example of research design pdf

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, automatically generate references for free.

• Knowledge Base
• Methodology

Research Design | Step-by-Step Guide with Examples

Published on 5 May 2022 by Shona McCombes . Revised on 20 March 2023.

A research design is a strategy for answering your research question  using empirical data. Creating a research design means making decisions about:

• Your overall aims and approach
• The type of research design you’ll use
• Your sampling methods or criteria for selecting subjects
• Your data collection methods
• The procedures you’ll follow to collect data
• Your data analysis methods

A well-planned research design helps ensure that your methods match your research aims and that you use the right kind of analysis for your data.

Table of contents

Step 1: consider your aims and approach, step 2: choose a type of research design, step 3: identify your population and sampling method, step 4: choose your data collection methods, step 5: plan your data collection procedures, step 6: decide on your data analysis strategies, frequently asked questions.

• Introduction

Before you can start designing your research, you should already have a clear idea of the research question you want to investigate.

There are many different ways you could go about answering this question. Your research design choices should be driven by your aims and priorities – start by thinking carefully about what you want to achieve.

The first choice you need to make is whether you’ll take a qualitative or quantitative approach.

Qualitative research designs tend to be more flexible and inductive , allowing you to adjust your approach based on what you find throughout the research process.

Quantitative research designs tend to be more fixed and deductive , with variables and hypotheses clearly defined in advance of data collection.

It’s also possible to use a mixed methods design that integrates aspects of both approaches. By combining qualitative and quantitative insights, you can gain a more complete picture of the problem you’re studying and strengthen the credibility of your conclusions.

Practical and ethical considerations when designing research

As well as scientific considerations, you need to think practically when designing your research. If your research involves people or animals, you also need to consider research ethics .

• How much time do you have to collect data and write up the research?
• Will you be able to gain access to the data you need (e.g., by travelling to a specific location or contacting specific people)?
• Do you have the necessary research skills (e.g., statistical analysis or interview techniques)?
• Will you need ethical approval ?

At each stage of the research design process, make sure that your choices are practically feasible.

Prevent plagiarism, run a free check.

Within both qualitative and quantitative approaches, there are several types of research design to choose from. Each type provides a framework for the overall shape of your research.

Types of quantitative research designs

Quantitative designs can be split into four main types. Experimental and   quasi-experimental designs allow you to test cause-and-effect relationships, while descriptive and correlational designs allow you to measure variables and describe relationships between them.

With descriptive and correlational designs, you can get a clear picture of characteristics, trends, and relationships as they exist in the real world. However, you can’t draw conclusions about cause and effect (because correlation doesn’t imply causation ).

Experiments are the strongest way to test cause-and-effect relationships without the risk of other variables influencing the results. However, their controlled conditions may not always reflect how things work in the real world. They’re often also more difficult and expensive to implement.

Types of qualitative research designs

Qualitative designs are less strictly defined. This approach is about gaining a rich, detailed understanding of a specific context or phenomenon, and you can often be more creative and flexible in designing your research.

The table below shows some common types of qualitative design. They often have similar approaches in terms of data collection, but focus on different aspects when analysing the data.

Your research design should clearly define who or what your research will focus on, and how you’ll go about choosing your participants or subjects.

In research, a population is the entire group that you want to draw conclusions about, while a sample is the smaller group of individuals you’ll actually collect data from.

Defining the population

A population can be made up of anything you want to study – plants, animals, organisations, texts, countries, etc. In the social sciences, it most often refers to a group of people.

For example, will you focus on people from a specific demographic, region, or background? Are you interested in people with a certain job or medical condition, or users of a particular product?

The more precisely you define your population, the easier it will be to gather a representative sample.

Sampling methods

Even with a narrowly defined population, it’s rarely possible to collect data from every individual. Instead, you’ll collect data from a sample.

To select a sample, there are two main approaches: probability sampling and non-probability sampling . The sampling method you use affects how confidently you can generalise your results to the population as a whole.

Probability sampling is the most statistically valid option, but it’s often difficult to achieve unless you’re dealing with a very small and accessible population.

For practical reasons, many studies use non-probability sampling, but it’s important to be aware of the limitations and carefully consider potential biases. You should always make an effort to gather a sample that’s as representative as possible of the population.

Case selection in qualitative research

In some types of qualitative designs, sampling may not be relevant.

For example, in an ethnography or a case study, your aim is to deeply understand a specific context, not to generalise to a population. Instead of sampling, you may simply aim to collect as much data as possible about the context you are studying.

In these types of design, you still have to carefully consider your choice of case or community. You should have a clear rationale for why this particular case is suitable for answering your research question.

For example, you might choose a case study that reveals an unusual or neglected aspect of your research problem, or you might choose several very similar or very different cases in order to compare them.

Data collection methods are ways of directly measuring variables and gathering information. They allow you to gain first-hand knowledge and original insights into your research problem.

You can choose just one data collection method, or use several methods in the same study.

Survey methods

Surveys allow you to collect data about opinions, behaviours, experiences, and characteristics by asking people directly. There are two main survey methods to choose from: questionnaires and interviews.

Observation methods

Observations allow you to collect data unobtrusively, observing characteristics, behaviours, or social interactions without relying on self-reporting.

Observations may be conducted in real time, taking notes as you observe, or you might make audiovisual recordings for later analysis. They can be qualitative or quantitative.

Other methods of data collection

There are many other ways you might collect data depending on your field and topic.

If you’re not sure which methods will work best for your research design, try reading some papers in your field to see what data collection methods they used.

Secondary data

If you don’t have the time or resources to collect data from the population you’re interested in, you can also choose to use secondary data that other researchers already collected – for example, datasets from government surveys or previous studies on your topic.

With this raw data, you can do your own analysis to answer new research questions that weren’t addressed by the original study.

Using secondary data can expand the scope of your research, as you may be able to access much larger and more varied samples than you could collect yourself.

However, it also means you don’t have any control over which variables to measure or how to measure them, so the conclusions you can draw may be limited.

As well as deciding on your methods, you need to plan exactly how you’ll use these methods to collect data that’s consistent, accurate, and unbiased.

Planning systematic procedures is especially important in quantitative research, where you need to precisely define your variables and ensure your measurements are reliable and valid.

Operationalisation

Some variables, like height or age, are easily measured. But often you’ll be dealing with more abstract concepts, like satisfaction, anxiety, or competence. Operationalisation means turning these fuzzy ideas into measurable indicators.

If you’re using observations , which events or actions will you count?

If you’re using surveys , which questions will you ask and what range of responses will be offered?

You may also choose to use or adapt existing materials designed to measure the concept you’re interested in – for example, questionnaires or inventories whose reliability and validity has already been established.

Reliability and validity

Reliability means your results can be consistently reproduced , while validity means that you’re actually measuring the concept you’re interested in.

For valid and reliable results, your measurement materials should be thoroughly researched and carefully designed. Plan your procedures to make sure you carry out the same steps in the same way for each participant.

If you’re developing a new questionnaire or other instrument to measure a specific concept, running a pilot study allows you to check its validity and reliability in advance.

Sampling procedures

As well as choosing an appropriate sampling method, you need a concrete plan for how you’ll actually contact and recruit your selected sample.

That means making decisions about things like:

• How many participants do you need for an adequate sample size?
• What inclusion and exclusion criteria will you use to identify eligible participants?
• How will you contact your sample – by mail, online, by phone, or in person?

If you’re using a probability sampling method, it’s important that everyone who is randomly selected actually participates in the study. How will you ensure a high response rate?

If you’re using a non-probability method, how will you avoid bias and ensure a representative sample?

Data management

It’s also important to create a data management plan for organising and storing your data.

Will you need to transcribe interviews or perform data entry for observations? You should anonymise and safeguard any sensitive data, and make sure it’s backed up regularly.

Keeping your data well organised will save time when it comes to analysing them. It can also help other researchers validate and add to your findings.

On their own, raw data can’t answer your research question. The last step of designing your research is planning how you’ll analyse the data.

Quantitative data analysis

In quantitative research, you’ll most likely use some form of statistical analysis . With statistics, you can summarise your sample data, make estimates, and test hypotheses.

Using descriptive statistics , you can summarise your sample data in terms of:

• The distribution of the data (e.g., the frequency of each score on a test)
• The central tendency of the data (e.g., the mean to describe the average score)
• The variability of the data (e.g., the standard deviation to describe how spread out the scores are)

The specific calculations you can do depend on the level of measurement of your variables.

Using inferential statistics , you can:

• Make estimates about the population based on your sample data.
• Test hypotheses about a relationship between variables.

Regression and correlation tests look for associations between two or more variables, while comparison tests (such as t tests and ANOVAs ) look for differences in the outcomes of different groups.

Your choice of statistical test depends on various aspects of your research design, including the types of variables you’re dealing with and the distribution of your data.

Qualitative data analysis

In qualitative research, your data will usually be very dense with information and ideas. Instead of summing it up in numbers, you’ll need to comb through the data in detail, interpret its meanings, identify patterns, and extract the parts that are most relevant to your research question.

Two of the most common approaches to doing this are thematic analysis and discourse analysis .

There are many other ways of analysing qualitative data depending on the aims of your research. To get a sense of potential approaches, try reading some qualitative research papers in your field.

A sample is a subset of individuals from a larger population. Sampling means selecting the group that you will actually collect data from in your research.

For example, if you are researching the opinions of students in your university, you could survey a sample of 100 students.

Statistical sampling allows you to test a hypothesis about the characteristics of a population. There are various sampling methods you can use to ensure that your sample is representative of the population as a whole.

Operationalisation means turning abstract conceptual ideas into measurable observations.

For example, the concept of social anxiety isn’t directly observable, but it can be operationally defined in terms of self-rating scores, behavioural avoidance of crowded places, or physical anxiety symptoms in social situations.

Before collecting data , it’s important to consider how you will operationalise the variables that you want to measure.

The research methods you use depend on the type of data you need to answer your research question .

• If you want to measure something or test a hypothesis , use quantitative methods . If you want to explore ideas, thoughts, and meanings, use qualitative methods .
• If you want to analyse a large amount of readily available data, use secondary data. If you want data specific to your purposes with control over how they are generated, collect primary data.
• If you want to establish cause-and-effect relationships between variables , use experimental methods. If you want to understand the characteristics of a research subject, use descriptive methods.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the ‘Cite this Scribbr article’ button to automatically add the citation to our free Reference Generator.

McCombes, S. (2023, March 20). Research Design | Step-by-Step Guide with Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved 29 April 2024, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/research-methods/research-design/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Principles of Research Design

Cite this chapter.

121 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Unable to display preview.  Download preview PDF.

Carter, K.C. (1985). Koch’s postulates in relation to the work of Jacob Henle and Edwin Klebs. Medical History , 29 , 353–374, 356–357.

CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Checkoway, H., & Demers, D.A. (1994). Occupational case—control studies. Epidemiologic Reviews , 16 , 151–162.

Comstock, G.W. (1994). Evaluating vaccination effectiveness and vaccine efficacy by means of case-control studies. Epidemiologic Reviews , 16 , 77–89.

Copeland, K.T., Checkoway, H., McMichael, A.J., & Holbrook, R.H. (1977). Bias due to misclassification in the estimation of relative risk. American Journal of Epidemiology , 105 , 488–495.

Coughlin, S.S. (1990). Recall bias in epidemiologic studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , 43 , 87–91.

Dwyer, D.M., Strickler, H., Goodman, R.A., & Armenian, H.K. (1994). Use of case-control studies in outbreak investigations. Epidemiologic Reviews , 16 , 109–123.

Farrar, W.B. (1991). Clinical trials: Access and reimbursement. Cancer , 67 , 1779–1782.

Feldman, F., Finch, M., & Dowd, B. (1989). The role of health practices in HMO selection bias: A confirmatory study. Inquiry , 26 , 381–387.

Felson, D.T. (1992). Bias in meta-analytic research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , 45 , 885–892.

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Gore, S.M. (1981). Assessing clinical trials—why randomise? British Medical Journal , 282 , 1958–1960.

Gray-Donald, K., & Kramer, M.S. (1988). Causality inference in observational vs. experimental studies: An empirical comparison, American Journal of Epidemiology , 127 , 885–892.

Greenland, S. (1977). Response and follow-up bias in cohort studies. American Journal of Epidemiology , 106 , 184–187.

Greenland, S., & Robins, J.M. (1985). Confounding and misclassification. American Journal of Epidemiology , 122 , 495–506.

Hammond, E.C., Selikoff, I.J., & Seidman, H. (1979). Asbestos exposure, cigarette smoking, and death rates. Annals of the New York Academy of Science , 330 , 473–490.

CAS   Google Scholar  

Hill, A.B. (1965). The environment and disease: Association or causation? Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine , 58 , 295–300.

Hills, M., & Armitage, P. (1979). The two-period cross-over clinical trial. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology , 8 , 7–20.

Jooste, P.L., Yach, D., Steenkamp, H.J., Botha, J.L., & Rossouw, J.E. (1990). Drop-out and newcomer bias in a community cardiovascular follow-up study. International Journal of Epidemiology , 19 , 284–289.

Kalton, G. (1993). Sampling considerations in research on HIV risk and illness. In D.G. Ostrow & R.C. Kessler (Eds.), Methodological Issues in AIDS Behavioral Research (pp. 53–74). New York: Plenum Press.

Google Scholar  

Kelsey, J.L., Thompson, W.D., & Evans, A.S. (1986). Methods in Observational Epidemiology . New York: Oxford University Press.

Khlat, M. (1994). Use of case-control methods for indirect estimation in demography. Epidemiologic Reviews , 16 , 124–133.

Khoury, M.J., & Beaty, T.H. (1994). Applications of the case-control method in genetic epidemiology. Epidemiologic Reviews , 16 , 134–150.

Kleinbaum, D.G., Kupper, L.L., & Morgenstern, M. (1982). Epidemiologic Research: Principles and Quantitative Methods . New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Lasky, T., & Stolley, P.D. (1994). Selection of cases and controls. Epidemiologic Reviews , 16 , 6–17.

Last, J.M., (Ed.). (1988). A Dictionary of Epidemiology (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Liberati, A. (1995). “Meta-analysis: statistical alchemy for the 21st century”: Discussion. A plea for a more balanced view of meta-analysis and systematic overviews of the effect of health care interventions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , 48 , 81–86.

Lubin, J.H., & Gail, M.H. (1984). Biased selection of controls for case-control analyses of cohort studies. Biometrics , 40 , 63–75.

Mastroianni, A.C., Faden, R., & Federman, D. (Ed.s). (1994). Women and Health Research: Ethical and Legal Issues of Including Women in Clinical Studies , vol. 1. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Miettinen, O.S. (1985). The case-control study: Valid selection of subjects. Journal of Chronic Disease , 38 , 543–548.

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Morabia, A. (1991). On the origin of Hill’s causal criteria. Epidemiology , 2 , 367–369.

Morgenstern, H. (1996, Spring). Course Materials, Part II: Class Notes for Epidemiologic Methods II, Epidemiology 201B , 54–82.

Morgenstern, H. (1982). Uses of ecologic analysis in epidemiologic research. American Journal of Public Health , 72 , 1336–1344.

O’Brien, P.C., & Shampo, M.A. (1988). Statistical considerations for performing multiple tests in a single experiment. 5. Comparing two therapies with respect to several endpoints. Mayo Clinic Proceedings , 63 , 1140–1143.

Olkin, I. (1995). Statistical and theoretical considerations in meta-analysis, quoting the National Library of Medicine. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , 48 , 133–146.

Rosner, F. (1987). The ethics of randomized clinical trials. American Journal of Medicine , 82 , 283–290.

Rothman, K.J. (1976). Causes. American Journal of Epidemiology , 104 , 587–592.

Rothman, K.J. (1986). Modern Epidemiology . Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

Sackett, D.L. (1979). Bias in analytic research. Journal of Chronic Diseases , 32 , 51–63.

Sartwell, P.E. (1960). On the methodology of investigations of etiologic factors in chronic disease—further comments. Journal of Chronic Disease , 11 , 61–63.

Schlesselman, J.J. (1982). Case Control Studies . New York: Oxford University Press.

Selby, J.V. (1994). Case-control evaluations of treatment and program efficacy. Epidemiologic Reviews , 16 , 90–101.

Senn, S.J. (1991). Falsification and clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine , 10 , 1679–1692.

Smith, P.G. (1983). Issues in the design of case-control studies: Matching and interaction effects. Tijdschrift voor Sociale Gezondheidszorg , 61 , 755–760.

Sterling, T.D., Weinkam, J.J., & Weinkam, J.L. (1990). The sick person effect. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , 43 , 141–151.

Susser, M. (1991). What is a cause and how do we know one? A grammar for pragmatic epidemiology. American Journal of Epidemiology , 133 , 635–648.

Wacholder, S., Silverman, D.T., McLaughlin, J.K., & Mandel, J.S. (1992). Selection of controls in case-control studies. III. Design options. American Journal of Epidemiology , 135 , 1042–1050.

Weed, D.L. (1986). On the logic of causal inference. American Journal of Epidemiology , 123 , 965–979.

Weiss, N.S. (1994). Application of the case-control method in the evaluation of screening. Epidemiologic Reviews , 16 , 102–108.

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

(2002). Principles of Research Design. In: Gender, Ethnicity, and Health Research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47569-3_3

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47569-3_3

Publisher Name : Springer, Boston, MA

Print ISBN : 978-0-306-46172-9

Online ISBN : 978-0-306-47569-6

eBook Packages : Springer Book Archive

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

Research Proposal Example/Sample

Detailed Walkthrough + Free Proposal Template

If you’re getting started crafting your research proposal and are looking for a few examples of research proposals , you’ve come to the right place.

In this video, we walk you through two successful (approved) research proposals , one for a Master’s-level project, and one for a PhD-level dissertation. We also start off by unpacking our free research proposal template and discussing the four core sections of a research proposal, so that you have a clear understanding of the basics before diving into the actual proposals.

• Research proposal example/sample – Master’s-level (PDF/Word)
• Research proposal example/sample – PhD-level (PDF/Word)
• Proposal template (Fully editable) 

If you’re working on a research proposal for a dissertation or thesis, you may also find the following useful:

• Research Proposal Bootcamp : Learn how to write a research proposal as efficiently and effectively as possible
• 1:1 Proposal Coaching : Get hands-on help with your research proposal

FAQ: Research Proposal Example

Research proposal example: frequently asked questions, are the sample proposals real.

Yes. The proposals are real and were approved by the respective universities.

Can I copy one of these proposals for my own research?

As we discuss in the video, every research proposal will be slightly different, depending on the university’s unique requirements, as well as the nature of the research itself. Therefore, you’ll need to tailor your research proposal to suit your specific context.

You can learn more about the basics of writing a research proposal here .

How do I get the research proposal template?

You can access our free proposal template here .

Is the proposal template really free?

Yes. There is no cost for the proposal template and you are free to use it as a foundation for your research proposal.

Where can I learn more about proposal writing?

For self-directed learners, our Research Proposal Bootcamp is a great starting point.

For students that want hands-on guidance, our private coaching service is recommended.

Psst… there’s more!

This post is an extract from our bestselling short course, Research Proposal Bootcamp . If you want to work smart, you don't want to miss this .

You Might Also Like:

10 Comments

I am at the stage of writing my thesis proposal for a PhD in Management at Altantic International University. I checked on the coaching services, but it indicates that it’s not available in my area. I am in South Sudan. My proposed topic is: “Leadership Behavior in Local Government Governance Ecosystem and Service Delivery Effectiveness in Post Conflict Districts of Northern Uganda”. I will appreciate your guidance and support

GRADCOCH is very grateful motivated and helpful for all students etc. it is very accorporated and provide easy access way strongly agree from GRADCOCH.

Proposal research departemet management

I am at the stage of writing my thesis proposal for a masters in Analysis of w heat commercialisation by small holders householdrs at Hawassa International University. I will appreciate your guidance and support

please provide a attractive proposal about foreign universities .It would be your highness.

comparative constitutional law

Kindly guide me through writing a good proposal on the thesis topic; Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Financial Inclusion in Nigeria. Thank you

Kindly help me write a research proposal on the topic of impacts of artisanal gold panning on the environment

I am in the process of research proposal for my Master of Art with a topic : “factors influence on first-year students’s academic adjustment”. I am absorbing in GRADCOACH and interested in such proposal sample. However, it is great for me to learn and seeking for more new updated proposal framework from GRADCAOCH.

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Print Friendly