essay on reign of terror

• Entertainment
• Environment
• Information Science and Technology
• Social Issues

Home Essay Samples Government Reign of Terror

Examining the Reign of Terror: Understanding its Unjustifiability

*minimum deadline

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below

• State of The Union
• Electoral College
• Body Camera
• Financial Crisis
• Totalitarianism

Related Essays

Need writing help?

You can always rely on us no matter what type of paper you need

*No hidden charges

100% Unique Essays

Absolutely Confidential

Money Back Guarantee

By clicking “Send Essay”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement. We will occasionally send you account related emails

You can also get a UNIQUE essay on this or any other topic

Thank you! We’ll contact you as soon as possible.

The Reign of Terror: when Revolution Turned Blood Red

This engaging essay takes us on a vivid journey through one of history’s most tumultuous periods, the Reign of Terror during the French Revolution. Set in the backdrop of 1790s France, the piece brings to life the chaotic and fear-laden atmosphere of the era, marked by the rise of the Jacobins and their leader, Maximilien Robespierre. The essay paints a vivid picture of the paranoia, suspicion, and extreme measures that characterized this period, where the guillotine became a symbol of both justice and terror. It delves into the complex character of Robespierre, acknowledging his progressive policies amidst the rampant executions. The narrative captures the tension and contradiction of the Reign of Terror, highlighting its role as a critical, albeit dark, phase in the fight for liberty, equality, and fraternity. The essay concludes by reflecting on the Reign of Terror as a profound lesson in the dangers of extremism and the moral dilemmas inherent in revolutionary change, posing questions about the true cost of freedom and justice that resonate through the ages. PapersOwl showcases more free essays that are examples of Revolution.

How it works

Picture this: France in the 1790s, a place where the air crackles with the promise of change and the shadow of the guillotine looms large. This is the setting of the Reign of Terror, a period in the French Revolution where things went from hopeful to horrifying faster than you can say “liberté, égalité, fraternité.”

The story of the Reign of Terror is like a rollercoaster that only goes down. It all kicked off after the French Revolution had already flipped the country upside down.

The monarchy? Gone. But what filled the void wasn’t peace and freedom; it was chaos and fear. Enter the Jacobins, led by the infamous Maximilien Robespierre, a group of radicals who believed that protecting the revolution justified some pretty extreme measures. And by extreme, I mean sending thousands to the guillotine, including Queen Marie Antoinette herself.

This period was marked by paranoia and suspicion on steroids. People were accused of being enemies of the state for just about anything, and the Revolutionary Tribunal was more like a conveyor belt to the guillotine than a court of justice. It was a time when saying the wrong thing, or nothing at all, could have you seeing the business end of Madame Guillotine.

But let’s not paint Robespierre as just a villain in a horror show. The guy believed he was doing what was needed for the revolution’s survival. Under his watch, there were some pretty progressive moves like price controls to keep bread affordable and abolishing slavery in the colonies. It’s just that these changes were overshadowed by the daily head count from the guillotine.

The Reign of Terror finally hit the brakes when Robespierre himself got a taste of his own medicine. His execution in July 1794 was like a wake-up call, ending the bloodbath and paving the way for a less terrifying phase of the revolution.

Reflecting on the Reign of Terror is like staring into a dark abyss of human nature. It’s a chilling reminder of how a quest for freedom can spiral into a freefall of violence. It makes you wonder about the price of change and what happens when the power to bring about that change gets a little too absolute.

In the end, the Reign of Terror stands as a bloody chapter in the tale of the French Revolution, a complex saga of power, ideology, and the human cost of radical change. It’s a part of history that asks us hard questions about justice, freedom, and how far we’re willing to go for our ideals. And let’s be honest, these questions are as relevant now as they were back in the tumultuous streets of 1790s France.

Cite this page

The Reign of Terror: When Revolution Turned Blood Red. (2024, Feb 01). Retrieved from https://papersowl.com/examples/the-reign-of-terror-when-revolution-turned-blood-red/

"The Reign of Terror: When Revolution Turned Blood Red." PapersOwl.com , 1 Feb 2024, https://papersowl.com/examples/the-reign-of-terror-when-revolution-turned-blood-red/

PapersOwl.com. (2024). The Reign of Terror: When Revolution Turned Blood Red . [Online]. Available at: https://papersowl.com/examples/the-reign-of-terror-when-revolution-turned-blood-red/ [Accessed: 14 Apr. 2024]

"The Reign of Terror: When Revolution Turned Blood Red." PapersOwl.com, Feb 01, 2024. Accessed April 14, 2024. https://papersowl.com/examples/the-reign-of-terror-when-revolution-turned-blood-red/

"The Reign of Terror: When Revolution Turned Blood Red," PapersOwl.com , 01-Feb-2024. [Online]. Available: https://papersowl.com/examples/the-reign-of-terror-when-revolution-turned-blood-red/. [Accessed: 14-Apr-2024]

PapersOwl.com. (2024). The Reign of Terror: When Revolution Turned Blood Red . [Online]. Available at: https://papersowl.com/examples/the-reign-of-terror-when-revolution-turned-blood-red/ [Accessed: 14-Apr-2024]

Don't let plagiarism ruin your grade

Hire a writer to get a unique paper crafted to your needs.

Our writers will help you fix any mistakes and get an A+!

Please check your inbox.

You can order an original essay written according to your instructions.

Trusted by over 1 million students worldwide

1. Tell Us Your Requirements

2. Pick your perfect writer

3. Get Your Paper and Pay

Hi! I'm Amy, your personal assistant!

Don't know where to start? Give me your paper requirements and I connect you to an academic expert.

short deadlines

100% Plagiarism-Free

Certified writers

Sign Up Now

Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents

Already registered? click here to login

By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service , privacy policy and student honor code .

• Homework Help
• Essay Examples
• Citation Generator
• Writing Guides
• Essay Title Generator
• Essay Topic Generator
• Essay Outline Generator
• Flashcard Generator
• Plagiarism Checker
• Paraphrasing Tool
• Conclusion Generator
• Thesis Statement Generator
• Introduction Generator
• Literature Review Generator
• Hypothesis Generator
• Napoleon Bonaparte
• Reign of Terror Research Paper

Reign Of Terror Research Paper

Jacques Hebert introduced way of worshipping a goddess of Reason. The older Gregorian calendar was replaced by the new dictatorship. The old calendar was based on Christianity, while the new calendar had days and names in rhythm with the modern times spirit. The churches were totally converted in to the temples of reason. Some were also converted in to museums of reasons. The week had ten days along with some public holidays. Robespierre took extreme actions to enforce these changes upon the public. The man power and talent was sent to the Guillotine so that in future it does not become a threat to the new Revolution. The Reign of Terror was simply an ungodly regime. It executed innumerable people, who had a capability of standing against the new revolution. Studies tell that within seven weeks, the new regime managed to send 1376 people to the guillotine. The Reign of Terror left extremely bad effects on the people of France. Outcome and After Effects of the Reign of Terror In March 1794, Jacques Hebert was arrested and executed. Some other ultra-revolutionaries were also executed. One month after, Georges Danton and his followers were also executed. They were the ones, who advocated the relaxation of some emergency measures. Robespierre proclaimed the Supreme Being's cult. He did this to encounter the influence of the Hebert. Later Robespierre was also executed along with his fellows. He had a fear that the Terror would turn against him. Basically what happened was that the supporters of the Robespierre started to feel that the Terror should end now and this was also felt by the radical Jacobins. Robespierre had a clear idea about the reputation of Danton. Once during a Convention, Danton rose and called for an end to the Reign of Terror. He was then executed because a decree was passed by the Convention that Danton insulted the court. Being the accused person, he was prohibited for speaking any single word regarding his own defense. When the court ordered for the execution of Georges Danton, he spoke that his enemies will be torn down by the people within three months. He also wished that his head should be shown to the general people. In the year 1974, Robespierre called for a new purge as he wanted to threat the people of his committee. Finally Cambon rose and said that it is the right time to tell the truth to the general public. He clearly said that Robespierre is the only person, who is paralyzing the Convention's will. He was then quickly arrested. Later he was sent to the guillotine. Robespierre was the last victim of the Reign of Terror. He had no idea that he established terror as the order of the day and then he was himself executed. The Reign of Terror had caused too much bloodshed and instability. The people of France had grown tired of all this. They wanted something moderate to happen. The executive power was then given to five people and the Republic existed no more. The name of the new government was "The Directory." This was the end of the French Revolution. The End of the French Revolution Several books have been written on the French Revolution, including the details of the Reign of Terror. This revolution seemed a failure in the year 1799. By the year 1815, this revolution almost nullified. It did not affect the general public and the state affairs any further. Landowning and the bourgeois class emerged as the powerful and dominant class in France. The Code of Napoleon consolidated the contractual relations and the social order. Also the feudalism died. France was unified by the revolution and it also enhanced the national state's power. The ancient structure of the Europe was torn down by both Napoleon and Revolutionary Wars. These wars inaugurated the modern era and hastened the nationalism advent. Reign of Terror is also viewed by the historians as an ominous precursor of the totalitarianism of the modern age. Democratic institutions such as constitutions, representative government and elections were established by the Revolution. Historians write that French Revolution brought a dramatic change in the lives of the French. Their clothes as well as their entire life style changed. There was no longer the rule of king, the slavery ended and also the feudal systems were abolished. Establishment of the metric system took place. This happened due to the Revolutionary leaders. They wanted to establish free public schools but due o various economic problems, there were not able to do so. The Reign of Terror ended completely by the year 1795, another…

Cite this Document:

"Reign Of Terror" (2012, May 31) Retrieved April 14, 2024, from https://www.paperdue.com/essay/reign-of-terror-111192

"Reign Of Terror" 31 May 2012. Web.14 April. 2024. < https://www.paperdue.com/essay/reign-of-terror-111192 >

"Reign Of Terror", 31 May 2012, Accessed.14 April. 2024, https://www.paperdue.com/essay/reign-of-terror-111192

Related Documents

Reign of terrors the transition.

The fear that grew in France with the beginning of the war and the anxiety surrounding the development of the situation was probably one of the main causes that led people to embrace a more open radical leftist position. Many of the conservatives and those who supported the monarchy began to be seen as enemies of France and politicians who would compromise with the monarchic forces at any time. The

Great Terror

Terror Robert Conquest's The Great Terror: A Reassessment is a book that is an absolute 'must read' for anyone who is interested in the history of Communism, and more important, the issue of human rights. In fact, it can be said that the book is perhaps one of the most powerful arguments in favor of human liberty, rights and the democratic process of government. It is also of interest to

Threshold of Terror: The Last Hours of

Threshold of Terror: The Last Hours of the Monarchy in the French Revolution Rodney Allen, an independent scholar who read history at Oxford, details the events that occurred during the crucial twenty-four hours between the 9th and 10th of August 1792, which led to the fall and execution of King Louis XVI of France. Using previously unpublished eyewitness accounts, illustrations, direct quotations, and paraphrases; the author describes the final hours

How the War on Terror Resembles the Vietnam War

Cold War and the War on Terror The Cold War (CW) and the War against Terror (WAT) were similar in several ways and different in other important aspects. Each is situated in its own particular political and social era. The CW emerged in the post-WW2 years and was inextricably linked with a number of dynamic variables then shaping the global geopolitical spectrum: these variables included the rise of the Military-Industrial Complex,

Historiographical Debate Into the Effects of Santa Anna's Reign in...

Santa Anna Dictatorship In his self-described revisionist biography Santa Anna of Mexico (2007), Will Fowler has courageously taken up the defense of the Mexico caudillo, fully aware that he is all but universally reviled in the historiography of the United States and Mexico. From the beginning, he made his intention clear to vindicate the reputation of a dictator whose "vilification has been so thorough and effective that the process of deconstructing

Politics Literature and the Arts

Terror, Imperialism, And Totalitarianism Imperialism is defined in the abstract, quite often, as the ideology of 'carrying the white man's burden,' in other words, of carrying the white cultural burden of civilization to the native or darker peoples of the world. But in practice, imperialism often has a less lofty goal and terror rather than teaching is the method used to enforce imperialism's 'laws' and values of social and political control.

Reign of Terror Essay

Reign of Terror DBQ: Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the Terror as an instrument of the French Revolution. France was experience a great amount of change in the summer of 1793, when the Jacobins succeeded the moderates in the National Convention. With the radical Jacobins in power, the country was in tumult, and a Reign of Terror ensued due to a law of suspects that legalized local revolutionary committees. Because of this, thousands of people were killed by guillotine or other methods. Throughout the summer of 1793, the radical Jacobins’ control of the Committee of Public Safety instituted the Terror which was advantageous in it’s intended purpose, yet it was disadvantageous because of the enemies it created. The main …show more content…

Moreover, a report to the government on public opinion states, “the majority of the citizens agreed in unanimously saying that tribunals act well, that they acquit the innocent and punish the guilty” (document 7). However, this report was most likely made to favor the ideals of the government, so it is most likely untrue. Simply put, the Terror was advantageous because it wiped out much of the opposition. Although they may have somewhat succeeded in suppressing the opposing sentiment within France, the Revolutionary Army managed to establish more enemies to clash with later on. Desmoulins in document 6 asked “Could you make a single man perish on the scaffold without making ten enemies for yourself from his family or his friends”. In Desmoulins’s opinion, it is impossible to go about killing a man without creating enemies out of that man’s affiliations in the process. Quite simply, the Army’s belief that they are moving towards a common good is negated by the sheer fact that they are murdering mass amounts of French citizens. The public opinion of the matter includes “bitter complaints [are] already expressed numberless times” (document 10). This is a great disadvantage because the Army established a mutual disdain for the revolutionary government. Without support of the government, it is rather difficult to flourish. All in all, the Reign of Terror was successful in

Reign Of Terror Dbq Essay

The French Revolution spanned ten years and was a period of great change within France. The official beginning of the French Revolution was in May-August of 1789 when common citizens, upset with how the upper class was treated them, forced King Louis XVI (the king of France at the time) to sign the Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen (the DoRoMaC). The DoRoMaC was a document that described exactly what rights the citizens wanted, such as freedom of speech and religion and innocence until proven guilty. Over the next four years, commoners lobbied for a democracy and, when King Louis XVI was executed in early 1793, a new governing body was formed called Committee of Public Safety., which was designed to subdue counterrevolutionaries. A man named Maximilien Robespierre was part of the Committee, and on September 5, 1793, he decided that the best way to keep France under control was fear. That day marks the start of the Reign of Terror.

Essay On Why The Reign Of Terror Is Not Justified Dbq

The National Assembly states that ignorance, neglect or contempt of the rights of man are the sole reason of public calamities and the corruption of the government (Doc A).According to Article 2, the aim of [government] is the preservation of the natural rights of man. These are liberty,property and security and resistance to oppression. However, Robespierre and Committee of Public safety violated Article 1,2,7,10. The government wanted to dechristianize france, they severely punished or even executed people who spoke out against the government. They denied rights and liberty and they prolonged cruel or unjust treatment or control… they were hypocrites. In March 1793, the revolutionary tribunal was established. On April 6,1793, the revolutionary government established the committee of Public Safety ( Document E) THe tribunal was developed to try crimes against the state. Anyone could come under suspicion but just criticizing the government in small way could get a person in trouble with the Committee of Pf Public safety. This did not justify these actions that the government took. There wasn't enough controls on the government to protect individual rights, the Committee of Public safety was know for suspecting almost everyone.That is proven by the fact, 35,000 to 40,000 people executed by the commission in the

Justification of the Use of Terror: How it Ultimately Led to the Downfall of Maximilien Robespierre

• 8 Works Cited

The French Revolution is arguably the bloodiest period in French history, with men such as Maximilien Robespierre leading the country into a situation of state sponsored terror. Originally being quite a liberal thinker inspired by the works of Rousseau, Robespierre quickly gained a reputation for being a radical throughout the course of the Revolution, especially during the Terror. Early on terror was justified as a means to root out foreign and domestic enemies of the Revolution, however; once the foreign threat had been taken care of it became increasingly difficult for Robespierre to rationalize his use of terror to bring about a supposed Republic of Virtue. In his speech, the “Justification of the use of Terror” which he presented to

Reign Of Terror Dbq

Innocent lives lost, brawls on the streets, and blood splattered on the ground. These are all things you would find during the Reign of Terror, a period of time during the French Revolution where the newly-created government executed large amounts of people who were suspected enemies of the Revolution. The French Revolution started in 1789 as an attempt to rid of the absolute monarchy that ruled over the French people and create a new government that fit their needs. There were three leading factors that spurred the start of the Revolution. The first was the high debt that rose during this time, primarily from King Louis XVI sending money to aid in the American Revolution.

Terror Is Justified Dbq

The Reign of Terror caused many enemies against the French Revolution. The Reign of Terror in France was justified because the Threats were required, however the methods were too extreme; It had supported the ideals of the Revolution. Due to the Reign of Terror, France rid itself of Monarchy and traits to France. On February 5, 1794 Robespierre had inferences of why the Reign of Terror was justified (Document G).

Later, when he was elected as the head of the Committee of Public Safety, he used his position to further impose his grandeur and beliefs onto the people of France. Simply, by being a part of the committee, the Jacobin Club and with help of the sans coulottes he brutally killed anyone he suspected of opposing him and his beliefs. In less than an year approximately 300,000 people suspected as enemies were arrested, more than 10,000 died in prison and 17, 000 were executed by guillotine. During this time, Robespierre also executed numerous political opponents. Overall, Maximilian de Robespierre had a significant impact on the French Revolution as he himself was the creator of the most symbolic part of

Declaration Of Independence And Enlightenment

King Louis XVI and Marie Antionette were two people that should not have been ruling a country. King Louis was always gone on hunting trips and Marie Antionette spent every dime of French money. Once the Monarchy ran out money, they started to tax the Third, and poorest, estate. The third estate took up 97% of the population. 97% of the population was starving and the royal family kept spending large amounts of money until the people revolted. The people of France tried to reason with King Louis, but he refused to change his ways and kept taxing the third estate. When the people revolted, they stormed the Bastille and took all of the weapons they could. The people then went to the King’s palace and demanded he fix the way he was ruling before they killed him. The King didn’t listen and was executed along with his wife. Of the three kids that Marie Antionette had, the two boys died of Tuberculosis in jail and the daughter was sent to live the remainder of her life in exile in Austria. It may seem as though the people of France had successfully overgrown their monarchy and could begin a life of freedom, however this is not the case. The French had rushed into combat too fast and did not have a plan for what to do after they had killed their rulers. The right of Terror begins where Maximilian Robespierre beheads 40,000 people in the span of ten months for speaking against the revolution. In the end, Robespierre ends up getting

The Reign of Terror: Was it Justified?

As more peoples blood is split to gain the rights not extended to them, the Terror grows becoming more and more gruesome. The French revolution began in late 1789 to obtain the rights that every citizen in born with. The motto of the French was liberty, equality, or death and the price to be paid for the civil liberties was blood. The revolutionary leader Robespierre and journalist Marat explained the more blood the better so that was what raged the people and started the Reign of Terror. Were the values expressed by the French Revolution necessary though? Even though, the French Revolution saw the Terror as a sign to create peace and restore a new France it was not justified because the extremities of the internal and external threats

Terror in the French Revolution Essay

They gained little attention and may have fizzled out but for the Catholic Church, they had been annoyed at the privileges given to protestants and wanted an end to the revolutionary committee. Tension had been rising slowly among the leaders of the revolution, they had started radicalism and now it had grown stronger and threatened even their own position. So in a quest to oversee this they went into talks with Louis xvi, when nothing could be gained from this, Louis felt it was time to flea and with his anti-revolutionary army he was going to gain back his power just as it had been taken from him. Louis failed miserably and was caught, this arose tension in Europe as the end to a monarchy in one country could spell disaster in other countries raising ideas. Louis was however restored to the throne under the revolutionaries' terms, however this threat from Europe would not go away and war with France was imminent. Revolutionary ideology would have to be dealt with. European monarchs did not want their stature threatened.

Advantages Of The Reign Of Terror

The revolutionaries used the Reign of Terror to their advantage, eliminating all of those in resistance. General Ronsin, who was a leader of the revolutionary army, strongly supported the use of guillotine and firing squad to execute the opposition (Document 5). These revolutionaries thought they had brought justice into France through the execution of those who were resisting the revolutionaries. In a speech to the National Convention, Maximilien de Robespierre explains how

Twelve Who Ruled – Why Tenacious Terror was Necessary Essay

In the year 1793-94, the Reign of Terror invoked by the twelve members of Committee of Public Safety (CPS) was unavoidable and led the way for a metamorphosis to occur within France during the French Revolution. While the word terror is often associated with Halloween or stories meant to be frightening for fun, the word held a far more serious meaning to the people of France. The theme of fear allowed the CPS members to change the monarchy to a revolutionary government in hopes of eventually enacting the constitution already written (75).

Robespierre and the Reign of Terror

Twenty thousand to forty thousand died; it is still unknown exactly how many people were lost through the blood drenching event of the Reign of Terror.[Footnote] Throughout the French revolution, specifically the eleven month, 1793-1794 Reign of Terror, revolutionary leaders, such as Maximilien Robespierre believed in enforcing fear to resolve the instability of France. “Terror is nothing else than swift, severe, indomitable justice; it flows, then, from virtue”-Maximilien Robespierre.[Footnote] This period in history signified great atrocities of massacres, and a time where fear was evoked within every French civilian. The National Convention of France was a great factor in encouraging the start of the Reign of Terror; they continued on

Effects Of The Reign Of Terror During The French Revolution

This paper focuses on one of the darkest times of the French revolution, which was the Reign of Terror. It aims to study how the Reign of Terror during the French Revolution reformed and reinvented France’s government and society, and how the Reign of Terror became the critical point of France’s transition from the

France's Social Changes

In defense to this France's constituent government issued a formal declaration of war against Austria and Prussia on April 20, 1792 (2016, M Issit). However France suffered defeats and the war had an adverse effect on the economy, with the currency value falling, prices rising further and food becoming in short supply. During this time there were emerging radical groups, intent on further revolution. In particular the Jacobins, who were led by Robespierre, advocating universal manhood suffrage, education for all and a secular state (2005, Calum Crosbie). Unrest in the city mounted high and the main constituent power the Girondists began to crumble under the pressure to the Jacobins, when they couldn’t tackle the problems presented. The King was also found out to be a traitor to the revolution leading to his execution.

The Three Stages Of The French Revolution

The French revolution is one of history’s bloodiest and most important series of events that has ever occurred in the western hemisphere. From the start of the revolution at 1789 to the end at 1799, a massive number of complex political, and socioeconomic events took place forever changing the country. This decade long feud between France’s people and her government can be simplified into three major stages. The first stage of the revolution was, for the most part constitutional and the most peaceful of the three stages. The second stage however wasn’t so peaceful. At the time, France was one of Europe’s most influential and powerful country’s and since such an impactful revolution was being executed, this brought many aggressive supporters as

Related Topics

• French Revolution
• Reign of Terror
• Committee of Public Safety
• Georges Danton
• Maximilien Robespierre

Guided Essay: The Reign of Terror: Was It Justified? I....

Guided Essay: The Reign of Terror: Was It Justified?

I. INTRODUCTION

A. Grabber:

B. Background information:

The Reign of Terror lasted less than two years, from the execution of Louis XVI in January 1793 to late July 1794. During those eighteen months, more than 20,000 French people were put to death by guillotine.

C. Restatement of the question:

The question is whether or not this behavior by the revolutionary French government was justified.

D. Thesis and Road Map:

The Reign of Terror . . . (was / was not) justified. This claim can be supported by three reasons: . . . , . . . , and . . ..

II. BODY PARAGRAPH #1

A. Baby Thesis: The first reason the Reign of Terror was . . . (justified / not justified) was . . .

B. Evidence: Provide at least two pieces of evidence that support your baby thesis.

C. Argument:

This evidence shows that the Reign of Terror was . . . (justified / not justified) because . . .

III.  BODY PARAGRAPH #2

A. Baby Thesis: A second reason the Reign of Terror was . . . (justified / not justified) was . . .

B. Evidence: Provide at least two pieces of evidence that describes this reason.

This evidence shows that the Reign of Terror was (justified / not justified) because . . .

Build Paragraph

IV. BODY PARAGRAPH #3

Baby Thesis: Finally, the Reign of Terror was . . . (justified / not justified) when it came to . . .

B. Evidence: Provide at least two examples that describe this reason.

In this regard, the Reign of Terror was (justified / not justified) because . . .

V. CONCLUSION

A. "Although" statement:

The opposite argument could be made about the Reign of Terror. For example, one might say that . . .

B. Summarize your arguments and restate your main idea with fresh conviction and new words:

Answer & Explanation

. INTRODUCTION

A. Grabber: The Reign of Terror, a dark period in the French Revolution, is known for its excessive use of the guillotine that led to the death of thousands of French citizens.

B. Background information: The Reign of Terror lasted from January 1793 to July 1794, and over 20,000 French people were executed.

C. Restatement of the question: The question is whether the actions of the French government during the Reign of Terror were justified.

D. Thesis and Road Map: The Reign of Terror was not justified. This claim can be supported by three reasons: the excessive use of violence, the violation of human rights, and the failure to achieve its goals.

A. Baby Thesis: The first reason the Reign of Terror was not justified was its excessive use of violence.

B. Evidence: During the Reign of Terror, thousands of people were executed, often without a fair trial or evidence of wrongdoing. The guillotine became a symbol of the revolution, and its use was often motivated by political reasons rather than actual guilt.

C. Argument: This evidence shows that the Reign of Terror was not justified because the use of excessive violence went against the principles of the revolution, which aimed to establish a fair and just society.

III. BODY PARAGRAPH #2

A. Baby Thesis: The second reason the Reign of Terror was not justified was the violation of human rights.

B. Evidence: During the Reign of Terror, people were arrested and executed for expressing their opinions, practicing their religion, or belonging to a certain social class. The government also established a surveillance system that monitored people's activities and punished those who were deemed to be enemies of the revolution.

C. Argument: This evidence shows that the Reign of Terror was not justified because it violated basic human rights, such as freedom of expression and association, which were essential to the principles of the revolution.

A. Baby Thesis: Finally, the Reign of Terror was not justified when it came to achieving its goals.

B. Evidence: Despite the use of violence and repression, the Reign of Terror failed to establish a stable and democratic government. Instead, it created a climate of fear and mistrust that hindered social and political progress.

C. Argument: In this regard, the Reign of Terror was not justified because it failed to achieve its goals and instead created more problems than it solved.

A. "Although" statement: Although some argue that the Reign of Terror was necessary to establish a strong government, this argument overlooks the excessive use of violence and the violation of basic human rights.

B. Summarize your arguments and restate your main idea with fresh conviction and new words: In conclusion, the Reign of Terror was not justified because it went against the principles of the revolution, violated basic human rights, and failed to achieve its goals. Instead of creating a fair and just society, it created a climate of fear and mistrust that lasted for years after the revolution.

The Reign of Terror was a period in the French Revolution that lasted from January 1793 to July 1794. During this time, over 20,000 French people were executed by the guillotine. The question of whether this was justified or not is a topic of debate.

However, there are several reasons why the Reign of Terror was not justified. Firstly, it was marked by the excessive use of violence. Thousands of people were executed, often without a fair trial or evidence of wrongdoing. The guillotine became a symbol of the revolution, and its use was often motivated by political reasons rather than actual guilt. This use of excessive violence went against the principles of the revolution, which aimed to establish a fair and just society.

Secondly, the Reign of Terror violated basic human rights. People were arrested and executed for expressing their opinions, practicing their religion, or belonging to a certain social class. The government also established a surveillance system that monitored people's activities and punished those who were deemed to be enemies of the revolution. This violation of basic human rights, such as freedom of expression and association, went against the very principles of the revolution.

Finally, the Reign of Terror failed to achieve its goals. Despite the use of violence and repression, the Reign of Terror failed to establish a stable and democratic government. Instead, it created a climate of fear and mistrust that hindered social and political progress. This failure to achieve its goals meant that the Reign of Terror was not justified and instead created more problems than it solved.

In conclusion, the Reign of Terror was not justified because it went against the principles of the revolution, violated basic human rights, and failed to achieve its goals. Instead of creating a fair and just society, it created a climate of fear and mistrust that lasted for years after the revolution. Therefore, the use of violence and repression during the Reign of Terror cannot be justified.

I believe that you have received the answer you were looking for. 

Note: Should you require further clarification, please let me know through a comment, and I will assist you accordingly.

Related Q&A

• Q argumentive essay on the topic of revenge. G "Do you believe Revenge is ever justified?" 1.. Prewriting needs to have: s... Answered over 90d ago
• Q Ann is a 28-year-old single woman currently working as a barista in a coffee shop while attending college part time. She... Answered over 90d ago
• Q As you read John 6:1-15, begin to imagine yourself as one of the characters of the passage (the child, one of his parent... Answered over 90d ago
• Q Part I:   For this Discussion, research a career that interests you on the Bureau of Labor Statistics website at https:/... Answered over 90d ago
• Q What is a MO?        a)   Knowing how criminals usually operate.      b)   Connecting many different types of crimes acr... Answered over 90d ago
• Q  . Requirement 4. What price should Johnston's managers set for unfinished bookcases to earn a net profit of $17 per boo... Answered 46d ago
• Q  . Amino acid transport into an intestinal cell against its concentration gradient is known to depend on sodium io conce... Answered over 90d ago
• Q Last week, on 9/22/22 at 9:03pm, we celebrated the autumnal equinox in the Northern hemisphere. In the diagram below, cl... Answered over 90d ago
• Q 1. In your new role as Director General of Volkswagen, you have been tasked by the board with producing a ten-year strat... Answered over 90d ago
• Q Read the following article: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-red-bull-turned-niche-market-billion-dollar-vishwanathan ... Answered over 90d ago
• Q (Urban Ministries of Durham) homeless shelter     Post a description of your agency context (location, population served... Answered over 90d ago
• Q Do customers over the age of 50 pay with a paper check for an order over $1000  more so than customers under the age of ... Answered over 90d ago
• Q     Preparation for resisting fight and flight instincts  Conflict that highlights the fallibility of human-made law  Te... Answered over 90d ago
• Q Share an article (APA) that informs the effectiveness of formalized training (i.e., modules, sessions, workshops) to eff... Answered over 90d ago
• Q 1. (40 points) When the Australian Government introduced the 'carbon tax' on 1 July 2012, it was accompanied by a packag... Answered over 90d ago
• Q Many introduction or removal procedures in code range 20500-20697 use  ___________ ____________, and require ___________... Answered over 90d ago

Home — Essay Samples — History — Joseph Stalin — Joseph Stalin’s Reign of Terror

Joseph Stalin's Reign of Terror

• Categories: Joseph Stalin Reign of Terror

About this sample

Words: 1139 |

Published: Nov 6, 2018

Words: 1139 | Pages: 3 | 6 min read

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Dr Jacklynne

Verified writer

• Expert in: History

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

2 pages / 758 words

2 pages / 995 words

5 pages / 2155 words

6 pages / 2847 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

In the annals of history, few figures evoke as much horror and fascination as Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin. These two leaders, who rose to power in the early 20th century, left an indelible mark on the world through their [...]

Joseph Stalin, the leader of the Soviet Union from the mid-1920s until his death in 1953, is often remembered for his ruthless tactics and extreme paranoia. His reign was characterized by a constant fear of betrayal and a [...]

Joseph Stalin, the leader of the Soviet Union from the mid-1920s until his death in 1953, was known for his distinctive and iconic military-style uniforms. His choice to consistently wear these uniforms has sparked much [...]

Totalitarianism is a political system in which the state holds total authority over the society and seeks to control all aspects of public and private life wherever possible. This form of government is characterized by a [...]

After the death of Lenin in 1924, the USSR has reached a major challenge of deciding who was to take charge over the country. The main power struggle prevailed amid Stalin and Trotsky, two committed members of the Bolshevik [...]

This paper includes a comparison between Joseph Stalin and the non- idealistic, successful prince created by Niccolo Machiavelli. Niccolo Machiavelli portrayed how this realistic leader should be in his book, The Prince. [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

Reign of Terror Narrative Essay

Reign Of Terror Reign of Terror is the period of the French revolution since September 5, 1793, to July 27 1794. It was a civil and a foreign war, where the government decided to terrify the people of France, and to take harsh consequences against those who were against the revolution, like the nobles and priests. The government forced terror in the hearts of the French. Approximately 40,000 people die during the Terror. About 15% were the nobles and clergy. Another 15% were the middle class. The rest were peasants. The brain of the terror is the Guillotine. It was blade, which dropped fast, and the victim would not feel pain.

Dr. Joseph Guillotine created the Guillotine, and it quickly became a symbol of horror in the Reign of Terror. Another method used in the period of Terror was The Breaking Wheel. The Breaking wheel was the famous execution before the Guillotine. The Breaking Wheel was a torture device where they attach a person to the wheel and rotate the wheel were his bones break and the person gets dehydrated. Drowning was also a method used in the French Revolution. Jean-Baptiste Carrier put his victims into vessels with trapdoors for bottoms and to sink them in the Loire River. There are many groups who participated in the French Revolution.

Robespierre was a famous person where he decides who shall get executed. The first and second estate hated Robespierre. Robespierre gave speeches where the revolutionary were interested and liked what he was saying. The new leader of the Jacobins was Robespierre under whom the Committee of Public Safety was established. The Sans Culottes were workman, who fought for survival. They were radical people who took part in the more violent events of the revolution. The National Convention created the Committee of Public Safety; it consists of nine members of the convention. The 1st and the 2nd estate are the church (priests) and the nobles.

Order custom essay Reign of Terror Narrative Essay with free plagiarism report

The National assembly created the revolution, and they helped the people who were with the revolution. J. P Marate was a doctor who wrote rumors in the newspaper about the nobles, and he lived in France sores. Robespierre was with the revolution, although Robespierre over exceeded the use of terror, which made the revolution in a worse condition. The Jacobins were also with the revolution because they were lead by Robespierre; they were part of the National assembly. Sans Culottes were radicals, where they wanted to change because they wore bad clothes and fought for survival.

The National Assembly was with the revolution; they made the government better for the people who supported the French Revolution. Committee of Public Safety was with the revolution, however they created the terror where execution was getting off limits where it made the revolution worse. 1st and 2nd estate were against the revolution, they nobles were living the life wear they had food clothes, paid no taxes. J. P Marate supported the revolution, but he wanted violence, which makes the revolution in a worse condition. Done by: Nader Al Nuwakhtha

Cite this Page

Reign of Terror Narrative Essay. (2017, Mar 31). Retrieved from https://phdessay.com/reign-of-terror-189532/

Run a free check or have your essay done for you

More related essays

Asoka was the ruler of the Mauryan Empire ( the main empire of India for 2000 years). After his remorse of the mass killing, for the land of Kalinga he.

After a little debate, Henry became the new Duke of Cornwall in October 502, and the new Prince od Wales and Earl of Chester In February 1503. Henry VII gave.

Louis XVI was born on August 23rd, 1754 in the Palace of Versailles. He was born Louis Auguste, duc de Berry to Louis, the Dauphin of France, and Marie-Joseph of.

Who Did Jack the Ripper Kill? - Jack Ripper Serial Killer Murder Jack the ripper is the most well known murders of all time! No killer has inspired more people,.

Francis's leadership and impact transformed Europe. Francis, one of the longest-reigning rulers, brought innovation, cultural rebirth, and political stability to his country. This article examines Francis's life, achievements, and legacy,.

The book written by Alfred McCoy (2006) entitled ‘A Question of Torture: CIA Interrogation, from the Cold War to the War on Terror’ speaks of CIA’s process of developing different.

In the 21st century, the world is one in chaos- nations go to war for the slimmest of reasons, economies can topple overnight, and the ever-present threat of global terrorism.

Ted Bundy was a terror for girls and women in 1970’s. He was a serial killer and a rapist who is believed to have ruthlessly murdered more than 20 girls.

We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Save time and let our verified experts help you.

• Share full article

Advertisement

Supported by

Guest Essay

Where Is America’s ‘Rules-Based Order’ Now?

By Spencer Ackerman

Mr. Ackerman is a foreign-policy columnist for The Nation and the author of “Reign of Terror: How the 9/11 Era Destabilized America and Produced Trump.”

No sooner had a nearly unanimous United Nations Security Council passed a resolution demanding an “immediate cease-fire” in Gaza last month than the United States and Israel acted as if it were a meaningless piece of paper. Israel, unwilling to accept a U.N. mandate, continued bombing the overcrowded southern city of Rafah and besieging Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City. Shortly after the vote, Biden administration officials called the resolution, No. 2728, “nonbinding,” in what appeared to be an attempt to deny its status as international law.

It was a confounding approach from an administration that allowed the resolution to go through with an abstention after vetoing three earlier ones. It also triggered a predictable bout of hand-wringing over the value of international law. At the State Department press briefing after the resolution passed, the department’s spokesman, Matthew Miller, said the measure would neither result in an immediate cease-fire nor affect thorny hostage-release negotiations. One reporter asked , “If that’s the case, what the hell is the point of the U.N. or the U.N. Security Council?”

The question is valid, but it’s also misdirected. U.N. resolutions that are written without enforcement measures obviously cannot force Israel to stop what its leadership insists is a justified war necessary to remove Hamas and prevent another Oct. 7 massacre. But it’s just as obvious what entity can make Israel stop and isn’t doing so: the United States.

Whatever the Biden administration might have thought it was doing by permitting the resolution to pass and then undermining it, the maneuver exposed the continuing damage Israel’s war in Gaza is doing to the United States’ longstanding justification for being a superpower: guaranteeing what U.S. administrations like to call the international rules-based order.

The concept operates as an asterisk placed on international law by the dominant global superpower. It makes the United States one of the reasons international law remains weak, since a rules-based order that exempts the United States and its allies fundamentally undermines the concept of international law.

American policymakers tend to invoke the concept to demonstrate the benefits of U.S. global leadership. It sounds, on the surface, a lot like international law: a stable global order, involving the panoply of international aid and financial institutions, in which the rules of acceptable behavior reflect liberal values. And when U.S. prerogatives coincide with international law, the United States describes the two synonymously. On the eve of Russia’s illegal 2022 invasion of Ukraine, Secretary of State Antony Blinken warned of a “moment of peril” for “the foundation of the United Nations Charter and the rules-based international order that preserves stability worldwide.”

But when U.S. prerogatives diverge from international law, America apparently has no problem violating it — all while declaring its violations to ultimately benefit global stability. The indelible example is the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq, which the George W. Bush administration cynically justified as a means of enforcing U.N. disarmament mandates. Iraq, the supposed violator, endured military occupation, while Washington’s unmatched military and economic power ensured that America faced little consequence for an invasion without U.N. authorization. Shortly before invading, the United States passed a law vowing to use “ all means ” necessary to release Americans detained by the International Criminal Court.

A cohort of American academics and once and future U.S. officials at Princeton later advocated what they called in a 2006 paper “ a world of liberty under law .” They framed it as addressing the weaknesses of international law, suggesting that when international institutions didn’t produce the outcomes favored by the “world of liberty,” there be an “alternative forum for liberal democracies to authorize collective action.” In practice, that forum has often been the White House. During the 2011 Libyan uprising, the United States and its allies used Security Council authorization of a no-fly zone to help overthrow Muammar Qaddafi — whose regime killed far fewer opponents than Israel has killed in Gaza since Oct. 7. American troops have now operated in eastern Syria for more than eight years, long enough for everyone to forget that there is no basis in international law for their presence.

That American-exceptionalist asterisk has been on display after each U.S. veto of cease-fire resolutions at the U.N. With Gaza’s enormous death toll and imminent famine , people can be forgiven for wondering about the point of the United States’ rules-based international order.

International law is unambiguously against what Israel is doing in Gaza. Two months before resolution No. 2728, the International Court of Justice ruled that the continuing Israeli campaign could plausibly be considered genocidal and ordered Israel to take measures to prevent genocide from unfolding. Ahead of 2728’s passage, the Canadian Parliament approved a motion, however porous , to stop new arms transfers to Israel. And the day the Security Council approved the resolution, the U.N.’s special rapporteur for the occupied territories, Francesca Albanese, recommended that member states should “immediately” embargo weapon shipments to Israel, since Israel “appears to have failed to comply with the binding measures ordered” by the international court.

But after 2728 passed, the White House national security spokesman, John Kirby, clarified that U.S. weapon sales and transfers to Israel would be unaffected. To the astonishment of some Senate Democrats , the State Department averred that Israel was not violating a Biden administration policy that recipients of American weaponry comply with international law. Last week, the White House reiterated that it had not seen “any incidents where the Israelis have violated international humanitarian law” after the Israel Defense Forces repeatedly bombed a convoy of aid workers from the World Central Kitchen who had informed the Israelis of their movements, killing seven.

The reality is that Washington is now arming a combatant that the United Nations Security Council has ordered to stop fighting, an uncomfortable position that helps explain why the United States insists 2728 isn’t binding.

And that reality isn’t lost on the rest of the world. The slaughter in Gaza has disinclined some foreign officials and groups to listen to U.S. officials about other issues. Annelle Sheline, a State Department human-rights officer who recently resigned over Gaza , told The Washington Post that some activist groups in North Africa simply stopped meeting with her and her colleagues. “Trying to advocate for human rights just became impossible” while the United States aids Israel, she said.

It’s a dynamic that sounds awfully reminiscent of what happened outside Europe when U.S. diplomats fanned out globally to rally support for Ukraine two years ago. They encountered “a very clear negative reaction to the American propensity for defining the global order and forcing countries to take sides,” as Fiona Hill, a Brookings Institution scholar, observed in a speech last year.

If the United States was frustrated by that negative reaction, imagine the reaction, post-Gaza, that awaits Washington the next time it seeks global support for the target of an adversary. The dead-on-arrival passage of resolution 2728 may very well be remembered as an inflection point in the decline of the rules-based international order — which is to say the world that the United States seeks to build and maintain.

Rising powers will be happy to cite U.S. precedent as they assert their own exceptions to international law. For as Gaza shows in a horrific manner, a world with exceptions to international law is one in which the least powerful suffer the most.

Spencer Ackerman is a foreign-policy columnist for The Nation and the author of “Reign of Terror: How the 9/11 Era Destabilized America and Produced Trump.”

The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips . And here’s our email: [email protected] .

Follow the New York Times Opinion section on Facebook , Instagram , TikTok , WhatsApp , X and Threads .

Reign Of Terror Essay

The Reign of Terror was a bloody and important event during the French Revolution. There was several leaders such as Georges Danton, who was a prominent lawyer and became one of the orator during this period of time. This research paper will be go deeply into Georges Danton’s political views and evolution. He was involved politically with the Cordeliers Clubs and was a member of the Committee of public Safety . The thesis of my research paper is: Danton, the leader during the Reign of Terror, who wants to help the population. However, he changed his political views because he wanted to arrest and stabilize the Revolution with the intention of creating a new constitution, and consequently he became a victim of the Terror. For the research, the card catalog in the library or JSTOR, EBSCO, SAGE Journal are beneficial because they are listed by title, author, and subject. After founding a …show more content…

The 4 X 6 are using for complete bibliography and the 5 X 8 are using for citations, and are classified by subjects. Those index cards are easy to organized and helpful to create the paper outline. Also, while we are talking about a subject we can pick up those cards and use the most important citation. This is the best way to doing my research because it will be easier to write my paper later. The most important is to find the thesis and then this is leading to books and articles needing for the topic. In this way focusing on finding books and checks if they are primary or secondary sources for my paper. By doing my research before that will help citing my sources in my paper. Then, these sources are helping prevent plagiarism because those citations are from credibility sources. Using the index cards are helpful because we can change our paragraph around and see which one we want to put first. Also, after reading the rough draft, having those cards are essentials to make any kind of changes for the final

Reign Of Terror Dbq Essay

The Reign of Terror opened the door for the government of France to secure military victories with thus decreased the amount of stress on the government. In Documents B and C, they both illustrate how actions taking by the Committee of Public Safety, the leading Terror body, helped lead to France to victory against foreign enemies. Document B gives us a timeline of the events leading up to the Reign of Terror and we can see how the actions taken by the Committee of Public Safety, such as the Levee en Masse, helped bring about French Victory. We can also see how Document C supports this deduction from Document B as Document C talks about the effect of the revolution and the Reign on the outside threat to France. We can also deduce from Document

Was The Reign Of Terror Justified Dbq Essay

The Reign of Terror lasted a year over the span of 1793 to 1794. Throughout this year, many people died because the National Assembly deemed it necessary in order to control the people in which they governed. If one were not following the ideals of the revolution, they were killed. Was the Reign of Terror justified? The Reign of Terror was not justified through the external and internal threats the people faced, the unreasonable methods of terror, and the ideals that the revolution followed.

Robespierre led the French Revolution known as “The Reign of Terror”. The new government would execute large numbers of individuals whom they believed to be enemies of the revolution. So, the Reign of Terror was unjustified, for it not only violated the Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen in multiple cases, specifically articles two and ten, but also caused the death of thousands. Although the Committee of Public Safety had good intentions, it ended up doing more harm than good as they invaded people’s lives and disregarded their rights as human beings.

Rhetorical Analysis Of How Many Rugby Players Use Steroids

Through showing the reader the amount of research that he has done on the topic, he was able pull the reader into understanding why this was important to him and why it should be important to the reader. To pull the reader more, Howell also used

The Similarities Between The Bystanders In Night And The Reign Of Terror

I am a Perpetrator. I oppress people that do not agree with me. Upstanders are hopeless, meaningless people to me. Before I got overthrown, I ruled above all the other citizens, enjoying rights that the other classes didn’t have. But my country didn’t like me, and they unanimously voted to overthrow me, even after I promised to make the Bystanders and Victims lives better.

Reign Of Terror Justified Dbq Essay

Should certain actions be accepted by society when they are for the greater good? Often in situations there are two defined sides. The reign of terror posed challenges to the government to remain civil and fair. While there were people that brought violence and hardship to avoid any change in the nation. The actions that took place during the reign of terror are justified due to the fact that it brought france order and stability, established fair rights, and abolished inherited human circumstances like slavery and nobility.

Fort Pillow Massacre Essay

The Fort Pillow Massacre represented one of the most unfortunate events in Civil War history. It resulted in a Confederate victory at the cost of many African Americans and Union troops. Sectionalism influenced the interpretations and accounts of what occurred at Fort Pillow. Both the South and North had conflicting accounts of the battle at Fort Pillow. This would lead to an investigation by the Joint Committee On the Conduct of the War which concluded that a massacre did occur.

Essay On Benedict Arnold Act Of Treason

Acts of treason, actual or supposed, litter American history, but questions of loyalty in American history is determined more often by opinion than facts. The various reactions to treason display a fundamental issue regarding loyalty and disloyalty in American history. Loyalty and disloyalty are driven by a similar, but different, essential driving factor that is mostly determined by public opinion. By using specific examples, it is easily detectable that the fundamental issues with deciding a person’s loyalty, which is intertwined with the roots of loyalty and disloyalty that drive the two principles, are public opinion and cause.

The Reign of Terror was very violent event that took place; although, people made it out to be helpful and resolve multiple issues it resulted in making many people very miserable and sad. This act that took place was not justified because the leader was self elected and not giving people the right to vote for their leader. Another example of this was people´s hopes were manipulated and misguided leading up to violence. The Reign of Terror was the third class (bourgeoisie) had started a war with the first class because they did not treat them well. The Bourgeoisie killed many of the first and second estate.

Terror In The Heart Of Freedom Summary

Terror in the Heart of Freedom: Citizenship, Sexual Violence, And The Meaning of Race in the Postemancipation South is a depiction of the struggle and horrors that the freed African American individuals faced and endured during the the post emancipation time period in the Southern states. With a special emphasis on Memphis, Tennessee and Little Rock, Arkansas. Rosen focuses on the issues surrounding how the discussions and events surrounding African American citizenship were framed around gender. Rosen sheds a light on the sexual abuse and rape that African American women were subject to during this time. Rosen also elaborates on how gender was used to frame men in a negative light by stereo types that described African American men as unable to fulfill their duty as the patriarch in their family, vagrant, unwilling to work, and unable to control and protect their women.

Massacre At Mystic Essay

The Native tribes in America have interacted with the Americans ever since they first arrived as English colonies and . The English Colonies which are now the United States of America have followed developing policies towards American tribes that depict the gradual but definite ultimate removal of the Indians. The decision to remove Cherokee Indians to lands west of the Mississippi in 1830 by the Jackson Administration was a significant change in social and political policy towards the tribes, but a continuation of economic policy. By acknowledging the tribes as subjects of the United States, the Jackson administration changed previous U.S. political policy towards the tribes. In the film “Massacre at Mystic” On May 26, 1637 when the English

Was The Reign Of Terror Justified Analysis

Was The Reign Of Terror Justified? The French Revolution was a very problematic time period. After the execution of Louis XVI, the Reign of Terror began during the years of 1793 - 1794 which was led by French politician, Maximilien Robespierre and lasted for 18 months. This topic is controversial when the question, “Was the Reign of Terror justified?” is asked.

Private Peaceful Essay

Private Peaceful is a historical fiction novel written by Michael Morpurgo. The story is set in the homefront, school, and battlefront during World War I. This story revolves around the powerless Peaceful brothers, Charlie and Tommo, who face injustice between people who have power and people who do not. Throughout the novel, Morpurgo tells a message to the readers that the rich and powerful victimise the poor and the weak.

Explain The Four Phases Of The French Revolution

In this paper I discuss the four phases of the French revolution and how they influenced one and other, these phases consist of The National assembly/ The Constitutional Monarchy, The Reign of Terror, The Directory, and the Age of Napoleon. The First phase of the French revolution is the National assembly or Constitutional Monarchy. " Constitutional monarchy, system of government in which a monarch shares power with a constitutionally organized government.

Essay On Nabati Poetry

It provides options for individuals to search through past publications. It is cheaper and less cumbersome compared to the idea of buying manuscripts and having loads of paper to go through and store (Kurpershoek, 1994, p.

More about Reign Of Terror Essay

Related topics.

• Maximilien Robespierre
• Committee of Public Safety
• Jacobin Club

• Free Essays
• Citation Generator

Reign Of Terror Essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

The reign of terror: not justified.

1793 to 1794 is when the Reign of Terror began and end. The Reign of Terror was about 2 years from when Louis XVI was beheaded and around the time 20,000 people were guillotined. 35,000 people were killed by officers and officials. The Reign of Terror was not justified.The claim stated can be supported by these 3 reasons: they were threatened in wrong ways for the wrong things , the methods used were not necessary, and the reasoning they gave did not match the actions.…

Was The Reign Of Terror Justified

Severed heads, numerous bodies, and constant fear in the streets, does the Reign of Terror sound justified to you? The Reign of Terror was an immense turning point in the French revolution and lasted for 18 months. During this time period 20,000 people were executed using the guillotine causing a lot of bloodshed. The reign of terror was unacceptable and cannot be justified for many reasons.…

The Reign of Terror: Was it Justified

In 1792, French adversaries were pushing in on all borders and spies were rampant on the streets. To defend from internal enemies, prominent French leader Robespierre enacted the Reign of Terror. Anyone suspected of aiding the enemy was swiftly put on trial and executed. (doc. G) The Reign of Terror was not justified because the threats to France externally and internally did not warrant the methods used.…

How Does Robespierre Justify the Use of Terror? Would Some People Still Agree with His Ideas?

What began as a march to Versailles to acquire King Louis XVI’s attention to end the grievances of the general population in 1789, soon spiraled into what became known as The French Revolution. With the execution of Louis XVI in 1973, this new “regime” still had many problems to overcome including the continuing war that constantly needed men and money. The National Convention (which was created in 1792 as part of a campaign to convert France into a constitutional monarchy) amid high pressures, decided to set in place a centralized government which provided everyone with food, support and direct the war effort, and punish counterrevolutionaries (611). Headed by Maxmilien Robespierre, this new government was based on the principles of virtue, in which the government sought to educate and/or force the citizens to become virtuous. Inspired by enlightenment thinkers Montesquieu and Rousseau, he believed in the importance of a government by terror. Robespierre justified his beliefs by saying stuff like: “To punish the oppressors of humanity is clemency; to forgive them is barbarity.”…

Rise of Democracy

The French Revolution demonstrated that the magnitude of violence is probable to be larger after the first incident of revolution. As one group claiming freedom or independence seeks to eliminate one or more other rival groups also claiming sovereignty. An excellent example in the French Revolution is the overthrow of the Constitutional Monarch on August 1792 and the creation of the First French Republic. Ensuing the creation of the Republic, the amount of violence escalated as the Republican regime looked to crush counter-revolutionary actions in France while straining at the same time to avoid defeat in war by the accumulated forces of Austria, Prussia, and Britain. The so-called Reign of Terror was put in place to annihilate both foreign and domestic forces of counter revolution. Once these foreign and domestic threats were in check in the spring of 1794, Terror continued in the direction of…

Reign of Terror

The Reign of Terror started in 1789 and was a time when supporters of the French Revolution ran wild and started killing non-supporters or counterrevolutionaries. The French held a ceremony if you will, in Paris for the execution of King Louis XVI on January 21, 1793. This was because Louis was having financial, and harvest issues. In June of 1789 King Louis called the Estates Meeting to discuss taxes and money problems. Then some men disliked what Louis was talking about so they stormed out and filed into a tennis court, and vowed not to leave until they created a new constitution. On August 26 “The Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen” was signed and put into action. Not everyone was in favor of this new constitution though. Neighboring countries and the catholic church disliked it because they feared a spread of a revolution and they lost power/property. To deal with their opposition of the “Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen” they wanted to become more “radical”. They were led by chief-prosecutor Robespierre, who found King Louis XVI guilty of crimes against state/treason, and was executed (Doc A), therefore connecting all of these events. Although it helped the government by getting rid of Louis XVI, The Reign of Terror was unjustified because it took away freedom of speech, religion, and killed thousands of people.…

Was The Reign Of Terror Justified Analysis

Also 35,000 people were killed by officials for no reason. It all happened about two year after Louis XVI was beheaded. Was using control with fear a good idea? No, it wasn’t. They just wanted control…

Justification for the Use of Terror

Maximilien Robespierre was the leader of The Committee of Public Safety during the radical phase of the french revolution. Robespierre played a big role in the Reign of Terror. Once a liberal thinker, he lost his belief in people. This caused him to become very radical in his actions (Justification for the Use of Terror (p. 1)). Hundreds of people were condemned to prison while others were executed, because they didn't agree with his beliefs. Were Maximilien Robespierre's efforts in the Reign of Terror justified, or were they entirely terroristic?…

How did Lenin and Robespierre's views on revolutionary leadership differ?

The French revolution was one sided the lower class rose up and easily destroyed the monarchy. Robespierre came to power as the head of the committee of public safety even though he had no other government experience. He was a radical nationalist and believed that his morality was incorruptible. After the tennis court oath Robespierre began to rise in popularity in the Jacobins club. Robespierre leaded by doing, he viciously attacked the views of the Girondists, Hebertists, and the Dantonists. When appointed to the committee of public safety he began to see any attack on his leadership as an attack on France. This is because he considered his views as the general will of the French public. Robespierre's main leadership tool during the reign of terror was terror, but this was a double sided guillotine, this also…

Tennis Court Oath Of Humanism

Midterm Exam Mardin Shinoo Professor Michael W. Johnson Revolutions in History North Park University Chicago, Illinois October 2014 Tennis Court Oath was an agreement proposed by Jean-Joseph Mounier on June 20, 1789. As part of the third estate, they were locked out of the usual meting hall and suspected that the king wanted them to disband. They took an oath to never separate until there was a written constitution was established for France. Humanism was a Renaissance cultural movement from the 1400s to the mid 1600s.…

Edmund Burke Reign Of Terror Analysis

The ‘Reign of Terror' was the name given to the actions of the ‘Committee of Public Safety' from the years between 1791-1794. Their actions can be justified, but can hold just as much criticism along with it. In my opinion, there could have been better ways to move the revolution along and the ‘Reign of Terror' should have never happened.…

Revolution In 'The Septembers Of Shiraz'

That is exactly how a revolution can go wrong. Moreover, the purpose of the revolution can get done, by hardwork and perseverance. The end result can happen but at what cost? Is killing and torturing people the way to go? Consequently, this has been happening around the world more and more. Such as, native americans fighting off modern day genocide on the border of north and south…

Is Established Order Necessary?

Shown with the American and French Revolutions, violence must have a clear defined goal of fundamental change of a government or it can turn poorly. During the French Revolution terror was used to justify the means of social change. Burke was really saying revolution and the violence that goes with it is not justifiable. Thomas Paine disagrees and views monarchy as evil and the solution is revolution to change the principles in place. Paine sees revolution, even when it goes south, as justifiable in monarchical countries because monarchies are inherently wrong. Whereas Locke has a safer middle ground saying if a government exercises “force without right” then the people have the right to revolution. Who gets to decide if force was used with or without right? Can anyone truly determine that with objectivity? The revolutions that took place after the Soviet Union fell, show that violence does not always go with revolution. Violence can be used to overthrow a…

Essay On V For Vendetta

The feature film V for Vendetta challenges values and attitudes of the mainstream population of the western world. The key concept behind the feature film is the act of terrorism; the justification of whether proactive violence.…

The film V for Vendetta directed by James McTeigue uses key ideas and serval film techniques to illustrate the parallels between the two main characters. It portrays a futuristic dystopian society where the United Kingdom is ruled by a tyrant. The film displays two protagonists one a shadowy freedom fighter, known only by the alias of ‘V.’ The other a young woman called Evey, who becomes part of V’s plot against the government by chance. The director of the film uses key ideas and several film techniques to illustrate the parallels between the two main characters. The opening scene of the film shows the similarities between the characters by displaying them getting ready in front of a mirror, whilst watching TV. As the film progresses McTeigue…

Related Topics

• French Revolution
• Louis XVI of France
• Age of Enlightenment
• United States Declaration of Independence
• Louis XVIII of France