inspector calls essay on inspector goole

An Inspector Calls Essays

One of the best things you can do to revise for any english exam is to read examples of essays. below you'll find a range of essays which you can read at your leisure., though there are always benefits in reading essays, becoming use to "active reading" is also important. to do this, use one of these strategies to help:, print the essay off and highlight key phrases or pieces of analysis that you like, keep some notes on the ways the essays use key vocabulary, cherry-picking the best phrases for use yourself, note down the structures of the essays but making a note of the focus of each paragraph, remember that there are hundreds of ways to write a successful essay, as the examples below will highlight. but they all manage to link the big ideas of the play with the language and structure; they all write about priestley's intentions and the audience's responses; they all recognise that this play is written to make a political point, not just to entertain the audience., a) how does priestley explore responsibility in an inspector calls , in the play, priestly wanted the audience to take responsibility for each other, to see that society was "one body." he wanted the audience in 1945 to recognise that although there had been positive changes since 1912, he didn't want them to regress and, in fact, wanted them to demand even more social reform., firstly , priestley uses the inspector to demonstrate to his audience that morality is a much more admirable quality in a person than mr birling's selfish manner. in act 3 mr birling offers "thousands" to help eva, though the inspector tells him that he is “offering money at the wrong time.” this shows that the inspector has the moral high ground and, although from a lower class, is holding all the power over the birling's treasured reputation. to the audience it would be obvious that birling should have given the money earlier, that it was inevitable that eva would end up costing him. it is also revealing that birling wouldn't give eva smith a small pay rise as it would have meant he couldn't "lower prices" but when it came to saving his status he was prepared to “give thousands.” by this stage, mr birling seems quite flustered and somewhat embarrassed as although in the outside world his authority is growing in his own home he can't control a man of “that class.” from a psychoanalytic perspective you could argue that this reflects birlings upbringing and the values that he was taught to respect as a younger man when he worked had and was kept poor in a way that taught him the value of hard work. in this way, mr birling feels that all the people who have money deserve it while the people who don't have money clearly don't deserve it. also, it is from his background that birling being taught to prioritise materialistic things could be the root of his difficult relationship with eric; he comes across as very cold and unforgiving which possibly reflected onto his son. this could easily be a subconscious cause of eric's addiction (looking for escape and comfort in the absence of his father's approval) and be linked to why eva viewed him to be more juvenile than gerald. the need for superficial things in his life like power and wealth is portrayed in the play as quite harmful and only something which will hold a person back, the inspector seems to be free from all these hindering social constructs and is definitely a much more favourable character because of this., in spite of their strong differences in beliefs, both mr birling and the inspector are very self-assured characters who are equally set in their ways . this is not mirrored in the younger characters like eric or sheila. priestly emphasizes a message directed towards the younger generations that they are the hope for change. throughout the play birling refuses to accept the need for reform or responsibility , he represents the stereotypical man of his age and class that priestley uses to contradict sheila's growing outward-looking empathy. when she promises the inspector that she will “never never do it again to anybody” she is acknowledging her privileges and shows that she understands how people must take responsibility for each other. i would say that her materialistic upbringing and the damage that has done makes her incredibly naive and impacts hugely on her opinion of others' worth. when talking about eva smith in act 1 one of the first things she asked was “is she pretty” from this line alone it is clear to the audience where her priorities lie and what kinds of values were instilled in her from a young age probably by her shallow mother. priestly highlights that it's the duty of the young to bring about reform and for this to happen they firstly need to realise the older generations won't do it for them. he also stresses that it's not ok for people like the birlings to take credit for their achievements but never accept responsibility for the consequences of their profit., priestley uses the contrast between age groups and class to explore universal divides caused by pride, reputation and lack of accountability, things that mr and mrs birling value highly but sheila is willing to let go of by accepting her mistakes and returning gerald's engagement ring (also rejecting her father's business interest in gerald.).

Examiners commentary:

The simple, clear first paragraph is fine.

The second paragraph, however, contains some interesting points that could be related to the question but which aren't. As a result, a lot of what's good in this paragraph is lost. This could have been easily fixed if the student had remembered to continually link their points back to the question.

The third paragraph is an improvement in that it does mention responsibility more often and has some interesting observations about the generation gap.

The third paragraph feels unfinished and unclear - it sounds like it's saying that Mr and Mrs Birling value accountability highly, or that the view a "lack of accountability" highly, neither of which are true.

AO1: Lots of AO1, though it isn't connected to the question often enough

AO2: Not enough AO2 at all - hardly any specific language analysis

AO3: Nothing of note outside of the first paragraph

Grade: This is a difficult essay to grade. There are lots of interesting points, especially about how our upbringings affect our outlook, but they're not always linked to the question which means they won't score as well as they should. Also, a complete lack of AO2 causes real problems. This is probably a G5 though with a few minor changes it could easily be pushed up two grades.

B) How does Priestley explore responsibility in An Inspector Calls ?

Priestley presents a strong message about responsibility throughout the play. he wants us all to take more responsibility for each other., firstly, he uses the character of mr birling to convey the ignorance of those who refuse to take responsibility. we can see this when mr birling says, “community and all that nonsense”. the use of the noun “nonsense” shows the audience that mr birling is mocking socialists and those who believe society should be a community. you can almost hear his sarcastic tone as if ‘community’ is an absurd idea. the word “all” also highlights his belief that anything to do with community, such as helping others and being responsible for one another, is ridiculous. this links to when he says, “a man has to mind his own business and look after himself and his own.” the repetition of the pronoun “his” emphasises that he only takes care of his possessions and doesn’t think twice about others. also, it exposes to the audience his sense of higher class entitlement linked to his lack of responsibility for things that are not directly his fault. the audience of 1945 would have been shocked because by this time, after the labour movement and war, people were becoming more open-minded about mixing social classes and community responsibility. this links to priestley’s message because he was a socialist and believed people should have equal rights., in contrast to mr birling, priestley uses the character of sheila to present those who are willing to take responsibility. we see this in the line, “i’ll never, never do it again to anyone”. the repetition of “never, never” reveals that sheila feels guilty and deeply regrets her actions. it also tells the audience that she is open-minded about changing how she behaves, regardless of her social class. the use of the noun “anyone” reveals that she doesn’t care if the person is upper class or lower class. she doesn’t want to put anyone in that position again and has taken full responsibility. if this play had been shown in 1912, the audience may have been more likely to agree with the birling’s ideas and would have thought sheila may be acting foolishly. however, the audience of 1945 would have been more sympathetic towards sheila because at this time, society was shifting towards the creation of the nhs, the introduction of education for all and the building of social housing. this reflected how society was coming together more and caring more for the poor instead of brushing them aside., similarly, the character of inspector goole is the main voice of responsibility in the play and is the voice of priestley himself as he is trying to show the birling family that being upper class doesn’t make them any less responsible for the community than the next person. this sense of responsibility is also reflected in the stage directions when the light goes from “pink and intimate” and “brighter and harder”, when the inspector enters. immediately, this tells us that the i nspector has a presence on the stage and that he has come to say something important. perhaps it is about bri nging light to the things that the upper classes like to hide in the shadows, or the harsh lighting works almost like he is interrogating the family. the spotlight is now on them and what they have done., additionally, priestley conveys a message of responsibility through the inspector when he says, “we are members of one body.” the noun “members” highlights that we are all joined together and if one member falls, then it brings everything down. furthermore, it links to the idea that community is like a family who should take care of each other no matter what. it could also have religious connotations because in the last supper jesus said, “this is my body that will be given up for you, take this in memory of me.” here, jesus said that people should eat the bread because it would bring everyone together and he always believed that people should be equal. in 1912, people were very divided and the poor would rarely move up to the higher classes. priestley was aiming to ensure that the shifts in society happening in 1945 were strengthened and that everyone felt that responsibility for others was important..

Really clear structure, with a clear target for each paragraph

Doesn't make a wide range of points but has a quote to backup each point and explores the quote in depth

Each section ends with something about the context

Though each point is presented with a quote attached, this could have been improved with some other references from the play even if those quotes or references weren't analysed in depth

AO1: Not much AO1 really, no real refernces to key moments of plot

AO2: Lots of great AO2 - quotes analysed in depth

AO3: Good AO3, all key points linked to context

Grade: A really neat, clear and well organised essay. A lack of AO1 is a problem, as is the fact that although each paragraph was linked to an idea connected to responsibility the link isn't always made clear. However, there's loads of AO2 and AO3 so it would be a comfortable G7. With a couple of sentences added to each paragraph which referenced a few key moments of plot it would go up to a G8.

C) How does Priestley explore responsibility in An Inspector Calls ?

Priestley explores ideas about responsibility through the way the birlings behave towards eva smith. arthur birling explains the family’s capitalist philosophy when he says ‘a man has to mind his own business and look after himself and his own’ which suggests that he feels that he only has responsibility for his own family and himself . this is reinforced by the way the birlings treat eva smith. first of all, arthur fires her from his factory to make an example of her because she asks for higher wages and dares to take responsibility for others by speaking up on their behalf. it is revealed that arthur’s prime motive is to keep wages down so that he could make more profits. priestley reinforces this through arthur’s constant repetition of ‘hard headed man of business’, to remind the audience that he is representative of capitalism and the damage it causes. the word ‘business’ is later used by birling to refer to the death of eva smith as he states how her death is ‘horrid business’ which emphasises the message that birling only sees people’s lives in terms of profit. priestley is showing the audience that a blind belief that generating profits and prosperity for the good of everyone is fundamentally wrong as it causes innocent people to suffer tragic consequences., although all the birlings are responsible for eva’s mistreatment and death in some way, they react differently when they find this out from the inspector. mr and mrs birling do not change and are only concerned about their reputation - the possible ‘scandal’ or arthur’s ‘knighthood’. however, priestley’s intention is give the audience a message of hope as sheila and eric do recognise that they have behaved badly by the end of the play and therefore he is suggesting that it is the younger generation that have the responsibility for adopting more socialist principles. through the younger birlings’ attitudes, priestley suggests that socialism is the modern way and that it is young people who will change society for the better., this change of views in the younger generation is also shown through the play’s structure as eric dramatically exits the stage at a crucial point suggesting he is struggling to contain his guilt over his mistreatment of eva smith. likewise, sheila is struggling with her guilt and tries to show that she has changed by directing others to realise their own responsibility in eva smith’s suicide. for example, sheila warns her mother not to ‘build up a wall’ this metaphor describes the separation of the social classes as mrs birling believes she is superior to the lower classes. the irony is that the opposite is true as priestley reveals how mrs birling’s behaviour is morally wrong – she punished a pregnant girl by refusing her charity when she needed it the most just because the girl used her name and in doing so angered mrs birling., through using the form of a morality play, priestley is able to identify what each family member’s sins and how it was these sins that they demonstrated and caused their mistreatment of eva smith. for instance, eric’s lust for eva smith meant that he forced himself upon eva and then his sloth – his inability to earn his own money meant he stole money from his father instead of facing up to his responsibility and earning money himself. by the end of the play, priestley shows that eric fully accepts his responsibility and describes how he cannot even remember his assault of eva as being a ‘hellish thing’. the use of this metaphor implies he is being tortured by his own guilt and knows he has been committed to hell due to his sins., priestley constructs the inspector’s role as that of a priest as he extracts all the confessions from the birlings and attempts to force them to accept their responsibilities through asking questions which challenge their capitalist way of life and challenges their edwardian values of social class and hierarchy. in addition, the inspector’s language has religious tones to it as he warns the birlings and gerald croft that if they do not stop exploiting the poor, they will learn their lesson with ‘fire, blood and anguish’. there is an inference that they will be punished in hell for not caring about the way those less fortunate are treated. through the inspector’s voice, the audience hear the socialist message that the birlings are being taught and we left knowing that this is a warning to us all – we need to accept responsibility and take better care of others around us., how does sheila change during an inspector calls, - summary paragraph, - stage directions, - confrontation with the inspector – she takes responsibility, - standing up to her parents, - the young are more impressionable, - ending – grown up, throughout inspector calls, sheila is the character who changes the most. at the beginning of the play she is a young, naïve girl who is happy to be told what to think and do; by the end she is the only character who really takes responsibility for the death of eva and is happy to tell her parents that she thinks they are wrong., the stage directions describe her as being “very pleased with life” a phrase which reflects her luxurious upbringing. she’s also described as being “excited” an adjective that suggests she is looking forward to her life. in both these respects she could be viewed as being ignorant to the reality of what her luxury costs others, or how difficult the times ahead will be., sheila refers to her parents as “mummy” and “daddy,” nouns that are associated with young children and not young adults; she is also told off by her mother for squabbling with her brother, a fact that reinforces our vision of her as being infantilised by her parents. sheila is then given a ring by her fiancé gerald. “is it the one you wanted me to have” she asks him, a phrase that suggests she wasn’t really interested in what she wanted but only what gerald wanted her to have. throughout the opening she is presented as a child, with no real desires or wishes of her own. in many respects, she is the traditional rich young woman – without a real mind of her own by virtue of her gender., when the inspector arrives, he explains how her spoilt behaviour in a shop led to eva being sacked. “then i’m really responsible,” she accepts, quickly recognising her role in the girl’s downfall. also, she observes that the inspector is getting ready to speak to gerald next and pushes this through, asking direct questions to gerald and working out the reasons why he wasn’t where he said he was the summer before. in both these cases, she is showing independent thought – by accepting responsibility even when others don’t and by pushing gerald against his wishes., during their time with the inspector, her parents and gerald repeatedly try to send sheila out of the room to protect her from his news – her mother argues that she is “looking tired,” something that we would only really say to a very small child. sheila repeatedly refuses, arguing that she will stay until “i know why that girl killed herself.” here, she clearly shows herself standing up to her parents, sticking to her desire to discover the truth of the situation., at one point arthur argues that the inspector is making “quite an impression” on sheila, suggesting that she’s coming around to the inspector’s way of thinking. “we often do on the young ones,” the inspector replies, suggesting that his socialist values are more affective on younger people. this reflects a view of priestley’s which was that socialism and left wing values are more impactful on younger people, a fact that’s often reflected in even modern opinion polls where right wing conservatives tend to be older. this is also shown in how, by the end of the play, mr and mrs birling remain unchanged by the arrival of the inspector, while their children change – even gerald admits that the events “affected him,” before he reverts back to his old ways., even after the inspector leaves, sheila continues to push his ideas trying to make sure that her family don’t forget him. she claims they are beginning to “pretend” that nothing has happened, clearly accepting that things won’t be the same again. her use of the verb is interesting as well, as games of “pretend” are really childish things. it seems that the girl who was once infantilised is now accusing her parents of playing make-believe. she also argues that her parents “don’t seem to have learnt anything,” behaving almost like a school mistress arguing that a lesson has been missed. she also says, in response to a speech from eric in which he accepts responsibility, that he makes her feel a little less “ashamed” of them, a word which really shows just how powerfully sheila sees her parents’ remorseless behaviour., her frustration is clear throughout the ending, where she says her parents’ behaviour “scares” her. this clearly references the inspectors closing words about “fire and blood and anguish” which referenced the years of war that would follow the period between the play being written and being performed. the audience at this point would doubtless be agreeing with sheila regarding her fear. her parents continue to ignore her desire to grow up, infantilising her again by suggesting that she’s just “tired” and “hysterical,” though they can’t ignore her final words when she refuses gerald’s ring again which clearly shows that she has grown up enough to express herself completely, how does priestley present mrs birling as an unlikeable character (high level response), priestley presents mrs birling as an unlikable character as she doesn’t change throughout the play. in acts 1 and 2 she doesn’t say much about the tragic death of eva at all, showing her lack of remorse., on the other hand, characters like sheila do realise the horror of the suicide. in act 2, gerald says “sorry, i’ve just realised a girl has died”. this is ironic [sic] as he had found out in act 1, but it had only sunken in in act 2. the word “sorry” shows he feels embarrassed about his emotional side, as many men of the time (1912) did., sheila also changes throughout, creating a stark contrast to her mother. in act 1 she refers to her mother as “mummy” like when she says “mummy, isn’t it a beauty” this shows she was dependant on her and worried about material things. she later says, “but these girls aren’t cheap labour, they’re people” to mr birling, showing his daughter isn’t afraid to voice her opinion but her mother is. in act 2, sheila says, “we really must stop these silly pretences”. the inclusive pronoun “we” not only presents sheila as the family member doing the right thing and trying to influence others, as her mother should, but also involves the audience, trying to give them a message. the noun “pretences” is significant as it was mrs birling who pretended not to remember eva smith., when she was shown the photo it was evident that mrs birling didn’t change throughout as at the end of the play in act 3 gerald suggests that “he’s been had”, and the birlings are keen to accept it, whilst sheila and gerald remain guilt-stricken. the audience of the time, in 1945, would have just experienced the war and realised everyone must start taking care of one another. they may have not been so quick to change, as, at the time, only rich, most-likely capitalist, people would have gone to the theatre to see the play, whereas a modern audience is more diverse and open., priestley also presents mrs birling as an unlikable character as she is dismissive towards many different groups. for example, she says “a girl of that class” when her part in the suicide is revealed. the noun “girls” shows mrs birling’s views that working class girls are undeserving of names. this derogatory comment would have infuriated an audience of 1945 as the working class were extremely beneficial during the war, though the class divide was massive in 1912. she is even misogynist, like mr birling, who says “clothes mean something different to women”. she says “sheila and i had better go to the drawing room”, which shows her views on women’s place in society, due to gender roles. she also says men have to spend a lot of time working away, but sheila challenges it and says she won’t get used to it. it is obvious priestley has used the younger generations as a symbol for more open-minded people as eric also challenges mr birling on war. mr birling says the titanic is “unsinkable, absolutely unsinkable”. the repetition and qualifiers enhance the dramatic irony as he was wrong about both of these things. it is almost as though priestley is mocking people like mr birling., mrs birling also has capitalist views which don’t change throughout the play. she believes in a social hierarchy as seen in the stage directions before the play begin, where the characters are placed around a rectangular table which gives power to those at the top and bottom, and when she says, “be quiet and let your father think of what we should do next”. the imperative verb “be” shows how she is even being rude towards her own children., this contrast with shelia’s feminism, which was popular due to the suffragette movement in 1912, significant after 1945 as many women helped the war effort and important to a modern audience who have achieved so much. mrs birling uses her powers for bad as she “influenced” the committee to refuse eva help., priestley uses the play as an allegory for his socialist views. by inducing a sense of hatred towards mrs birling he allows the audience to see the flaws in a capitalist mind-set. priestley, having served in the war himself, developed strong socialist views. this is reflected in the inspector, who is a mouthpiece for priestley as he uses the metaphor, “we are all part of one body” to imply everyone should look after one another. priestley had a popular radio programme which was cancelled for being too “left wing” by the bbc. as time progresses, the audience becomes more socialist and the play is more effective., priestley presents mrs birling as having double standard. this can be seen in the quotation, “i’m sorry eric… didn’t know”, after finding out it was her son she was talking about when she said he should take full responsibility for eva’s pregnancy., despite stage directions calling for pink, intimate lighting at the beginning, mrs birling never seems to be intimate with her children. when the inspector asks if eric drinks, she says “of course not, he’s only a boy”, which shows she is either lying or not close with her family. however, sheila says he’s been “steadily drinking for two years”, showing she is either trying to get him into trouble or is keen to get him help. either way, she is closer with him than his own mother. the siblings also exchange comments when she calls him “squiffy”. the colloquialism has mrs birling unaware of the changes and reluctant to change her mind-set. this also foreshadows the importance of alcohol in the play as it was the cause of eric’s behaviour., how does priestley present the views of the inspector in an inspector calls (high level response), inspector goole is presented as an omnipotent, powerful figure throughout the whole play; his presence immediately has the power to change the light and cheerful atmosphere of the birlings' dinner party. the lighting changes from "pink and intimate" to "brighter and harder" once the inspector arrives. here, priestley's use of the adjectives "pink and intimate" suggests a warm and happy atmosphere whereas the adjective "harder" opposes this. priestley uses the inspector as a dramatic device. not only could it be argued that the inspector is an immensely powerful figure but also that priestley uses the stage directions that inspector goole's arrival to act as a symbol for how he wants society to improve. the lighting before the inspector arrives suggests that the birling family – who are a stereotypical portrayal of a middle class family – were happy whilst they were ignorant to the working class. the lighting change tells us how priestley wants society to change; he wants society to stop being ignorant to the working class., furthermore, j. b. priestley uses the inspector to convey that he wants society to change and become more empathetic towards the working class instead of perceiving them as being disposable. when the inspector arrives, he tells the birling family about eva smith’s suicide in which she drank a lot of strong disinfectant that “burnt her inside out”. priestley’s language persuades the audience to feel immense sympathy not only for eva smith but also for all of the working class; it could be argued that eva smith’s suffering and suicide is used as a metaphor to highlight the continuous struggled faced by the working class, throwing into relief the issues within society and how these problems are ignored by the wealthier classes. priestley’s gory imagery alternately makes the audience feel guilty because they may realise how ignorant they have been to ignore the struggles of the working class and persuade them to change by being more empathetic., priestley suggests that a pressing issue with the twentieth century society is that people are reluctant to take responsibility for their actions. this view is encapsulated through the use of the elder members of the birling family, arthur birling and his wife mrs birling – who do not take responsibility for their actions towards eva smith. however, priestley uses the inspector to try to change this. the inspector states that if we share nothing else, “we have to share our guilt”. here priestley uses the personal pronoun “we” to give society a sense of unity, implying everyone must do the same and follow the inspector’s teachings. ‘an inspector calls’ was set in 1912, a time in which society was divided by not only gender but by social class. priestley wants the middle and upper classes to transform from abusing their power to dominate and exploit the working class to instead being more responsible for their actions and treating people more sympathetically ., priestley uses the inspector to convey the consequences of what will happen if members of society do not change. he states that we will be “taught” in “fire and blood and anguish”. priestley’s use of a triplet of nouns act as metaphors for the two world wars. the entire play is used as a motif for the wars; if society proceeds to not improve the way in which members of society treat each other, the world wars will repeat in an endless cycle until we learn. here, the inspector is presented as an omnipotent being. ‘an inspector calls’ was written and first performed at the end of the second world war therefore the contemporary audience will have experienced the perpetual suffering that comes with them. priestley uses the inspector to make the audience fearful as they are persuaded to think that the inspector is a god-like character imposing judgement on society. this will persuade all audiences to change their actions and embrace socialist ideologies of caring for other members of society which is what priestley intended them to do., priestley wants the middle and upper classes to stop being selfish and exploiting the poor for their own financial gain, but instead be more generous and empathetic towards other members of the working class. the inspector is almost an impartial figure in the play because he does not fit into the distinct levels of society. this gives the audience the impression that the inspector is an unbiased figure; they will be persuaded to listen to him and change their views., compare priestley’s presentation of eva smith and shelia birling., in the play ‘an inspector calls’ we see a family called the birlings that consist of many different characters, personalities and beliefs. we only begin to see these different aspects when the family begin to learn how each one of them was involved in causing the chain of events which led a girl, eva smith to commit suicide. there are two characters in particular who are very different in the way that they live their lives and their own outlook on life. these two characters are eva smith and shelia birling., shelia is the daughter of sybil and arthur birling. they are a well-known family in brumley and are in the public eye constantly because of the position her father holds within the town as he is on the bench and the owner of the big birling and company and is due to marry gerald croft whose parents are very well-known also., eva smith is almost the opposite of the social scale to shelia. she has no friends or family to rely on and is quite an independent woman. she struggles to get by and is unable to cope with the strains that she is forced to be under at her age., at the beginning of the play we see shelia at the table with her family and how she is influenced by her family’s thoughts. she was quite childish and used petty excuses for her actions ‘i told him that if they didn’t get rid of that girl, i’d never go near the place again’. this shows that shelia had the same approach about how to treat others of the lower class as her father, which is not a good quality that shelia and arthur birling share., when we first hear of eva smith in the play we learn about the time that she experienced while working at birling and company. she was outspoken, resilient and gutsy as she led a group of workers on strike in an attempt to get higher wages ‘she’d had a lot to say-far too much- so she had to go’., there we see the huge difference in the lives that each of them live, but it is the way that shelia changes as the play goes on and learns more about eva smith’s life., once shelia knows more about the family’s effect on eva’s life she becomes more defiant, and mature. she begins to stand up to her parents who still look down on eva. she realises that there is no need to treat a person the way that the birling family did, no matter whether it was the same girl or not ‘everything we said had happened really hadn’t happened. if it didn’t end tragically, then that’s lucky for us. but it might have done.’ she has a more compassionate approach to eva and her life as she learns about the suffering that this girl the same age as herself had to go through., priestly shows the importance of caring for others within your community by showing that if the birling’s had looked after eva smith and treated her with any respect then maybe it would have prevented her suicide, because she would have been in a lot happier state of mind. this also takes place near to every one of us. if you treat one person unacceptably then you never know what effect that may have on them and others around them, if you do your bit to treat every person with decency that you meet then you will have no regrets with what you have done., priestly also shows through shelia that she was the next generation, with the new ideas of how people of another class should be treated and how the other birling’s are still living in the old, traditional frame of mind, which is harsh and uncaring to others. whereas shelia would be a middle aged woman when priestly wrote the book, he wanted to show the difference of views between the younger and older generations of 1912., shelia birling and eva smith are very different characters, but it is the effect that they can have on each other’s lives which highlights priestley’s views about community., to what extent could you argue that mr birling is the most important character in an inspector calls , as the ‘head of the household’ mr birling is, arguably, the central character to an inspector calls. throughout the beginning of the play he displays the kind of arrogance that priestley expected to see from a selfish capitalist; throughout the exchange, he is completely unapologetic about the death of eva; and after the inspector leaves, he tries his hardest to get out of trouble. also, if you argued that an inspector calls is really a morality play, then you could see mr birling as representing the deadly sins of greed and pride, both things that priestly attacked capitalists for., at the beginning of the play, mr birling is described as “heavy looking” which immediately reminds us of a large, well fed, rich man, enjoying the luxuries of life. his “easy manners” but “provincial speech” remind us that although he is now rich (as symbolised by his knowledge of manners) he is from working class roots (provincial means from the country, or of a lower class.) mr birling is one of those men who had made money during the industrial revolution and, priestley argues, was then exploiting the working classes for his own profit., during the opening exchanges over dinner, birling shows off to gerald croft – his daughter’s new fiancé – by mentioning some rather expensive port he bought, and then gives a long and stuffy speech about how lucky his children are to be born into a time of such good fortune. throughout the speech priestley uses a lot of dramatic irony as he mentions birling’s belief that there would be no labour issues (despite the fact that the russian revolution was just five years away;) there would be no war in germany (despite two being on the horizon,) and – in a moment of comedy – that the titanic was “unsinkable.” throughout this speech, audience members are reminded of how little we know about the future, and how important it is that we prepare for the unexpected. birling is shown to be arrogant, small minded, and selfish; all features that a socialist like priestley would expect to see in a capitalist like birling., priestly times the inspector’s arrival so that he cuts birling off during one of his selfish rants: “a man has to mind his own business and look after himself,” he is saying as the doorbell rings. his initial response to the inspector is immediately defensive: he delivers a short speech detailing the members of the local police force that he knows, and the fact that he used to be mayor. the inspector seems uninterested though. throughout their exchange birling makes it clear that he feels no responsibility saying a number of times that he had nothing to do with this “wretched” girl’s death. the use of this adjective is interesting as “wretched” can mean poor or downtrodden, but it can also mean disliked and disgusting; birling, we have to assume, feels both are true. at one point he argues, perfectly summarising priestley’s feelings about the attitude of people like birling: “i can't accept any responsibility. if we were all responsible for everything that happened to everybody we’d had anything to do with, it would be very awkward.”, during the remainder of the play, mr birling continues to reveal himself as being selfish and without regret. he is continually worried about the threat to his dreamt of knighthood and, when the chance arises, is even happy to direct all the blame at his young son, eric. he also tries to bribe the inspector, offering him “thousands” now it has all gone wrong, despite the fact that he wouldn’t pay her even a few shillings more at the time. throughout act 3, it is mr birling who leads the campaign to recognise the inspector as being a fraud and he is the most relieved when it turns out that there is no dead girl. however, unlike sheila, he isn’t relieved that no-one had died but is simply pleased to have saved his own hide., however, as the main character in the play mr birling receives both the opening and closing lines. in the end, it is him who is stuck, holding the phone and revealing that there is and “inspector on the way,” and in many ways it is him that the audience will be most pleased to see get his just deserts., what is the role of the inspector in an inspector calls , an inspector calls is a parable that was set during the belle époque (meaning the beautiful period) which lasted from 1870-1914. in the play, a family have their dinner party interrupted by an inspector who comes to visit. though this is a morality play in the traditional sense, its moral compass is very much set by the author’s belief in socialism ., the inspector arrives at a critical point. mr birling, the patriarch of his family, is delivering a lecture to his son and future son-in-law, about how “men must look after themselves…” in this way he is exposing his deep selfishness – one that priestly believed was at the heart of all capitalists. at this point there is a “sharp ring on the doorbell,” the adverb perhaps foreshadowing how the inspectors arrival will cut through the birlings’ veneer of respectability ., almost as soon as he arrives, mr birling reminds him of his own social standing – that he used to be mayor and has played golf with the chief inspector. the fact that mr birling is threatening the inspector is barely concealed , though the inspector brushes it aside. as a morality play, all the characters in an inspector calls represent something else - an ideal or social group or class. here, the birlings represent the wealthy and privileged elite while the inspector represents the newly educated middle classes, who would rise up and form a bridge between the elite and the working classes below them. the inspector, as becomes clear, is here to ensure that the birlings do not get away with how they treated eva smith., the inspector is described as giving an “impression of massiveness.” this is interesting as it makes it clear that he isn’t massive but should give that “impression.” as a direction this is a bit of a nightmare for a casting agent . he shouldn’t be big, but should have a gravitas that makes him seem huge. fortunately, however, priestley has written a part that gives every opportunity for moral superiority for an actor., also, from the moment he arrives the stage directions call for the lighting to change from “pink and intimate” – perhaps reflecting the rose - tinted spectacles through which the birlings view the world – and to something more “harsh.” perhaps this change is designed to highlight how the inspector’s arrival puts the birlings behaviour in the spotlight or exposes the lies they kept hidden in the shadows ., the first to fall to his inspection is mr birling, who sacked eva after she arranged for a strike amongst his workers while they demanded more pay. though birling admitted that she was a good worker, he clearly saw his profits threatened by her behaviour and made an example of her. mr birling’s children, however, do not share his selfishness and, as his son points out, “why shouldn’t they try for higher wages we try for bigger profits.” in many ways this quote exposes the selfish, unreasonable nature of capitalists : that they see their own right to desire more profits as god given , while those who resist are “troublemakers” and “cranks.”, after mr birling, the inspector turns to sheila, who had eva sacked from her job in a local department store. it is clear from the story – which sheila tells – that she was jealous of eva’s good looks. it is also clear, however, that sheila deeply regrets her actions. not long after this, mrs birling comments that sheila’s feelings have been changed and claims that the inspector has made an “impression” on her. this is a telling word – an “impression” is something that is the result of pressure, as though she’s been bullied into seeing things differently; but it is also something that often disappears over time. mrs birling’s feelings are clear: that the inspector’s ideas have affected sheila, but only fleetingly . the inspector replies dryly , acknowledging that he will often have an effect on the young. in many ways this reflects the old adage that young people are more socialist by nature, gradually turning to the more self-centred right as they grow. this is certainly the point that is being made by priestley, as the inspector affects the younger generation far more than their elders., after sheila, he turns to gerald who, again, reveals his own role in the death of eva. by this stage she is known as daisy renton – a name that perhaps reflects the fact her position: daisies are simple flowers that call to mind the innocence of daisy chains; while the appearance of “rent” in her name reminds us of what she did to her body in order to survive., the play continues to get darker as the inspector turns to mrs birling. under pressure she tells the inspector, and the audience, about how she turned away a young pregnant woman and that if the inspector was doing his job properly he should be chasing down the father. at this point, the audience know that she is talking about eric and are tensely waiting for the big reveal. in many respects it is also at this point that the audience is forced to reflect on the nature of this play: up until this moment, the action seems relatively realistic and, although the focus has been on only one character at any time, the focus has shifted around the room without any seeming construction . this time, however, the structure is too neat to be believed; it’s too well constructed to maintain the illusion of realism , and we know that we are watching a parable in which the inspector has an almost divine control over the action., after exposing the family’s “crimes” the inspector finally delivers his closing speech, which has all the hallmarks of a sermon that is delivered to the audience as much as it is to the family. in it, he reminds us of all the eva smiths and john smiths there are in the world, and that we are “one body.” here, the inspector is addressing both the audience in 1945 and the audience in 1912. the telling difference was the two world wars, during which the working classes proved themselves to be every bit as strong and resilient as their “social superiors.” the sense of national bonding that took place during the wars led to significant social changes in the uk, not least the creation of the nhs and the welfare state, and it was characters like the inspector (and priestley) who made sure this happened., his final warning, however, that “if we do not learn this lesson we will be taught it in fire and blood and anguish,” has a slightly different meaning in the two time periods. for the family in 1912 it was prophetic ; but for an audience in 1945 it would have been suggesting that the wars were almost a punishment for their behaviour, and a way of suggesting that if they didn’t embrace socialism now then the wars, and all the horrors that came with them, would return again., at the end of the play, the birlings receive a phone call which tells them that a real police inspector is on the way, to talk about a girl who has recently died. this final moment raises questions about the role of the inspector goole we’ve just watched, and it is at this point that his name seems important: is he a goole, or a ghoul, or something else from some other world is he some angelic messenger send to bring divine judgement that question is never answered, though the audience – or the young ones at least – should have no doubts that his understanding of the world is from a “higher” place., another essay on the role of the inspector in an inspector calls ., this essay's structure is as follows:, a summary paragraph, how the inspector is introduced, mr birling and the inspector – good for ao2, a “panic” paragraph – without quotes – that picks up on some key moments from the rest of the play – good for ao1, the inspector at the end, in the play an inspector calls, a police inspector brings judgement to a rich family who live in 1912. the play is a morality play, in which each of the characters represents a particular role or opinion. in this morality play, the inspector promotes a socialist understanding of the world in a way that reflects the views of the play’s author jb priestley., when the inspector arrives he cuts off mr birling’s lecture when he is saying that “ a man must look after himself and his family …” this interruption symbolises the way that inspector is going to stop mr birling’s views. also, it says that there is a “ sharp ring on the doorbell .” the word “ sharp ” suggests that the inspector will cut through mr birling’s selfish ideas. also, from the moment he arrives the stage directions call for the lighting to change from “ pink and intimate ” to something more “ harsh .” this is because the birlings see the world through as being nice and friendly while the inspector will bring a “ harsh ” judgement on them., in the play, the inspector works as a foil to mr birling’s selfish capitalism. at the beginning of the play, mr birling calls socialists “ cranks ” – which means crazy – and says that if we all listened to socialists we’d be like “ bees in a hive .” this remark criticises socialists as bees lack individuality, they work almost like a big machine, and only do what they’re told and mr birling doesn’t want the world to be like this. the inspector, however, believes that we are “ members of one body ” and that we are “ responsible for each other .” in this way, the inspector is talking about the socialist ideas which suggest that because we all live together we should look after each other. in fact, he goes on to suggest that if we don’t learn to do this we will “ taught it in fire and blood and anguish .” this is clearly a reference to the two world wars which were fought between the time the play was set and when it was written. it is also telling that mr birling didn’t think the wars would happen – he would probably have referred to that as being an idea from some kind of “ crank .”, at the beginning of the play mr birling threatens the inspector by saying that he plays golf with the chief inspector. the inspector, however, doesn’t care and carries on his investigation. throughout the play, the inspector acts like he doesn’t care about the characters social standings and only wants to focus on the facts. he is someone logical and he doesn’t care what people think of him. he just wants the truth about eva’s death. he also has a habit of looking “hard” at the person he is addressing. this is because he is inspecting them, almost as though he’s looking through them and into their soul., in the end the inspector leaves and we are left unsure as to whether he was real or not. however, because his name is inspector goole – which sounds similar to ghoul (which is a kind of spirit or ghost) – the audience would be within their rights to think of him as a kind of spiritual prophet or divine messenger., a third essay on the role of the inspector in an inspector calls , jb priestley uses the story of an inspector calls to contrast the differences between upper/upper-middle and working class people in society during the edwardian times. the inspector questions the birling family to think about the consequences of their actions on others – predominately the working class and people whom they believe to be inferior to them. priestley uses the inspector to make society question their morals and think about accepting responsibility for their actions. each character reacts differently to the inspector and priestley uses this to represent capitalist vs socialist ideals., - nice opening – clear and specific and leaves the examiner comfortable that you know what you’re doing. may be a bit long – though it is all meaningful, when the inspector enters the birling household, the stage directions states that the lights change from ‘pink and intimate’ to ‘brighter and harder’. this shows how the presence of the inspector changes the atmosphere and how he is here for a purpose. the lighting change from ‘pink and intimate’ to ‘brighter and harder’ almost shows how the inspector is going to burst the birling’s protected, capitalist bubble. the idea of the lights being ‘brighter and harder’ create the idea of a spotlight shining on the birling family and how the inspector is there to expose them to the truth. in the stage directions, it also says that the inspector ‘creates an impression of massiveness’. this shows that although the birling’s are superior to him in class, the inspector still holds the authority over them all. it could also be foreshadowing that the inspector is going to create a lasting ‘impression’ over the birling family and impact their lives hopefully for the better., - super cool lots of detail, specific things being said and focusing on sections of the text. this is what you want to do, in act one, mr birling makes several threats to the inspector about his connections with the chief constable. this shows how mr birling feels threatened and uncomfortable with the inspectors presence. he tries to assert his authority over the inspector to protect himself and his pride as he’s being questioned by someone who is inferior to himself. he doesn’t want to damage his reputation and all he is thinking about is himself. this represents the capitalist society and how they refuse to think of any but themselves and how they will go to any measure to protect their reputation. mr birling also tries to emphasise his importance to the inspector by mentioning gerald and his family name. he says, “perhaps i ought to explain first that this is mr gerald croft – the son of sir george croft – you know, crofts limited.” by mentioning gerald’s family name, it shows how mr birling is trying to intimidate the inspector. also, mr birling could be mentioning the croft name to try to make himself feel more in control of the situation and back in the superior position in the room. priestley uses the reaction of mr birling to the inspector to represent how people of the upper capitalist class use their positions of power as an excuse to be ignorant to their actions. priestley wanted make people aware of this to questions their own ignorance., - again, this is great. you show a clear understanding of the relationship between birling and the inspector and clearly explain the power dynamic in the room, at the end of the play, the inspector makes a big final speech to the birling family. it opens with a reminder that there are thousands of “john smiths and eva smiths” in the world. this reminds the audience that we all have to accept responsibility for our actions and realise it is not enough to only think of ourselves but we must think of others as well. the inspector then goes on to say that “we don't live alone. we are members of one body. we are responsible for each other.” these three concise sentences summarise the lesson priestley was trying to convey to the audience. by keeping the sentences short but powerful, it leaves a lasting impression on the birling family but more importantly, the audience. this links to the beginning stage direction of the inspector creating an ‘impression of massiveness’. he then warns the family (and audience) that if ‘men don’t soon learn their lesson they will be taught in fire and blood and anguish’. this is a reference to the many years of war that had taken place between when the play was set and when it was performed. it could be seen to be served as a warning to the people that they need to change their actions or history will repeat itself., - really good as well. you’ve focused in on specific techniques here and shown a clear understanding of how those techniques have effects., overall, this is a very good essay – it’s got a wide range of detailed quotes, points and pieces of analysis. it could be improved with a few moments where you zoom in on specific words and explore the meaning of them – think about mr birling saying he “can’t” take responsibility, or mrs birling saying she “won’t” take responsibility and the inspector saying “we are responsible.” this kind of link will push this essay up into the 8-9 category., what is the significance of the ending in an inspector calls , in effect, ‘an inspector calls’ has arguably three endings, or climaxes. the first is the final speech of the inspector, before he exits dramatically, walking ‘straight out’. the second is as the family think it all may have been a ‘fake’. the third represents the justice in the final words of the play., priestly ensures that the inspector says little in the way of moral judgment until just before he exits. this in itself increases dramatic tension – the audience is waiting for a confrontation which is dependent on all the facts of the story finally emerging. his final speech is based on the great moral authority he has gained through the entirety of the play and is in a sense cathartic. as an ‘inspector’, he is symbolic of the moral and legal authority of the police force. ‘inspecting’ carries the idea of sifting carefully though the actions of the birlings in a detailed and objective manner. priestley adds objectivity and legal precision to the inspector’s character; thus by the climax of his investigation, we, the audience, instinctively trust his moral conclusions also. there is a sense of relief in hearing the birlings finally being condemned for their actions., the inspector’s final speech is, in tone, almost a sermon. the frequent use of blunt, short diction is combined with imperatives which make him seem almost a preacher or a prophetic figure, as he tells the birlings to “remember this”, and tells them that “we are responsible for each other.” although he uses often the first person plural to emphasise their common humanity, he is also accusatory with his use of ‘you’ as he threatens them with what will come if they fail to learn this lesson. the imagery priestley draw from is biblical by nature. from the eucharist service, the inspector uses the biblical metaphor that we are all “members of one body”. the well-known nature of this metaphor makes it seemingly self-evidently true to the audience. the apocalyptic imagery that follows is equally well-known, as the inspector promises “fire and blood and anguish”. the tricolon is heavily emphatic and emotive – the birlings’ rejection of it, which follows swiftly, creates a further sense of their moral vacuity. this sermonic end to the inspector’s presence onstage makes him seem a didactic mouthpiece for the play – he speaks in effect as much to the audience as to the birlings. although it is a relatively brief and restrained speech, nonetheless it is a powerful end – it seems – to the drama., birling’s absence of moral epiphany is enacted in the second ‘ending’ of the play in the ‘huge sigh of relief’ he emits when he discovers that the inspector is not actually from the police station. he rejects the inspector’s final words through this stage direction which creates a dramatic hyperbole that it is impossible for the audience to miss. eva smith’s name suggests that she represents all of the ordinary humanity, eva suggesting eve of genesis, symbolically the mother of humanity, and smith being a stereotypical working-class surname. thus birling’s ‘huge’ indifference is, symbolically, to the suffering of any human being, particularly those who are his socially inferior. indeed, his estimations of people’s worth have been entirely based on their money or their social connections; early on in the play he attempts at first to threaten the inspector by explicitly ‘warning him that the chief constable, colonel roberts, is an ‘old friend’ of his. birling’s ‘relief’ therefore is that his place in society is not damaged after all – even though it is based on corruption and inhumanity towards whose who are weaker and more socially vulnerable than him. thus birling has learned nothing at all in the play., further, birling is ‘triumphant’ when he decides that the story is nothing more than ‘moonshine’. ‘triumph’ suggests victory and winning – birling’s delight is based on his perception that he will not be in any way held to account for his misdeeds. ‘moonshine’ is a dismissive colloquialism – priestley uses this to emphasise that there is no emotional impact whatsoever on birling for the suffering of eva smith and those whom she represents. this is accentuated by mrs birling’s suggestion that in the morning eric and sheila will be as ‘amused’ as they are. the tragedy of what happened to eva through her circumstances and through the undeserved actions of others is in effect diminished to a joke. priestley ensures that this anticlimactic interpretation of the play’s events by mrs birling is morally repugnant to the audience. the older birlings and gerald are villainesque, antagonistic figures., sheila is partly redeemed from the birling’s self-seeking immorality. sheila’s response to birling’s ‘relief’ is to accuse him of ‘pretending’ that all is well. this accusation of play-acting creates an ironic role-reversal, as though birling is the one childishly refusing to engage with reality, and she becomes the parent-figure who rebukes him for his immaturity. this childishness is not an indication of birling’s innocence, but of his lack of responsibility. sheila is the youthful one in the conversation, but she is the one who is vulnerable to the corruption of her parents, and she lacks meaningful power. partly also because of her gender, she is, like eva, the victim of birling’s philosophy of greed – and yet the awakening of her moral awareness is presented as a coming-of-age epiphany. she learns to reject the selfishness and inhumanity of her parents as she realises that all the working-class are intrinsically human beings. she absorbs the relatively complex moral didacticism the inspector represents with regards to the interconnectedness of human society. this is particularly shown by her quoting the exact words of the inspector’s apocalyptic list of consequences if the rich fail to heed the social situation: she quotes his words of ‘fire and blood and anguish’. although she shows no explicit awareness of the social apocalypse of which the inspector warns, she recalls what ‘he made me feel’. her emotional engagement is presented in ironic juxtaposition with her parents’ emotional disengagement. priestley redeems her partly to show the morally repugnant nature of the birlings’ lack of redemption, through juxtaposing their response with hers., the unrepentant birlings are presented by priestley as grotesque not only through their failure to realise their wrong-doing, but also, and more importantly in their seeking of moral superiority over eva smith and the workers she represents. the callous self-righteousness they exhibit is best portrayed in mrs birling’s rhetorical question, ‘why shouldn’t we’ when sheila asks how they possibly can continue as they were before. the fact she considers the question to need no actual answer indicates her moral blindness – it indicates her assumption that the rightr of the powerful to abuse the poor is irrefutable and self-evident. priestley, through the drama, shows how society creates moral indifference to the working-class., the superficiality is also epitomised in gerald’s statement that ‘everything is all right now.’ this bland cliché becomes ironically extremely emotive for the audience as we know that the lack of a moral compass for the birlings and gerald means that others will be treated just as eva was. the superficiality of this analysis has great dramatic power to repulse the audience – and perhaps to begin to effect the social change priestley desired., the third and final ‘ending’ is mysterious. at one level, it satisfies the audience’s hope that there will be justice for eva. by instructing the actors to look ‘guiltily’ around, priestly ensures that the moral indifference of the second ending is not the concluding note of the play. birling speaking on the phone when the person has ‘rung off’ indicates also that his social authority is over; creating the sense that there is justice has lost what he really cared about. the inspector’s semi-comical surname, ‘goole’ also seems relevant right at the play’s climax. there is the suggestion that he did indeed in some way represent supernatural forces intervening in the birlings’ lives to bring justice for eva. however, the play by its nature ends inconclusively. in effect, we are left on a cliffhanger wondering what the ‘real’ police inspector will do. perhaps this reflects priestley’s aim for the audience to think about the play’s social message. the ending of ‘an inspector calls’ is a strong statement of the responsibility of those who seek money and social rank at the expense of humanity. it is strongly didactic and powerful., check this essay.

There are drastic differences that are seen in people who are born in different generations. One may argue that the younger generations are more impressionable and naive while the older generations are very hardheaded and assertive. By creating characters like Sheila and Eric with a large age gap between Mr. and Mrs. Birling in the play An Inspector Calls, tension is created through their differences clashing. J.B. Priestley’s use of contrasting characterization within the Birling family in the play An Inspector Calls creates tension and communicates his theme that one must take into consideration the consequences of their actions and take responsibility for them.

The Birling’s children, Erica and Sheila, are presumed to be very naive and still listening and agreeing with their parent’s words due to their ages. Yet, thought the play both Eric and Sheila prove to be mentally mature and responsible while directly reflect the inspector’s message. Eric Birling was caught up in the complicated situation relating to the death of Eva Smith through his role in impregnating her. Although he is ashamed, he steps up to the plate and confesses his actions and even admits to the fact that “I wasn’t in love with her or anything”, yet he understands that his actions did produce consequences and he takes responsibility for them. He insists on giving her enough money to keep her going, even though it included stealing money from his father (Priestley 50). This action was done unjustly, yet it shows how determined Eric was in order to fix his mistake and take responsibility for his actions- exactly what the Inspector teaches. Sheila Birling, the sister of Eric, also starts out by admitting to her role in the death of Eva. She expresses her sorrow and regret for her actions stating how “It was my own fault… and if I could help her now, I would” right away (24-25). Even though she did not take action like Eric did, she still takes responsibility for her actions and shows that she really does care about the consequences she was unable to attend to. As the play continues and everyone finds out that inspector Goole was a fake, the parents of Sheila and Eric both start to downplay the events of that evening. Suddenly the tension starts to rise as soon as the children speak directly against their parents stating “if you must know it’s you two who are being childish” (55). Sheila is so disgusted by the actions of her parents, that her character takes an unpredictable turn and she evolves into a brave young woman annoyed enough to scold her own parents. Even Eric states directly to his parents that “well, I don’t blame you. But don’t forget i’m ashamed of you as well. Yes- both of you” (54). The characters Sheila and Eric create tension in the play through their differences regarding their view on taking responsibility that contrasts greatly with their parents. The fact that the younger generation is standing up to the older generation and doing unconventional actions like scolding them, the main theme of the novel is clearly represented.

The older generation in the Birling family consists of strong characters: unlikely to sway in their ideas easily, hard headed, and arrogant. Arthur too is confronted about his dealings with Eva Smith, but immediately states that “the girl has been causing trouble in the works. I was quite justified (19). Here, he is seemingly ok knowing that she was forced to kill herself all because of something that started out with him originally and a sign of regret is not to be found. The younger generation, prominently Sheila is verbally pointing out her contrasting viewpoint directly saying (to Mr. Birling) “I think it was a mean thing to do” (21). Tension is created as a result of her comment, but in a way she forces her father to re-examine at his actions by him hearing an opposite viewpoint and internally contemplate her and the Inspector’s message. Another situation that increases the tension overall is when Sheila hears her father describe Eva as cheap labour, and automatically she jumps in stating “but these girls aren’t cheap labour – they’re people” clearly showcasing the differences in the mindset of the two generations (19). Lastly, Mrs. Birling gets confronted with her mistake and does admit to her actions. Her arrogance shows through when she plainly lays out her thoughts to the inspector that “if you think you can bring any pressure to bear upon me, Inspector, you’re quite mistaken. Unlike the other three, I did nothing I’m ashamed of or that won’t bear investigation… You have no power to change my mind” and like Mr. Birling does not have a hint of regret in her (44). Sybil Birling is blinded to the problems within her household and herself, and therefore tension is created when she directly contradicts the viewpoints of her children. The theme of the play is brought out because of this, when the children start to argue their point about accepting responsibility for their actions’ consequences.

Through tension between the characters, the main theme that we don’t live alone, are members of one body, and are responsible for each other is revealed. Sadly for this to be revealed, tension is built greatly dividing the Birling family- the younger vs the older generation. The children desperately try to get their parents to accept what they believe is the inspector’s lesson and purpose for visiting, yet Arthur and Sybil are set on the idea that they are just “the famous younger generation who know it all. And they can’t even take a joke” (72). Although it may be true that the inspector is not real and the older generation will never learn, the main theme is being communicated successfully to the audience. By looking at Mr. and Mrs. Birling and the way they instigate an attack on themselves by their children, the audience feels disgusted by them and the theme reaches the audience.

Inspector Goole Analysis

Role of inspector goole and link to the family.

Inspector Goole is a police inspector who acts as Priestley's voice in the play.

Illustrative background for Link to the family

Link to the family

  • He is a police inspector who narrates the story of Eva Smith/Daisy Renton through a series of interrogations of the Birling family and Gerald.

Illustrative background for Role in the play

Role in the play

  • Inspector Goole reveals information at key moments, in chronological (time) order, to build up the life of Eva Smith.
  • He acts as Priestley’s voice – he presents strong socialist beliefs and gives warnings about what could happen if the Birlings continue their selfish ways.

Character Analysis of Inspector Goole

As Inspector Goole enters the room, the atmosphere of the dinner party changes dramatically.

Illustrative background for Authoritative

Authoritative

  • He presents himself as a person of authority, who even Mr Birling and Gerald Croft, his social superiors, find it difficult to contradict (go against).
  • He is assertive (forceful) and powerful – the upper class are used to police officers who speak to them respectfully and do not accuse them of misdeeds. They find the Inspector very difficult.
  • He takes charge of the dinner party and the interrogation, carefully questioning one family member at a time, in the order he chooses – when Mr Birling tries to change that order, he flatly refuses.

Illustrative background for Acts like a teacher

Acts like a teacher

  • Despite interrogating the characters, Inspector Goole does not actually openly accuse them of anything until they admit to their actions - he teaches the characters.
  • He gets them to understand the roles they played and lets them either feel remorse or show a lack of compassion (pity).
  • He causes each character to develop and waits to see if they will use this as an opportunity to change their ways.

Illustrative background for Highlights the faults of the upper classes

Highlights the faults of the upper classes

  • Priestley uses him to show how shocked the Birlings are by this – this suggests that they expect special treatment purely because of their social class.
  • Inspector Goole knows most of the details of Eva Smith’s story and the family’s involvement before he even asks them – this terrifies the Birlings (who react aggressively) because they work so hard to put up a perfect family image.

Illustrative background for Mysterious

  • It is unclear who, or what, the Inspector actually is – is he real? Is he a ghost (or a ghoul)? Is he the characters’ consciences? Is he God?

Significance of Inspector Goole

Inspector Goole encourages social equality with how he treats the Birlings and Gerald. He is Priestley's mouthpiece for anti-capitalist and pro-socialist messages.

Illustrative background for Encourages social equality

Encourages social equality

  • Inspector Goole threatens the very structure of society by refusing to treat members of the upper classes any differently – instead, he treats everyone the same and encourages more equality within society.

Illustrative background for Warnings about capitalism and war

Warnings about capitalism and war

  • Before he leaves, Inspector Goole warns the Birling family that if they do not make some important changes to the way they live their lives, ‘fire and blood and anguish’ will follow.
  • This is Priestley warning the family that selfish, capitalist attitudes will ultimately lead to two World Wars, causing thousands of deaths and permanent changes to British (and World) society.

1 Plot Summary

1.1.1 Act 1 Summary

1.1.2 Act 1 Key Quotes

1.2.1 Act 2 Summary

1.2.2 Act 2 Key Quotes

1.3.1 Act 3 Summary

1.3.2 Act 3 Key Quotes

1.3.3 Act 3 More Key Quotes

1.3.4 End of Topic Test - Acts 1, 2 & 3

2 Context & Key Themes

2.1 Context & Key Themes

2.1.1 Social Class & Equality

2.1.2 Class Tension

2.1.3 Abuse of Power & Corruption

2.1.4 Socialism vs Capitalism

2.1.5 Blame & Responsibility

2.1.6 Attitudes to Women

2.1.7 Characterisation of Women

2.1.8 Dramatic Function of Characters

2.1.9 End of Topic Test - Context & Key Themes

2.1.10 End of Topic Test - Context & Key Themes 2

2.1.11 Grade 9 - Key Themes

3 Key Characters

3.1 Mr Birling

3.1.1 Mr Birling Analysis

3.1.2 Mr Birling Quotes

3.2 Mrs Birling

3.2.1 Mrs Birling Analysis

3.2.2 Mrs Birling Quotes

3.2.3 Exam-Style Questions - Mrs Birling

3.3.1 Sheila Analysis

3.3.2 Sheila Quotes

3.3.3 End of Topic Test - The Birlings & Sheila

3.4.1 Eric Analysis

3.4.2 Eric Quotes

3.5.1 Gerald Analysis

3.5.2 Gerald Quotes

3.6 Inspector Goole

3.6.1 Inspector Goole Analysis

3.6.2 Inspector Goole Quotes

3.6.3 End of Topic Test - Eric, Gerald & Inspector Goole

3.7 Grade 9 - Key Characters

3.7.1 Grade 9 - Key Characters

4 Authorial Method

4.1 Arrangement & Structure of the Play

4.1.1 Setting, Lighting & Dramatic Irony

4.1.2 Structure & Chronology

4.1.3 Structure & Chronology 2

4.1.4 End of Topic Test - Authorial Method

Jump to other topics

Go student ad image

Unlock your full potential with GoStudent tutoring

Affordable 1:1 tutoring from the comfort of your home

Tutors are matched to your specific learning needs

30+ school subjects covered

Gerald Quotes

Inspector Goole Quotes

English Made Simple

[email protected]

logo2

  • 15 November 2020 6 October 2022
  • 2 Comments on Inspector Goole, a character analysis.

The role/function of Gerlad’s character in the play.

In this series of articles we have looked at the role of each character in the play and what function they serve and how Priestley is using them. In terms of the inspector:

  • Priestley does not tell us who exactly this mysterious character is. The mysterious aura around the inspector is only reinforced right at the end when we hear that the second inspector is coming and that a girl (presumably Eva) has died just now. In other words the figure of the mysterious inspector is given a supernatural air by the fact that not only may he not be actually part of the police force he seems to be able to know the future. This helps to create a degree of mystique around the character and it is important to remember that a play such as ‘An Inspector Calls’ is not merely a political work but also a play, and the primary goal of a play is to entertain it, thus writers often exercise ‘artistic license’, meaning they do not always stick to facts but engage in creativity. As literature, poetry, plays are not about academic research it is seen as perfectly normal to engage in ‘artistic license’.
  • The inspector may be serving as the voice of society, the voice of morality exposing to the Birling family and their new son in law, Gerald, their part that they have played in the death of Eva Smith and in more general terms a message to the rich in society of their role in the suffering of the working class and a plea for a better, more just society.

Inspector Goole as a supernatural character.

The name which Priestley chose for the inspector is Goole, which sounds almost the same as ‘ghoul’. A ghoul is a demonic creature, a malovelent ghost. Even the very name of the inspector carries with it some association with the supernatural. Nor do we ever know his first name, which adds to the mystery around him.

He is clearly not a normal ‘person’. He may not even be a human being, but some sort of supernatural entity. We do not know for sure as Priestley did not tell us, perhaps deciding it was better for the play and for the character of the inspector to enjoy the air of mystery around him.

However we can see some similarities with other supernatural characters in the works of other British writers such as Dickens. Dicken’s had various supernatural characters in his famous work, ‘ A Christmas Carol’ including various ghosts such as the ghost of Christmas past, Christmas present and Christmas Yet to Come.

Vintage, Arthur Rackham, Christmas, Christmas Carol

Like ‘An Inspector Calls’, ‘A Christmas Carol’ focuses on the rich not helping the poor. However the Christmas Carol has much more of the supernatural and in some ways can be seen as a more sophisticated progression on from fairy tales that younger children would have been reading earlier on in their lives. ‘An Inspector Calls’ is a bit more realistic and only has a slight but powerful dose in the form of the mysterious inspector. Nor is there any reference to religion by Priestley whereas Dickens uses Christmas (a Christian celebration) for his story of Scrooge.

The inspector is a strong character, Priestley wrote of him that he ‘ Need not be a big man but he creates at once an impression of massiveness, solidity and purposefulness. ‘

There are various examples in history of men or women such as Napoleon and others who are not physically that big or tall but have a very powerful personality or energy around them that inspire respect and perhaps even submissiveness.

Priestley also writes:

”He is a man in his fifties, dressed in a plain darkish suit of the period. He speaks carefully, weightily and has a disconcerting habit of looking hard at the person he addresses before actually speaking”

He is clearly a serious man, dressed in a serious manner with a serious style of speech. The death of a woman is not something light. He looks ‘hard’ at the Birlings. This may reflect the fact that Priestley wants the rich in society to look at themselves to carry out introspection.

The Inspector as an inquisitor

The inspector carries out an inquistorial style with the Birlings, asking them questions to which he knows the answers to, revealing through the night the involvement of all the Siblings in Eva’s death. As he is perceived as an inspector he is seen as an important and powerful figure whom the rich and also powerful Birlings cannot afford to be evasive with or refuse to answer questions to. Answering him is unavoidable.

By extension what could possibly be drawn from this is that there may  be a day when everybody will have to reckon with their own deeds, and possibly deal with guilt.

However in addition to being an inquisitor, a questioner, the inspector is also the voice of morality, as we can see in many quotes urging the rich Birlings to have empathy for the poor in society as in the quote:

“…It would do us all a bit of good if sometimes we tried to put ourselves in the place of these young women counting their pennies in their dingy little back bedroom”’

That ‘do us all a bit of good’ and ‘we tried to put ourselves’ does not apply to the Birlings only but to the audience and to society in general especially those who are richer.

In an age of social separation, where TV was not common and no internet, where people could not even visually witness the suffering of the poor Priestley through the inspector makes an impassioned appeal to the rich in society to think and contemplate on the suffering of the poor.

Later on the inspector castigates the Birlings for their role in Eva’s death.

“And be quiet for a moment and listen to me. I don’t need to know any more. Neither do you. This girl killed herself- and died a horrible death. But each of you helped to kill her. Remember that. Never forget it. (He looks from one to the other of them carefully) But then I don’t think you ever will. Remember what you did”

This is again another appeal to the Birlings, but on a deeper level an appeal to the wealthy in society to think about their role in the suffering of the working class.

The inspector leaves in an impressive manner. There are no pleasantries, no superfluous niceties e.g. ‘I hope you have a nice day, it’s cold outside’. No far from that, he delivers a hard hitting, to the point final message ending with a customary ‘Good night’, which is the most he goes in terms of formal pleasantry. He says:

“But remember this. One Eva Smith has gone- but there are millions and millions and millions of Eva Smiths and John Smiths still left with us, with their lives, their hopes and fears, their suffering and chance of happiness, all intertwined with our lives, and what we think and say and do. We don’t live alone. We are members of one body. We are responsible for each other. And I tell you that the time will soon come when, if men will not learn that lesson, then they will be taught it in fire and blood and anguish. Good night.”

Priestley explained later on he deliberately set the play in 1912 as it was two years before a horrific event which had precisely tonnes of ‘fire and blood and anguish’, broke out and that was the first world war.

In contrast to Birling who thinks there will be no war, the inspector seems to allude to the possibility of a war or of a ferocious conflict. The inspector who seems to know everything related to the Birlings and is all-knowing in that context is clearly more intelligent than the somewhat foolish Birling.

Ww1, Trench, Warfare, One, War, World, Great, Military

The first world war when millions died. It started two years after 1912 the year ‘An Inspector Calls’ is set.

The inspector (and thus Priestley) is telling the Birlings (and thus Priestley is telling society) that we are interconnected and must shoulder collective responsibility for the suffering of the vulnerable in society or otherwise we will suffer collective punishment. Unlike Dicken’s ‘A Christmas Carol’ there is no reference to religion or the hereafter but more perhaps an allusion to karmic comeuppance.

The inspector (Priestley) is telling us all of a common humanity that we share that the likes of Eva Smith who are in the millions have ‘hopes and fears’ too. This is to address the relative de-humanization or ‘otherisation’ of the working class by the rich as inferior and not worthy of respect or much importance, an unpleasant reality that must be endured, rather than as fellow human beings in the family of mankind.

Useful vocabulary for GCSE students in essays and exam questions.

  • Otherise – To make someone the ‘other’, not part of you or your community, to exclude them and possibly even view them as an enemy or threat.
  •   Interconnected– For different things to be connected or linked to each other. Priestley shows we cannot just live pretending other classes do not exist but we are all interconnected whether we like it or not.
  • Karma– The belief that ‘what goes around, comes around’, that if you do bad then later on bad will be done to you.
  • Mystique – To have an air of mystery around you as the inspector does when he leaves and we see another phone call this time from what seems to be a real actual inspector.
  • Allude – An indirect reference to something else. Sometimes understand by only the speaker and the one listening to him due to their common awareness of the context or related facts, whereas a passer by may not understand. The noun is allusion.

Tell us what you think about Eric in the comments section below and if you have any questions

(2) Comments

  • Pingback: - English Made Simple
  • Pingback: Eva Smith, character analysis - English Made Simple

Leave A Comment Cancel reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Post Comment

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

inspector calls essay on inspector goole

An Inspector Calls

J. b. priestley, ask litcharts ai: the answer to your questions, inspector goole quotes in an inspector calls.

Wealth, Power, and Influence Theme Icon

It’s the way I like to go to work. One person and one line of inquiry at a time. Otherwise, there’s a muddle.

Morality and Legality Theme Icon

Inspector: There are a lot of young women living that sort of existence, Miss Birling, in every city and big town in this country. Sheila: But these girls aren’t cheap labor. They’re people .

Class Politics Theme Icon

Gerald: We’re respectable citizens and not dangerous criminals. Inspector: Sometimes there isn’t as much difference as you think.

Wealth, Power, and Influence Theme Icon

Miss Birling has just been made to understand what she did to this girl. She feels responsible. And if she leaves us now, and doesn’t hear any more, then she’ll feel she’s entirely to blame, she’ll be alone with her responsibility.

If there’s nothing else, we’ll have to share our guilt.

You’ve had children. You must have known what she was feeling. And you slammed the door in her face.

There’ll be plenty of time, when I’ve gone, for you all to adjust your family relationships.

Public versus Private Theme Icon

This girl killed herself—and died a horrible death. But each of you helped to kill her. Remember that. Never forget it. But then I don’t think you ever will.

There are millions and millions of Eva Smiths and John Smiths still left with us, with their lives, their hopes and fears, their suffering and chance of happiness, all intertwined with our lives, with what we think and do. We don’t live alone. We are members of one body. We are responsible for each other.

Whoever that chap was, the fact remains that I did what I did. And Mother did what she did. And the rest of you did what you did to her. It’s still the same rotten story whether it’s been told to a police inspector or to somebody else.

An Inspector Calls PDF

  • International
  • Schools directory
  • Resources Jobs Schools directory News Search

AQA GCSE Grade 9 Essay: The Portrayal of Inspector Goole in "An Inspector Calls" by Priestley

AQA GCSE Grade 9 Essay: The Portrayal of Inspector Goole in "An Inspector Calls" by Priestley

Subject: English

Age range: 14-16

Resource type: Unit of work

GCSE and A Level Resources

Last updated

25 June 2023

  • Share through email
  • Share through twitter
  • Share through linkedin
  • Share through facebook
  • Share through pinterest

inspector calls essay on inspector goole

An Outstanding Analysis of Inspector Goole in “An Inspector Calls” - AQA GCSE Grade 9 Essay

Uncover the portrayal of Inspector Goole in J.B. Priestley’s renowned play, “An Inspector Calls,” through this exceptional AQA GCSE Grade 9 essay. Gain valuable insights into the character’s role, motivations, and impact on the storyline. Discover the dramatic techniques used by Priestley to bring Inspector Goole to life, and explore the themes and messages conveyed through this complex character. This essay reflects a deep understanding, earning it the highest grade possible.

Tes paid licence How can I reuse this?

Your rating is required to reflect your happiness.

It's good to leave some feedback.

Something went wrong, please try again later.

This resource hasn't been reviewed yet

To ensure quality for our reviews, only customers who have purchased this resource can review it

Report this resource to let us know if it violates our terms and conditions. Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch.

Not quite what you were looking for? Search by keyword to find the right resource:

Characters - AQA Inspector Goole in An Inspector Calls

The main characters in An Inspector Calls are the Birling family, Gerald Croft and Inspector Goole. The Inspector’s investigation aims to teach each character a lesson.

Part of English Literature An Inspector Calls

Inspector Goole in An Inspector Calls

A photo of Inspector Goole

The Inspector arrives whilst the Birling family are celebrating the engagement of Sheila and Gerald. The stage directions state that he 'need not be a big man' but that he must create an ' impression of massiveness, solidity and purposefulness '. The Inspector investigates each family member one at a time and in doing so, reveals the consequences of their behaviour.

He drives forward the drama, with his questions creating shocking moments and gripping cliff-hangers for the audience. By the end of the play it is revealed that he isn’t actually an Inspector. It is not entirely clear who he is, Priestley leaves it up to the audience to decide. His name 'Goole' suggests a supernatural or ghost like element, and he seems to know what the characters will say before they do - is he the conscience of the audience? Is he the voice of Priestley? Either way he delivers a frightening message when he leaves, that if people do not take responsibility for each other, the world is doomed.

Social and historical context

Inspector Goole sheds a light on all the concerns that Priestley had at the time of writing An Inspector Calls around age, gender, class and social responsibility. Priestley uses the Inspector to make the audience question their own behaviour and morality and hopes that they will learn some lessons as the Birlings do. The issues the Inspector highlights are just as relevant to a modern day audience.

Analysing the evidence

But just remember this. One Eva Smith has gone - but there are millions and millions and millions of Eva Smiths and John Smiths still left with us, with their lives, their hopes and fears, their suffering and chance of happiness, all intertwined with our lives, and what we think and say and do. We don't live alone. We are members of one body. We are responsible for each other. And I tell you that the time will soon come when, if men will not learn that lesson, then they will be taught it in fire and blood and anguish. Good night.

How does the Inspector’s use of language help Priestley to get his message across to the audience and the Birlings in Act 3?

Show answer Hide answer

How to analyse the quotation:

"But just remember this. One Eva Smith has gone - but there are millions and millions and millions of Eva Smiths and John Smiths still left with us , with their lives, their hopes and fears, their suffering and chance of happiness, all intertwined with our lives , and what we think and say and do. We don't live alone. We are members of one body. We are responsible for each other . And I tell you that the time will soon come when, if men will not learn that lesson, then they will be taught it in fire and blood and anguish . Good night."

  • "there are millions and millions and millions of Eva Smiths and John Smiths still left with us" - repetition of millions emphasises his point that Eva is representative of many others.
  • "their lives, their hopes and fears, their suffering and chance of happiness, all intertwined with our lives" - use of emotive words helps us empathise with the victims like Eva Smith.
  • "We don't live alone. We are members of one body. We are responsible for each other" - three short sentences have enormous impact and sum up his point very simply and clearly.
  • "fire and blood and anguish" - almost biblical, a terrifying image. Unlike Mr Birling, Inspector Goole's predictions are correct - Britain experiences two world wars. This makes him a more trustworthy character and also emphasises Priestley’s views.

How to use this in an essay:

The Inspector's use of language in Act 3 is very effective in getting his message across to the Birlings and the audience. First he uses repetition 'there are millions and millions and millions of Eva Smiths and John Smiths still left with us' . This emphasises how many of these people there are in the world, that this was not just an isolated case. He then uses a number of emotive words 'their lives, their hopes and fears, their suffering and chance of happiness, all intertwined with our lives' and this again makes the audience sympathise with those less fortunate than themselves. He uses short sentences to summarise his point 'We don't live alone. We are members of one body. We are responsible for each other' . The language he uses here is very plain, the short sentence sums up the idea that we are all responsible for one another, a message that Priestley wished to convey in this play. Finally, he uses terrifying imagery, he talks about 'fire and blood and anguish' . This is a Biblical picture of hell, of what the world will become if we don’t do as the Inspector says. All these language devices help to make his point effectively and are particularly powerful as this is the final speech by the Inspector.

More guides on this topic

  • Plot summary - AQA
  • Plot summary quiz
  • Themes - AQA
  • Themes quiz
  • Form, structure and language - AQA
  • Form, structure and language quiz
  • Dramatisation - AQA
  • Sample exam question - AQA

Related links

  • Bitesize revision podcasts
  • Jobs that use English
  • BBC Teach: Literature
  • Watch Macbeth on iPlayer
  • BBC Sounds Classic Stories
  • Edusites Subscription
  • Get Revising: Eng Lit
  • RSC: Teacher Resources
  • Fast Past Papers

Get £10 off your first lesson on PMT Tuition. Use the code PMTAPRIL10 . Book before 30 April, new accounts only.

PMT

An Inspector Calls

Ruth 's Profile Picture

Ruth D. ★ 5.0 (4)

Queens university belfast - ba english.

Experienced English teacher

  • Qualified Teacher

PMT Education

Notes || Exam Prep || Character Profiles || Themes || Additional Reading & Videos

This topic is included in  Paper 2 . You can find notes and guides for it below.

  • Overview and Key Scenes
  • Glossary of Key Terms
  • Definitions Flashcards
  • Guide to Paper 2
  • How to plan and write a top mark essay
  • Question Bank - Characters
  • Question Bank - Relationships
  • Question Bank - Themes

Additional Reading & Videos:

  • An Inspector Calls (2017 film version)
  • An Inspector Calls (1982 film version)
  • An Introduction to An Inspector Calls

Character Profiles

  • Eric Birling
  • Gerald Croft
  • Mrs Birling
  • Sheila Birling
  • The Inspector
  • Capitalism vs Socialism
  • Exploitation
  • Generations Young vs Old
  • Social Class
  • Social Responsibility
  • Wealth and Materialism

Connect with PMT Education!

  • Revision Courses
  • Past Papers
  • Solution Banks
  • University Admissions
  • Numerical Reasoning
  • Legal Notices

Home — Essay Samples — Literature — Inspector Goole — Analysis Of Inspector Goole’s Character In An Inspector Calls

test_template

Analysis of Inspector Goole’s Character in an Inspector Calls

  • Categories: An Inspector Calls Character Inspector Goole

About this sample

close

Words: 1307 |

Published: Aug 6, 2021

Words: 1307 | Pages: 3 | 7 min read

Image of Dr. Charlotte Jacobson

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

  • 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
  • Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

author

Prof. Kifaru

Verified writer

  • Expert in: Literature

writer

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

3 pages / 1346 words

4.5 pages / 2155 words

3 pages / 1458 words

6 pages / 2816 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Analysis of Inspector Goole’s Character in an Inspector Calls Essay

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Inspector Goole

When looking at A Streetcar Named Desire – a tragedy, after all – it is traditionally required that there should be a selected antagonist, a ‘villain’ so to speak. Stanley Kowalski, you could argue, is that ‘villain’. It is [...]

In both Tennessee Williams’ A Streetcar named Desire and Sylvia Plath’s Ariel, there is extensive concern for how masculinity and femininity are portrayed. Both texts present archetypical interpretations of gender as [...]

Throughout scenes 1 and 2 of A Streetcar Named Desire, playwright Tennessee Williams presents Stanley as extremely powerful and authoritative through the use of dialogue as well as stage directions. The audience immediately [...]

The struggle of the outsider is facilitated by their isolation and their inability to form significant bonds with others in their community. Whilst outsiders have the capacity to challenge their respective communities, their [...]

The protagonist of A Streetcar Named Desire, Blanche Dubois, is a fallen southern Belle whose troubled life results in the deterioration of her mental health. She has just returned from a date with Mitch and their conversation [...]

"A Streetcar Named Desire" is a story of damaged people. Blanche DuBois, a repressed and sexually warped Southern belle, seeks either atonement or reassurance; she wants someone to help lift the burden of her guilt for her [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

  • Instructions Followed To The Letter
  • Deadlines Met At Every Stage
  • Unique And Plagiarism Free

inspector calls essay on inspector goole

Marked by Teachers

  • TOP CATEGORIES
  • AS and A Level
  • University Degree
  • International Baccalaureate
  • Uncategorised
  • 5 Star Essays
  • Study Tools
  • Study Guides
  • Meet the Team
  • English Literature
  • Arthur Miller

Inspector Goole- An Inspector Calls Coursework

Authors Avatar

An Inspector Calls is a play written by J.B. Priestley. The play was first staged in 1946 and is set in 1912, before the Second World War. The play is a typical detective genre where there is a connection between each character, a chain of events and a twist at the end. The play is about an inspector who appears at the Birling household to interrogate each character and shows that there is a connection. The Inspector at first seems like an ordinary inspector but it becomes apparent to each character that inspector Goole is not actually a real inspector. We can suggest that the inspector may be of the supernatural from his name ‘Goole’ this sounds like ‘Ghoul’, which adds to the supernatural effect. Also spector, which is inside of the word ‘inspector’, means ghost this helps suggest that the inspector is supernatural.  We can suggest that the inspector is one of the conscience as the inspector reveals each of the wrong each character has done. We can also suggest that the Inspector is there to show Priestley’s views on society at this period of time. The name of the book ‘An inspector Calls’ can suggest that the inspector is not the ordinary. This is done as the title is 'an' which is not specific. If Priestley wanted to show the inspector was the ordinary he would have used ‘the’ as this is specific.

The play is set in the house of the Birling family who are a family of a high status, which is shown by the props in the setting. They have gathered in celebration to celebrate the engagement between both Shelia, who is Mr Birling’s daughter and Gerald who is from the Croft family who are of an even higher status than the Birling’s. Mr Birling is a major character in this play as he has the strongest personality. Birling is a character that believes in Capatalism where each man is for himself. He also believes that the Germans are not going to want a war, which is dramatically ironic as the audience will know he is wrong as it was staged in 1946 after the war. This shows that the influence on the audience to side with the inspector and therefore Priestley is due the period of time it was staged in.  Priestley does not agree with Birling’s views and shows this through his constant interruption of Birling’s conversations. In this play, Priestley shows how important the youths are and how much wiser they are than the older people. Priestley shows this through Sheila and Eric. Both Sheila and Eric are children of Mr and Mrs Birling. Both Mr and Mrs Birling have similar ways of thinking and do not listen to what either Sheila or Eric are saying they constantly put them down and will not be persuaded to change their ways. When Mrs Birling is having a conversation with the Inspector she tries to warn her mother not to say something she may regret and is told

Join now!

‘You’re behaving like an hysterical

 Child tonight’

In the beginning of the play you can instantly see that the Birling family are of a high status through the setting and

‘You ought to like this Port, Gerald’

Port was an expensive alcohol and so this shows that this family are not working class. This also shows how inferior Birling feels to Gerald as he tries to show Gerald that what his family can afford so can the Birling’s.

This is a preview of the whole essay

As the night progresses all the women leave the scene and the patriarchal society is shown. Gerald, Eric and Mr Birling are the only people in this scene. Birling speaks to Gerald with respect and treats his own son with none. Birling once again goes into a conversation telling each of them how good Capitalism is and how each man should look after himself and dismisses anything which Eric has to say about the matter. This conversation is again interrupted by the doorbell which signalling the arrival of the inspector. As the Inspector comes into the scene Edna is told to brighten up the room and this creates a setting of interrogation and exposure of the characters. The Inspector is in a dark suit and creates an intimidating impression. This causes none of the characters or even the audience to question the Inspector, as this would be the typical image of an inspector.

At first none of the characters knew why the inspector had chosen to come and interrogate the Birling household, but then it all becomes apparent. Birling is first to be interrogated and comes across as arrogant when he says

‘I was an alderman for years and

Lord Mayor for two years, I know the

Brumley police office pretty well’

This is said by Birling in an attempt to intimidate the Inspector. However he fails to. The Inspector goes on to tell Birling of the reason for the interrogation and uses emotive language to get some emotions from Birling

‘She was in great agony’

But this fails and instead a shocked involuntary response from Eric is shown. The inspector uses this language a lot during the play to constantly remind the audience of the girl’s death. This evokes sympathy from the audience.  Birling gets very impatient with the Inspector and when he learns of his involvement in the Eva Smith’s suicide he says

‘I can’t accept any responsibility’

This shows that Birling has no remorse. Birling is not used to being answered back by anyone and so is shocked when the inspector does so, he then tries to intimidate the inspector the only way he knows how to. He shows his connection to the chief constable

‘Perhaps I ought to warn you that

 He is an old friend’

This is a desperate attempt to intimidate the inspector, but the inspector does not feel intimidated by this.

In this scene Priestly shows how important the youth are and how important it is to listen to them. Eric disagrees with what his father did to Eva Smith and feels that he should not have done this

‘Why shouldn’t they try for higher wages’

This shows that Eric cannot be for capitalism and Priestley uses him to be the voice of him and the audience.

 When Sheila is brought into the interrogation the inspector uses descriptive language to emphasise what happened to the young woman

‘Several hours in agony’

The inspector says this to trigger an emotion from Sheila and once again Priestly shows that the youth are wiser and more considerate than their elders as Sheila says

‘Oh- how horrible’

This shows that Sheila felt shocked at the death of this woman Sheila also displays that she has a conscience as she says

‘I can’t help thinking about this

Girl’

Showing that she has a different attitude than her father. Gerald is also displayed to be a younger version of Mr Birling as he has similar views he says

‘It is what happened to her after she

Left Mr Birling’s works that is important’

This shows us that Gerald must have similar views to Birling and this could potentially be one of the reasons why Birling respects Gerald so much. Once Sheila learns of her connection to the young girl she feels remorseful she says

‘I’ll never, never do it again to anybody’

Again Priestley is showing that the youth are wiser. The inspector is pleased by this response.

Gerald also finds he has a connection to the young woman but knows her by another name, Daisy Renton. He complies and is hesitant to discuss what happened in front of Sheila.

Mrs Birling comes across to be like her husband. She begins her interrogation feeling very confident and like her husband, tries to intimidate the inspector. Mrs Birling has no feelings towards the young woman and when she learns of her own involvement to the girl’s death she takes no responsibility and says

‘You’re quite wrong to suppose I shall

Regret what I did’

This shows that she is not remorseful and Priestley through the inspector shows us how stubborn and callous the older people are. Mrs Birling makes matters worst despite being warned by Sheila. Mrs Birling accuses the man who had made her pregnant and says

‘If the young girl’s death is due to anybody

Then it is due to him’

Mrs Birling says this as she feels that there is no connection between the young woman and herself but soon realises that there is. Mrs Birling would not have made this statement if she had known that her son, Eric, was responsible for the pregnancy. Sheila realises that the person responsible could be her brother, Eric and so therefore is constantly telling her mother to stop what she is saying.

When both Mr and Mrs Birling learn of Eric involvement they are in shock. They both refuse to believe that Eric is an alcoholic Mrs Birling says

‘You’re not the type you don’t get drunk’

This displays Mrs Birling’s blissful ignorance towards Eric’s drinking problem and again Priestley shows his feelings towards older people in his play.

Eric already expected to be interrogated once he learned of the woman’s name. Eric was remorseful over what had happened and felt angry towards his mother for not helping the woman.

The inspector makes a speech after the interrogation and this speech seems like a response to what Birling was saying at the beginning of the play. This speech is also the view of Priestley. He uses emotive language in this speech and there is a repetition of the word ‘millions’. He uses this to emphasise the point. He says

‘All entwined with our lives and what

We think say and do. We don’t live

Alone’

This is Priestley’s view. It tells us that everybody has a connection with each other as shown and that we should be responsible for each other. The use of exaggeration and the pronoun ‘we’ creates an effect that we are all connected. In Birling’s speech in the beginning he mentions each man looking after himself so this can be taken as a response.

The inspector also says

‘If men will not learn that lesson

They will be taught in fire, blood

And anguish’

This is a reference to world war two and shows that being like Mr Birling and believing in capitalism will only result in war. Birling mentions this in his speech in the beginning and says that another war happening will not happen. Which both the audience and the inspector can see is incorrect. The inspector’s reference to the war can suggest he is from the future warning them of the dangers of people not being responsible for each other.

When the inspector has gone each character realises that the inspector was not the usual type, as he knew too much about the case. Sheila feels that whether the inspector was real or not does not make a difference, whereas Mr and Mrs Birling feel that it does, as it would mean that their names would be cleared. Quickly Mr and Mrs Birling forget about what has happened and are more concerned about having a good name. Sheila and Eric take responsibility of what happened to this young woman and it does have an impact on them. Priestley shows that the youth are impressionable and so therefore the inspectors impact has remained on them, whereas the elders are not impressionable and so Mr and Mrs Birling quickly forgot what had previously happened.

When the inspector’s identity is checked the Birling’s and Gerald learn that there is no such inspector on the force and that no such woman had been sent to the infirmary. When they learn of this Mr and Mrs Birling are very pleased and encourage Sheila and Eric to celebrate with them but both are disgusted by their parents. At the end of this scene the Birling’s gets a phone call finding out that a girl had just been sent to the infirmary matching their description. This can also help us to suggest that the inspector was from the past coming to warn them.

In conclusion the play conveys a strong political message, which promotes socialism. The inspector was the voice of Priestley and he showed his socialist views through him. Priestley did not agree with Capitalism as he was a socialite and felt that each person should be responsible for one another as we each have a connection. He showed this through this play. Sheila and Eric can be considered to be the view of the audience who would not agree with what Birling is saying, as they know the consequences of this mentality. The fact that the play was set in 1912 and staged in 1946 shows us that both Sheila and Eric must be the views of the audience as the audience would have been through the war and therefore side with the Inspector who is the voice of Priestley as the audience would know the consequences of people being capitalist. Birling is very ignorant and unimpressionable. He refused to listen to what either Sheila or Eric had to say and refer to them as being foolish. Priestley would use the inspector and devices to deliberately interrupt any conversation, which Birling would have on Capitalism, which showed his view. The inspector’s first appearance, which interrupted Birling’s conversation, was the first sign of what the inspector could be of. This showed that the inspector could have come as a warning to the Birling family. The inspector showed several times that he knew more than what an ordinary inspector would know. The inspector could have also have been an inspector of the conscience as each character had a connection to the woman’s death due to something wrong they had done. Although not each character learnt from this. Priestley feels that the youth are very impressionable and so the inspector could be of the supernatural that has come to change the impression on the youth so that they can be responsible for each other. Priestley intended to show people the importance of the youth, as they are very influential he also intended to show how important it is for people to care for one another and not to selfish. This play is relevant for this period of time as the message, which Priestley has shown on everybody caring for one another and how important the youth are can be used for any period of time, as it is the basic ways of maintaining society. The inspector’s omniscience is also created by the mystery, which the inspector created by knowing of the future, his ghostly presence and his advice given at his ending speech.  

Inspector Goole- An Inspector Calls Coursework

Document Details

  • Word Count 2496
  • Page Count 7
  • Subject English

Related Essays

Analysing an Inspector Calls by J.B. Priestly.

Analysing an Inspector Calls by J.B. Priestly.

An inspector calls - Character assessment - "Beatrice was a weak wife who could have done more".|

An inspector calls - Character assessment - "Beatrice was a weak wife who c...

Crucible Coursework

Crucible Coursework

Literature Coursework: A View from a Bridge

Literature Coursework: A View from a Bridge

Home / Essay Samples / Entertainment / Inspector Goole / Inspector Goole as an Image of Socialist Values and Morality

Inspector Goole as an Image of Socialist Values and Morality

  • Category: Literature , Entertainment
  • Topic: An Inspector Calls , Inspector Goole , Literature Review

Pages: 2 (983 words)

  • Downloads: -->

--> ⚠️ Remember: This essay was written and uploaded by an--> click here.

Found a great essay sample but want a unique one?

are ready to help you with your essay

You won’t be charged yet!

Lord of The Flies Essays

Frankenstein Essays

Beowulf Essays

Of Mice and Men Essays

Fahrenheit 451 Essays

Related Essays

We are glad that you like it, but you cannot copy from our website. Just insert your email and this sample will be sent to you.

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service  and  Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Your essay sample has been sent.

In fact, there is a way to get an original essay! Turn to our writers and order a plagiarism-free paper.

samplius.com uses cookies to offer you the best service possible.By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .--> -->