of a semester. The tool that some people might be familiar with, which is a great starter for this, is Google Jamboard. It allows you to basically have a digital whiteboard that you share and people can add simple things like post-its and little comments and little drawings.
Then once you’ve mastered that, or if you want something more than that, there’s a whole range of really nice tools that allow you to do a little bit more co-creation. One of them that’s commonly used by teachers is Padlet which people may be familiar with and allows you to create multiple different vertical columns that allow people to organize and share and create information or images in different categories. Some newer ones include Miro and Mural, these are a little bit fancier whiteboards that allow you to create really intricate collective creations.
Whether it’s a framework that you’ve given your class and asking them each to fill in a certain section of it with images or diagrams or text or things that they find online. You can use it in a very simple way. A lot of people see it and get overwhelmed by a tool like Miro or Mural. By the way, both of those have free educator plans to start out with. A lot of people get overwhelmed because they are powerful professional tools. Actually, they have wonderful onboarding exercises and examples, and templates. As long as you can devote about 15 to 20 minutes to getting yourself set up, you can actually get started really easily.
I would encourage people to start with something very simple for the students to do, so there’s some very simple icebreaker activities just so that students can get familiar with the toolset on those tools for the first time because there are a bunch of different tools to choose from. The first glance can be a little bit overwhelming for students. It’s good to have a very simple exercise. Actually, both Miro and Mural come with preset templates, for example, for icebreakers. You can just pull up one of those and just practice with the students for a few minutes to show them how they’re going to co-create something on the board for something that you’ve planned.
A brand new one that’s just joined that’s even easier, which I really love, is called FigJam. If people are familiar with Figma, which is a super popular new design tool. FigJam is a free, open whiteboard, digital whiteboard that anyone can now use. It’s even simpler than Miro or Mural, and yet it’s really powerful for creating things together and collaboratively thinking about a topic and it’s fun. I think our teaching should really be fun. Our learning should be fun. It should be effective. It should be engaging of course, but it should also be fun.
These tools really allow us to have a little fun, be a little playful, and occasionally you can add a sticker or a little funny GIF or graphic. That enhances learning. It makes learning more effective and engaging. It just enhances the experience. That’s part of the co-creation process as well.
[00:30:01] Bonni: What have you found that people might run into as far as challenges go when trying to use these co-create tools?
[00:30:09] Jeremy: I run a program called the Journalism Creators Program at the Newmark Graduate School of Journalism at CUNY in the City University of New York. We do have some students who are coming in from various parts of the world for remote sessions and including places where there’s really low bandwidth or there’s complicated connectivity issues. We have occasionally had a couple of issues with people trying to use something like Miro collaboratively, collectively at the same time. In some cases that low bandwidth makes it difficult to take advantage of all the features of that kind of tool.
If you are dealing with low bandwidth situations or students who don’t have access to a relatively modern laptop, that kind of a tool might be a bit of a challenge for them. In which case you might try a simpler one like Google Jamboard, or even go back to even simpler tools. Again, if need be, have them use paper and be drawing something on paper and showing it in front of their camera, or if you’re in a remote situation or just using paper and pen in a live classroom. I think the important thing is people are creating together. They’re building together. They’re doing something engaging interactive and fun.
I’ve resorted to using tinfoil and toothpicks and clay and whatever the materials are, whether they’re digital or not will depend on the context. Just judging by what your students can do and what works for them, you can really do as exciting a newer thing as you’d like, or return to something traditional and effective as well.
[00:31:50] Bonni: One of the challenges that I have found in these spaces are actually two ends of a continuum. One challenge is students or learners not understanding that to leave the other stuff there. So sometimes you’ll have people that will delete everything that’s there, because they’re not accustomed to that. Multiple people will be working on this and it’s one of those things I have at least once forgot to explain, like, “No, you’re not starting with a blank sheet of paper. It’s not just your sheet of paper, but it’s something that multiple people will be contributing to.”
That’s been one end of that spectrum. Then on the other end is a real hesitancy to then change or modify anything. When you’re doing collaborative writing, part of that is understanding what your roles are going to be. If you’re an editor, we need to get to some space where we trust each other enough to let that person edit versus that, oh no, I have to leave their original exactly like it looked when I came across it and then somehow try to morph around it. I found an overarching guidance that helps us to set norms and also to identify and establish what those roles are going to be.
Sometimes I think it’s when you do a lot of collaborative work, you’re just so used to that. You just hop right on, off you go, and not recognizing that we’re taking our identities into these spaces and to be sensitive about what that means if you change somebody’s work without talking about it in advance. That doesn’t mean that you had a bad idea or a bad writer. These are some of the more collaborative people-oriented skill sets that I find myself needing to think about in addition to using the tool for whatever it is we’re trying to accomplish on the discipline-specific learning. If that makes any sense. Have you ran into this as well?
[00:33:41] Jeremy: Yes. I think that’s an important point. I think the first step is walking people through the instructions, as you said, making it really clear. Here are three things to keep in mind it’s okay to make a mistake. You can play around it’s important to respect other people’s work and, and to draw on your own space, et cetera. Setting up some instructions. The second thing I’ve found helpful is having a little experimental time. In other contexts, when we get a chance to try something a little bit before we might get to an amuse-bouche in a restaurant or something, to taste something or a sample at a Trader Joe’s or something.
I think giving people a little bit of a mess page, I call it a mess page or a scratch page where the first time we’re using something, they can just play around and try out the different tools and it’s okay to be messy or make a mistake or even erase something because they’ll realize how it works. Then when we’re trying to really create something for the exercise or activity where we’re past that scratch phase and we’re ready to go. The third thing that I think is helpful in this regard is having separate spaces to some extent. You use Jamboard, for example, you can have each group or each student have a separate little area that’s their own.
If you have Google Slides, I often have students, co-create a Google slide deck. They’re each working on a different slide and I’ll usually take a minute or two beforehand to just label the slides with their names or even just 1 through 20 or whatever number of students you have. Then they’re each on their own slide, for example, and you can do this with pretty much any of these digital whiteboard tools where you have– For example, with Mural or Miro, you can copy and paste an area essentially that is designated for each student so that they’re not working on top of each other digitally.
They each have their own designated work area and the same applies. even if you’re using a Google doc. Google Docs can be fine. There’s simple collaborative tools and you can designate a space for each group or each student to work in. Then there’s less risk of students typing on top of each other or deleting things. One thing I do encourage them to do though is when we’re doing these exercises is to take time. We usually set aside some time for students to look at each other’s work because there is also a risk that students just do their own thing and they’re not really noticing what else is going on.
We want to take a time just like elementary school students do a gallery walk. They walk around the room and see what everyone else put up around the walls. We do a digital gallery walk where we say, look at what everyone else created, and then most of these tools have commenting functions. You can drop-a comment and say, “Oh, that was really interesting. I wonder what you meant by this,” or, “I really liked that you mentioned that it connects to something that I was working on as well.” You get some additional interaction in that next phase after the initial creation.
[00:36:34] Bonni: I love doing that too and asking people to say, what do you notice the themes are or patterns, or what ones stood out as completely surprising or unique in some way and being able to see those connections can be so powerful and it’s almost a new lens that we can put onto our learning. That can be so powerful.
[00:36:53] Jeremy: It’s really fun and it’s something that can happen live in the session again, or it can be something you continue afterward as part of the ongoing thread of the class, and even with a tool like Padlet it allows that kind of commenting. Most of these tools really can work well, too, and to continue the discussion after class. The discussion after class or between classes, it doesn’t have to be on a “discussion board”. It can really be done in a creative way through some of these collaborative tools.
[00:37:24] Bonni: before Jeremy and I get to the recommendations segment, I wanted to thank today’s sponsor and that is SaneBox. SaneBox is one of those services that I’ve been subscribing to and so has Dave for so long that I almost forget how e-mail works without it. What SaneBox does is it helps take all of the stuff that pops up with equal importance in our inbox and sorts it with a lot of really smart thinking, the algorithm that it uses to sort things into things that might be less important puts them in other folders, such as SaneLater or Sane Newsletters, lots of ways to get things out of our inbox that are likely to be less important.
If it ever gets that wrong, which I still scratch my head because it really doesn’t with me but if on occasion I want to take something and retrain SaneBox, all I have to do is, for example, I could drag an e-mail from that SaneLater folder into my inbox and SaneBox just magically remembers, “Oh, next time she gets that same e-mail, she wants it to show up in her inbox instead of in the SaneLater,” and of course, vice versa works as well. Very easy to retrain it. I hardly ever have to do that, but if I ever do, it’s a really easy process,.
It makes it so much easier for me to manage my e-mail and to make sure that I’m not overloaded with a bunch of messages that all get treated the same when they really shouldn’t be in terms of priority. If you head on over to sanebox.com/tihe as in Teaching in Higher Ed, you can get a free trial and take advantage of a $25 credit toward a SaneBox subscription. Again, head on over to sanebox.com/tihe, and thanks once again to SaneBox for sponsoring today’s episode. This is the point in the show where we each get to share our recommendations.
I have one that actually relates back to you, and that is, I want to recommend that people go check out this notion page that you have for an event that we both got to be a part of. That is a link to Journalism Through the Learning Design Starter Toolkit. I’ll put a link to that in the show notes, but it is the same four categories of tools and many of the same tools that you just mentioned. Even though it’s in a journalism context, I found it so helpful just in any context to want to do these four functions. I just encourage people to go over and check that out as a way of extending the learning from today’s episode.
I’m going to pass it over to you, Jeremy, for your recommendations.
[00:39:59] Jeremy: Sure. I have a few final digital tools that we didn’t mention. I’ll just mention really quickly in passing. Then I’ll give you my personal recommendation. A few tools that are really, really fun and great I think for people to explore, if you haven’t, one is GooseChase. This is for scavenger hunts. You can use them with the class. You can use them for an orientation session. It’s super fun. It’s a digital scavenger hunt. I love using it with students to get them to know each other and to just have an onboarding fun experience. It’s a blast.
Another that I want to recommend highly if people aren’t aware of Pathwright. It’s a wonderful new way to think about learning paths online, creating learning paths. We’re all familiar I’m sure with learning management systems the big famous ones like Canvas and Blackboard, but there’s a whole other approach, which is to focus on creating a path for learning which Pathwright has created. It’s a small startup from South Carolina and not many people know about it in my experience and in the big world of higher education.
I found it to be one of the most elegant ways to create learning paths for people in different kinds of courses. If people are looking for alternatives to the traditional LMS solution, I highly encourage people to check it out. We’ve used it for our programs and I find it to be really, really great. The other big recommendation I’ll offer it has nothing to do with any of these tools. I write about these tools all the time for Wonder Tools which is my newsletter wondertools.substack.com. When I’m not thinking about tools or writing about tools, I love reading as I’m sure many people listening do as well, but sometimes I’m ready for something a little bit lighter or lighter on the eyes.
I’ve been super into graphic novels since the pandemic began in particular. I want to recommend a couple of really great ones. Gareth Heinz has really wonderful graphic novel versions of The Iliad and Odyssey and it’s terrific. Jerry Craft has a couple of really great graphic novels that are actually technically aimed at YA, young adult audiences, but I find them to be great. One’s called the New Kid . People might be familiar with Raina Telgemeier who’s another author who writes in that vein who wrote a book called Smile and there are a series of those graphic novels.
Then there’s just a great array of classic novels that are in graphic novel form. A Handmaid’s Tale is one I read recently. Oliver Twist , The Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar Wilde, A Wrinkle in Time . All of these have really nice, relatively new graphic novel versions. If you’re looking to read but want something that’s nice on the eye, that’s my recommendation for today. Then if you’re looking for something really a little bit higher brow in the graphic novel realm, there’s a guy named Christophe Chabouté, a French graphic novelist who did a beautiful version of Moby Dick , which is just gorgeous and wonderful and has a few others, one called Park Bench , one called Alone .
Then one based on the classic Jack London story To Build a Fire , which is just fantastic. He’s a really wonderful graphic novelist that I recommend people check out.
[00:43:22] Bonni: Well, you definitely have not left us with nothing to play with after [laughs] today’s episode, nothing to check out. I am excited about checking out so many of the tools that you mentioned in the main part of the episode and following that up with the things that you recommended. Jeremy, thank you for being a guest today on Teaching in Higher Ed .
[00:43:40] Jeremy: It’s been a total pleasure, Bonni. I love your podcast. You do great work. I’m so excited to be in this community of educators who are working in this really, really exciting field.
[00:43:54] Bonni: I’m so grateful to Jeremy Caplan for joining me for today’s episode of Teaching in Higher Ed, I was energized by our conversation and then have all these things I want to check out and hope you do too. If you’d like to see the show notes for today’s episode, it’s probably already in your podcast player, you can probably swipe over depending on what app you’re using, but if you want to access it more directly, head on over to teachinginhighered.com/366, as in episode 366. You can also subscribe to the weekly Teaching in Higher Ed update.
These show notes will show up in your inbox, along with some other goodies, like other recommendations, some quotable words, and other things I think you’ll enjoy. Head over to teachinginhighered.com/subscribe if you’d like to subscribe to the Teaching in Higher Ed update. I’ll see you next time on Teaching in Higher Ed .
[00:44:55] [END OF AUDIO]
The transcript of this episode has been made possible through a financial contribution by the Association of College and University Educators (ACUE). ACUE is on a mission to ensure student success through quality instruction. In partnership with institutions of higher education nationwide, ACUE supports and credentials faculty members in the use of evidence-based teaching practices that drive student engagement, retention, and learning.
Teaching in Higher Ed transcripts are created using a combination of an automated transcription service and human beings. This text likely will not represent the precise, word-for-word conversation that was had. The accuracy of the transcripts will vary. The authoritative record of the Teaching in Higher Ed podcasts is contained in the audio file.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
An unexpected error occurred. Please try again.
This resource was developed by EARTHDAY.ORG™ staff and George Mason University faculty to seamlessly embed the Global Earth Challenge citizen science app into higher education curriculum and campus activities. Explore below how you can incorporate citizen science into your syllabus, your club, society, or campus community.
I. instructions, ii. opportunities for global earth challenge integration.
Be a part of the solution and build community within your institution while adding to data sets around the globe.
EARTHDAY.ORG™ (EDO), in partnership with George Mason University’s (GMU) Office of Sustainability , is encouraging universities around the world to incorporate EDO’s Global Earth Challenge program into their curriculum and campus experience. Whether you’re a student, a faculty member, a staff member, or parent/legal guardian Global Earth Challenge is for you! Global Earth Challenge is an international citizen scientist initiative designed to collect data for air quality, plastic pollution, and insects using the respective widgets. It is an open data citizen science database that has interoperability between citizen science data sets on six Earth Challenge research questions .
Due to COVID-19, students are limited in both their academic pursuits and their options to participate in environmental conservation.
In response to the global pandemic, schools, camps and many other typical comforts are drastically different. We want to support educators and parents around the world in supplying high-quality, reliable education materials to keep students engaged, safe and learning.
We are encouraging students to focus on the air, plastics and insects widgets if done so safely. We are not encouraging anyone to use any facets of the application, or go outside, if it is not safe to do so.
Participants can download the Global Earth Challenge application from Apple’s App Store or from Google’s Play Store . You can download Global Earth Challenge wherever you’re connected to the Internet and it’s recommended you download it with your smartphone. If you’re particularly data-conscious, you can download Global Earth Challenge via Wi-Fi. Once downloaded, Global Earth Challenge can be used anywhere. The app includes an introduction to the project, and we encourage you to read the introductory slides. Additionally, each widget (air quality, plastics, and insects) contains instructions, definitions, and supplementary materials to help guide users through the process. There are also hub sites for each of the widgets to learn more about the ways data collected with Global Earth Challenge is being used to create change for people and the planet as well as other ways to get involved with the research topic.
Global Earth Challenge is different from other citizen science programs in that the data collection is just the beginning.
Our goal is that each participant also learns from the data, questions the importance of the data, and applies the data to create real-world solutions. Through suggested calls to action, sample habits, and opportunities to engage with policy, we hope that participants not only learn about local environmental issues, but become inspired to take action to address those issues and improve their community’s resilience and well-being.
The three widgets we want to focus on for this semester are the air quality, plastic pollution, and insects widgets.
Air Quality Widget
Insect Widget
Plastic Pollution Widget
Mobilizeu partners.
If your institution is already participating in EDN’s Mobilize U, encourage those members to become citizen scientists with Global Earth Challenge!
Are you interested in creating change for people and the planet? Global Earth Challenge is a perfect opportunity for you to learn while you make a difference!
Are there research centers that focus on sustainability, environmentalism, climate, or the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals? If so, then integrating Global Earth Challenge will be an excellent fit!
Faculty are encouraged to include Global Earth Challenge as part of their syllabus - either as a regular assignment or as an extra credit assignment. We have already drafted language that can be used, see “Global Earth Challenge Resources for Faculty/Instructors/Teachers” and “Tips/Tricks.”
Sustainability is an important topic to today’s students and Global Earth Challenge provides your institution with an excellent opportunity to demonstrate to new students that their institution cares about people and the planet! Global Earth Challenge could be actively promoted by the instructor(s) or integrated into the curriculum as a supplemental assignment or extra credit.
Global Earth Challenge provides students with an excellent opportunity to engage in experiential learning, data collection, and reporting as a citizen scientist which could be incorporated into required co-curricular learning, additional research projects, service learning, etc.
If you’re a faculty member and you plan to, or have, added/integrated Global Earth Challenge into your curriculum, tell your colleagues about it and encourage them to do the same.
If you’re the Provost of your institution, encourage your faculty members to promote and/or integrate Global Earth Challenge into their curriculum. If you’re not the Provost, you can chat with your Provost and encourage them to share information about Global Earth Challenge with faculty at your institution.
Orientation.
Global Earth Challenge could be used as an orientation activity for students since students can engage with the app completely virtually and also collect and report data on their own time.
If your institution provides students with opportunities to engage in community service and/or requires students to complete a certain number of community service hours, encourage students to download the Global Earth Challenge app and log the number of hours spent collecting citizen-science data which could then count as community service hours!
RSOs are well known for hosting fun, exciting, and educational events for their members and the campus community. RSOs could encourage their members to adopt and use Global Earth Challenge while also hosting virtual events for the campus community to participate in.
RHA primarily focuses on the on-campus living experience for students and often hosts programs, events, and activities for the campus community. RHA could encourage its members to adopt and use Global Earth Challenge while also hosting virtual events for the campus community to participate in.
If your institution already has student groups that are well known for their engagement with “green,” sustainability, climate, or environmental issues then they’re excellent groups to promote Global Earth Challenge to. If they’re required to complete a specific number of community service hours, they could use their participation in Global Earth Challenge to count towards or supplement their service hours.
Housing and residence life.
Global Earth Challenge is an excellent opportunity for Resident Assistants, Peer Mentors, Community Directors, Residence Directors, etc. to incorporate the app into their programming and events. Staff members in Housing & Residence Life could integrate Global Earth Challenge into their Residential Curriculum, Experiential Learning Model, or other programming/learning model.
Although participation in Global Earth Challenge is not an internship per say it provides participants with a unique feature for their resume and application materials - participation in a global, citizen science initiative!
This is a great initiative to encourage members of your campus community to participate in, as it clearly demonstrates how local issues are intertwined with global issues. Furthermore, it provides participants with an opportunity to contribute to a database of information used by scientists all over the world to inform and address climate-related issues and challenges.
This department might be particularly interested in participating given the focus of their work.
Institutions could invite their employees (whether student employees, faculty, or staff) to participate in Global Earth Challenge, especially if the institution is adopting or promoting participation for their students. This is a great way to help employees feel connected to the institution while building a positive culture of engagement, learning, and positive impact!
Institutions could invite their community partners to participate in Global Earth Challenge, especially if the institution is adopting or promoting participation for their students, faculty, and staff. This is a great way for an institution to strengthen its relationship with community members and key stakeholders.
Institutions could encourage their corporate partners, sponsors, and key stakeholders to adopt or promote participation of the Global Earth Challenge app. This is a great way for corporate partners and key stakeholders to demonstrate that they are committed to sustainability as well as the key issues that matter to the institution.
Institutions could invite their alumni to participate in Global Earth Challenge, especially if the institution is adopting or promoting participation for their students, faculty, and staff. This is a great way for an institution to remain connected with their alumni while also making a positive difference!
BE A PART OF THE SCIENCE
Download the Global Earth Challenge app .
Global Earth Challenge – A Citizen’s Science Initiative
Air Pollution Video
For use with Earth School and EDO’s partnership with UNEP. We were featured on the citizen science day- Quest 26
Climate Civics Tookit
This toolkit is designed for educators, parents or motivated students who want to explore ways to learn more about the local impacts of climate change and what it means to be an active participant in community civic action. This resource is very flexible to best suit your needs: the activities can be done all together or spread out over time for year-round climate exploration.
Global Earth Challenge Instructional Videos
Videos outlining use of the app and important features.
Earth Challenge Citizen Science Cloud
Database containing all citizen science data collected with the Global Earth Challenge app for researchers to search, visualize, and download data and for participants to browse.
Extra credit.
“You’re required to create a creative work (video recording, spoken word performance, dramatic rendering, painting, collage, etc. - the only limit is your imagination!) that is reflective of your experience participating in Global Earth Challenge and also explores how citizen-science initiatives are a force for positive change for people and the planet.”
PLASTIC POLLUTION
Discover more about the global plastic pollution problem and use lesson plans that center around this topic while integrating Global Earth Challenge as an interactive resource.
INSECT DECLINE
Learn about the ecosystem services insects provide and use our activities and resources to help educate students on the most pressing threats insects face.
AIR QUALITY
Develop an understanding of the causes of bad air quality, how it affects people and our environments and learn what scientists are doing to combat these issues.
This resource was created by EARTHDAY.ORG in partnership with George Mason University's Office of Sustainability and developed by Benjamin Auger, Terra Pascarosa, Tracey Ritchie, and Katie Wood.
This toolkit was last updated November 2020.
Hi, It seems you are visiting us from India, would you like to visit our India pages?
Yes please No thank you
Acknowledge the truth .
The St. Petersburg TRHT—formerly known as the St. Petersburg/Pinellas Higher Education for Racial Equity (SPHERE)—is an officially recognized Truth, Racial Healing and Transformation campus center of the American Association Colleges and Universities . Our Center is a collaboration between Stetson University College of Law , Eckerd College and community organizations in Pinellas County, Florida.
The St. Petersburg TRHT empowers students and community members to take leadership in dismantling systemic racism and false notions of racial hierarchy. We collaborate with organizations, government entities, and higher education institutions in Pinellas County to advance programming, advocacy, and services that enhance racial equity. Through our Racial Justice Fellowship Program, Community Conversations, and National Day of Racial Healing, we strive to make St. Petersburg a more just and equitable place to live and work.
To dismantle existing racial hierarchies and inspire a narrative change to highlight our shared humanity while building strong relationships in our communities.
This video explores the connections between law and racial justice, and the St. Petersburg TRHT Racial Justice Fellows’ legislative advocacy efforts.
HIGHER EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP ANNOUNCES SECOND CLASS OF RACIAL JUSTICE STUDENT FELLOWS
GROUP OF FLORIDA COLLEGES, UNIVERSITIES COME TOGETHER TO ADDRESS RACIAL INJUSTICE
USF ST. PETE TEAMS UP WITH LOCAL LEADERS TO ADDRESS RACIAL INEQUITIES
Racial Justice Fellows
One-year funded fellowship
Curriculum focused on local race equity history
Open to full-time Pinellas County higher education students
Local summer internships
TRHT Framework
Building relationships through community conversations
Narrative change through arts, culture, and media
National Day of Racial Healing
Get Involved
Become a Donor/Sponsor
Apply to become a Student Fellow
Serve as an Equity Organization
Serve as an Equity Practioner
Serve as a Faculty Partner
St. Pete art event celebrates National Day of Racial Healing
St. Pete-based universities, including USF, team up for racial equity consortium
Racial justice program at USF gives students tools to advocate for equity
USF students learn to impact changes for racial justice
Students to support local racial justice efforts in St. Petersburg Higher Education Consortium fellowship
Racial equity consortium launches fellowship program for St. Pete campus students, Pinellas County institutions
Higher learning consortium to focus on Truth and Racial Healing
Higher education institutions in Pinellas County unite for racial justice
Community Conversations offer people from diverse backgrounds the opportunity to connect through storytelling, fostering a sense of shared humanity. These safe and brave spaces encourage participants to recognize commonalities, paving the way for dismantling biased belief systems. The structured, co-facilitated methodology of Community Conversations guides participants on a path toward embracing full humanity.
Community Conversations are:
Interactive experiences fostering trust, connection, and relationship building
Designed for diverse participants—everyone is welcome
Flexible in duration, from 90 minutes to four hours
Available in-person or virtually
Open only to registered attendees
Limited to 28 to 30 participants
Suitable for departments, committees, organizations, and leadership teams
Not recorded or mandated
Everything you need to know about approaching an academic assignment, from understanding the assignment title to your final proof read.
Links to guides on many topics related to writing, including grammar, proofreading and being critical.
How to get started on finding and managing information and how to read with a purpose.
How to manage your time and how to make good notes.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Higher Education Assignment Toolkit (HEAT) 1: Understanding the Assignment and getting started. 2: Finding and managing information. 3: Making reading more manageable. 4: Planning the structure. 5: Writing your assignment. 6: Drafting, editing and proofreading.
38 Higher Education Assignment Toolkit.© De Montfort University 2010. STAGE 4: Pa c a Set a timer and write for 10 minutes Don't stop - keep writing, even if you're writing 'I don't know what to write about' Any order, anything, (have a look at the questions below) You can use single words, phrases, sketches, diagrams, pictures
10 Higher Education Assignment Toolkit.© De Montfort University 2010. STAGE 1: Understanding the assignment title and getting started Jobs to do Specific jobs Target date Achieved Revised dates or Notes Understand the task eg., read through assignment task, produce a 'mind map' of initial approach to the assignment
Higher Education Assignment Toolkit.© De Montfort University 2010. 49 STAGE 5: W i i g a ig e Structuring an introduction An introduction is like a guidebook to your whole assignment. It gives background information into your topic area and outlines all the ideas you are going to present.
Use this toolkit to help you complete the different stages of the assignment process. It provides information on which study skills to develop, academic offences to avoid, links to resources, and the support available in the library. Individual assessments should be entirely your own work. You are not permitted to work with other students on ...
Higher education assignment toolkit. One of the defining features of academic writing is that it is based on research so you will need to read for your assignments and include references in in them. The DMU referencing guide provides detailed instructions on how to do this. The Higher Education Assignment Toolkit takes you through all of the ...
Use this extract from from the Higher Education Assignment Toolkit (HEAT) to help you address the feedback you receive from your tutors. Referencing from databases Writing Reports . Download our PDF guide on writing reports. Verbal Presentations.
assignment by Sarah Post, mathematics professor.10:15-11:00 Open discussion with the 2-4 attendees on their (planned) assignments: concerns and issues, suggestions, in-class activities, clarity, expli. uantitative Reasoning Assignments and Activities10:00-11:00 Backward design principles and assignment design activity by guest speaker, Stephen ...
Answer. The CLaSS team have produced a number of resources to help you in the planning, research and writing of your assignment. The Higher Education Assignment Toolkit is a good place to start. This 6 stage guide covers understanding the assignment and getting started; finding and managing information; making reading more manageable; planning ...
Example of an assignment that asks to compare and evaluate various sources. Paraphrasing . Example of an assignment that asks students to critically approach source use and paraphrasing. Research Log . Example of an assignment that asks students to detail the research process by recording search strategies and resources located. Topic Proposal
Teaching Academic Writing is a 'toolkit' designed to help higher education lecturers ... The wording of assignments 89 Students' participation in assessment 92 Pre-empting plagiarism 95
Teaching Academic Writing is a 'toolkit' designed to help higher education lecturers and tutors teach writing to their students. Containing a range of diverse teaching strategies, the book offers both practical activities to help students develop their writing abilities and guidelines to help lecturers and tutors think in more depth about the ...
Students may focus more on how to obtain a high grade on assignments rather than focusing on what they need to learn and confidently apply in new situations. All of the above. Answer: Option 4. References . Biggs, J. (2014). Constructive alignment in university teaching. HERDSA Review of higher education, 1(5), 5-22
Have a look at the guide on using feedback for advice on how you can improve in specific areas. The Higher Education Assignment Toolkit takes you through all of the stages of writing your assignment and has some advice on structuring your essay. It is available as a PDF and as an interactive version.
The need for clear assignment directions is essential in all areas of higher education, however having the discussion specifically for reflection is important. This is because when posing a reflective assignment it can feel easy to consider reflection as 'special' and separate from common 'good academic practice' and therefore that it ...
How to Create a Digital Teaching Toolkit. [00:00:00] Bonni Stachowiak: Today on episode number 366 of the Teaching in Higher Ed Podcast, Jeremy Caplan tells us how to create a digital teaching toolkit. [music] [00:00:14] Production Credit: Produced by Innovate Learning, maximizing human potential.
Higher Education Toolkit. This resource was developed by EARTHDAY.ORG™ staff and George Mason University faculty to seamlessly embed the Global Earth Challenge citizen science app into higher education curriculum and campus activities. Explore below how you can incorporate citizen science into your syllabus, your club, society, or campus ...
Teaching Academic Writing is a 'toolkit' designed to help higher education lecturers and tutors teach writing to their students. Containing a range of diverse teaching strategies, the book offers ...
Paper—Online Learning Platforms: Reconstructing Modern Higher Education The last step has been to conduct tests with students. 300 people studying in the above universities have participated in ...
Higher Education Assignment Toolkit (HEAT) for printing or viewing on your PC or iBooks device. HEAT Toolkit 4 Download this section of the HEAT Toolkit (4) Download pdf. for printing or viewing on your PC or iBooks device. Last Updated: Jul 11, 2023 11:51 AM; URL: https ...
First Saint Petersburg State Medical University (Saint Petersburg State Medical University I.P. Pavlov) is a State Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education in Saint Petersburg city of the Russian Federation. First Saint Petersburg State Medical University was established in 1897 as Medical Institute for Women's, which was the first medical institution in Russia and in...
The St. Petersburg TRHT—formerly known as the St. Petersburg/Pinellas Higher Education for Racial Equity (SPHERE)—is an officially recognized Truth, Racial Healing and Transformation campus center of the American Association Colleges and Universities.Our Center is a collaboration between Stetson University College of Law, Eckerd College and community organizations in Pinellas County, Florida.
Higher Education Assignment Toolkit. The HEAT toolkit. Everything you need to know about approaching an academic assignment, from understanding the assignment title to your final proof read. Academic writing. Guides to Academic Writing. Links to guides on many topics related to writing, including grammar, proofreading and being critical. ...
Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University (SPbSPMU) has been established in 1925 as Academic and Research Institute of Maternal health and babyhood protection. We are the oldest and world's only Pediatric University. Nowadays, SPbSPMU is exists as a Clinical Hospital for 113 years and as the University for 93 years.