thesis statement of plastic pollution

Plastic Pollution - Free Essay Samples And Topic Ideas

Plastic pollution is a pressing environmental issue due to the accumulation of plastic objects in the Earth’s environment. Essays could explore its causes, impacts on wildlife and ecosystems, and strategies to reduce plastic waste. We have collected a large number of free essay examples about Plastic Pollution you can find in Papersowl database. You can use our samples for inspiration to write your own essay, research paper, or just to explore a new topic for yourself.

Plastic Pollution in the Oceans

“There is more microplastic in the ocean than there are stars in the Milky Way” (McCarthy). Many Americans consume plastic throughout the year and do not recycle all of it. The beaches are getting dirtier and dirtier but there is not much change going on. The wastes on the beaches, streets, and air are going into the ocean and harming the species. Pollution in the oceans is affecting the sea creatures because surfers are exposed to pathogens, sea turtles develop […]

Plastic Pollution in the Ocean

All pollution is bad for the ocean and all the creatures in it. However, there is one material that is highly potent to the ocean, and that is plastic. It has many immensely negative effects on the ocean's wildlife. Thousands of marine animals die each year because of plastic debris. There are many ways that plastic can get to the ocean than you know. This has been an ongoing problem and still has not been stopped. Plastic was founded in […]

Pollution Caused by Plastic Bags

Every minute, one garbage truck of plastic is dumped into oceans. The plastic waste problem is a great issue that the world is facing today. While plastic has brought many great benefits to society, it has done so at the cost of harm to the environment and wildlife. Plastic bags, in particular, contribute greatly to this ongoing crisis. There has been great attention given to single use plastics recently. Many companies, cities, and some countries have banned certain single use […]

We will write an essay sample crafted to your needs.

Our Planet is Drowning in Plastic Pollution

In 2018, recycling and not littering has become very common for an average person in California. Despite the hard work and dedication to recycling and giving people fines for littering any piece of trash, we still have a problem with plastic waste and taking care of the environment. Recycling bins are known to be around for a while now and are used to help reduce the polluting of our environment. However plastic waste is the one product that is destroying […]

Fight against Plastic Pollution

 Do you ever consider the life of the shopping bag you use to transport your groceries or the plastic straw that seems to come standard now with most beverages? “A bag that is used on average for 15 minutes, yet it could take 100 to 300 years to fragment” according to SAS.org. These often one-time-use plastics do more harm than good when looking at their long half-life and the effects on our environment, even though their implementation into the market […]

Plastic Straws Cause and Effect Final Draft

 Plastic can be seen practically everywhere in this day and age. It has a vast array of uses from storing leftover food to insulating houses. It is a cheap and useful invention; however, not all of the effects of this invention are positive. Due to plastic straws’ negative environmental impact as well as the opportunity to use less harmful alternatives, the use of plastic straws by mainstream restaurant businesses should be questioned by consumers. Plastic waste is responsible for the […]

Save the Earth from the Plastic Pollution

Pollution is caused by some sort of toxic waste that is thrown into the atmosphere or land nearby. There are many types of pollution, the main are air pollution, plastic pollution, and water pollution, all three are very dangerous to the ecosystem. Pollution is the contamination of the environment in which we live in and it harms nature and living things around it. It is the biggest global killer affecting over 100 million people. That’s more than global diseases like […]

Plastic Pollution in the Philippines

The top countries that dispose of the most plastic are all in Asia the Philippines is the third. What is the problem, the Philippines are using too many plastic objects. Who has the pollution affected humans, food sources including, land animals, crops, and wildlife? Solutions what can the Philippines do to help the water pollution and save their and our world. What is the problem? “The Philippines generates 2.7 million tonnes of plastic waste annually and 20 percent – or […]

 The Effects of Building Construction on Wildlife Habitats

Conserving habitats is not an easy task. The number of threatened and endangered species in the United States and critical habitats is constantly being destroyed (Shilling 1662). With one-quarter of mammal species at risk of extinction and amphibians on the decline, more needs to be done to protect wildlife habitats. Plans to protect species tend to be for well-known animals such as the bald eagle or the gray wolf. As a result, many species are barely surviving. Conservation biologists warn […]

Campaign against Plastic Pollution

Plastic has become a necessity in man’s life all around the world. Plastics are in everything; your toothbrush, mechanical pencil, cell phone, milk jug, and even your face wash. This “versatile, lightweight, flexible, moisture-resistant, strong, and relatively inexpensive” substance has dire consequences on the ocean environment because it is extremely durable and non-biodegradable (Le Guern, 2018). Consequently, plastic is found floating around in our oceans for decades. Some countries are enforcing taxes, laws, and bans on microplastics (such as plastic […]

Plastic Pollution in Tho Ocean: Facts and Information

To many, the ocean may just serve as a place for water recreation and fishing. However, without the ocean, the Earth would not have the air we breathe. The ocean produces over half the world’s oxygen and absorbs fifty times more carbon than the atmosphere. Covering more than 70 percent of the earth’s surface we truly have only one “World Ocean”. Home to 97 percent of the planet’s water supply saltwater moves from one part of the ocean to another […]

Paired Debate Speech Water Pollution and Consumerism

Water is polluted many different ways, just to name a few are hypoxia, wastewater pollution, and marine debris. In this paper I will touch on many different ways waters become polluted, and you can see for yourself that human involvement is the root cause of it all. There are different types of pollution in the world. However, my argument is that water pollution is a more pressing matter in comparison to other forms of pollution. The EPA states in their […]

Plastic Pollution and its Effect on the Thermal Capacity of Seawater

The findings of this study indicate that as expected the natural albedo of seawater is susceptible to positive and negative forcing by pollution and natural agents. Comparison of oil and gas pollutants showed inverse temperature change profiles, with the oil sample heating more rapidly and cooling more slowly than seawater, while the plastic sample heated slower and cooled faster than the control. Regarding oil pollution, reports have shown that while a rainbow film of oil over the surface of the […]

Beach Clean-Up Study Shows Global Scope of Plastic Pollution

Have you ever been to the beach and seen trash laying there? Most people who see trash on the beach pick it up and throw it away. But, there are some people who see it and think “It’s just a little bit of trash, I’m sure it’s fine”. If you're one of those people I suggest you stop. There is so much waste in the ocean that destroys the life of marine animals. Not only does it hurt them and […]

Plastic Pollution of Earth’s Oceans

Introduction Approximately 300 million tons of plastic is produced every year (Cressey 2016). It's disposable, yet long-lasting nature makes it critical to pose the question “where does all this plastic end up?” A large quantity of the plastic produced eventually ends up floating on the surface of the ocean- some even reach the seafood humans eat (Rochman, 2016). Plastic is a cheap, versatile, disposable material that does not degrade easily, making it a perfect candidate for a variety of uses […]

Plastic Pollution in Ocean

Abstract The use of plastic is a part and parcel of modern life. Because of its non-biodegradable nature, plastic garbage creates hazards both on the surface and in the water of seas and oceans. Inhabitants of the oceans are endangered due to plastic pollution. Moreover, the presence of tiny plastic particles in the marine food chain also raises questions about human health and food security. The UN Environment Assembly passed a resolution in Dec. 2017 to eliminate plastic pollution in […]

Climate Change in Oceans and its Impacts

 Abstract This paper examines the impact climate change has on oceans based on data and research. It focuses on how sea level rises, pollution of plastic, and ocean acidification have affected our daily lifestyle and how marine animals are deeply affected by our actions. This paper highlights the dangers of living this lifestyle and suggests ways to combat this important issue. Until we decide ourselves that we want a change, then our planet will continue to suffer because of our […]

Plastic Pollution in the USA

In America we love plastic! We use it in our everyday life because it’s super convenient, but most people rarely think about the impact plastic has on the world around us. The downside of these qualities is that, unlike other materials, plastic does not biodegrade and it takes over hundreds of years for it to break down causing an increase every day to plastic pollution. Those billions of plastics end up in our oceans. This has become a cause of […]

Ocean Pollution: Plastic

The topic that I chose to write about is ocean pollution, specifically plastic. I found a very interesting article by National Geographic that makes me wonder just how much plastic we use daily, and how much it affects marine life. According to the article, the Aquarium Conservation Partnership (ACP), comprising twenty-two aquariums in seventeen different states is pushing a campaign called "No Straw November". The campaign is a push to eliminate single-use plastic including plastic straws, bottles, and plastic in […]

Plastic in the Environment

Plastic being one of the top littered items on earth has taken a negative effect on our environment regarding climate and geological change. In today's world plastic is something that we use on a daily basis whether that means the use of water bottles, plastic bags, straws, etc. Although individuals are encouraged to recycle, not everyone does. The fact that plastic takes 450 to 1000 years to decompose can determine the type of negative impact it can have on earth […]

The Negative Effect of Single Use Plastic

One of the largest producers of plastic wastes in Asia is the Philippines. According to PhilStar Global (2018), about 79 percent of branded plastic residual wastes came from food packaging, followed by household and personal care products with 12 and eight percent, respectively. One of the solutions that the researchers have in mind to minimize producing plastic waste is the banning of single-use plastic. The researchers envision their campus free from single-use plastic and free from its harmful effects on […]

Additional Example Essays

• Why Should Recycling be Mandatory?
• How Have You Impacted Your Community
• Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill
• Dogs Are Better Than Cats Essay
• Personal Philosophy of Leadership
• Personal Narrative: My Family Genogram
• Gender Roles in the Great Gatsby
• Socioautobiography Choices and Experiences Growing up
• Comparison Of Introverts VS Extroverts
• Compare and Contrast: Hamlet and The Lion King
• How Does Jack Represent Savagery in the Novel?
• Why Does Tom Cheat On Daisy

How To Write An Essay On Plastic Pollution

Introduction to the issue of plastic pollution.

Writing an essay on plastic pollution requires a clear understanding of the environmental impact of plastic waste. Begin your essay by defining plastic pollution and explaining its significance as a global environmental issue. Describe how plastics, due to their non-biodegradable nature, accumulate in the environment, causing harm to wildlife, ecosystems, and potentially human health. Your introduction should also highlight key statistics or facts that underscore the severity of the issue, setting the stage for a comprehensive discussion on the causes, effects, and potential solutions to plastic pollution.

Exploring the Causes of Plastic Pollution

In the main body of your essay, delve into the causes of plastic pollution. Discuss the role of overconsumption of single-use plastics, inadequate waste management systems, and the lack of public awareness about the environmental consequences of plastic use. Examine how industrial practices, consumer behavior, and regulatory policies contribute to the proliferation of plastic waste. This section should provide a detailed exploration of the factors leading to plastic pollution, demonstrating a deep understanding of the complexities surrounding this environmental challenge.

Examining the Impact of Plastic Pollution

A critical component of your essay should be an analysis of the impacts of plastic pollution. Discuss how plastic waste affects marine life through ingestion and entanglement, and how it disrupts aquatic ecosystems. Explore the concept of microplastics and their potential to enter the food chain, posing risks to animal and human health. Highlight the socio-economic impact of plastic pollution on communities, particularly those reliant on fishing and tourism. This part of the essay should paint a vivid picture of the far-reaching and multifaceted consequences of plastic pollution, making a compelling case for urgent action.

Proposing Solutions and a Call to Action

Conclude your essay by proposing solutions to address plastic pollution. Discuss initiatives such as increasing recycling rates, promoting alternatives to single-use plastics, implementing stricter regulations on plastic production and disposal, and raising public awareness about sustainable consumption. Reflect on the role of individuals, governments, and businesses in combating plastic pollution. Your conclusion should not only summarize the key points of your essay but also inspire a sense of responsibility and urgency in addressing this pressing environmental issue. A well-crafted conclusion will leave the reader with a clear understanding of the steps that can be taken to mitigate plastic pollution and the importance of collective action in preserving the environment.

1. Tell Us Your Requirements

2. Pick your perfect writer

3. Get Your Paper and Pay

Hi! I'm Amy, your personal assistant!

Don't know where to start? Give me your paper requirements and I connect you to an academic expert.

short deadlines

100% Plagiarism-Free

Certified writers

• USF Research
• USF Libraries

Digital Commons @ USF > Office of Graduate Studies > USF Graduate Theses and Dissertations > USF Tampa Theses and Dissertations > 8785

USF Tampa Graduate Theses and Dissertations

Plastic pollution in urban rivers: spatial and temporal patterns of plastic release and transport.

Charlotte Juliane Haberstroh , University of South Florida

Graduation Year

Document type.

Dissertation

Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)

Degree Granting Department

Civil and Environmental Engineering

Major Professor

Mauricio E. Arias, Ph.D.

Committee Member

Mahmood H. Nachabe, Ph.D.

Amy N.S. Siuda, Ph.D.

Amy L. Stuart, Ph.D.

Michael C. Wang, Ph.D.

Cambodia, Field study, Florida, Microplastics, Stormwater

This dissertation investigates plastic release and transport in urban rivers with a focus on the driving spatial and temporal factors. Plastic is a key pollutant of this century that affects humans and the environment around the world. Rivers are a focal point of release and management, as they concentrate and accumulate plastics from urban watersheds and convey them to the world’s oceans.

This research assessed cross-sectional, longitudinal, and seasonal patterns of plastics in rivers, and evaluated the role of urban pollution and watershed hydrology. A detailed background is provided in the literature review. This work is built on two case studies: an 18-month seasonal monitoring in the Hillsborough River in Florida, USA and a wet season field campaign in the Mekong floodplain in Cambodia, Southeast Asia.

The first section explores the effects of flow conditions on cross-sectional distribution and transport of plastic during the wet season in Florida. This includes a detailed analysis of polymer characteristics and abundance linked to flow profiles as well as the determination of advective, vertical, and lateral transport fluxes of plastics. Advective fluxes were two orders of magnitude higher than lateral and vertical fluxes under calm flow conditions. With increased turbulence, enhanced particle exchange in the cross-section resulted in a three to tenfold increase in lateral and vertical plastic fluxes. Plastics are differently affected by turbulence depending on their properties: Large, irregular, and rougher particles tend to mix better than smaller, rounder and smoother ones.

The second section evaluates the effects of urban pollution and rainfall seasonality on river plastic transport in the Hillsborough River. Annual plastic loads are highly uncertain, with median estimates at the river mouth of 3.33 billion particles (coefficient of variation 89.3%) or 2.04 tons of plastic (coefficient of variation 201%). My work provided clear evidence on the impact of urban pollution and seasonal (rainfall) dynamics through the year. A multi-variable statistical analysis was conducted to assess the role of plastics, flow components, and rainfall in the context of urbanization. Plastic loads are concentration-limited, whereas increases in rain, flow and runoff promote dilution and drive mobilization. This finding provides new insight into human and environmental factors governing urban river plastic pollution. The last section looks at the extremes of urban river plastic pollution. I present the findings of what may be the peaks of plastic release and transport in the large Mekong-Tonle Sap-Bassac river confluence in Phnom Penh, the capital of Cambodia. Driven by seasonal high flows, large amounts of plastic are released; an increase of plastic count loads by one and a half times and of mass loads by over 20 times was measured within the city boundaries. The plastic mass is mostly transported at the surface, directing plastics downstream towards the ocean as well as to Cambodia’s largest freshwater fisheries. A portion of the plastic load is mixed into the water column to be potentially retained in the rivers, where it could break down and/or be released over long periods of time. This chapter synthesizes the findings of an understudied area in Southeast Asia with a massive environmental impact on Cambodia’s largest water bodies and plastic pollution in the Mekong and the ocean. This research advances our understanding of spatial and temporal drivers of plastic pollution in urban rivers. It highlights and explains the impact of urban areas, watershed hydrology, and seasonal characteristics on plastic transport and distribution. With stormwater runoff as a main source of plastic in rivers, these findings emphasize the necessity to address plastic as a pollutant in stormwater management practices.

Scholar Commons Citation

Haberstroh, Charlotte Juliane, "Plastic Pollution in Urban Rivers: Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Plastic Release and Transport" (2021). USF Tampa Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/etd/8785

Since July 15, 2021

Included in

Water Resource Management Commons

Advanced Search

• Email Notifications and RSS
• All Collections
• USF Faculty Publications
• Open Access Journals
• Conferences and Events
• Theses and Dissertations
• Textbooks Collection

Useful Links

• USF Office of Graduate Studies
• Rights Information
• SelectedWorks
• Submit Research

Home | About | Help | My Account | Accessibility Statement | Language and Diversity Statements

Privacy Copyright

Why is Christian Science in our name?

Our name is about honesty. The Monitor is owned by The Christian Science Church, and we’ve always been transparent about that.

The Church publishes the Monitor because it sees good journalism as vital to progress in the world. Since 1908, we’ve aimed “to injure no man, but to bless all mankind,” as our founder, Mary Baker Eddy, put it.

Here, you’ll find award-winning journalism not driven by commercial influences – a news organization that takes seriously its mission to uplift the world by seeking solutions and finding reasons for credible hope.

Your subscription makes our work possible.

We want to bridge divides to reach everyone.

Get stories that empower and uplift daily.

Already a subscriber? Log in to hide ads .

Select free newsletters:

A selection of the most viewed stories this week on the Monitor's website.

Every Saturday

Hear about special editorial projects, new product information, and upcoming events.

Select stories from the Monitor that empower and uplift.

Every Weekday

An update on major political events, candidates, and parties twice a week.

Twice a Week

Stay informed about the latest scientific discoveries & breakthroughs.

Every Tuesday

A weekly digest of Monitor views and insightful commentary on major events.

Every Thursday

Latest book reviews, author interviews, and reading trends.

Every Friday

A weekly update on music, movies, cultural trends, and education solutions.

The three most recent Christian Science articles with a spiritual perspective.

Every Monday

Charting the rise of plastic pollution – and solutions

• Deep Read ( 2 Min. )
• By Erika Page Staff writer
• Jacob Turcotte Graphics editor

April 22, 2024

Plastic is nearly everywhere. 

Scientists have detected microplastics from the peak of Mount Everest and the depths of the Marianas Trench to the air we breathe and the water we drink.

Why We Wrote This

The rapid growth of plastic pollution is grabbing attention – on Earth Day and in global treaty talks. Our story and charts show the scale of the problem and possible paths toward solutions.

The challenge for humanity, then, is how to clean up our own mess. Hence today’s theme for Earth Day: planet versus plastics. 

The prospect of charting a new course is daunting. This week, leaders from around the world are gathering in Ottawa, Ontario, for the fourth of five sessions of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee, tasked with designing a global treaty on plastic pollution by this year.      

Ideas for better ways of doing things abound, from using more traditional alternatives to adopting new materials. Bioplastics made from biomass – including seaweed derivatives – are often biodegradable. Polylactic acid, made from sugarcane or corn, needs the right temperature and pressure conditions to decompose. 

“There is no one silver bullet that is going to solve this problem,” says Erin Simon of the World Wildlife Fund. Using less plastic and improving recycling and waste management systems will continue to be essential. “No matter the technical solution, we need the infrastructure and the policy to go with it.” 

The good news she sees is that public opinion is rallying against plastic waste. 

Scientists have detected microplastics from the peak of Mount Everest and the depths of the Marianas Trench to the air we breathe and the water we drink.

More than  400 million metric tons of plastic are produced each year, using thousands of chemicals scientists believe to be harmful. Plastic waste is expected to triple by 2060. Of the 48 million tons the United States generates, about 5% is recycled, leaving the rest to landfills, incinerators, and pollution. Meanwhile, plastic production accounts for 5% of the world’s carbon emissions and 12% of its oil demand.

The prospect of charting a new course is daunting. This week, leaders from around the world are gathering in Ottawa, Ontario, for the fourth of five sessions of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC-4), tasked in 2022 with designing a global treaty on plastic pollution by this year. Already, in the past decade more than 60 nations have enacted some sort of ban on the use of polystyrene foam in things like cups and food packaging.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; Our World in Data; Morales-Caselles et al. (2021), "An inshore–offshore sorting system revealed from global classification of ocean litter"; United Kingdom Food Standards Agency

Ideas for better ways of doing things abound, from using more traditional plastic alternatives such as paper, glass, and metal to adopting new materials. Bioplastics made from biomass – including starches, wax, and seaweed derivatives – are often biodegradable. That’s an important virtue in line with efforts to create a more “circular economy” with sustainability in mind.

Polylactic acid, made  from  sugarcane or corn, is being  used  to package fruits, juice, and yogurt, though it needs the right temperature and pressure conditions to decompose. 

“There is no one silver bullet that is going to solve this problem,” says Erin Simon, vice president of Plastic Waste and Business at the World Wildlife Fund, one of the world’s leading international conservation organizations. Using less plastic and improving recycling and waste management systems will continue to be essential. “No matter the technical solution, we need the infrastructure and the policy to go with it.” 

The good news, says Ms. Simon, is that public opinion is rallying against plastic waste. A global ban on single-use plastics is  supported  by 85% of people polled around the world, according to a WWF and Plastic Free Foundation survey. 

“There are so many things that we can disagree on,” says Ms. Simon. “But on this one, we all agree … There is no plastic that should be in nature.” 

For regular people who want to do something, she offers the same advice she gives large businesses: “Clean up your own house. Look at how you depend on single-use,” she says. “Make those choices. Don’t look for perfect. Take one step at a time. … Then advocate.”

Help fund Monitor journalism for $11/ month

Already a subscriber? Login

Monitor journalism changes lives because we open that too-small box that most people think they live in. We believe news can and should expand a sense of identity and possibility beyond narrow conventional expectations.

Our work isn't possible without your support.

Unlimited digital access $11/month.

Digital subscription includes:

• Unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.
• CSMonitor.com archive.
• The Monitor Daily email.
• No advertising.
• Cancel anytime.

Related stories

Why un talks this week focus on just one word: plastics, plastics have shaped nearly every aspect of society. now what, readers write: compassion for each other – and the planet, share this article.

Link copied.

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

Subscription expired

Your subscription to The Christian Science Monitor has expired. You can renew your subscription or continue to use the site without a subscription.

Return to the free version of the site

If you have questions about your account, please contact customer service or call us at 1-617-450-2300 .

This message will appear once per week unless you renew or log out.

Session expired

Your session to The Christian Science Monitor has expired. We logged you out.

No subscription

You don’t have a Christian Science Monitor subscription yet.

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( Lock A locked padlock ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

JavaScript appears to be disabled on this computer. Please click here to see any active alerts .

Impacts of Plastic Pollution

Plastic pollution has become ubiquitous in natural and built environments, raising concerns about potential harm to humans and nature alike. Once in the environment, research shows that plastic pollution is persistent and may take between 100 to 1,000 years or more to decompose, depending on environmental conditions. 

Once in the environment, plastic pollution can fragment into smaller pieces of plastic. Microplastics are plastic particles ranging in size from five millimeters to one nanometer; nanoplastics are plastic particles smaller than one micrometer. Both are found in every ecosystem on the planet from the Antarctic tundra to tropical coral reefs.  

On this page:

Environmental Impacts

Human health impacts.

Plastic pollution poses a threat to the marine environment. It puts marine species at higher risk of ingesting plastic, suffocating, or becoming entangled in plastic pollution. Research indicates that more than 1,500 species in marine and terrestrial environments are known to ingest plastics.  

The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development estimated that in 2019, plastic products were responsible for 3.4% of global greenhouse gas emissions throughout their life cycles, with 90% of these emissions coming from the production and conversion of fossil fuels into new plastic products. OECD also reports that, unless human behavior changes, greenhouse gas emissions associated with the life cycle of plastic products are expected to double by 2060. The World Economic Forum projects that without intervention, the global plastics industry will account for 20% of total oil consumption and up to 15% of global carbon emissions by 2050.   

According to the United Nations Environment Programme, microplastics have also been found in human livers, kidneys, and placentas. Additionally, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (pdf) (291 KB)  finds that carcinogenic chemicals found in plastic products can leach into tap water, which may cause developmental, reproductive, neurological, and immune disorders. Some animal studies have raised similar concerns about endocrine-disrupting effects. More research is needed to better understand the potential human health impact of microplastics. 

• Sustainable Management of Plastics Homepage
• About Plastic Pollution
• Best Practices
• Regulation and Policy
• Resources and Grant Programs
• What You Can Do to Reduce Plastic Waste

A global plastics treaty is being negotiated in Ottawa this week – here’s the latest

Lead Researcher - Global Plastics Policy Centre, University of Portsmouth

Associate Professor in Arts and Sustainability, University of Portsmouth

Professor of Ocean Policy and Economy, University of Portsmouth

Disclosure statement

Antaya March receives funding from the Flotilla Foundation and the United Nations Environment Programme.

Cressida Bowyer receives funding from UK Research and Innovation (UKRI).

Steve Fletcher receives funding from the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC), the Flotilla Foundation, the UK Government and the United Nations Environment Programme. He currently serves as the NERC Agenda Setting Fellow for Plastic Pollution.

University of Portsmouth provides funding as a member of The Conversation UK.

View all partners

Plastic pollution spans the globe, yet national policies are generally not effective enough, and have so far focused primarily on waste management rather than targeting the root cause. To make matters worse, the global trade in plastic waste tends to push waste to parts of the world with the least capacity to manage it.

On this basis, in March 2022, nearly 200 nations endorsed a historic resolution to develop a new global and legally binding agreement or treaty by the end of 2024.

The global plastics treaty focuses on ending plastic pollution, not eliminating the use of plastics. The mandate specifies that the agreement should include the entire lifecycle of plastics, which spans resource extraction and production of materials through the design, sale and use of products, to the management of waste. However, as the latest crucial negotiations begin in Ottawa, Canada — from April 23-29 — the shape of the treaty remains unclear.

Divisive positions

Between the negotiations in Canada and a final round in Busan, South Korea, in November, only 14 days of discussion time remain. The timeline is increasingly challenging. Negotiators must make rapid and significant progress this week towards a comprehensive treaty.

There is a broad division between countries, ranging from “low-ambition” countries which have hindered progress to a high-ambition coalition (led by Rwanda and Norway). This disparity means it is unclear where the treaty will land.

Will it be ambitious, with strict binding measures focusing on all stages of the plastics life cycle (including the “upstream” stages associated with resource extraction, manufacturing and processing)? Or will it be a weaker treaty, with voluntary and country-led measures that focus mainly on waste management and pollution prevention (the “downstream” stages)?

At present, unless consensus is reached, a small number of nations can veto or block the process. So this round of negotiations will need to overcome procedural delays and strive for a balanced approach that respects diverse national interests yet still produces a worthwhile treaty.

Voices in the room

There is ongoing dialogue regarding which voices are in attendance and influencing governments. Around 190 industry representatives were at a previous round of negotiations in Paris and 143 at the most recent round in Nairobi . The strong presence of industry and their ability to lobby governments continues to be a source of antagonism.

Some argue it is beneficial to have industry engaged in the process. Others say that the industry’s substantial resources diminishes the fair representation and influence of civil rights and non-governmental organisations advocating for those who bear the brunt of plastic pollution. If industry has such a large presence, there is considerable work to be done to amplify the voices of civil rights groups, NGOs and evidence-based contributions from academics.

Financing implementation

How the actions identified under the treaty will be paid for still needs to be determined, and could be a major stumbling block. Without financial support, there is a significant risk that even well-intentioned measures could falter.

A well-structured financial framework could ensure transparency and accountability through a mixture of private and public finance or novel mechanisms such as plastic pollution fees . Financial institutions are already on board , but strong legal mandates are required to generate a favourable investment environment. Overcoming this hurdle will be mission-critical in Ottawa.

Shifting away from waste management

There is a strong argument by the petrochemical and fossil fuel industry and some lower-ambition countries that the treaty should focus on waste management, improved collection, recycling and removal technologies. But plastic production is so great that solutions to prevent or manage plastic waste and pollution cannot keep up, and will only reduce global plastic pollution by 7% in the long term.

Negotiators must instead be bold and tackle plastic pollution at source by setting binding targets to reduce production. A significant reduction and simplification of the toxic chemicals used in the production of primary plastic polymers themselves is another priority.

Targets for reduction should also fall on the manufacture of products, sale, distribution, import and export. Upstream policies to reduce non-essential plastics, new plastics, and harmful additives will increase reusability and recyclability. These are fundamental steps towards ending plastic pollution by tackling the cause, not the symptoms.

Reuse as a potential early victory

“Reuse” could feature in the treaty. Not to be confused with recycling or refill, reuse emphasises the repeated use of items in their current form , curtailing the demand for new plastic production for single-use products or packaging. In certain applications such as packaging for food, drink, cosmetics and parcel packaging, it could eventually reduce plastic production by up to 75% .

Reuse would be relatively agreeable for most countries, especially when compared to divisive measures such as caps on production or outright bans on certain items or materials. These more contentious approaches can stall progress as they confront varied national interests and economic considerations. In contrast, agreeing to implement reuse systems in places such as restaurants or public buildings is an easy win in the context of very complicated political negotiations.

In Ottawa, negotiators will need to adopt a focused, cooperative approach, eliminating procedural delays to meet the pressing deadlines and critical requirements of the treaty, ensuring that time is used as efficiently as possible to achieve outcomes that do in fact help to end plastic pollution.

Don’t have time to read about climate change as much as you’d like? Get a weekly roundup in your inbox instead. Every Wednesday, The Conversation’s environment editor writes Imagine, a short email that goes a little deeper into just one climate issue. Join the 30,000+ readers who’ve subscribed so far.

• Plastic pollution
• Global plastics treaty
• Give me perspective

Project Offier - Diversity & Inclusion

Senior Lecturer - Earth System Science

Sydney Horizon Educators (Identified)

Deputy Social Media Producer

Associate Professor, Occupational Therapy

• International edition
• Australia edition
• Europe edition

Plastic-production emissions could triple to one-fifth of Earth’s carbon budget – report

Exclusive: By the middle of the century, pollution from plastic industry could ‘undermine world’s effort’ to control climate crisis

By the middle of the century, global emissions from plastic production could triple to account for one-fifth of the Earth’s remaining carbon budget, an analysis has found.

The stunning new estimates from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, published on Wednesday, provide yet more evidence that the plastic industry is “undermining the world’s efforts to address climate change”, said Heather McTeer Toney, executive director of the Bloomberg Philanthropies’ Beyond Petrochemicals campaign, which helped fund the new report.

The production of plastic, which is made from fossil fuels, is greenhouse gas-intensive. Coal, oil or gas must first be mined or extracted, and then those materials must be refined and processed in another emissions-heavy procedure. In some cases, other chemical compounds such as formaldehyde must also be produced, creating more pollution.

Petrochemicals are then “cracked” into plastic building blocks such as ethylene – the aspect of plastic production with the largest emissions toll. Additional emissions come from the process of polymerization – combining those building blocks to form larger molecules – and then shaping them into products, the report says.

To estimate the total emissions associated with plastic production, the authors examined the greenhouse gas impact of nine of the most common types of plastics, which are used to create plastic packaging, water bottles, hot beverage containers and other materials.

Plastic creation generated 2.24 gigatonnes of planet-heating pollution in 2019, or as much as 600 coal-fired power plants. That year, it accounted for 5% of all global carbon emissions, 12% of the world’s oil demand and 8.5% of gas demand, the report found.

Those numbers are expected to increase dramatically, the report says, because the plastic industry is on an exponential growth trajectory, with production expected to double or even triple by 2050 .

If production increases by 4% every year, doubling within a quarter of a century, planet-warming emissions could hit 6.78 gigatonnes by 2050 – equal to the emissions of more than 1,700 coal plants.

Fully decarbonizing the power grid – a key focus of global climate plans – could limit this climate impact, yet would still leave the world on a perilous path. As much as 70% of the fossil fuel used in plastic creation comes from the raw materials used in production – not the electricity used in processing – the authors write.

As a result, even if the world achieves fully carbon-free electricity by 2050, plastic production would produce 5.13 gigatonnes of pollution in 2050 under a 4% annual growth scenario.

Preventing this explosive growth could slash this impact. But even if production remains steady, by 2050 it would account for 15 to 19% of the remaining global carbon budget to keep global average temperatures at 1.5C, the report found.

Even with a fully decarbonized grid, that percentage could still be up to 16%.

The report was released before the 4th Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC4) meeting for a global plastics treaty set to start next week in Ottawa, Canada.

Neil Tangri, science and policy director at the environmental justice group Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives, who reviewed the report, said the findings made it clear that plastic production was a “wrecking ball for our climate” and that he hoped it would influence the forthcoming negotiations.

“This report provides negotiators with the strongest scientific evidence to date on the need to stop and reverse the expansion of plastic production,” he said.

In a brief forthcoming analysis, Tangri’s organization found that the estimates suggest plastic production could completely consume the world’s carbon budget before the century’s end. But they also suggest that curbing plastic production could yield enormous climate benefits, Tangri said.

“If this treaty forces companies to significantly cut plastic production – by at least 12% per year by our calculations – we can still keep the world’s 1.5 degree goal alive and stem the climate impacts of plastic,” he said.

Curbing plastic production could have other positive knock-on effects, the authors wrote, including on public health.

“Petrochemicals, the building block of plastic, are already poisoning communities that neighbor production facilities with cancer-causing pollution,” Toney said in an emailed statement. “The consequences of this industry’s unfettered carbon emissions will reach everyone on the planet.”

Plastic also generates toxic and planet-heating emissions at the end of its life if it is burned in an incinerator or sent to a landfill.

Despite this huge climate toll, current proposals to slash plastic pollution under the treaty, which has been described as the most important environmental deal since the 2015 Paris Climate Accord, “do not yet include any explicit consideration of climate impacts”, the authors wrote.

• Big oil uncovered
• Fossil fuels
• Climate crisis

Most viewed

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• v.6(30); 2021 Aug 3

Plastic Pollution: A Perspective on Matters Arising: Challenges and Opportunities

Austine ofondu chinomso iroegbu.

† Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Doornfontein 2028, Johannesburg, South Africa

‡ Centre for Nanostructures and Advanced Materials, DSI-CSIR Nanotechnology Innovation Centre, Council for Scientific & Industrial Research, CSIR, Pretoria 0001, South Africa

Suprakas Sinha Ray

Vuyelwa mbarane.

§ State Information Technology Agency (SITA), 459 Tsitsa Street, Erasmuskloof 0048, Pretoria, South Africa

João Carlos Bordado

∥ Centro de Recursos Naturais e Ambiente (CERENA), Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal

José Paulo Sardinha

Plastic pollution is a persistent challenge worldwide with the first reports evidencing its impact on the living and nonliving components of the environment dating back more than half a century. The rising concerns regarding the immediate and long-term consequences of plastic matter entrainment into foods and water cannot be overemphasized in light of our pursuit of sustainability (in terms of food, water, environment, and our health). Hence, some schools of thought recommend the revisitation and continuous assessment of the plastic economy, while some call for the outright ban of plastic materials, demonstrating that plastic pollution requires, more than ever, renewed, innovative, and effective approaches for a holistic solution. In this paper, dozens of reports on various aspects of plastic pollution assessment are collated and reviewed, and the impact of plastic pollution on both the living and nonliving components of the environment is discussed. Current challenges and factors hindering efforts to mitigate plastic pollution are identified to inform the presented recommendations while underscoring, for policymakers, stakeholders, and the scientific community, the exigency of finding sustainable solutions to plastic pollution that not only encompass existing challenges but also future threats presented by plastic pollution.

1. Pollution—An Overview

Pollution is a global phenomenon, a persistent challenge that is transnational (i.e., borderless) in nature, transinstitutional in purview, and transdisciplinary in solution scope. 1 − 3 As indicated in Figure ​ Figure1 1 , pollution can arise naturally, for example, by saltwater intrusion into freshwater resources and volcanic eruptions that release dangerous gases, or it can be manmade, a result of anthropogenic activities such as the exploitation of the environment and its resources and the introduction of matter or energy into the environment that are not natural to it. 4 − 6 Substances or energies (e.g., material entropy) that are introduced into the environment through anthropogenic activities can upset and compromise the natural balance of the earth’s intricate and inter-related systems, causing a “domino effect”. 7 − 9 Pollution can also be considered as (an) unnatural disturbance(s) arising from the intrusion of energy or matter into the environment, which may result in the interruption (i.e., modification) or degradation of the natural state of a system or environment, thereby increasing the risk of the system or environment deviating from its initial state (i.e., original conditions and functions). For example, the water present in commercial petroleum products (e.g., gasoline) can be considered a pollutant because it affects the original conditions and functions of these products in motor engines. Hence, it can be inferred that chemical reactions usually occur as a result of unnatural disturbances (i.e., the agitation or excitation of the state of matter or a system), causing the transformation or transmutation of substances (i.e., matter) from one form to another (which may be reversible or irreversible); accordingly, pollution has the potential to change the dynamics of matter and environments, which consequentially impacts the natural characteristics of living and nonliving components. 8 , 10 Notwithstanding, we hold that matter or energy entering an environment cannot be considered pollution (or a pollutant) if the effect of such intrusion or disturbance on the environment or system is not negative, i.e., is (i) neutral or (ii) positive. Hence, we posit that meeting these conditions should be the basis for considering such matter or energy as “green” or “eco-friendly”. For example, sunlight is considered friendly to green vegetation but unfriendly to plastic materials; in the former, it is vital for photosynthesis, and in the latter, it is known to promote photodegradation.

Common sources of pollution.

Pollution has detrimental consequences, which cannot be overstated in light of current environmental challenges. For example, it has been reported that a slight deterioration in air quality, owing to pollution, significantly impairs the natural behavior of bees, interrupting their critical roles in the ecosystem and thereby threatening food security. 11 Elsewhere, it has been found that a strong correlation exists between congenital anomalies and community exposure to chemicals associated with environmental contaminants. 12 A recent study has shown that the deterioration in the quality of milk in breastfeeding mothers can be traced to environmental pollution; it further contends that pollutants, such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), entering the human body have the potential to disrupt and alter the natural balance of a mother’s milk with health consequences for breastfeeding infants that can range from allergies and endocrine disorders to impaired neurodevelopment. 13 To place the existential threat of pollution in context, a global health assessment has established that more than 20% of global deaths can be traced to pollution-related health complications. 14 Pollution impacts almost every aspect of our existence and the living and nonliving components of the environment. For example, satellite data spanning three decades evidence the devastating impact of global warming (a result of environmental pollution), which has shrunk Greenland’s ice sheets to almost nothing, thus contributing to rising global sea levels. 15

Plastic pollution is a pressing global challenge owing to the pervasive, near-unmanageable threat it poses to living and nonliving systems and the environmental stress it causes. 16 , 17 Herein, we define plastic pollution (encompassing macro-, micro-, and nanoplastic debris) as the intrusion or invasion by plastic materials (i.e., polymeric systems), either through direct introduction or degradation processes, of environments (to which they are not native) to negatively or undesirably impact such environments. Similar to greenhouse gases, persistent pollutants, and other environmental contaminants, plastic pollution cannot be restricted by territorial boundaries or legislation because it is able to migrate between water bodies, disperse through air, and be transported to remote locations through human intervention. 18 − 20

The following criteria are considered conditions for qualifying a pollutant as hazardous to the environment: 8 (i) its biological impact even at minute concentrations is significant (noticeable and observable); (ii) it easily diffuses into the atmosphere, is soluble in water, and has an affinity for accumulating in environments; (iii) it tends to persist in a given environment; (iv) it can impact a wide range of targets (living and nonliving), especially those directly linked to human health or important for environmental stability and functions; (v) its degradation byproducts or their combination with other environmental chemical compounds exhibit toxicity, persist, and accumulate in a target or exceed the original levels of the material; (vi) it is suitable for large-scale production and its benefits are considered to outweigh the concomitant cost of pollution. This perspective shows that plastic pollution satisfies all of these criteria and, thus, is hazardous to both living and nonliving systems in the environment.

A Google Scholar search using the search criteria “Plastic Pollution” at 10-year intervals in the last seven decades reveals that the number of publications on plastic pollution has increased, as shown in Figure ​ Figure2 2 . Across the world, the issue of plastic pollution has brought about a paradigm shift in discourses on climate change and ocean and environmental sustainability. 21 , 22 In almost every country in the world, multiple individuals and groups have become environmental activists against plastic pollution. 23 In addition, governments, world leaders, and various stakeholders participate in discussions, conventions, and resolutions in concerted efforts to find a holistic solution to plastic pollution. 24 , 25

Number of publications between 1952 and 2021 on plastic pollution. The search engine was Google Scholar, while the keyword for the search was Plastic Pollution.

However, despite being a half-century-old problem, it is evident that the threat posed by plastic pollution is not abating and remediation will require, more than ever, renewed effort and a holistic approach with concrete commitments from all stakeholders. Borrelle et al. 17 estimated that more than 10% of the global plastic waste generated in 2016 found its way into aquatic environments. Moreover, they forecast that, without immediate intervention, by 2030, the world’s aquatic environments could contain more than 80 metric ton (Mt) of plastic debris. 17 Such a volume of plastic added to the world’s aquatic environments would displace an equal volume of water, shrinking aquatic habitats, increasing the likelihood of floods, and exacerbating global warming; 2 these phenomena, in turn, have countless negative consequences, such as endangering individuals and communities, destroying properties, and straining healthcare facilities and resources, government budgets, and the insurance industry, demonstrating the wider impact of plastic pollution. 26 − 28

Concerns regarding the mounting challenges of pervasive environmental and biological stressors, chiefly arising from the short- and long-term impacts of plastic pollution, have prompted the consolidation of the efforts (and associated financial, scientific, economic, and political resources) of stakeholders, worldwide, in the form of a sustainable development goal (SDG) initiative that prioritizes sustainable and healthy earth for all. 29 Therefore, discourses on environmental pollution such as plastic pollution should evaluate challenges, possible amelioration/mitigation, or control, with reference to the SDGs and current environmental issues.

This perspective differs from existing publications on plastic pollution ( Table 1 ) as it underscores key challenges and factors hindering global efforts to mitigate the menace of plastic pollution while highlighting various views on plastic pollution. It also discusses important developments and initiatives, aimed at mitigating the environmental impacts of plastic pollution, and presents recommendations that are based on a multidisciplinary approach. Policymakers, stakeholders (i.e., the plastic economy value chain), and the scientific community are alerted to the exigency of synergistically reshaping the current plastic economy to demonstrate a commitment toward the pursuit of green(er) plastics and support of blue sea initiatives, focusing on sustainable solutions that address the existing and future challenges presented by plastic pollution.

Plastics are polymeric systems (i.e., macromolecules), for example, polyethylene, polyacrylamides, polyesters, and polypropylene. Although plastics are generally polymers, not all polymers are plastics, such as natural cellulose, carbohydrates, proteins (e.g., leather), lignin, and natural rubber ( Hevea brasiliensis ). In this perspective, we consider plastic pollutants to be polymer-based materials in the environment, which may be plastics or not, that are potentially harmful.

2. A World of Polymers

We have always lived in the polymer age. Humans are essentially polymeric, from the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) that encodes our human traits to the protein that covers our body (skin) and our keratin-laden hair. Moreover, our living, walking polymeric forms are sustained by the polymers we consume in the forms of carbohydrates and proteins and protected by the polymer-based clothes we wear. Advances in polymer science and engineering over the years have led to the discovery and commercialization of various polymer-based systems or materials such as polycarbonates, nylons, polyimides, polyurethanes, and liquid crystals, which have found various domestic and industrial applications that shape our world and advance our quality of life. Polymers feature prominently in almost every sector of the economy, from industries that manufacture pharmaceuticals, composites, and tires to laboratories that perform DNA profiling for criminal investigations by law enforcement agencies, demonstrating that polymers and polymer science have contributed and continue to contribute to civilization; additional examples are presented in Figure ​ Figure3 3 . 35 − 38 Owing to great minds such as Hermann Staudinger (1881–1965), Wallace Hume Carothers (1896–1937), Paul J. Flory (1910–1985), and Stephanie L. Kwolek (1923–2014) advancing the field of polymer science and engineering, plastics are considered one of man’s greatest feats in the field of science and technology. 39 , 40 In 1962, Fred Wallace Billmeyer Jr. (1919–2004) predicted that, with advances in polymer science and engineering, plastics will become the dominant materials of the future, surpassing steel, aluminum, and copper. 41 More than half a century later, this prediction seems accurate as, in recent times, plastics have outperformed competing materials, including wood, metal, and glass, as the material of choice in diverse domestic and industrial applications; the production of plastics exceeded 8 billion Mt between 1950 and 2015. 2 , 42

Immense contributions of polymers to human advancement and civilization cannot be overstated; polymers feature heavily in almost every sector of the economy.

Owing to their flexibility and adaptability for various applications, lightweight, moisture resistance, corrosion resistance, and low-cost plastics are sought-after materials for various applications. Commodity plastics such as polypropylene, which is a very cost-effective polymeric material that can be blow-molded, extruded, thermoformed, or injection-molded, are popular for the fabrication of products such as packaging films, plastic crates used for good transportation, storage containers (e.g., ice cream containers and yogurt containers), plastic caps, jerry cans, and hair combs. Other well-known commodity plastics include poly(vinyl chloride) (generally known as PVC and employed in piping and insulation systems), polyethylene (generally employed in packaging films), and poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET; generally employed in beverage packaging). 36 , 43 Since our reliance on polymers increases in step with advances in science and technology (e.g., robotics, artificial intelligence, synthetic organs, insulation for energy conservation, and smart materials), a future that is not enriched and heavily dependent on plastics seems unlikely. 43 − 45

3. Health and Environmental Issues

There is no gainsaying that plastics have contributed immensely to the rise of human civilization; however, the distribution of plastic debris (macro-, micro-, and nanoplastics) in the environment and its entrainment into biological systems have become a serious issue. 46 Various health conditions such as thyroid dysfunction, obesity, diabetes, and reproductive impairment have been attributed to plastic pollution. 47 For example, it has been shown that nanoplastics impact negatively the composition and diversity of microbial communities in the human gut, which, considering emerging research evidencing the strong relationship between the gut and neural networks in the brain, could negatively impact the endocrine, immune, and nervous systems. 20 As already highlighted, pollution changes the dynamics of systems and environments with consequential impacts on the natural characteristics of their living and nonliving components; thus, it is reasonable to infer that the entrainment of nanoplastics into the human gut holds physiological consequences. The genotoxicity of micro- and nanoplastics to DNA has been established. It has been demonstrated that if the plastic matter is small enough to cross the nuclear membrane surrounding the DNA, damage can occur, impairing the DNA structure or forming lesions, which, unrepaired or misrepaired, can cause mutagenic processes that are considered to play a role in the carcinogenesis of cells. Additionally, it was found that the type and level of damage of DNA depend on the shape, functional groups, and chemical composition of the plastic debris. 48 The human airway is a key pathway for plastic fiber entrainment into the lungs, and biopersistence of the fibers depends on their length, structure, and chemical composition. Moreover, at certain exposure limits, all plastic fibers are likely to produce inflammation, which can lead to lung challenges such as the formation of reactive oxygen species with the potential to initiate cancerous growth through secondary genotoxicity. 49 Although there are few studies on the extent of the damage that prolonged exposure to plastic particles can cause to the human body (suggesting the need to increase research in this area), it is accepted that industry workers at textile facilities are at a high risk of contracting occupational diseases arising from high exposure to textile fibers. 50 It has long been established that constituents of plastic packaging chemically interact with or migrate into fat-containing foods; typical interactions include the migration of antioxidants from the plastic packaging into the food, sometimes bonding to the food surface. 51 Such transfer of packaging additives from the packaging material to its food content is a potential health risk. Furthermore, PET, a common plastic employed in the food and beverage industry, is a source of endocrine disruptors; 52 these endocrine disruptors leach from the plastic packaging into the consumables that it contains. Even at standard room temperature, phthalates (potential endocrine disruptors) are known to leach from PET packaging into various food contents in the presence of water. 52

The low thermal conductivities of plastic materials, although considered advantageous in certain applications (e.g., heat insulation), 43 contribute to global warming when these plastics are distributed in aquatic environments; they displace equal volumes of water and restrict heat flow from the sun to the aquatic environment, leading to a rise in sea levels and the dissipation of energy into the immediate environment. 2 The degradation pathways of plastics in the environment can also contribute to environmental stress. For example, Gewert et al. 53 posited that PVC, a very unstable polymer in the presence of UV radiation (+ h v), undergoes dechlorination in the environment, forming polyene moieties and hydrochloric acid (HCl) in the presence of water, as shown in Scheme 1 .

Reproduced with permission from Gewert, B.; Plassmann, M. M.; MacLeod, M. Pathways for degradation of plastic polymers floating in the marine environment. Environ. Sci.: Process. Impacts 2015 , 17, 1513–1521. 53 Copyright 2015, Royal Society of Chemistry, UK.

This dechlorination process and subsequent release of HCl have the potential to contribute to the acidification of aquatic environments by decreasing the pH level, in addition to the acidification caused by atmospheric CO 2 . It has been highlighted that increasing ocean acidity will aggravate global warming, 54 , 55 detrimentally affecting and possibly mutating habitats and the characteristics of various environments 56 , 57 to seriously undermine our goal of sustainable earth for future generations. However, a major concern must be raised at this point: the risk posed by PVC debris on living systems. Can PVC debris find its way into living systems? If it can, does it follow the above-mentioned degradation pathway? If it does, what health challenges do direct dechlorination and the subsequent release of HCl present living systems such as humans?

The load-bearing capacity of an environment is considered finite and it is believed that exceeding this capacity of an environment (and its living and nonliving components) to tolerate stressors such as synthetic waste (e.g., plastic debris) can result in unpredictable, possibly catastrophic, situations owing to a butterfly effect. 9

4. Challenges Associated with Plastic Pollution Mitigation

Factors militating against efforts to manage and limit the negative environmental impacts of plastic pollution are numerous and multifaceted; they include economic and political factors, a lack of commitment by governments and global plastic economy stakeholders, dissenting opinions of scientists, and under-reported or overlooked polluters. 2 , 58 − 61 Here, we highlight a few important challenges. For example, in October 2020, it was reported that the United States generated an estimated 42 Mt of plastic waste in 2016, of which between 0.14 and 0.41 Mt was allegedly dumped illegally into the environment (land and water) and another 0.15–0.99 Mt was exported to other countries such as South Africa, Indonesia, and Mexico, where it was inadequately recycled (either burnt or discarded in open landfill sites). It was further stated that between 2010 and 2016, the United States was the most significant contributor to plastic pollution in the environment, overtaking China. 62 This indicting report of a technologically and economically advanced country such as the United States and others 63 demonstrates one of the key challenges facing global efforts to mitigate plastic pollution, i.e., the tendency of global powers to pass the responsibility for their generated waste on to poorer nations, who are less equipped to recycle or manage the waste. Hence, we contend that the issue of plastic pollution and its mitigation strategies transcend the generally narrow public focus on single-use carrier bags (although they contribute to the problem) and concern powerful stakeholders such as multinational corporations and top brands that have the capacity (financially, politically, etc.) to undermine or circumvent concerted global efforts to address plastic pollution. For example, based on an audit undertaken in more than a dozen countries, it was found that well-known global brands, such as Coca-Cola, Nestlé, PepsiCo, and Unilever, are among the top sources of plastic pollution (for the third consecutive year); 64 yet, there are scant reports of these brands taking ownership of the environmental threat posed by plastic packaging used in their products, especially in countries in sub-Saharan Africa (e.g., Nigeria). 65

Multiple studies have demonstrated that automobile tires are significant contributors to microplastic pollution in the environment. For example, Kole et al. 66 demonstrated that the wear and tear of tires contribute significantly to the entrainment and distribution of plastic particles in the environment. They estimate the annual per capita emission of tire particles to range between 0.23 and 4.7 kg, with a global average of 0.81 kg. Furthermore, they contend that 5–10% of the plastic pollution in aquatic environments is derived from automobile tires, while 3–7% of the plastic particles in the air that we breathe is derived from automobile tires, which is a significant contribution to the global air burden. 66 However, they did not collate data on the amount of plastic matter, derived from tires, that enters the food chain (through water and air), or how much is consumed by ruminants owing to plastic matter trapped/settled on their food sources, e.g., grasses. Furthermore, they did not include comprehensive data from the wear and tear of bicycle tires or tires employed in the aviation industry since reports that quantify the contributions of these categories of plastic polluters are limited. A related study quantified the relative abundance of plastic matter (i.e., microplastic debris) generated by the wear and tear of automobile tires at roadside drains and in the natural environment near major road intersections, finding that it ranged from 0.6 ± 0.33 to 65 ± 7.36 in 5 mL of sampled material. The report also noted that plastic debris tends to act as a vector for other hazardous systems and thus persists in the environment with serious negative consequences. 67 Owing to increasing concerns that automobile users contribute substantially to microplastic distribution in the environment, the Swedish Government commissioned the Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute (VTI) to conduct a comprehensive study of this matter between 2018 and 2020. The key findings of their study are summarized. 68

• At least half of Sweden’s microplastic pollution derives from tires.
• Particles as large as 20 μm are deposited on or near roads and are carried off by winds to remote places. In addition, rain or snow clean-up processes transport these particles to other locations.
• Stormwater transports tire-based microplastics into open waters, reservoirs, and containment areas.
• It is necessary to further investigate the transportation and fate of these generated microplastics in sewerage and natural organisms.

Notwithstanding the mounting evidence of tire-based microplastic pollution, the multibillion-dollar tire industry is resisting scrutiny of its contribution to plastic pollution and the imposition of sanctions and regulations through the intense lobbying of European Union (EU) lawmakers. The report further highlighted how the tire industry commissioned and published no less than ten studies to counter reports revealing the significant risk that tire particles pose to humans and the environment; 69 again demonstrating how polluters undermine efforts to mitigate the plastic pollution caused by their products. In addition, several studies have argued that because tire particles contain toxic substances, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (phenanthrene, butylated hydroxyanisole, 2-methylnaphthalene, etc.) that are considered to pose serious health risks to living systems, 70 , 71 their distribution in the environment should not be trivialized.

Another factor limiting efforts to mitigate plastic pollution is the dissenting opinions and counteropinions held by scientists on various aspects of plastic pollution, e.g., sources, risk assessment, and toxicology. For example, Stafford and Jones 72 opine that addressing plastic pollution, such as ocean plastic pollution, is less pressing than addressing other environmental challenges such as climate change and biodiversity loss. They insist that emerging reports highlight the exigency of directing global efforts toward mitigating carbon emissions rather than expending energy on lesser threats, such as marine plastics. They further suggest that although ocean plastic pollution is a problem that needs attention, it does not pose an immediate ecological or toxicological threat at a planetary boundary level (i.e., the threat posed by plastic pollution is contextually less pressing than the threats posed by climate change and biodiversity loss that have long exceeded core planetary boundaries). 72 However, Avery-Gomm et al. 73 have challenged the position of Stafford and Jones, 72 arguing that global threats must continually be kept in perspective because undermining one threat by substituting it with another so-called “heftier” threat would be counterproductive in the global pursuit of sustainability. In their concluding remarks, they posit that the continuous discourse on plastic pollution has informed the improvement of the monitoring and risk evaluation of plastic pollution, as well as the development of frameworks for mitigation and remediation. 73 Elsewhere, an environmental toxicologist and risk assessor has argued that microplastics in marine and freshwater ecosystems do not pose any threat to the aquatic habitat as long as these pollutants are in low concentrations, despite the contradictory views of fellow scientists, referring to the threat posed by microplastics to aquatic habitats as a superficial risk. 74 However, this trivialization of the threat posed by plastic pollution on not only aquatic habitats but also terrestrial and arboreal environments is strongly rejected by Hale, 75 who insists that there is no basis to downplay the threat posed by plastic pollution to aquatic habitats. Hale contends that, in addition to plastic particle size, assessments of the toxicological impacts and consequences of plastic pollution in any given environment must consider the chemical compositions of the polymeric materials employed in the manufacture and production of the plastic materials; the shapes, surface areas, density, and persistence of the plastic particles; as well as the effects of additives (e.g., modifiers) and even sorbed pollutants (e.g., carriers and/or transfer agents). 75 Hale’s position is supported by Kramm et al., 76 who add that plastic pollution is a prototypically global and complex anthropogenic issue. They hold that a reductionist approach to addressing a serious environmental issue such as that presented by plastic pollution is detrimental to mitigation efforts. Moreover, they consider it high time that the scientific community takes responsibility for the environmental problems resulting from the work and inventions of scientists rather than trivializing or shirking responsibility. 76 Although some scientists may want to trivialize the threat of plastic pollution, it is generally accepted that any substance or energy can become toxic and environmentally disruptive at sufficient concentrations. 8 The fundamentally different opinions of scientists are a key challenge to forging cooperation; after all, a house divided against itself cannot stand. Such differences also convey disunity and present avenues or opportunities for plastic polluters to exploit, to avoid responsibility, to the detriment of the environment and, by extension, humanity.

Studies have evidenced that textiles and fibers are major contributors to the plastic materials that entrain into human lungs, food, and the environment ( Table 2 ). 49 , 77 However, because clothing is a primary human need, the textile industry directly and indirectly employs more than 100 million people globally and is a significant contributor to the gross domestic product (GDP) and economic growth of various nations. 78 , 79 In this context, addressing the plastic pollution resulting from the use of textiles and fibers is a challenge since any approach will have consequences (whether that approach involves banning the use of textiles and fibers or mitigating their contribution to plastic pollution as much as possible). Figure ​ Figure4 4 shows how much textile lint accumulates in the lint trap of a commercial dryer in a laundry house. This commercial dryer features a trap that prevents lint from escaping; however, washing machines and dryers that do not feature appropriate filtration systems release significant volumes of textile fibers into the environment.

Lint accumulation from a winter blanket in a commercial dryer. (A) Winter blanket loaded inside a commercial dryer. (B) Accumulation of lint inside the lint trap during the drying of the blanket. (C) Unweighed lint accumulated in the lint trap from the winter blanket after a single dry cycle. Photo Credit: First author (AOCI).

Moreover, considering that most polymers employed in the manufacturing of synthetic fibers and textiles are derived from petroleum and fossil-based resources, plastic pollution mitigation becomes a challenge (especially for oil-dependent economies) when balancing economics and politics. 80 , 81

Products and polymer-based articles, such as toothbrushes, shoes (materials or soles may be made from plastics), insulated electrical cables and equipment, light switches, writing pens (i.e., plastic cases), writing and printing inks (employ polymeric systems such as drag-reducing agents and stabilizers), mattresses, wigs and artificial hair (usually derived from high-performance polymers), artificial nails (e.g., acrylics), kitchen wipes (composed of microfibers), automobile paints, phone casings, computer casings, plastic wristwatches, and marine paints, are usually overlooked or underestimated as significant contributors to plastic pollution. Collectively, the “insignificant” contributions of these products or articles to plastic pollution, owing to poor disposal or through the process of wear and tear/degradation, is less insignificant. Notwithstanding, several reports focus on single-use plastic carrier bags as the primary plastic pollutant menacing our environment. 84 , 85 While we do not fault the positions held by these scientists, we argue that almost everyone releases plastic matter into the environment on a daily basis, e.g., through the shedding of textile fibers from our clothing. Hence, a more holistic approach to the management and control of plastic pollution is necessary to realize a sustainable environment. A small leak will sink a great ship; hence, we must beware of the plastic fibers that billions shed from their clothes daily or that is derived from insignificant contributors. It is our opinion that most people have little or no idea that their footwear (made from polymeric materials) also contributes to plastic pollution in the environment through wear and tear. As people tread on road surfaces, these surfaces abrade their footwear and accumulate plastic particles, which are subsequently washed away by rain into open waters. Furthermore, reports on the contributions of automobile and marine paints/coatings to plastic pollution through wear and degradation are limited. We submit that the contributions of automobile and marine paints/coatings to plastic pollution must be analyzed and quantified, as they represent potential secondary or primary sources of micro- and nanoplastic stressors in the environment. Moreover, the advanced paints and coatings (e.g., anticorrosive paints and coating) 86 , 87 that scientists and technologists are developing may pose additional environmental challenges when such materials leach, degrade, or form sediments in particular environments. It is worth noting that during the environmental degradation of paints and coatings, sorbed pollutants or additives may combine with biogenic systems and unpredictably alter living and nonliving systems in the environment. These plastic pollutant sources are usually overlooked or understudied, resulting in a knowledge gap that must be addressed to formulate a holistic approach to the management and control of plastic pollution in various environments.

5. Opportunities

Evidently, plastic pollution is a global challenge, and, as has been demonstrated, it meets all of the criteria of an environmental hazard for both the living and nonliving components of the environment. It is also apparent that a plastic-free future is unlikely despite the threat plastic pollution poses to the environment. 25 In addition, emerging data indicate an increase in global plastic pollution owing to the demand for personal protective equipment, 88 , 89 such as facemasks, to limit the spread of COVID-19. Besides, even if we were to ban the production and use of plastics, we would still need to address the plastic pollution currently present in our water, atmosphere, soil, consumables (e.g., table salts), and even vegetation (e.g., wheat and lettuce). 90 − 92 Hence, concerted global efforts are required to mitigate, manage, and control the current and possible future threats plastic debris distribution in the environment poses to its living and nonliving systems. Fortunately, various courses of action can be taken to realize this goal.

5.1. Plastic Education in National Curricula

Because prevention is better than cure, environmental responsibility and sustainability must be taught (formally and informally) from childhood, be it at home or in religious or formal education settings, to instill an appreciation of life and the environment. Such an educational approach is comparable to comprehensive sex education (CSE) that forms part of school curricula and teaches students life skills that enable them to make appropriate and healthy choices concerning their sexual lives. 93 We hold that incorporating plastic education into the national curricula is critical to mitigating, managing, and controlling plastic pollution and fostering sustainability. 94 We have enumerated elsewhere 2 the opportunities a plastic education curriculum presents. Hence, we support the call by the comity of nations for a global curriculum on plastic pollution, taught from kindergarten to the tertiary level, that addresses existing and emerging environmental and sustainability goals and objectives. For example, it has been established that handwashing clothes limits the amount of plastic fibers that ends up in the environment and prolongs the life span of fabrics. Although most people would consider using washing machines to do their laundry, a greater understanding of the limitations of these conveniences in mitigating plastic pollution may change behavior. It is believed that one of the reasons plastic pollution persists is the disconnect between scientific knowledge and the formative knowledge of the population. The population should be equipped with sufficient knowledge concerning the dangers and detrimental impact of plastic pollution (i.e., heightened risk awareness); instilling this risk awareness through formative education from childhood will promote the acceptance and support of policies and initiatives formulated to mitigate plastic pollution.

Religious and cultural institutions must actively participate in educating society on the value of sustainable earth and environment. It has been observed that culture, tradition, and religion all overwhelmingly influence the psyche, politics, emotional intelligence, and approach to life of individuals; 95 , 96 hence, addressing a global issue such as plastic pollution requires a rethink of our educational systems and the roles they play in promoting a sustainable environment. Human behaviors are ranked as some of the main challenges to addressing environmental issues; however, educational, religious, cultural, and traditional organizations can influence the attitudes and behaviors of their members in terms of environmental issues and are best placed to convince the population of the dire need to manage and control plastic pollution through behavioral change and ethical best practice. 2 , 97

Furthermore, global education systems should place greater emphasis on “responsible science”, where every scientific pursuit considers the environment to avoid engineering our own destruction. Scientists must understand that sustainability is their core mandate and must take ownership of the environmental challenges in which they are complicit. We believe that the formal and informal education sectors are critical to achieving the SDGs 29 and posit that plastic pollution mitigation, management, and control can only be achieved through the cooperation of all stakeholders, i.e., every human on the earth, for divided we fall. In closing, we emphasize that incorporating plastic education in national curricula to increase risk awareness is an opportunity that should not be squandered.

5.2. Green(er) Alternatives

We have previously mentioned that for a material to be considered green or eco-friendly, the effect of its intrusion or degradation in any given environment should either be neutral (have no net effect) or positive (energy-efficient, easily recyclable or reusable, etc.). In our view, the concept of “green plastics” should, in addition to biodegradability, encompass biocompatibility as well as a net neutral or positive impact on the environment. Hence, a “green plastic” should be an alternative polymeric material with properties or characteristics that are comparable or superior to those of conventional polymeric materials but that demonstrates less environmental impact. Such plastics can be biobased or fossil-based materials. 98 There has been an increasing and persistent call for rethinking the plastic economy in terms of the future of the environment; the sustainability of civilization; and the pursuit of green(er) chemistry, sustainable chemicals, and a circular economy. 99 − 102 Consequently, research that explores green(er) alternatives to conventional plastic materials has increased. For example, on June 5, 2014, Avantium ( https://www.avantium.com/ ) Technologies, headquartered in Amsterdam (The Netherlands), reportedly reached an agreement with international brands, such as Coca-Cola, Danone, Swire, and others, to produce packages exclusively from 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid (FDCA), a carbohydrate-based material, industrially known as poly(ethylene furanoate) (PEF), which affords many advantages over fossil-based PET, the dominant plastic material employed industry-wide in beverage packaging. 103 The advantages of PEF over PET include a higher gas barrier and better water, thermal, and tensile properties. 101

In recent years, a myriad of green(er) plastics with the potential to replace conventional plastics in various domestic and industrial applications has emerged. For example, nanocellulose has recently gained prominence as a versatile, benign, ubiquitous, and sustainable material that can be modified, spun, drawn, molded, and even cast, finding applications in almost every economic sector and replacing plastics and other conventional materials such as steel. 104 In addition to its abundance, nanocellulose has been demonstrated to represent a green(er) alternative to plastics used in, among others, the packaging industry, membrane fabrication, and composites with properties and characteristics comparable to and even exceeding those of conventional plastics in terms of resilience, lightweight, and strength. 105 As nanocellulose research and development advances, it is hoped that nanocellulose will replace conventional plastic materials in many domestic and industrial applications to promote our SDGs. The increasing number of green(er) alternatives to conventional plastics, such as DNA biodegradable materials, 106 lignin biodegradable and biocompatible composite films, 107 chitin biocompatible and biodegradable plastics and fibers, 108 , 109 biocompatible and nontoxic plastics derived from lactic acid, 110 is a testament to the promising technologies available to mitigate plastic pollution. In a yet-to-be-published work, we demonstrate that bamboo straws are not only green(er) than plastic straws but also sustainable and do not negatively impact the environment. We also posit that other green(er) articles, such as tires, shoes, and clothing, may become possible in the near future with concerted effort and political will.

5.3. Revision of Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)

As previously noted, in too many cases, the cost of pollution is considered tolerable in terms of a narrow cost–benefit analysis; thus, the negative impact of plastic pollution on, among others, our ecosystem and health, with a cost of more than USD 2 trillion per annum is usually under-reported. 47 , 111 Moreover, because most of the plastic debris generated inland generally finds its way into aquatic ecosystems, the oceans are one of the environments worst hit by plastic pollution, with an estimated impact of over USD 1 trillion per annum in terms of the loss in ocean productivity. 112 As pointed out by Forrest et al., 47 the current extended producer responsibility (EPR) and other plastic-related laws must be reviewed to reflect the exigency of the threat posed by plastic pollution; moreover, “voluntary” financial contributions from entities throughout the value chain of the plastic economy would generate considerable funds for innovative waste management schemes and environmental remediation. The goal of a circular plastic economy will remain elusive unless processes and technologies exist that ensure that the recycling of waste plastic is economically viable; 47 to promote the realization of a circular plastic economy, such technologies and processes must not only be cost-competitive but also enable the production of high-purity monomers (that are comparable to virgin resins) from waste plastic recovered from the environment. 113 , 114 As long as plastic recycling is disincentivized by its high cost, realizing and sustaining a circular plastic economy will be expensive, which is one of the major reasons that stakeholders in the plastic economy value chain have not fully embraced the concept of a circular plastic economy despite the recognized benefits. 115 Furthermore, we suggest that tariffs and levies on reclaimed or recycled plastic goods and materials should be reviewed throughout the value chain to promote their economic viability and enable them to compete with products produced from virgin resins, thus encouraging businesses to engage in environmental remediation. In addition, policies should be formulated to encourage consumers to use reusable and recycled products, thus incentivizing the reclamation of plastic wastes.

Elsewhere, we have argued 2 that despite the potential benefits of a circular economy, such as job creation, infrastructure development, and a low-carbon economy, we do not foresee the realization of a sustainable circular plastic economy without the cooperation of policymakers, governments, and the population. Hence, the synergistic cooperation of all stakeholders is imperative to plastic pollution mitigation.

6. Conclusions

Pollution is a global phenomenon and no nation or continent is immune to its negative environmental impact. Plastic pollution, in particular, is hazardous to the living and nonliving components of the environment. The negative impact of macro-, micro-, and nanoplastics on the environment and living organisms results from a combination of inherent characteristics and toxicity, the leaching of additives or constituent compounds, and the release of persistent sorbed pollutants. Although studies concerning the impact of plastic matter on various ecosystems, such as soil and air, are limited, the available literature demonstrates the exigency of revisiting the entire plastic economy value chain to ensure a sustainable environment.

To meaningfully address this global challenge, the scientific community must take ownership of the environmental challenges in which it is complicit as well as a remedial action. The political will of governments, cooperation of stakeholders, and determination of the population are imperative to the success of plastic pollution mitigation. Although plastics have contributed immensely to the progress and advancement of our civilization, we must ensure that posterity inherits sustainable earth. The time for action is now.

7. Future Prospects

Plastic pollution is a global phenomenon that exacerbates global warming and flooding and must be mitigated to achieve environmental sustainability. While plastic pollution presents a serious environmental threat, numerous opportunities exist that can be harnessed to mitigate, manage, and control this global problem. However, our understanding of plastic pollution is incomplete and further investigation is required to fully elucidate this problem. For example, studies on the accumulation of plastic debris as sediment in water beds (e.g., ocean floors), as a result of the phenomenon of convergence caused by the persistent directional flow of surface water, need to be investigated. We argue that (with the exception of polyethylene, polypropylene, and expanded polystyrene) a significant portion of plastic debris, such as polyesters, rubber particles, polyurethanes, PET, poly(vinyl chloride), linear low-density polyethylene, and high-density polyethylene, with specific gravities exceeding 1 g/cm 3 , sink to the bottom of the oceans. It is necessary to investigate whether these plastic particles undergo biodegradation and are biocompatible with the life forms inhabiting the ocean floors. The degradation pathways or processes of these plastic materials in the absence of light and oxygen, which are the conditions that exist at ocean floors, must be determined. Do these plastic materials resist anaerobic degradation processes on the ocean floor? What is the impact of free volume or molecular impermeability on the chemical and biological resistance of these plastics? The composition of ocean beds is not easy to study; however, modified nuclear microscopy and micro-Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) mapping may facilitate such investigations. In addition, understanding the degradation pathways of nanoplastics may reveal ways to break plastic materials down into their constituent chemical compounds that can be captured and reused. 116 It is, furthermore, necessary to elucidate the biochemical kinetics and interactions of polymeric systems (e.g., plastic and rubber), their degradation pathways in living systems, the possible risk they pose to living organisms, and their potential to cause living cell mutations and physiological changes. Finally, facile and inexpensive sensors must be developed to monitor our consumables, such as food and water, for plastic debris. A real-time monitoring system of water distribution networks would enable governments to protect water resources and the health of their populations by preventing people from ingesting harmful amounts of plastic materials. However, what amount of plastic constitutes a harmful amount of plastic for an average human is unclear. Perhaps medical science can determine this amount.

Acknowledgments

The authors (SSR and AOCI) thank the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (HGER74p) and the Department of Science and Innovation (HGERA8x) for financial support.

Author Contributions

⊥ A.O.C.I. and S.S.R. contributed equally to this work.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

• Pacheco Ferreira A. Environmental Fate of Bioaccumulative and Persistent Substances - A Synopsis of Existing and Future Actions . Rev. Gerenc. Políticas Salud 2008, 7 , 14–23. [ Google Scholar ]
• Iroegbu A. O. C.; Sadiku R. E.; Ray S. S.; Hamam Y. Plastics in Municipal Drinking Water and Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluents: Challenges and Opportunities for South Africa—a Review . Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27 , 12953–12966. 10.1007/s11356-020-08194-5. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bernhardt A.; Caravanos J.; Fuller R.; Leahy S.; Pradhan A.. Pollution Knows No Borders ; Global Alliance On Health And Pollution: Sweden, 2019. [ Google Scholar ]
• Edwards B. A.; Kushner D. S.; Outridge P. M.; Wang F. Fifty Years of Volcanic Mercury Emission Research: Knowledge Gaps and Future Directions . Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 757 , 143800 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143800. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bashir I.; Lone F. A.; Bhat R. A.; Mir S. A.; Dar Z. A.; Dar S. A.. Concerns and Threats of Contamination on Aquatic Ecosystems . In Bioremediation and Biotechnology ; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2020; pp 1–26. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ecology of Industrial Pollution ; Batty L. C.; Hallberg K. B., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2010. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ray S. S.; Iroegbu A. O. C.; Bordado J. C. Polymer-Based Membranes and Composites for Safe, Potable, and Usable Water: A Survey of Recent Advances . Chem. Afr. 2020, 3 , 593–608. 10.1007/s42250-020-00166-z. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Holdgate M. W. A Perspective of Environmental Pollution , 1st ed.; The Syndics of the Cambridge University Press: The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1RP, Great Britain, 1979. [ Google Scholar ]
• Frondel M.; Oertel K.; Rubbelke D. The Domino Effect in Climate Change . Int. J. Environ. Pollut. 2002, 17 , 201. 10.1504/IJEP.2002.000666. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• WorldWildlife. Pollution—Threats. https://www.worldwildlife.org/threats/pollution #::text=Pollution may muddy landscapes%2Cpoison,or kill plants and animals.&text=Long-term exposure to air,somespecies unsafe to eat (accessed Jan 20, 2021).
• Thimmegowda G. G.; Mullen S.; Sottilare K.; Sharma A.; Mohanta S. S.; Brockmann A.; Dhandapany P. S.; Olsson S. B. A Field-Based Quantitative Analysis of Sublethal Effects of Air Pollution on Pollinators . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2020, 117 , 20653–20661. 10.1073/pnas.2009074117. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Dolk H.; Vrijheid M. The Impact of Environmental Pollution on Congenital Anomalies . Br. Med. Bull. 2003, 68 , 25–45. 10.1093/bmb/ldg024. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Pajewska-Szmyt M.; Sinkiewicz-Darol E.; Gadzała-Kopciuch R. The Impact of Environmental Pollution on the Quality of Mother’s Milk . Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26 , 7405–7427. 10.1007/s11356-019-04141-1. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Prüss-Ustün A.; Wolf J.; Corvalán C.; Bos R.; Neira M.. Preventing Disease Through Healthy Environments: A Global Assessment of the Burden of Disease from Environmental Risks ; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016. [ Google Scholar ]
• France24. Climate Change: Greenland’s Ice Sheet has Melted Past the Point of No Return , https://www.france24.com/en/20200815-climate-change-greenland-s-ice-has-melted-past-the-point-of-no-return (accessed Aug 16, 2020).
• Thushari G. G. N.; Senevirathna J. D. M. Plastic Pollution in the Marine Environment . Heliyon 2020, 6 , e04709 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04709. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Borrelle S. B.; Ringma J.; Law K. L.; Monnahan C. C.; Lebreton L.; McGivern A.; Murphy E.; Jambeck J.; Leonard G. H.; Hilleary M. A.; Eriksen M.; Possingham H. P.; De Frond H.; Gerber L. R.; Polidoro B.; Tahir A.; Bernard M.; Mallos N.; Barnes M.; Rochman C. M. Predicted Growth in Plastic Waste Exceeds Efforts to Mitigate Plastic Pollution . Science 2020, 369 , 1515–1518. 10.1126/science.aba3656. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wilke C. Plastics Are Showing up in the World’s Most Remote Places, Including Mount Everest ; Science News: Washington, DC, 2020. [ Google Scholar ]
• Borrelle S. B.; Rochman C. M.; Liboiron M.; Bond A. L.; Lusher A.; Bradshaw H.; Provencher J. F. Opinion: Why We Need an International Agreement on Marine Plastic Pollution . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2017, 114 , 9994–9997. 10.1073/pnas.1714450114. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Teles M.; Balasch J. C.; Oliveira M.; Sardans J.; Peñuelas J. Insights into Nanoplastics Effects on Human Health . Sci. Bull. 2020, 65 , 1966–1969. 10.1016/j.scib.2020.08.003. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Shen M.; Huang W.; Chen M.; Song B.; Zeng G.; Zhang Y. (Micro)Plastic Crisis: Un-Ignorable Contribution to Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Climate Change . J. Cleaner Prod. 2020, 254 , 120138 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120138. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Marlin D.; Ribbink A. J. The African Marine Waste Network and Its Aim to Achieve ‘Zero Plastics to the Seas of Africa . S. Afr. J. Sci. 2020, 116 , 8104 10.17159/sajs.2020/8104. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Eriksen M. Junk Raft: An Ocean Voyage and a Rising Tide of Activism to Fight Plastic Pollution ; Beacon Press Books: Boston, MA, 2017. [ Google Scholar ]
• Haward M. Plastic Pollution of the World’s Seas and Oceans as a Contemporary Challenge in Ocean Governance . Nat. Commun. 2018, 9 , 667 10.1038/s41467-018-03104-3. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• United Nations Environmental Assembly. Towards a Pollution-Free Planet ; United Nations Environment Programme: Nairobi, Kenya, 2017. [ Google Scholar ]
• Vousdoukas M. I.; Mentaschi L.; Voukouvalas E.; Bianchi A.; Dottori F.; Feyen L. Climatic and Socioeconomic Controls of Future Coastal Flood Risk in Europe . Nat. Clim. Change 2018, 8 , 776–780. 10.1038/s41558-018-0260-4. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hudson P.; Botzen W. J. W.; Aerts J. C. J. H. Flood Insurance Arrangements in the European Union for Future Flood Risk under Climate and Socioeconomic Change . Global Environ. Change 2019, 58 , 101966 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101966. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Tabe-Ojong M. P. J.; Boakye J. A.; Muliro M. Mitigating the Impacts of Floods Using Adaptive and Resilient Coping Strategies: The Role of the Emergency Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty Program (LEAP) in Ghana . J. Environ. Manage. 2020, 270 , 110809 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110809. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• The UN. The Sustainable Development Goals Report , https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2020 (accessed Nov 27, 2020).
• Sivan A. New Perspectives in Plastic Biodegradation . Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2011, 22 , 422–426. 10.1016/j.copbio.2011.01.013. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chae Y.; An Y.-J. Current Research Trends on Plastic Pollution and Ecological Impacts on the Soil Ecosystem: A Review . Environ. Pollut. 2018, 240 , 387–395. 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.05.008. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Windsor F. M.; Durance I.; Horton A. A.; Thompson R. C.; Tyler C. R.; Ormerod S. J. A Catchment-scale Perspective of Plastic Pollution . Global Change Biol. 2019, 25 , 1207–1221. 10.1111/gcb.14572. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Picó Y.; Barceló D. Analysis and Prevention of Microplastics Pollution in Water: Current Perspectives and Future Directions . ACS Omega 2019, 4 , 6709–6719. 10.1021/acsomega.9b00222. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Zhang Y.; Kang S.; Allen S.; Allen D.; Gao T.; Sillanpää M. Atmospheric Microplastics: A Review on Current Status and Perspectives . Earth-Sci. Rev. 2020, 203 , 103118 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103118. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Deng H.; Wei R.; Luo W.; Hu L.; Li B.; Di Y.; Shi H. Microplastic Pollution in Water and Sediment in a Textile Industrial Area . Environ. Pollut. 2020, 258 , 113658 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113658. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Charles E.; Carraher J.. Carraher’s Polymer Chemistry , 10th ed.; Taylor & Francis Group, LLC: Boca Raton, FL, 2018. [ Google Scholar ]
• Liechty W. B.; Kryscio D. R.; Slaughter B. V.; Peppas N. A. Polymers for Drug Delivery Systems . Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 2010, 1 , 149–173. 10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-073009-100847. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Lowman A. M.; Morishita M.; Kajita M.; Nagai T.; Peppas N. A. Oral Delivery of Insulin Using PH-responsive Complexation Gels . J. Pharm. Sci. 1999, 88 , 933–937. 10.1021/js980337n. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Patterson G. Polymer Science from 1935–1953 ; Springer Briefs in Molecular Science;Springer: Berlin, 2014. [ Google Scholar ]
• Thompson R. C.; Swan S. H.; Moore C. J.; vom Saal F. S. Our Plastic Age . Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2009, 364 , 1973–1976. 10.1098/rstb.2009.0054. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Billmeyer F. W. Textbook of Polymer Science , 3rd ed.; Wiley: New York, 1962. [ Google Scholar ]
• Geyer R.; Jambeck J. R.; Law K. L. Production, Use, and Fate of All Plastics Ever Made . Sci. Adv. 2017, 3 , e1700782 10.1126/sciadv.1700782. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Andrady A. L.; Neal M. A. Applications and Societal Benefits of Plastics . Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2009, 364 , 1977–1984. 10.1098/rstb.2008.0304. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ghosh S.; Nitin B.; Remanan S.; Bhattacharjee Y.; Ghorai A.; Dey T.; Das T. K.; Das N. C. A Multifunctional Smart Textile Derived from Merino Wool/Nylon Polymer Nanocomposites as Next Generation Microwave Absorber and Soft Touch Sensor . ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12 , 17988–18001. 10.1021/acsami.0c02566. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kim C.; Batra R.; Chen L.; Tran H.; Ramprasad R. Polymer Design Using Genetic Algorithm and Machine Learning . Comput. Mater. Sci. 2021, 186 , 110067 10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.110067. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Fadare O. O.; Wan B.; Guo L. H.; Zhao L. Microplastics from Consumer Plastic Food Containers: Are We Consuming It? . Chemosphere 2020, 253 , 126787 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126787. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Forrest A.; Giacovazzi L.; Dunlop S.; Reisser J.; Tickler D.; Jamieson A.; Meeuwig J. J. Eliminating Plastic Pollution: How a Voluntary Contribution From Industry Will Drive the Circular Plastics Economy . Front. Mar. Sci. 2019, 6 , 627 10.3389/fmars.2019.00627. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Rubio L.; Marcos R.; Hernández A. Potential Adverse Health Effects of Ingested Micro- and Nanoplastics on Humans. Lessons Learned from in Vivo and in Vitro Mammalian Models . J. Toxicol. Environ. Heal. Part B 2020, 23 , 51–68. 10.1080/10937404.2019.1700598. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Gasperi J.; Wright S. L.; Dris R.; Collard F.; Mandin C.; Guerrouache M.; Langlois V.; Kelly F. J.; Tassin B. Microplastics in Air: Are We Breathing It In? . Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health 2018, 1 , 1–5. 10.1016/j.coesh.2017.10.002. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chen G.; Feng Q.; Wang J. Mini-Review of Microplastics in the Atmosphere and Their Risks to Humans . Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 703 , 135504 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135504. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• vom Bruck C. G.; Figge K.; Rudolph F. Interaction of Fat- Containing Food with Plastics Packaging . J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1981, 58 , 811–815. 10.1007/BF02665586. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sax L. Polyethylene Terephthalate May Yield Endocrine Disruptors . Environ. Health Perspect. 2010, 118 , 445–448. 10.1289/ehp.0901253. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Gewert B.; Plassmann M. M.; MacLeod M. Pathways for Degradation of Plastic Polymers Floating in the Marine Environment . Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts 2015, 17 , 1513–1521. 10.1039/C5EM00207A. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Barford E. Rising Ocean Acidity Will Exacerbate Global Warming . Nature 2013, 7 , 40842 10.1038/nature.2013.13602. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Service R. F. Rising Acidity Brings an Ocean of Trouble . Science 2012, 337 , 146–148. 10.1126/science.337.6091.146. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Corrales X.; Coll M.; Ofir E.; Heymans J. J.; Steenbeek J.; Goren M.; Edelist D.; Gal G. Future Scenarios of Marine Resources and Ecosystem Conditions in the Eastern Mediterranean under the Impacts of Fishing, Alien Species and Sea Warming . Sci. Rep. 2018, 8 , 14284 10.1038/s41598-018-32666-x. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Dell’Acqua O.; Ferrando S.; Chiantore M.; Asnaghi V. The Impact of Ocean Acidification on the Gonads of Three Key Antarctic Benthic Macroinvertebrates . Aquat. Toxicol. 2019, 210 , 19–29. 10.1016/j.aquatox.2019.02.012. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Raszewski S. Introduction . The International Political Economy of Oil and Gas ; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2018; pp 1–6. [ Google Scholar ]
• Balmaceda M. M. Differentiation, Materiality, and Power: Towards a Political Economy of Fossil Fuels . Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2018, 39 , 130–140. 10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.052. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Jambeck J. R.; Geyer R.; Wilcox C.; Siegler T. R.; Perryman M.; Andrady A.; Narayan R.; Law K. L. Plastic Waste Inputs from Land into the Ocean . Science 2015, 347 , 768–771. 10.1126/science.1260352. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Liu C.; Thang Nguyen T.; Ishimura Y. Current Situation and Key Challenges on the Use of Single-Use Plastic in Hanoi . Waste Manage. 2021, 121 , 422–431. 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.12.033. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Law K. L.; Starr N.; Siegler T. R.; Jambeck J. R.; Mallos N. J.; Leonard G. H. The United States’ Contribution of Plastic Waste to Land and Ocean . Sci. Adv. 2020, 6 , eabd0288 10.1126/sciadv.abd0288. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ritchie H.; Roser M.. Plastic Pollution , https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollutio (accessed Mar 23, 2021).
• Roper W. Worst Plastic Polluters in 2020 , https://www.statista.com/chart/23720/worst-polluting-companies/#::text=According to the Break Free, in the world for 2020. (accessed Mar 23, 2021).
• Dumbili E.; Henderson L.. The Challenge of Plastic Pollution in Nigeria . Plastic Waste and Recycling ; Elsevier, 2020; pp 569–583. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kole P. J.; Löhr A. J.; Van Belleghem F.; Ragas A. Wear and Tear of Tyres: A Stealthy Source of Microplastics in the Environment . Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14 , 1265 10.3390/ijerph14101265. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Knight L. J.; Parker-Jurd F. N. F.; Al-Sid-Cheikh M.; Thompson R. C. Tyre Wear Particles: An Abundant yet Widely Unreported Microplastic? . Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27 , 18345–18354. 10.1007/s11356-020-08187-4. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Andersson-Sköld Y.; Johanesson M.; Gustafsson M.; Järlskog I.; Lithner D.; Polukarova M.; Strömvall A.-M.. Microplastics from Tyre and Road Wear - A Literature Review ; Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute: Sweden, 2020. [ Google Scholar ]
• Brock J.; Geddie J.. Tire Industry Pushes Back Against Evidence of Plastic Pollution , https://www.reuters.com/article/us-tyres-plastic-environment-insight-idUSKCN22413H (accessed Mar 23, 2021).
• Sibeko M. A.; Adeniji A. O.; Okoh O. O.; Hlangothi S. P. Trends in the Management of Waste Tyres and Recent Experimental Approaches in the Analysis of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) from Rubber Crumbs . Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27 , 43553–43568. 10.1007/s11356-020-09703-2. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kelly F. J.; Fussell J. C. Air Pollution and Airway Disease . Clin. Exp. Allergy 2011, 41 , 1059–1071. 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03776.x. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Stafford R.; Jones P. J. S. Viewpoint – Ocean Plastic Pollution: A Convenient but Distracting Truth? . Mar. Policy 2019, 103 , 187–191. 10.1016/j.marpol.2019.02.003. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Avery-Gomm S.; Walker T. R.; Mallory M. L.; Provencher J. F. There Is Nothing Convenient about Plastic Pollution. Rejoinder to Stafford and Jones “Viewpoint – Ocean Plastic Pollution: A Convenient but Distracting Truth?” . Mar. Policy 2019, 106 , 103552 10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103552. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Burton G. A. Stressor Exposures Determine Risk: So, Why Do Fellow Scientists Continue to Focus on Superficial Microplastics Risk? . Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51 , 13515–13516. 10.1021/acs.est.7b05463. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hale R. C. Are the Risks from Microplastics Truly Trivial? . Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52 , 931. 10.1021/acs.est.7b06615. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kramm J.; Völker C.; Wagner M. Superficial or Substantial: Why Care about Microplastics in the Anthropocene? . Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52 , 3336–3337. 10.1021/acs.est.8b00790. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Cai Y.; Yang T.; Mitrano D. M.; Heuberger M.; Hufenus R.; Nowack B. Systematic Study of Microplastic Fiber Release from 12 Different Polyester Textiles during Washing . Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54 , 4847–4855. 10.1021/acs.est.9b07395. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Shishoo R. The Global Textile and Clothing Industry: Technological Advances and Future Challenges ; WoodHead Publishing: U.K., 2012. [ Google Scholar ]
• Guan Z.; Xu Y.; Jiang H.; Jiang G. International Competitiveness of Chinese Textile and Clothing Industry – a Diamond Model Approach . J. Chin. Econ. Foreign Trade Stud. 2019, 12 , 2–19. 10.1108/JCEFTS-01-2018-0003. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Cohen D. F. S.; Kirshner J.. 6. The Cult of Energy Insecurity and Great Power Rivalry Across the Pacific . In The Nexus of Economics, Security, and International Relations in East Asia ; Stanford University Press, 2020; pp 144–176. [ Google Scholar ]
• Prontera A. The New Politics of Energy Security in the European Union and Beyond ; Routledge: Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY, 2017. [ Google Scholar ]
• Henry B.; Laitala K.; Klepp I. G. Microfibres from Apparel and Home Textiles: Prospects for Including Microplastics in Environmental Sustainability Assessment . Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 652 , 483–494. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.166. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sait S. T. L.; Sørensen L.; Kubowicz S.; Vike-Jonas K.; Gonzalez S. V.; Asimakopoulos A. G.; Booth A. M. Microplastic Fibres from Synthetic Textiles: Environmental Degradation and Additive Chemical Content . Environ. Pollut. 2021, 268 , 115745 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115745. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Schnurr R. E. J.; Alboiu V.; Chaudhary M.; Corbett R. A.; Quanz M. E.; Sankar K.; Srain H. S.; Thavarajah V.; Xanthos D.; Walker T. R. Reducing Marine Pollution from Single-Use Plastics (SUPs): A Review . Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018, 137 , 157–171. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.10.001. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Xanthos D.; Walker T. R. International Policies to Reduce Plastic Marine Pollution from Single-Use Plastics (Plastic Bags and Microbeads): A Review . Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2017, 118 , 17–26. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.02.048. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Armelin E.; Oliver R.; Liesa F.; Iribarren J. I.; Estrany F.; Alemán C. Marine Paint Fomulations: Conducting Polymers as Anticorrosive Additives . Prog. Org. Coat. 2007, 59 , 46–52. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2007.01.013. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Harb S. V.; Trentin A.; Uvida M. C.; Hammer P.. Advanced Organic Nanocomposite Coatings for Effective Corrosion Protection . Corrosion Protection at the Nanoscale ; Elsevier, 2020; pp 315–343. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ammendolia J.; Saturno J.; Brooks A. L.; Jacobs S.; Jambeck J. R. An Emerging Source of Plastic Pollution: Environmental Presence of Plastic Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Debris Related to COVID-19 in a Metropolitan City . Environ. Pollut. 2021, 269 , 116160 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116160. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Patrício Silva A. L.; Prata J. C.; Walker T. R.; Duarte A. C.; Ouyang W.; Barcelò D.; Rocha-Santos T. Increased Plastic Pollution Due to COVID-19 Pandemic: Challenges and Recommendations . Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 405 , 126683 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126683. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Li L.; Luo Y.; Li R.; Zhou Q.; Peijnenburg W. J. G. M.; Yin N.; Yang J.; Tu C.; Zhang Y. Effective Uptake of Submicrometre Plastics by Crop Plants via a Crack-Entry Mode . Nat. Sustain. 2020, 3 , 929–937. 10.1038/s41893-020-0567-9. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Rillig M. C. Plastic and Plants . Nat. Sustain. 2020, 3 , 887–888. 10.1038/s41893-020-0583-9. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Zhang Q.; Xu E. G.; Li J.; Chen Q.; Ma L.; Zeng E. Y.; Shi H. A Review of Microplastics in Table Salt, Drinking Water, and Air: Direct Human Exposure . Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54 , 3740–3751. 10.1021/acs.est.9b04535. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Global Education Monitoring Report (UNESCO). Global Education Monitoring Report (UNESCO). Facing the Facts: The Case for Comprehensive Sexuality Education ; Policy Paper #39, Geneva, Switzerland, 2019.
• Leal Filho W.; Raath S.; Lazzarini B.; Vargas V. R.; de Souza L.; Anholon R.; Quelhas O. L. G.; Haddad R.; Klavins M.; Orlovic V. L. The Role of Transformation in Learning and Education for Sustainability . J. Cleaner Prod. 2018, 199 , 286–295. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.017. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Cesur R.; Mocan N. Education, Religion, and Voter Preference in a Muslim Country . J. Popul. Econ. 2018, 31 , 1–44. 10.1007/s00148-017-0650-3. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Baynes J.; Herbohn J.; Gregorio N.; Unsworth W.; Tremblay É. H. Equity for Women and Marginalized Groups in Patriarchal Societies during Forest Landscape Restoration: The Controlling Influence of Tradition and Culture . Environ. Conserv. 2019, 46 , 241–246. 10.1017/S0376892919000079. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Heberlein T. A. Navigating Environmental Attitudes ; Oxford University Press: New York, 2012. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Rujnić-Sokele M.; Pilipović A. Challenges and Opportunities of Biodegradable Plastics: A Mini Review . Waste Manage. Res. 2017, 35 , 132–140. 10.1177/0734242X16683272. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• To M. H.; Uisan K.; Ok Y. S.; Pleissner D.; Lin C. S. K. Recent Trends in Green and Sustainable Chemistry: Rethinking Textile Waste in a Circular Economy . Curr. Opin. Green Sustainable Chem. 2019, 20 , 1–10. 10.1016/j.cogsc.2019.06.002. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kümmerer K.; Clark J. H.; Zuin V. G. Rethinking Chemistry for a Circular Economy . Science 2020, 367 , 369–370. 10.1126/science.aba4979. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Iroegbu A. O.; Sadiku E. R.; Ray S. S.; Hamam Y. Sustainable Chemicals: A Brief Survey of the Furans . Chem. Afr. 2020, 3 , 481–496. 10.1007/s42250-020-00123-w. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Amulya K.; Katakojwala R.; Ramakrishna S.; Venkata Mohan S. Low Carbon Biodegradable Polymer Matrices for Sustainable Future . Compos. Part C: Open Access 2021, 4 , 100111 10.1016/j.jcomc.2021.100111. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Levant D.; van der Meulen M. J.. Avantium raises 36M Investment from Swire Pacific, The Coca-Cola Company, Danoneand ALPLA , https://www.avantium.com/press-releases/avantium-raises-e36m-investment-swire-pacific-coca-cola-company-danone-alpla/ (accessed Apr 26, 2021).
• Ray S. S.; Ofondu Chinomso Iroegbu A. Nanocellulosics: Benign, Sustainable, and Ubiquitous Biomaterials for Water Remediation . ACS Omega 2021, 6 , 4511–4526. 10.1021/acsomega.0c06070. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Thomas B.; Raj M. C.; Athira K. B.; Rubiyah M. H.; Joy J.; Moores A.; Drisko G. L.; Sanchez C. Nanocellulose, a Versatile Green Platform: From Biosources to Materials and Their Applications . Chem. Rev. 2018, 118 , 11575–11625. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00627. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wang D.; Cui J.; Gan M.; Xue Z.; Wang J.; Liu P.; Hu Y.; Pardo Y.; Hamada S.; Yang D.; Luo D. Transformation of Biomass DNA into Biodegradable Materials from Gels to Plastics for Reducing Petrochemical Consumption . J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142 , 10114–10124. 10.1021/jacs.0c02438. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wang H.; Yuan T.-Q.; Song G.; Sun R. Advanced and Versatile Lignin-Derived Biodegradable Composite Film Materials Toward a Sustainable World . Green Chem. 2021, 23 , 3790–3817. 10.1039/D1GC00790D. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• He M.; Wang X.; Wang Z.; Chen L.; Lu Y.; Zhang X.; Li M.; Liu Z.; Zhang Y.; Xia H.; Zhang L. Biocompatible and Biodegradable Bioplastics Constructed from Chitin via a “Green” Pathway for Bone Repair . ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2017, 5 , 9126–9135. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02051. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Zhu K.; Tu H.; Yang P.; Qiu C.; Zhang D.; Lu A.; Luo L.; Chen F.; Liu X.; Chen L.; Fu Q.; Zhang L. Mechanically Strong Chitin Fibers with Nanofibril Structure, Biocompatibility, and Biodegradability . Chem. Mater. 2019, 31 , 2078–2087. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b05183. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Nguyen V. P.; Yoo J.; Lee J. Y.; Chung J. J.; Hwang J. H.; Jung Y.; Lee S.-M. Enhanced Mechanical Stability and Biodegradability of Ti-Infiltrated Polylactide . ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12 , 43501–43512. 10.1021/acsami.0c13246. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Raynaud J. Valuing Plastics: The Business Case for Measuring, Managing and Disclosing Plastic Use in the Consumer Goods Industry ; Richens J.; Russell A., Eds.; United Nations Environment Programme, 2014. [ Google Scholar ]
• Beaumont N. J.; Aanesen M.; Austen M. C.; Börger T.; Clark J. R.; Cole M.; Hooper T.; Lindeque P. K.; Pascoe C.; Wyles K. J. Global Ecological, Social and Economic Impacts of Marine Plastic . Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2019, 142 , 189–195. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.03.022. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Rahimi A.; García J. M. Chemical Recycling of Waste Plastics for New Materials Production . Nat. Rev. Chem. 2017, 1 , 0046 10.1038/s41570-017-0046. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ragaert K.; Delva L.; Van Geem K. Mechanical and Chemical Recycling of Solid Plastic Waste . Waste Manage. 2017, 69 , 24–58. 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.07.044. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Staub C. Low Virgin Plastics Pricing Pinches Recycling Market Further , https://resource-recycling.com/plastics/2020/05/06/low-virgin-plastics-pricing-pinches-recycling-market-further/ (accessed May 1, 2021).
• Bianco A.; Sordello F.; Ehn M.; Vione D.; Passananti M. Degradation of Nanoplastics in the Environment: Reactivity and Impact on Atmospheric and Surface Waters . Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 742 , 140413 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140413. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]

• Skip to main content
• Keyboard shortcuts for audio player

Talks for a plastic pollution treaty are stalling. Could the U.S. be doing more?

Michael Copley

Plastic waste and garbage are seen at a beach in Panama. LUIS ACOSTA/AFP via Getty Images hide caption

Plastic waste and garbage are seen at a beach in Panama.

Negotiators from about 175 countries have been sparring for more than a year over a treaty to clean up plastic pollution that's choking rivers and piling up in landfills. As a critical new round of deliberations starts this week in Canada, the talks are floundering.

Some scientists and civil society groups say the United States bears a lot of the blame.

Almost every piece of plastic is made from fossil fuels, and major oil and natural gas producers like Russia and Saudi Arabia have also been widely criticized for throwing up roadblocks in the negotiations. However, scientists and environmentalists following the talks say the U.S. exerts outsized influence on the process. The country is the top producer of oil and gas globally, and it has the world's biggest economy, which has historically given the U.S. huge sway in environmental negotiations.

The world is awash in plastic. Oil producers want a say in how it's cleaned up

So far, American negotiators have been unwilling to push for measures in the treaty that would drive big cuts in plastic waste, critics say, like caps on manufacturing. Instead, they say, U.S. government representatives have put their weight behind policies around recycling and waste management that are favored by the country's giant fossil fuel and petrochemical industries . Researchers say those actions on their own won't drastically reduce plastic pollution.

"I don't think it's an understatement to say that where we're headed at right now with progress in negotiations is towards failure. And if there's one country that I think is responsible for that, I think it's the United States," says Douglas McCauley, a professor of environmental science at University of California, Santa Barbara, who has consulted with the U.S. State Department about the treaty and is attending the talks in Ottawa.

NPR spoke to seven scientists and environmental advocates who have consulted with the U.S. government about the plastics negotiations, some multiple times. Many of those experts contend that an absence of U.S. leadership is hindering efforts to push forward a treaty with effective regulations. The outcome of the negotiations could also have big implications for human health. A recent study found plastics contain more than 4,200 hazardous chemicals , the vast majority of which aren't regulated globally, according to the researchers.

"It's not that the U.S. is actively opposing some of these policies that could make a difference," McCauley says. "It's that they are showing no action whatsoever, no ambition whatsoever, for adopting any of these policies."

Investigations

How big oil misled the public into believing plastic would be recycled.

In a letter to President Biden in March , a coalition of more than 300 scientists said policy recommendations the government received from plastic manufacturers — and the government's own stance in the talks to date — are "inconsistent" with efforts to deal comprehensively with plastic waste. And a group of nine Democratic attorneys general whose states are grappling with plastic pollution recently urged the U.S. treaty delegation to back stronger global rules , saying the country is "uniquely positioned" to influence the negotiations.

"There is an important role the U.S. could play in addressing the growing influence of industry on these negotiations," says Carroll Muffett, chief executive of the Center for International Environmental Law who is an observer at the negotiations and whose organization has consulted with the State Department about the treaty. "So far, we have yet to see the U.S. on the right side of that issue."

A State Department spokesperson said in a statement to NPR that U.S. officials met with "a wide set of stakeholders" ahead of the negotiations in Canada, and that the country has a "central role in bridging differing positions" in the talks. For an agreement to be effective, it needs to be supported by every country, the spokesperson said, including major plastic producers and consumers.

Matt Seaholm, chief executive of a business group called the Plastics Industry Association, says the U.S. is doing "a very good job of trying to balance all of the interests" of different stakeholders.

"The U.S. government has positioned itself well to drive forward a workable, consensus-based agreement," Ross Eisenberg, president of another industry group called America's Plastic Makers, said in a statement.

A climate activist holds a banner next to a plastic installation after marching to demand reductions in global plastic production ahead of negotiations in Kenya in November 2023. LUIS TATO/AFP via Getty Images hide caption

A climate activist holds a banner next to a plastic installation after marching to demand reductions in global plastic production ahead of negotiations in Kenya in November 2023.

It's a pivotal moment in the negotiations

The world produces about 400 million metric tons of plastic waste every year, according to the United Nations Environment Programme — roughly the weight of every human on the planet . Most of it ends up in places like oceans, shorelines and landfills, where it breaks down into tiny pieces called microplastics that have been found in every corner of the environment and inside human bodies.

The problem is getting worse. The amount of plastic waste the world produces is expected to almost triple in the coming decades, with less than a fifth recycled, according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. So in 2022, countries agreed to negotiate a legally binding agreement to "end plastic pollution."

With months to go before a deadline to hash out the treaty, interest groups on all sides of the issue say this is a pivotal moment. The last round of negotiations in Kenya ended in deadlock . Afterward, environmental groups warned the talks were at risk of collapsing after some oil- and gas-producing countries blocked a final decision on how to move forward.

The negotiations are happening at a time when the oil and gas industry increasingly sees petrochemicals as a core part of their business. Efforts to limit the risks from climate change threaten demand for fossil fuels, but oil and gas demand for petrochemicals is expected to keep rising for years, industry analysts say .

Magnus Løvold, a policy advisor at the Norwegian Academy of International Law, says fossil-fuel producers including Russia, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Iran and Bahrain "want this process to fail."

An observer at the negotiations, Løvold adds: "The reason for that is that these countries, they have huge oil production, they have a considerable petrochemical industry, so they see that regulation of plastics is a threat to their economic interest."

The U.S. is a giant in those same industries. Booming production of American natural gas has propelled plastic manufacturing around the world. Last year, the country produced, consumed and exported a record amount of ethane , which is used in plastic manufacturing and almost always comes from natural gas when it is produced in the U.S.

Experts who have met with the State Department and who have attended the talks say U.S. negotiators could be handcuffed by domestic politics. It would be "probably impossible" for the Biden administration to convince two-thirds of the Senate to approve a plastics treaty, says Løvold of the Norwegian Academy of International Law.

The U.S. government "does not want to be the bad guy," says Erica Nuñez, head of The Ocean Foundation's plastics initiative who has consulted with the State Department. "I think they do really want to come out of this with some wins. And I think they're very challenged right now in identifying what those wins are [realistically] within the U.S. context."

Against the backdrop of booming fossil fuel production, U.S. negotiators at the talks have declined to back a binding global agreement, say the state attorneys general and environmental advocates who have attended the talks. Instead, they say the U.S. has sought an accord that would leave countries free to decide for themselves how to clean up plastic pollution.

"The U.S. is really trying to reshape what could be a binding global treaty with binding global targets into a ground-up treaty where every country just says, 'Alright, this is what we're willing to do,'" says Muffett of the Center for International Environmental Law. "And that is inadequate."

A State Department spokesperson said the agreement needs to include "universal obligations," but that "overly prescriptive approaches" could dissuade countries that are big producers and consumers of plastic from joining. Countries should be able to meet their obligations "in ways that take into account their respective priorities and circumstances," the spokesperson said.

The sun sets behind an oil refinery in Texas. Almost every piece of plastic is made from fossil fuels. MARK FELIX/AFP /AFP via Getty Images hide caption

The sun sets behind an oil refinery in Texas. Almost every piece of plastic is made from fossil fuels.

The plastic industry says cutting production is off limits

The plastics industry is fighting on two fronts to block treaty provisions that could constrain manufacturing. It is trying to stop countries from limiting how much new plastic is produced, and it opposes global regulations on the chemicals that companies use.

Scientists and environmental advocates say that to make a significant dent in plastic pollution, countries have to cut how much new plastic they manufacture. But plastic makers and the oil and gas industry, which includes national oil companies and publicly traded corporations, say the world needs all the plastic they can produce, and that negotiators should focus on creating a so-called circular economy where plastic is recycled and reused to prevent waste.

The industry is making that argument at the same time it tries to fend off scrutiny of a decades-long controversial campaign to sell recycling to the public. Investigations, including by NPR , have shown the plastics industry promoted recycling even though officials long knew that it probably wouldn't work on a large scale. Former industry officials have said the goal was to avoid regulations and ensure demand for plastics kept growing.

Current officials have said those investigations don't accurately portray today's industry.

"We fully and readily admit that we don't recycle enough plastic," says Seaholm of the Plastics Industry Association. "But what we're saying is we want to recycle more. The industry is putting billions of dollars into recycling technologies that get us where we need to be."

Seaholm says the industry also supports policies to encourage recycling, like making producers help pay for recycling infrastructure, and requiring companies to use some recycled material in plastic products.

A lot of experts say recycling will have to be part of the solution, because plastic is ingrained in modern life. But they say governments need to regulate manufacturing for recycling to work. The Business Coalition for a Global Plastics Treaty, which includes major brands like Coca-Cola, Unilever and Walmart, is calling for governments to phase out "problematic plastics" that are hard to recycle or that are likely to end up as waste in the environment.

A State Department spokesperson said the U.S. is advocating for measures to reduce demand for new plastic, including through government procurement policies. However, the spokesperson said countries wouldn't be stopped from also trying to limit the supply of new plastic. A lot of countries want to do that with caps on manufacturing.

Reducing demand for new plastic is "great," says Nuñez of The Ocean Foundation. But "we still need to directly implement policies to limit fossil fuel extraction — which is something that the U.S. is avoiding," she says.

As for the chemicals that go into plastic, industry representatives say they should be regulated by national governments, not by a global treaty on plastic pollution.

But scientists and environmental advocates calling for global chemical regulations note that plastic waste – and the chemicals it's made from – doesn't stay in the country where it is produced. It floats down rivers and around oceans.

To protect people and the environment, governments that are part of the High Ambition Coalition to End Plastic Pollution, including the European Union, Canada, and the United Kingdom, as well as a number of developing countries from Rwanda to the Maldives, want to "eliminate and restrict" hazardous plastics and chemicals globally. They also want to force companies to disclose information about the chemicals they use.

"We have the evidence to show that human health and environmental health are being impacted," says Susanne Brander, an ecotoxicologist at Oregon State University who was on a call recently with the State Department discussing the plastics treaty. "If we can't get information on what's being used," she adds, "we have no way of truly making these products safer."

Pakistani laborers, mostly women, sort through empty bottles at a plastic recycling factory in Hyderabad, Pakistan. Pervez Masih/AP hide caption

Pakistani laborers, mostly women, sort through empty bottles at a plastic recycling factory in Hyderabad, Pakistan.

Lawmakers and observers warn of industry influence

But groups advocating for aggressive global rules say there's been little progress in the negotiations. After more than a year of talks, governments still haven't come up with a plan that has the "ambition and strength" to limit plastic production and cut down on pollution, the group of state attorneys general wrote to the State Department earlier this month. The group faulted the U.S. delegation for taking a position that "lacks concrete objectives or standards."

"The United States has the power to persuade and to be forward-leaning," says Margaret Spring, chief conservation and science officer at the Monterey Bay Aquarium who has consulted with the State Department on the plastics treaty and is leading a delegation at the talks for the International Science Council. "Right now, you've seen other countries doing that. And so that's been disappointing to many of us."

Negotiators face intense lobbying from groups that have big financial stakes in the plastics industry. The influence of plastic producers and petrochemical companies is "one of the largest barriers to strong action," a group of Democrat lawmakers, as well as Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, an Independent, and Mohammed Chahim, a member of the European Parliament, wrote recently to Biden and leaders of the UN and European Commission.

Ahead of this week's negotiations in Canada, the industry said it would be a mistake to talk much about manufacturing. "Certainly there are those in the [Biden] administration who would like to see some much more aggressive policies towards our industry, which we certainly don't agree with," says Seaholm of the Plastics Industry Association. "But there are those who are truly honest brokers that we're continuing to work with."

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. A lock ( ) or https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Keyboard Navigation

• Agriculture and Food Security
• Anti-Corruption
• Conflict Prevention and Stabilization
• Democracy, Human Rights, and Governance
• Economic Growth and Trade
• Environment, Energy, and Infrastructure
• Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment
• Global Health
• Humanitarian Assistance
• Innovation, Technology, and Research
• Water and Sanitation
• Burkina Faso
• Central Africa Regional
• Central African Republic
• Côte d’Ivoire
• Democratic Republic of the Congo
• East Africa Regional
• Power Africa
• Republic of the Congo
• Sahel Regional
• Sierra Leone
• South Africa
• South Sudan
• Southern Africa Regional
• West Africa Regional
• Afghanistan
• Central Asia Regional
• Indo-Pacific
• Kyrgyz Republic
• Pacific Islands
• Philippines
• Regional Development Mission for Asia
• Timor-Leste
• Turkmenistan
• Bosnia and Herzegovina
• North Macedonia
• Central America and Mexico Regional Program
• Dominican Republic
• Eastern and Southern Caribbean
• El Salvador
• Middle East Regional Platform
• West Bank and Gaza
• Dollars to Results
• Data Resources
• Strategy & Planning
• Budget & Spending
• Performance and Financial Reporting
• FY 2023 Agency Financial Report
• Records and Reports
• Budget Justification
• Our Commitment to Transparency
• Policy and Strategy
• How to Work with USAID
• Find a Funding Opportunity
• Organizations That Work With USAID
• Resources for Partners
• Get involved
• Business Forecast
• Safeguarding and Compliance
• Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility
• Mission, Vision and Values
• News & Information
• Operational Policy (ADS)
• Organization
• Stay Connected
• USAID History
• Video Library
• Coordinators
• Nondiscrimination Notice
• Collective Bargaining Agreements
• Disabilities Employment Program
• Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey
• Reasonable Accommodations
• Urgent Hiring Needs
• Vacancy Announcements
• Search Search Search

This Earth Day, Taking Action on Plastic Pollution, Extreme Heat, and Methane Emissions

For Immediate Release

Office of Press Relations [email protected]

Statement by Administrator Samantha Power

USAID Announces additional $35.7 million in new funding for Save Our Seas

Imagine a garbage truck full of plastic: old food containers, water bottles, wrapping from packages delivered to your door. That’s the amount of plastic waste that is dumped into the ocean every single minute. What’s worse, as demand for plastics grows, experts estimate that by 2030, this rate will increase to the equivalent of two garbage trucks per minute – and by 2040, three garbage trucks per minute.

Plastic pollution is becoming inescapable. Microplastics – tiny pieces of plastic so small that the human eye cannot easily see them – are now contaminating the food we eat , the air we breathe , the water we drink , and, unsurprisingly, our bodies themselves . Much of this plastic pollution comes from mismanaged waste that is openly dumped into the ocean as well as fields, pits, and rivers, and then leaks into the broader environment. Once plastic gets into the environment, it is extremely difficult and expensive to remove.

This year, as the world commemorates the 54th annual Earth Day with the theme “Planet versus Plastics,” USAID is joining others throughout the global community in committing to do our part to drastically reduce plastic pollution.

In 2022, I announced a landmark initiative to help stop plastic from getting into the environment in the first place: the Save Our Seas Initiative . Save Our Seas works with local and national governments, businesses, civil society, and other organizations to help countries reduce, reuse, and recycle plastic. So far, Save Our Seas has helped prevent more than 99,000 metric tons of plastic from getting into the environment – the equivalent of 10.7 billion plastic bottles.

Today, I am pleased to announce that USAID, working together with Congress, intends to provide an additional $35.7 million in new funding for the Save Our Seas Initiative.

We are also launching our largest country partnership to date with the Government of India. Led by an India-based consortium, this program will work hand-in-hand with local governments to develop and implement Plastic Reduction Action Plans; partner with the private sector to invest in recycling and plastic-alternative innovations; promote sustained behavior change in schools to reduce plastic use and plastic waste; and support social protections, fair wages, and recognition by the government for informal waste workers. Working with Congress, USAID intends to invest $11.25 million in these efforts.

Of course, while plastic pollution is an urgent threat, it is far from the only challenge our planet faces today. On January 30, I spoke at Johns Hopkins about the pressing need to help communities develop and implement tools to prepare for this era of so-called climate shocks: extreme weather events that have become so common they can no longer be characterized as “shocking.” Indeed, just in the months since my remarks, record heat led to deadly wildfires sweeping across South America ; countries in Southern Europe and North Africa imposed water rations in the face of severe drought ; and the U.S. Census Bureau announced that just last year, disasters forced 2.5 million Americans to flee their homes .

While 2023 was the hottest year on record, this year is expected to be even hotter. Here in the United States, heat is already deadlier than hurricanes, floods, and tornadoes combined. So last month, USAID and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies hosted the first Global Summit on Extreme Heat to help countries grapple with our planet’s fast-growing temperatures. We kicked off two months of action and called on governments, companies, universities, and NGOs to work together to develop, implement, and scale solutions. We also launched a central virtual hub to organize and track progress across sectors. But of course, as we work together to help countries build resilience to climate-induced disasters, we also need to continue ramping up our efforts to help countries reduce the emissions that are driving these intensifying disasters in the first place.

One of the most powerful ways to do so is to reduce methane pollution, which is 80 times more potent than carbon dioxide at warming the planet in the near term. We know that we can make progress here by making fairly simple changes to our existing programming. For instance, in Kenya, Feed the Future teams reduced methane emissions from cows by 28 percent while increasing milk productivity by 43 percent – just by improving the cows’ diets. In the Dominican Republic, we supported a local community in cleaning up a landfill – and in doing so, reduced emissions from decomposing waste that amounted to the equivalent of burning three million gallons of gasoline per year.

From plastic pollution to extreme heat to methane emissions, the challenges facing our planet are daunting – but we see real progress when we come together and invest in solutions. So this Earth Day, we recommit to taking action toward a more resilient, sustainable, and equitable world.

Related Press Releases

Usaid announces commitments to protect our ocean at the 2024 our ocean conference.

• April 17, 2024

USG Celebrates Oasis Project to Restore Aral Sea Ecosystem

• April 11, 2024

USAID and IFRC Hold Global Summit on Extreme Heat, Launch Global Action Sprint

• March 28, 2024

Administrator Samantha Power and EPA Administrator Michael S. Regan Formalize Partnership to Advance Environmental Protection Around the World

• March 26, 2024

Share This Page