data analysis narrative research

• Privacy Policy

Home » Narrative Analysis – Types, Methods and Examples

Narrative Analysis – Types, Methods and Examples

Table of Contents

Narrative Analysis

Definition:

Narrative analysis is a qualitative research methodology that involves examining and interpreting the stories or narratives people tell in order to gain insights into the meanings, experiences, and perspectives that underlie them. Narrative analysis can be applied to various forms of communication, including written texts, oral interviews, and visual media.

In narrative analysis, researchers typically examine the structure, content, and context of the narratives they are studying, paying close attention to the language, themes, and symbols used by the storytellers. They may also look for patterns or recurring motifs within the narratives, and consider the cultural and social contexts in which they are situated.

Types of Narrative Analysis

Types of Narrative Analysis are as follows:

Content Analysis

This type of narrative analysis involves examining the content of a narrative in order to identify themes, motifs, and other patterns. Researchers may use coding schemes to identify specific themes or categories within the text, and then analyze how they are related to each other and to the overall narrative. Content analysis can be used to study various forms of communication, including written texts, oral interviews, and visual media.

Structural Analysis

This type of narrative analysis focuses on the formal structure of a narrative, including its plot, character development, and use of literary devices. Researchers may analyze the narrative arc, the relationship between the protagonist and antagonist, or the use of symbolism and metaphor. Structural analysis can be useful for understanding how a narrative is constructed and how it affects the reader or audience.

Discourse Analysis

This type of narrative analysis focuses on the language and discourse used in a narrative, including the social and cultural context in which it is situated. Researchers may analyze the use of specific words or phrases, the tone and style of the narrative, or the ways in which social and cultural norms are reflected in the narrative. Discourse analysis can be useful for understanding how narratives are influenced by larger social and cultural structures.

Phenomenological Analysis

This type of narrative analysis focuses on the subjective experience of the narrator, and how they interpret and make sense of their experiences. Researchers may analyze the language used to describe experiences, the emotions expressed in the narrative, or the ways in which the narrator constructs meaning from their experiences. Phenomenological analysis can be useful for understanding how people make sense of their own lives and experiences.

Critical Analysis

This type of narrative analysis involves examining the political, social, and ideological implications of a narrative, and questioning its underlying assumptions and values. Researchers may analyze the ways in which a narrative reflects or reinforces dominant power structures, or how it challenges or subverts those structures. Critical analysis can be useful for understanding the role that narratives play in shaping social and cultural norms.

Autoethnography

This type of narrative analysis involves using personal narratives to explore cultural experiences and identity formation. Researchers may use their own personal narratives to explore issues such as race, gender, or sexuality, and to understand how larger social and cultural structures shape individual experiences. Autoethnography can be useful for understanding how individuals negotiate and navigate complex cultural identities.

Thematic Analysis

This method involves identifying themes or patterns that emerge from the data, and then interpreting these themes in relation to the research question. Researchers may use a deductive approach, where they start with a pre-existing theoretical framework, or an inductive approach, where themes are generated from the data itself.

Narrative Analysis Conducting Guide

Here are some steps for conducting narrative analysis:

• Identify the research question: Narrative analysis begins with identifying the research question or topic of interest. Researchers may want to explore a particular social or cultural phenomenon, or gain a deeper understanding of a particular individual’s experience.
• Collect the narratives: Researchers then collect the narratives or stories that they will analyze. This can involve collecting written texts, conducting interviews, or analyzing visual media.
• Transcribe and code the narratives: Once the narratives have been collected, they are transcribed into a written format, and then coded in order to identify themes, motifs, or other patterns. Researchers may use a coding scheme that has been developed specifically for the study, or they may use an existing coding scheme.
• Analyze the narratives: Researchers then analyze the narratives, focusing on the themes, motifs, and other patterns that have emerged from the coding process. They may also analyze the formal structure of the narratives, the language used, and the social and cultural context in which they are situated.
• Interpret the findings: Finally, researchers interpret the findings of the narrative analysis, and draw conclusions about the meanings, experiences, and perspectives that underlie the narratives. They may use the findings to develop theories, make recommendations, or inform further research.

Applications of Narrative Analysis

Narrative analysis is a versatile qualitative research method that has applications across a wide range of fields, including psychology, sociology, anthropology, literature, and history. Here are some examples of how narrative analysis can be used:

• Understanding individuals’ experiences: Narrative analysis can be used to gain a deeper understanding of individuals’ experiences, including their thoughts, feelings, and perspectives. For example, psychologists might use narrative analysis to explore the stories that individuals tell about their experiences with mental illness.
• Exploring cultural and social phenomena: Narrative analysis can also be used to explore cultural and social phenomena, such as gender, race, and identity. Sociologists might use narrative analysis to examine how individuals understand and experience their gender identity.
• Analyzing historical events: Narrative analysis can be used to analyze historical events, including those that have been recorded in literary texts or personal accounts. Historians might use narrative analysis to explore the stories of survivors of historical traumas, such as war or genocide.
• Examining media representations: Narrative analysis can be used to examine media representations of social and cultural phenomena, such as news stories, films, or television shows. Communication scholars might use narrative analysis to examine how news media represent different social groups.
• Developing interventions: Narrative analysis can be used to develop interventions to address social and cultural problems. For example, social workers might use narrative analysis to understand the experiences of individuals who have experienced domestic violence, and then use that knowledge to develop more effective interventions.

Examples of Narrative Analysis

Here are some examples of how narrative analysis has been used in research:

• Personal narratives of illness: Researchers have used narrative analysis to examine the personal narratives of individuals living with chronic illness, to understand how they make sense of their experiences and construct their identities.
• Oral histories: Historians have used narrative analysis to analyze oral histories to gain insights into individuals’ experiences of historical events and social movements.
• Children’s stories: Researchers have used narrative analysis to analyze children’s stories to understand how they understand and make sense of the world around them.
• Personal diaries : Researchers have used narrative analysis to examine personal diaries to gain insights into individuals’ experiences of significant life events, such as the loss of a loved one or the transition to adulthood.
• Memoirs : Researchers have used narrative analysis to analyze memoirs to understand how individuals construct their life stories and make sense of their experiences.
• Life histories : Researchers have used narrative analysis to examine life histories to gain insights into individuals’ experiences of migration, displacement, or social exclusion.

Purpose of Narrative Analysis

The purpose of narrative analysis is to gain a deeper understanding of the stories that individuals tell about their experiences, identities, and beliefs. By analyzing the structure, content, and context of these stories, researchers can uncover patterns and themes that shed light on the ways in which individuals make sense of their lives and the world around them.

The primary purpose of narrative analysis is to explore the meanings that individuals attach to their experiences. This involves examining the different elements of a story, such as the plot, characters, setting, and themes, to identify the underlying values, beliefs, and attitudes that shape the story. By analyzing these elements, researchers can gain insights into the ways in which individuals construct their identities, understand their relationships with others, and make sense of the world.

Narrative analysis can also be used to identify patterns and themes across multiple stories. This involves comparing and contrasting the stories of different individuals or groups to identify commonalities and differences. By analyzing these patterns and themes, researchers can gain insights into broader cultural and social phenomena, such as gender, race, and identity.

In addition, narrative analysis can be used to develop interventions that address social and cultural problems. By understanding the stories that individuals tell about their experiences, researchers can develop interventions that are tailored to the unique needs of different individuals and groups.

Overall, the purpose of narrative analysis is to provide a rich, nuanced understanding of the ways in which individuals construct meaning and make sense of their lives. By analyzing the stories that individuals tell, researchers can gain insights into the complex and multifaceted nature of human experience.

When to use Narrative Analysis

Here are some situations where narrative analysis may be appropriate:

• Studying life stories: Narrative analysis can be useful in understanding how individuals construct their life stories, including the events, characters, and themes that are important to them.
• Analyzing cultural narratives: Narrative analysis can be used to analyze cultural narratives, such as myths, legends, and folktales, to understand their meanings and functions.
• Exploring organizational narratives: Narrative analysis can be helpful in examining the stories that organizations tell about themselves, their histories, and their values, to understand how they shape the culture and practices of the organization.
• Investigating media narratives: Narrative analysis can be used to analyze media narratives, such as news stories, films, and TV shows, to understand how they construct meaning and influence public perceptions.
• Examining policy narratives: Narrative analysis can be helpful in examining policy narratives, such as political speeches and policy documents, to understand how they construct ideas and justify policy decisions.

Characteristics of Narrative Analysis

Here are some key characteristics of narrative analysis:

• Focus on stories and narratives: Narrative analysis is concerned with analyzing the stories and narratives that people tell, whether they are oral or written, to understand how they shape and reflect individuals’ experiences and identities.
• Emphasis on context: Narrative analysis seeks to understand the context in which the narratives are produced and the social and cultural factors that shape them.
• Interpretive approach: Narrative analysis is an interpretive approach that seeks to identify patterns and themes in the stories and narratives and to understand the meaning that individuals and communities attach to them.
• Iterative process: Narrative analysis involves an iterative process of analysis, in which the researcher continually refines their understanding of the narratives as they examine more data.
• Attention to language and form : Narrative analysis pays close attention to the language and form of the narratives, including the use of metaphor, imagery, and narrative structure, to understand the meaning that individuals and communities attach to them.
• Reflexivity : Narrative analysis requires the researcher to reflect on their own assumptions and biases and to consider how their own positionality may shape their interpretation of the narratives.
• Qualitative approach: Narrative analysis is typically a qualitative research method that involves in-depth analysis of a small number of cases rather than large-scale quantitative studies.

Advantages of Narrative Analysis

Here are some advantages of narrative analysis:

• Rich and detailed data : Narrative analysis provides rich and detailed data that allows for a deep understanding of individuals’ experiences, emotions, and identities.
• Humanizing approach: Narrative analysis allows individuals to tell their own stories and express their own perspectives, which can help to humanize research and give voice to marginalized communities.
• Holistic understanding: Narrative analysis allows researchers to understand individuals’ experiences in their entirety, including the social, cultural, and historical contexts in which they occur.
• Flexibility : Narrative analysis is a flexible research method that can be applied to a wide range of contexts and research questions.
• Interpretive insights: Narrative analysis provides interpretive insights into the meanings that individuals attach to their experiences and the ways in which they construct their identities.
• Appropriate for sensitive topics: Narrative analysis can be particularly useful in researching sensitive topics, such as trauma or mental health, as it allows individuals to express their experiences in their own words and on their own terms.
• Can lead to policy implications: Narrative analysis can provide insights that can inform policy decisions and interventions, particularly in areas such as health, education, and social policy.

Limitations of Narrative Analysis

Here are some of the limitations of narrative analysis:

• Subjectivity : Narrative analysis relies on the interpretation of researchers, which can be influenced by their own biases and assumptions.
• Limited generalizability: Narrative analysis typically involves in-depth analysis of a small number of cases, which limits its generalizability to broader populations.
• Ethical considerations: The process of eliciting and analyzing narratives can raise ethical concerns, particularly when sensitive topics such as trauma or abuse are involved.
• Limited control over data collection: Narrative analysis often relies on data that is already available, such as interviews, oral histories, or written texts, which can limit the control that researchers have over the quality and completeness of the data.
• Time-consuming: Narrative analysis can be a time-consuming research method, particularly when analyzing large amounts of data.
• Interpretation challenges: Narrative analysis requires researchers to make complex interpretations of data, which can be challenging and time-consuming.
• Limited statistical analysis: Narrative analysis is typically a qualitative research method that does not lend itself well to statistical analysis.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

Framework Analysis – Method, Types and Examples

Methodological Framework – Types, Examples and...

Grounded Theory – Methods, Examples and Guide

Symmetric Histogram – Examples and Making Guide

Bimodal Histogram – Definition, Examples

Discriminant Analysis – Methods, Types and...

Narrative Analysis 101

Everything you need to know to get started

By: Ethar Al-Saraf (PhD)| Expert Reviewed By: Eunice Rautenbach (DTech) | March 2023

If you’re new to research, the host of qualitative analysis methods available to you can be a little overwhelming. In this post, we’ll  unpack the sometimes slippery topic of narrative analysis . We’ll explain what it is, consider its strengths and weaknesses , and look at when and when not to use this analysis method. 

Overview: Narrative Analysis

• What is narrative analysis (simple definition)
• The two overarching approaches  
• The strengths & weaknesses of narrative analysis
• When (and when not) to use it
• Key takeaways

What Is Narrative Analysis?

Simply put, narrative analysis is a qualitative analysis method focused on interpreting human experiences and motivations by looking closely at the stories (the narratives) people tell in a particular context.

In other words, a narrative analysis interprets long-form participant responses or written stories as data, to uncover themes and meanings . That data could be taken from interviews , monologues, written stories, or even recordings. In other words, narrative analysis can be used on both primary and secondary data to provide evidence from the experiences described.

That’s all quite conceptual, so let’s look at an example of how narrative analysis could be used.

Let’s say you’re interested in researching the beliefs of a particular author on popular culture. In that case, you might identify the characters , plotlines , symbols and motifs used in their stories. You could then use narrative analysis to analyse these in combination and against the backdrop of the relevant context.

This would allow you to interpret the underlying meanings and implications in their writing, and what they reveal about the beliefs of the author. In other words, you’d look to understand the views of the author by analysing the narratives that run through their work.

The Two Overarching Approaches

Generally speaking, there are two approaches that one can take to narrative analysis. Specifically, an inductive approach or a deductive approach. Each one will have a meaningful impact on how you interpret your data and the conclusions you can draw, so it’s important that you understand the difference.

First up is the inductive approach to narrative analysis.

The inductive approach takes a bottom-up view , allowing the data to speak for itself, without the influence of any preconceived notions . With this approach, you begin by looking at the data and deriving patterns and themes that can be used to explain the story, as opposed to viewing the data through the lens of pre-existing hypotheses, theories or frameworks. In other words, the analysis is led by the data.

For example, with an inductive approach, you might notice patterns or themes in the way an author presents their characters or develops their plot. You’d then observe these patterns, develop an interpretation of what they might reveal in the context of the story, and draw conclusions relative to the aims of your research.

Contrasted to this is the deductive approach.

With the deductive approach to narrative analysis, you begin by using existing theories that a narrative can be tested against . Here, the analysis adopts particular theoretical assumptions and/or provides hypotheses, and then looks for evidence in a story that will either verify or disprove them.

For example, your analysis might begin with a theory that wealthy authors only tell stories to get the sympathy of their readers. A deductive analysis might then look at the narratives of wealthy authors for evidence that will substantiate (or refute) the theory and then draw conclusions about its accuracy, and suggest explanations for why that might or might not be the case.

Which approach you should take depends on your research aims, objectives and research questions . If these are more exploratory in nature, you’ll likely take an inductive approach. Conversely, if they are more confirmatory in nature, you’ll likely opt for the deductive approach.

Need a helping hand?

Strengths & Weaknesses

Now that we have a clearer view of what narrative analysis is and the two approaches to it, it’s important to understand its strengths and weaknesses , so that you can make the right choices in your research project.

A primary strength of narrative analysis is the rich insight it can generate by uncovering the underlying meanings and interpretations of human experience. The focus on an individual narrative highlights the nuances and complexities of their experience, revealing details that might be missed or considered insignificant by other methods.

Another strength of narrative analysis is the range of topics it can be used for. The focus on human experience means that a narrative analysis can democratise your data analysis, by revealing the value of individuals’ own interpretation of their experience in contrast to broader social, cultural, and political factors.

All that said, just like all analysis methods, narrative analysis has its weaknesses. It’s important to understand these so that you can choose the most appropriate method for your particular research project.

The first drawback of narrative analysis is the problem of subjectivity and interpretation . In other words, a drawback of the focus on stories and their details is that they’re open to being understood differently depending on who’s reading them. This means that a strong understanding of the author’s cultural context is crucial to developing your interpretation of the data. At the same time, it’s important that you remain open-minded in how you interpret your chosen narrative and avoid making any assumptions .

A second weakness of narrative analysis is the issue of reliability and generalisation . Since narrative analysis depends almost entirely on a subjective narrative and your interpretation, the findings and conclusions can’t usually be generalised or empirically verified. Although some conclusions can be drawn about the cultural context, they’re still based on what will almost always be anecdotal data and not suitable for the basis of a theory, for example.

Last but not least, the focus on long-form data expressed as stories means that narrative analysis can be very time-consuming . In addition to the source data itself, you will have to be well informed on the author’s cultural context as well as other interpretations of the narrative, where possible, to ensure you have a holistic view. So, if you’re going to undertake narrative analysis, make sure that you allocate a generous amount of time to work through the data.

When To Use Narrative Analysis

As a qualitative method focused on analysing and interpreting narratives describing human experiences, narrative analysis is usually most appropriate for research topics focused on social, personal, cultural , or even ideological events or phenomena and how they’re understood at an individual level.

For example, if you were interested in understanding the experiences and beliefs of individuals suffering social marginalisation, you could use narrative analysis to look at the narratives and stories told by people in marginalised groups to identify patterns , symbols , or motifs that shed light on how they rationalise their experiences.

In this example, narrative analysis presents a good natural fit as it’s focused on analysing people’s stories to understand their views and beliefs at an individual level. Conversely, if your research was geared towards understanding broader themes and patterns regarding an event or phenomena, analysis methods such as content analysis or thematic analysis may be better suited, depending on your research aim .

Let’s recap

In this post, we’ve explored the basics of narrative analysis in qualitative research. The key takeaways are:

• Narrative analysis is a qualitative analysis method focused on interpreting human experience in the form of stories or narratives .
• There are two overarching approaches to narrative analysis: the inductive (exploratory) approach and the deductive (confirmatory) approach.
• Like all analysis methods, narrative analysis has a particular set of strengths and weaknesses .
• Narrative analysis is generally most appropriate for research focused on interpreting individual, human experiences as expressed in detailed , long-form accounts.

If you’d like to learn more about narrative analysis and qualitative analysis methods in general, be sure to check out the rest of the Grad Coach blog here . Alternatively, if you’re looking for hands-on help with your project, take a look at our 1-on-1 private coaching service .

Psst... there’s more!

This post was based on one of our popular Research Bootcamps . If you're working on a research project, you'll definitely want to check this out ...

Thanks. I need examples of narrative analysis

Here are some examples of research topics that could utilise narrative analysis:

Personal Narratives of Trauma: Analysing personal stories of individuals who have experienced trauma to understand the impact, coping mechanisms, and healing processes.

Identity Formation in Immigrant Communities: Examining the narratives of immigrants to explore how they construct and negotiate their identities in a new cultural context.

Media Representations of Gender: Analysing narratives in media texts (such as films, television shows, or advertisements) to investigate the portrayal of gender roles, stereotypes, and power dynamics.

Where can I find an example of a narrative analysis table ?

Please i need help with my project,

how can I cite this article in APA 7th style?

please mention the sources as well.

My research is mixed approach. I use interview,key_inforamt interview,FGD and document.so,which qualitative analysis is appropriate to analyze these data.Thanks

Which qualitative analysis methode is appropriate to analyze data obtain from intetview,key informant intetview,Focus group discussion and document.

I’ve finished my PhD. Now I need a “platform” that will help me objectively ascertain the tacit assumptions that are buried within a narrative. Can you help?

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Print Friendly

Narrative Analysis In Qualitative Research

Saul McLeod, PhD

Editor-in-Chief for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MRes, PhD, University of Manchester

Saul McLeod, PhD., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years of experience in further and higher education. He has been published in peer-reviewed journals, including the Journal of Clinical Psychology.

Learn about our Editorial Process

Olivia Guy-Evans, MSc

Associate Editor for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MSc Psychology of Education

Olivia Guy-Evans is a writer and associate editor for Simply Psychology. She has previously worked in healthcare and educational sectors.

On This Page:

What Is Narrative Analysis?

Narrative analysis is a qualitative research method used to understand how individuals create stories from their personal experiences.

There is an emphasis on understanding the context in which a narrative is constructed, recognizing the influence of historical, cultural, and social factors on storytelling.

It differs from other qualitative methods like interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA) and discourse analysis by specifically examining how individuals use stories to make sense of their experiences and the world around them.

Narrative analysis is not applicable to all research topics; it is best suited when the focus of the analysis is narratives or stories.

Examples of topics that are well-suited to narrative analysis include: various aspects of identity, individual experiences of psychological processes, interpersonal and intimate relationships, and experiences of body, beauty and health

Assumptions of Narrative Analysis

• Stories are interpretations of the world and experiences: Narrative analysis assumes that stories are not accurate representations of reality. People use stories to explain or normalize what has occurred in their lives and make sense of why things are the way they are. People make sense of their lives through the stories they tell.
• Language is an object for close investigation: A structural analysis of a narrative focuses on the way a story is told, treating language as an object for investigation in itself, not just as it refers to content. This kind of analysis attends to the linguistic phenomena of a story and its overall composition.
• Meaning is created through narrative: Narrative inquiry is the study of how stories unfold over time and is useful for understanding how people perceive reality, make sense of their worlds, and perform social actions. Researchers and participants are co-authors of stories because they collaborate to create meaning. Narrative analysts show how the tools (e.g. its structure and style) used to build a story create the meaning of the experience being shared
• Stories do not speak for themselves: Narratives do not speak for themselves, and they require interpretation when used as data in social research. Researchers must interpret a story by deciding what constitutes a story, collecting stories, identifying stories within data, and identifying narrative themes and relationships.

Key Concepts in Narrative Analysis

Narrative analysis is concerned with more than just  what  is said (the content). It also considers  how  the story is constructed (the structure) and the context or situation in which the story is told (the performance)

• Defining “Story” and “Narrative” : A story is a structured account of events, while a narrative is a story that has been shaped and given meaning by a storyteller. The process of transforming events into a narrative involves selecting, organizing, and interpreting those events in a way that conveys a particular message or understanding.
• Content:  While narrative analysis values how a story is told, the content ( what is said ) remains significant. The themes, events, and characters in a story provide insights into the storyteller’s experiences, beliefs, and values. Therefore, narrative analysis sees content as inseparable from structure and performance. All three work together to create the meaning of a story.
• Narrative Structure: Narrative analysis examines how elements like plot, setting, and characterization are used to construct a story. For example, a researcher might study how the sequence of events, the choice of words, or the use of metaphors shapes the meaning of a story.
• Narrative as Performance: Narratives are not simply neutral accounts of events but are performed and co-constructed through interactions between the storyteller and the audience. This means that understanding a narrative involves paying attention to how it is told, who is telling it, and to whom it is being told. For instance, a researcher might study how a story changes depending on who is telling it, or how the same story is received by different audiences.

Approaches to Narrative Analysis

There are different models and approaches to narrative analysis, and the type that is used depends on the research problem.

• Thematic Analysis : Thematic analysis assumes language is a direct and unambiguous route to meaning. In this approach, researchers collect many stories and then inductively create conceptual groupings from the data. One of the assumptions of thematic analysis is that everyone in the group means the same thing by what they say, even when grouped into a similar thematic category.
• Structural Analysis: This approach views language as a resource and an object for investigation, moving beyond the referential content. Structural analysis assumes the way a story is told is as important as the content of the story. Following Labov’s Narrative Model, the researcher may focus on identifying and examining the key elements of narrative structure, such as the abstract, orientation, complicating action, evaluation, resolution, and coda.
• Interactional Analysis: Interactional analysis looks at how narratives are created and understood within the context of social interactions. This approach acknowledges that narratives are not created in isolation but are shaped by the listener’s responses, the social context of the storytelling, and the relationship between the storyteller and the listener. E.g. Mishler’s Model.
• Performance Analysis : Examining the performative elements of storytelling such as the use of language, nonverbal communication, and audience engagement provides further insights into how stories are constructed and the effects they create. Researchers are interested in how the narrator positions themselves in relation to the audience.

Pratical Steps: Conducting Narrative Analysis

The steps involved in conducting narrative analysis are often iterative and non-linear, rather than following a strict sequential order.

While the steps provide a general framework and guidance for the research process, in practice, researchers may move back and forth between different stages, or engage in multiple steps simultaneously, as new insights and questions emerge from the data.

The iterative nature of narrative analysis reflects the complex and dynamic nature of human experience and meaning-making.

1. Situate the Epistemological Approach

Determine whether to use a naturalist or constructivist approach. The research questions and theoretical framework inform this decision.

Situating the epistemological approach at the outset of the study helps ensure consistency and coherence throughout the research process, guiding methodological choices and the interpretation of findings.

If the research questions focus on understanding the subjective experiences and meaning-making processes of participants, a constructivist approach may be more appropriate.

Conversely, if the research aims to identify common patterns or themes across narratives and assumes a more objective reality, a naturalist approach may be suitable.

Naturalist Approach :

• Assumes that narratives reflect an objective reality or truth
• Seeks to capture and understand the “real” experiences and perspectives of participants
• Aims to minimize the researcher’s influence on the data collection and interpretation process
• Aligns with a more positivist or realist paradigm

Constructivist Approach :

• Assumes that narratives are constructed and shaped by the interaction between the narrator and the listener (researcher)
• Acknowledges that multiple realities or truths can exist, as individuals interpret and make sense of their experiences differently
• Recognizes the researcher’s role in co-creating meaning during the data collection and analysis process
• Aligns with an interpretivist or social constructionist paradigm

2. Select the Analytical Model(s)

Decide which model(s) to use in analyzing narrative data. Different models focus on different features of narratives and raise distinct questions during analysis.

Research design, informed by the chosen epistemological approach, will guide decisions regarding the use of single or multiple models.

• Structural Model:  Examines the structure of stories and the ways in which they are told. Considers elements such as plot, characters, setting, and narrative arc
• Thematic Model:  Analyzes the content of stories, focusing on the themes around which stories are told. May involve coding the data to identify recurrent themes and organizing them into categories or hierarchies
• Interactional/Performative Model:  Investigates the contextual features that shape the construction of narratives and how meaning is collaboratively created through interaction between storytellers and listeners.

3. Select Narratives to Analyze

In conducting narrative analysis involves selecting specific narratives to analyze within the larger dataset. Even when the aim is to analyze the data holistically, researchers often choose to focus on particular narratives for close scrutiny.

This selection process is guided by the research questions, theoretical framework, and the analytical strategy employed in the study.

When selecting narratives to analyze, researchers may consider the following:

• Representativeness : Choosing narratives that are representative of the broader dataset or the phenomena under investigation. This may involve selecting narratives that exemplify common themes, patterns, or experiences shared by multiple participants.
• Uniqueness : Identifying narratives that stand out as unique, unusual, or deviant cases. These narratives may offer valuable insights into the diversity of experiences or challenge dominant patterns or assumptions.
• Theoretical relevance : Selecting narratives that are particularly relevant to the theoretical framework or concepts guiding the study. These narratives may help illuminate or expand upon key theoretical ideas.
• Richness of data : Choosing narratives that are rich in detail, providing thick descriptions and in-depth insights into the participants’ experiences, thoughts, and emotions.

4. Identifying Narrative Blocks

A narrative block refers to a complete, self-contained story or narrative within a larger dataset, such as an interview transcript.

It is a segment of the data that has a clear beginning, middle, and end, and that conveys a specific experience, event, or perspective of the participant.

This involves looking for cues like “entrance and exit talk”, which signal the beginning and end of a distinct narrative within a conversation.

For instance, phrases like, “There was this one time…” or “Let me give you an example…” may signal the beginning of a narrative block.

Similarly, phrases like, “So that’s how that wrapped up…” or “That is a pretty classic example of…” can help researchers pinpoint the end of a narrative block

It is important to note that the selection of narratives and units of analysis is an iterative process, and researchers may revisit and refine their choices as they delve deeper into the data and their analysis progresses.

Researchers should be transparent about their selection criteria and process, and should reflect on how their choices may impact the interpretation and findings of the study.

Here’s an example of what a narrative block might look like:

“I remember when I first started college. I was so nervous and excited at the same time. I didn’t know anyone on campus, and I was worried about fitting in. But during orientation week, I met this group of people who were just as lost and nervous as I was. We bonded over our shared experiences and became fast friends. That group of friends made all the difference in my college experience. We supported each other through the ups and downs, and I don’t think I would have made it through without them.”

This narrative block has a clear beginning (starting college), middle (meeting friends during orientation week), and end (reflecting on the importance of those friendships throughout college).

It conveys a specific experience and perspective of the participant, making it a suitable unit for narrative analysis.

5. Code Narrative Blocks

In conducting narrative analysis involves coding the narrative blocks using one or multiple analytical models.

Coding is the process of assigning labels or categories to segments of data, allowing researchers to organize, retrieve, and interpret the information in a systematic manner.

The coding process may involve several rounds or iterations, as researchers refine their codes and categories based on their deepening understanding of the data.

There are two main approaches to coding narrative blocks:

It’s important to note that these classifications are not always clear-cut, and researchers may use a combination of inductive and deductive approaches in their analysis.

For example, a researcher might start with a deductive structural analysis, using a predefined model of narrative structure, but then switch to an inductive thematic analysis to identify emergent themes within each structural element.

Inductive Coding

This approach, starting with the data and allowing themes and categories to emerge from the narratives aligns with a constructivist approach, where meaning is viewed as co-created between the researcher and the participant.

Researchers using inductive coding might identify emergent themes in the narratives about “life events” and code these narrative blocks accordingly.

For example, stories about deciding to have children could be coded as “Narratives about deciding to have children”.

• Also known as “open coding” or “data-driven coding”
• Involves allowing themes and categories to emerge from the data itself, rather than imposing pre-existing frameworks or theories
• Researchers immerse themselves in the narrative data, identifying patterns, similarities, and differences across the stories
• Codes are developed based on the researcher’s interpretation of the data and are refined iteratively throughout the analysis process
• Aligns with a constructivist approach, acknowledging the researcher’s role in co-creating meaning and the possibility of multiple interpretations

Deductive Coding

This approach, using pre-existing frameworks or theories to guide the coding process, aligns with a naturalist approach, where the researcher seeks to objectively identify and categorize elements of the narratives.

One such framework is the one proposed by Labov (1997), which identifies six key elements of a story:

• Abstract : A summary or overview of the story, often provided at the beginning
• Orientation : The setting or context of the story, including information about the time, place, characters, and situation
• Complicating Action : The main plot or sequence of events that drive the story forward, often involving a problem, challenge, or conflict
• Evaluation : The storyteller’s commentary on the meaning or significance of the events, revealing their attitudes, opinions, or emotions
• Resolution : The outcome or conclusion of the story, often resolving the complicating action or providing a sense of closure
• Coda : An optional element that brings the story back to the present or reflects on its broader implications

When using this framework for deductive coding, researchers would analyze each narrative block, looking for segments that correspond to these six elements. They would then assign the appropriate code to each segment, such as “Abstract,” “Orientation,” “Complicating Action,” and so on.

Here’s an example of how this might be applied to a narrative block:

“I remember my first day at my new job [Orientation]. I was so nervous and excited at the same time [Evaluation]. As soon as I walked in, I realized I had forgotten my employee ID [Complicating Action]. I panicked and thought I would be fired on the spot [Evaluation]. But then my manager came over, laughed, and said, ‘Don’t worry, it happens to everyone. We’ll get you a new one.’ [Resolution] That moment taught me that it’s okay to make mistakes and that my new workplace was actually pretty understanding [Coda].”

By applying Labov’s story structure framework, researchers can systematically analyze the narrative data, identifying patterns in how stories are structured and told.

This can provide insights into the way individuals make sense of their experiences and construct meaning through storytelling.

Step 6: Delve into the Story Structure

This step involves a deep and systematic examination of the coded narrative data, with a focus on understanding how the narrators use story structure elements (e.g., abstract, orientation, complicating action, evaluation, resolution, and coda) to construct meaning and convey their experiences.

By delving into the story structure, researchers can identify patterns, themes, and variations across different narratives, and gain insights into the ways in which individuals make sense of their lives through storytelling.

It allows researchers to move beyond the surface level of the narratives and to gain a deeper understanding of how individuals use storytelling to make sense of their lives and multifaceted nature of human experience.

This involves:

• Researchers organize the coded narrative data by grouping together segments that belong to the same story structure element (e.g., all “orientation” segments, all “complicating action” segments, etc.).
• This allows researchers to compare and contrast how different narrators use each story structure element, and to identify patterns, themes, and variations across the narratives.
• Researchers closely examine the content of each coded segment, paying attention to the specific details, descriptions, and evaluations provided by the narrators.
• They also consider the function of each story structure element, i.e., how it contributes to the overall meaning and coherence of the narrative.
• For example, researchers might analyze how narrators use the “orientation” element to set the scene, introduce characters, and provide context for their stories, or how they use the “evaluation” element to convey their attitudes, emotions, and reflections on the events being narrated.
• Researchers seek to understand how narrators make sense of their experiences and construct meaning through the way they structure and tell their stories.
• This involves considering the interplay between story structure, content, and context, and how these elements shape the overall meaning and significance of the narratives.
• Researchers may also consider the narrator’s perspective, the audience and social context of the storytelling, and the broader cultural and historical frameworks that inform the narratives.

Throughout this process, researchers need to be aware of the challenges and complexities of interpretation, such as the fact that narrators may not always follow a linear or coherent story structure, or that different individuals may attribute different meanings to similar experiences.

Researchers should aim to provide nuanced and contextualized descriptions of their findings, supported by relevant examples and quotes from the narratives.

Step 7: Compare Across Story Structure

This step involves a comparative analysis of the narrative data, looking for patterns, similarities, and differences in how story structure elements are used across different narratives.

In the previous step (Step 6: Delve into the Story Structure), researchers examined each story structure element in depth, analyzing its content, function, and meaning within individual narratives.

In Step 7, the focus shifts to a higher-level analysis, where researchers compare and contrast the use of story structure elements across the entire dataset.

The goal is to provide a comprehensive and integrative understanding of the narrative data, one that goes beyond the analysis of individual stories and reveals the broader patterns, meanings, and significance of storytelling in human experience.

This comparative analysis can be done in several ways:

• Researchers look for similarities and differences in how different individuals use each story structure element (e.g., orientation, complicating action, resolution) to construct their narratives.
• This can reveal patterns in how people from different backgrounds, experiences, or perspectives structure and tell their stories.
• Researchers may also compare the use of story structure elements across different types of narratives, such as life stories, event narratives, or turning point narratives.
• This can help identify genre-specific patterns or conventions in how stories are structured and told.
• Researchers may consider how the social, cultural, or historical context in which narratives are produced influences the way story structure elements are used.
• For example, they may compare narratives told in different settings (e.g., interviews, social media, public speeches), or at different points in time, to see how context shapes the structure and content of stories.

Throughout this comparative analysis, researchers should remain attentive to the overarching narrative and the broader themes and meanings that emerge from the data.

While breaking down narratives into specific story structure elements can provide valuable insights, it’s important not to lose sight of the holistic nature of narratives and the way in which different elements work together to create meaning.

Researchers should also be reflexive about their own role in the analysis process, acknowledging how their own backgrounds, assumptions, and interpretive frameworks may shape their understanding of the narratives.

They should strive to provide a balanced and nuanced account of their findings, highlighting both the commonalities and the variations in how story structure elements are used across different narratives.

By comparing story structure elements across the dataset, researchers can generate new insights and theories about the ways in which individuals use storytelling to make sense of their lives and experiences.

They may identify common patterns or structures that underlie different types of narratives, or they may discover how particular social, cultural, or historical factors shape the way stories are told.

Step 8: Tell the Core Narrative

This step involves synthesizing the insights and findings from the previous steps into a coherent and compelling narrative account that captures the essence of the research participants’ experiences and the key themes and meanings that emerged from the analysis.

At this stage, researchers have thoroughly examined the narrative data, coding and analyzing it at various levels, from the specific story structure elements to the broader patterns and comparisons across narratives.

They have gained a deep understanding of how participants use storytelling to make sense of their lives and experiences, and how different factors (such as social, cultural, or historical context) shape the way stories are told.

In Step 8, researchers aim to distill this complex and multifaceted understanding into a clear and concise narrative that conveys the core insights and conclusions of the study.

The goal is to provide a powerful and insightful narrative account that captures the richness and complexity of the research participants’ experiences, and that contributes to a deeper understanding of the ways in which storytelling shapes and reflects human lives and meanings.

By telling the core narrative, researchers can communicate the significance and relevance of their findings to a wider audience, and contribute to ongoing conversations and debates in their field and beyond.

• Researchers review the findings from the previous steps and identify the most salient and significant themes and meanings that emerged from the analysis.
• These themes may relate to the content of the narratives (e.g., common experiences, challenges, or turning points), the structure of the narratives (e.g., common patterns or variations in how stories are told), or the broader social and cultural factors that shape the narratives.
• Researchers organize the key themes and findings into a logical and compelling narrative that tells the “core story” of the research participants’ experiences.
• This may involve selecting illustrative examples or quotes from the narratives to support and enrich the main points, and providing interpretive commentary to guide the reader’s understanding.
• Researchers should aim to create a narrative that is both faithful to the complexity and diversity of the participants’ experiences and clear and accessible to the intended audience.
• In telling the core narrative, researchers should also consider the broader implications and significance of their findings, both for the specific field of study and for understanding human experience more generally.
• This may involve discussing how the findings relate to existing theories or debates in the field, identifying new questions or directions for future research, or highlighting the practical applications or social relevance of the study.

Ethical Considerations in Narrative Analysis

Researchers face the challenge of balancing the need to provide faithful accounts of participant stories with the ethical obligation to interpret those stories in a way that respects the participants and avoids misrepresentation.

This requires nuance and sensitivity, acknowledging the ambiguities inherent in narrative data.

Reflexivity and Positionality

Researchers should acknowledge their role in shaping all aspects of the research process, including the interpretation of narratives.

Researchers need to be aware of their own subjectivity and how their experiences, assumptions, and perspectives could influence their interpretations of participants’ narratives.

This awareness, often referred to as reflexivity, involves critically examining one’s own assumptions and being conscious of potential biases throughout every stage of the research process.

Researchers are encouraged to maintain field journals to track their thoughts and experiences, which can provide valuable insights into their influence on the research.

• Transparency is Crucial: Researchers must be transparent about their positionality, clearly articulating how their background and perspectives have shaped their understanding of the data.
• Reflexive Journals: Researchers can utilize reflexive journals to document feelings and thoughts throughout the research process, particularly during data analysis, helping to distinguish personal biases from participant perspectives.
• Team-Based Reflexivity: In team-based research, researchers should engage in open communication with their colleagues, sharing their reflexive insights and perspectives to ensure a well-rounded understanding of the data.

Respecting Participants’ Voices

Ethical narrative analysis emphasizes the importance of representing participants’ stories in a way that is true to their experiences.

Ethical narrative analysis prioritizes representing participants’ stories in a manner that accurately reflects their lived experiences, ensuring their voices are heard and their perspectives are not misrepresented.

This can include involving participants in the interpretation of their narratives and giving them a voice in how their stories are shared.

This can involve:

• Participant Involvement: Researchers can involve participants in the interpretation of their narratives, giving them a voice in deciding how their stories are shared [VI, 15].
• Member Checking: Sharing transcripts, analyses, and publications with research participants is a common practice in narrative research, allowing for further dialogue and ensuring accurate representation.
• Collaborative Meaning-Making: Researchers should approach interviews as opportunities for collaborative meaning-making, recognizing that interviewees have their own agendas and interpretations of the interactions. Researchers should validate participant experiences without judgment, encouraging them to tell their stories authentically.
• Ethical Interviewing: Researchers must adopt ethical interviewing practices, gaining informed consent, guaranteeing anonymity, and being sensitive to potential distress caused by interview questions.

Strengths of Narrative Analysis

Narrative analysis is a powerful tool for qualitative research, offering several strengths.

• Rich Insights into Human Experience : Narrative analysis stands out for its ability to generate rich, nuanced insights into the complexities of human experience. Unlike other methods that might overlook individual perspectives, narrative analysis centers on personal stories, capturing the unique ways individuals perceive, interpret, and make sense of their lives and experiences.
• Exploring Underlying Meanings : This method enables researchers to go beyond superficial descriptions, uncovering the underlying meanings, motivations, and interpretations embedded within personal narratives. By examining the stories people tell, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of the beliefs, values, and cultural contexts that shape those experiences.
• Versatility and Broad Applications : Narrative analysis offers flexibility in its application, proving valuable for a wide range of research topics, particularly those focused on social, personal, cultural, or ideological phenomena. This approach proves particularly well-suited for exploring topics where individual perspectives and experiences are central to understanding the phenomenon under investigation.
• Democratizing Data Analysis : By focusing on the narratives of individuals, narrative analysis offers a democratizing approach to research. This method values the insights and interpretations individuals have about their own experiences, often contrasting with broader societal, cultural, and political factors. This approach acknowledges that individuals possess valuable understandings of their own lives, contributing to a more comprehensive and inclusive research process.

Let’s illustrate these strengths with a specific research example. Imagine investigating the experiences and beliefs of individuals facing social marginalization.

Narrative analysis, in this context, would allow researchers to closely examine the stories told by people within marginalized groups.

By identifying recurring patterns, symbols, or motifs within their narratives, researchers could shed light on how these individuals make sense of their experiences, revealing the often-hidden impacts of social marginalization.

Weaknesses of Narrative Analysis

• It can be time-consuming: Narrative analysis can require a significant time investment to analyze source data, especially when long-form stories are involved. Researchers must also be knowledgeable about the author’s cultural context and consider other interpretations of the narrative.
• Reliability and generalizability are limited: Because narrative analysis relies heavily on subjective interpretation of the narrative, the findings cannot usually be generalized to larger populations or empirically verified. Although conclusions about the cultural context might be drawn, they are based on anecdotal data, making them unsuitable as a basis for theory development.
• Labov’s model is not appropriate for all types of narratives: While Labov’s model can be useful for analyzing monological narratives, it is not suitable for conversational narratives, interactional discourses, or co-constructed stories. This is because the model primarily focuses on analyzing monological narratives collected through interviews like oral histories or life stories, rather than conversational interviews.
• Timelines may oversimplify life stories: While timelines can be a useful tool for organizing large amounts of narrative data, they have limitations. Summarizing and quantifying narrative data in this way risks reducing the complexity and oversimplifying the stories of individuals. Additionally, timelines may not fully capture the episodic nature of narratives, which often unfold non-linearly.

Further Information

For narrative analysis.

• Bamberg, M. (2006) Stories: Big or small. Why do we care? Narrative Inquiry, 16(1):139–147.
• Bamberg, M. (2012) Narrative analysis, in H. Cooper, P.M. Camic, D.L. Long, A.T. Panter, D. Rindskopf and K. Sher (eds), APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, Vol. 2. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 85–102.
• De Fina, A., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2012). Analyzing narrative Discourse and sociolinguistic perspectives Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
• Gee, P. (2011). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
• Holstein, J., & Gubrium, J. (Eds.). (2012). Varieties of narrative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
• Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

LABOVIAN MODEL

Labov’s Narrative Model, developed by sociolinguist William Labov, is a structural approach to analyzing narratives that focuses on the formal properties and organizational features of stories.

Labov identified six key elements that he argued are present in fully-formed oral narratives: abstract, orientation, complicating action, evaluation, resolution, and coda.

• Labov, W. (1997). Further steps in narrative analysis. Journal of Narrative and Life History (7 ),395–415.
• Labov, W. and Waletzky J. (1997) Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7 (1–4): 3–38.
• McCormack, C. (2004). Storying stories: a narrative approach to in-depth interview conversations.  International journal of social research methodology ,  7 (3), 219-236.
• Patterson, W. (2008). Narratives of events: Labovian narrative analysis and its limitations.  Doing narrative research , 22-40.

POLKINGHORNE MODEL

The Polkinghorne Model, developed by psychologist Donald Polkinghorne, is a narrative approach to understanding human experience and meaning-making.

According to Polkinghorne, narratives are not simply a way of representing or communicating experience, but are the primary means through which we construct and make sense of our lives.

He argued that narratives are a fundamental form of human cognition, and that we use stories to organize and interpret our experiences, to create coherence and continuity in our sense of self, and to navigate the social and cultural worlds we inhabit.

One of the key features of the Polkinghorne Model is its emphasis on the interpretive and constructivist nature of narrative analysis.

Polkinghorne argued that narratives are not simply a reflection of an objective reality, but are always shaped by the social, cultural, and historical contexts in which they are told, as well as by the individual’s own perspective and meaning-making processes.

• Polkinghorne, D. E. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis.  International journal of qualitative studies in education ,  8 (1), 5-23.
• Polkinghorne, D. (1988).  Narrative knowing and the human sciences . Suny Press.
• Polkinghorne, D. E. (2007). Validity issues in narrative research.  Qualitative inquiry ,  13 (4), 471-486.

MISHLER MODEL

Elliot Mishler, a social psychologist and professor at Harvard Medical School, developed an influential model for analyzing narratives in the context of medical encounters.

The Mishler Model, also known as the “Narrative Functions Model,” focuses on the interactive and collaborative nature of storytelling in medical interviews, and examines how patients and healthcare providers co-construct meaning through their dialogue.

• Mishler, E. G. (1995). Models of narrative analysis: A typology.  Journal of narrative and life history ,  5 (2), 87-123.
• Mishler, E. G. (1986).  The analysis of interview-narratives  (pp. 233-255). TR Sarbin (Ed.), Narrative psychology: The storied nature of human conduct.
• Mishler, E. G. (2009).  Storylines . Harvard University Press.
• Mishler, E. G. (1991).  Research interviewing: Context and narrative . Harvard university press.

FOR VISUAL NARRATIVE ANALYSIS

• Bell, 5. E. (2002), Photo images: Jo Spence’s narratives of Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and with illness. Health An Interdisciplinary by post, 6 (1), 5-30.
• Pink, 5. (2004) Visual methods in C. Seale, G. Gobo, obrium, & D. Silverman (Eds), [Special issue) Qualitative Research Practice (pp. 361-378). London: Sage
• Adams, H. L. (2015). Insights into processes of posttraumatic growth through narrative analysis of chronic illness stories.  Qualitative Psychology ,  2 (2), 111.
• Ehsan, N., Riaz, M., & Khalily, T. (2019). Trauma of terror and displacement: A narrative analysis of mental health of women IDPS in KPK (Pakistan).  Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology ,  25 (2), 140.
• Fewings, E., & Quinlan, E. (2023). “It hasn’t gone away after 30 years.” late-career Australian psychologists’ experience of uncertainty throughout their career .  Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 54 (3), 221–230. 
• Skopp, N. A., Holland, K. M., Logan, J. E., Alexander, C. L., & Floyd, C. F. (2019). Circumstances preceding suicide in US soldiers: A qualitative analysis of narrative data.  Psychological services ,  16 (2), 302.

The Ultimate Guide to Qualitative Research - Part 2: Handling Qualitative Data

• Handling qualitative data
• Transcripts
• Field notes
• Survey data and responses
• Visual and audio data
• Data organization
• Data coding
• Coding frame
• Auto and smart coding
• Organizing codes
• Qualitative data analysis
• Content analysis

Thematic analysis

• Thematic analysis vs. content analysis
• Introduction

Types of narrative research

Research methods for a narrative analysis, narrative analysis, considerations for narrative analysis.

• Phenomenological research
• Discourse analysis
• Grounded theory
• Deductive reasoning
• Inductive reasoning
• Inductive vs. deductive reasoning
• Qualitative data interpretation
• Qualitative data analysis software

Narrative analysis in research

Narrative analysis is an approach to qualitative research that involves the documentation of narratives both for the purpose of understanding events and phenomena and understanding how people communicate stories.

Let's look at the basics of narrative research, then examine the process of conducting a narrative inquiry and how ATLAS.ti can help you conduct a narrative analysis.

Qualitative researchers can employ various forms of narrative research, but all of these distinct approaches utilize perspectival data as the means for contributing to theory.

A biography is the most straightforward form of narrative research. Data collection for a biography generally involves summarizing the main points of an individual's life or at least the part of their history involved with events that a researcher wants to examine. Generally speaking, a biography aims to provide a more complete record of an individual person's life in a manner that might dispel any inaccuracies that exist in popular thought or provide a new perspective on that person’s history. Narrative researchers may also construct a new biography of someone who doesn’t have a public or online presence to delve deeper into that person’s history relating to the research topic.

The purpose of biographies as a function of narrative inquiry is to shed light on the lived experience of a particular person that a more casual examination of someone's life might overlook. Newspaper articles and online posts might give someone an overview of information about any individual. At the same time, a more involved survey or interview can provide sufficiently comprehensive knowledge about a person useful for narrative analysis and theoretical development.

Life history

This is probably the most involved form of narrative research as it requires capturing as much of the total human experience of an individual person as possible. While it involves elements of biographical research, constructing a life history also means collecting first-person knowledge from the subject through narrative interviews and observations while drawing on other forms of data , such as field notes and in-depth interviews with others.

Even a newspaper article or blog post about the person can contribute to the contextual meaning informing the life history. The objective of conducting a life history is to construct a complete picture of the person from past to present in a manner that gives your research audience the means to immerse themselves in the human experience of the person you are studying.

Oral history

While all forms of narrative research rely on narrative interviews with research participants , oral histories begin with and branch out from the individual's point of view as the driving force of data collection .

Major events like wars and natural disasters are often observed and described at scale, but a bird's eye view of such events may not provide a complete story. Oral history can assist researchers in providing a unique and perhaps unexplored perspective from in-depth interviews with a narrator's own words of what happened, how they experienced it, and what reasons they give for their actions. Researchers who collect this sort of information can then help fill in the gaps common knowledge may not have grasped.

The objective of an oral history is to provide a perspective built on personal experience. The unique viewpoint that personal narratives can provide has the potential to raise analytical insights that research methods at scale may overlook. Narrative analysis of oral histories can hence illuminate potential inquiries that can be addressed in future studies.

Whatever your research, get it done with ATLAS.ti.

From case study research to interviews, turn to ATLAS.ti for your qualitative research. Click here for a free trial.

To conduct narrative analysis, researchers need a narrative and research question . A narrative alone might make for an interesting story that instills information, but analyzing a narrative to generate knowledge requires ordering that information to identify patterns, intentions, and effects.

Narrative analysis presents a distinctive research approach among various methodologies , and it can pose significant challenges due to its inherent interpretative nature. Essentially, this method revolves around capturing and examining the verbal or written accounts and visual depictions shared by individuals. Narrative inquiry strives to unravel the essence of what is conveyed by closely observing the content and manner of expression.

Furthermore, narrative research assumes a dual role, serving both as a research technique and a subject of investigation. Regarded as "real-world measures," narrative methods provide valuable tools for exploring actual societal issues. The narrative approach encompasses an individual's life story and the profound significance embedded within their lived experiences. Typically, a composite of narratives is synthesized, intermingling and mutually influencing each other.

Designing a research inquiry

Sometimes, narrative research is less about the storyteller or the story they are telling than it is about generating knowledge that contributes to a greater understanding of social behavior and cultural practices. While it might be interesting or useful to hear a comedian tell a story that makes their audience laugh, a narrative analysis of that story can identify how the comedian constructs their narrative or what causes the audience to laugh.

As with all research, a narrative inquiry starts with a research question that is tied to existing relevant theory regarding the object of analysis (i.e., the person or event for which the narrative is constructed). If your research question involves studying racial inequalities in university contexts, for example, then the narrative analysis you are seeking might revolve around the lived experiences of students of color. If you are analyzing narratives from children's stories, then your research question might relate to identifying aspects of children's stories that grab the attention of young readers. The point is that researchers conducting a narrative inquiry do not do so merely to collect more information about their object of inquiry. Ultimately, narrative research is tied to developing a more contextualized or broader understanding of the social world.

Data collection

Having crafted the research questions and chosen the appropriate form of narrative research for your study, you can start to collect your data for the eventual narrative analysis.

Needless to say, the key point in narrative research is the narrative. The story is either the unit of analysis or the focal point from which researchers pursue other methods of research. Interviews and observations are great ways to collect narratives. Particularly with biographies and life histories, one of the best ways to study your object of inquiry is to interview them. If you are conducting narrative research for discourse analysis, then observing or recording narratives (e.g., storytelling, audiobooks, podcasts) is ideal for later narrative analysis.

Triangulating data

If you are collecting a life history or an oral history, then you will need to rely on collecting evidence from different sources to support the analysis of the narrative. In research, triangulation is the concept of drawing on multiple methods or sources of data to get a more comprehensive picture of your object of inquiry.

While a narrative inquiry is constructed around the story or its storyteller, assertions that can be made from an analysis of the story can benefit from supporting evidence (or lack thereof) collected by other means.

Even a lack of supporting evidence might be telling. For example, suppose your object of inquiry tells a story about working minimum wage jobs all throughout college to pay for their tuition. Looking for triangulation, in this case, means searching through records and other forms of information to support the claims being put forth. If it turns out that the storyteller's claims bear further warranting - maybe you discover that family or scholarships supported them during college - your analysis might uncover new inquiries as to why the story was presented the way it was. Perhaps they are trying to impress their audience or construct a narrative identity about themselves that reinforces their thinking about who they are. The important point here is that triangulation is a necessary component of narrative research to learn more about the object of inquiry from different angles.

Conduct data analysis for your narrative research with ATLAS.ti.

Dedicated research software like ATLAS.ti helps the researcher catalog, penetrate, and analyze the data generated in any qualitative research project. Start with a free trial today.

This brings us to the analysis part of narrative research. As explained above, a narrative can be viewed as a straightforward story to understand and internalize. As researchers, however, we have many different approaches available to us for analyzing narrative data depending on our research inquiry.

In this section, we will examine some of the most common forms of analysis while looking at how you can employ tools in ATLAS.ti to analyze your qualitative data .

Qualitative research often employs thematic analysis , which refers to a search for commonly occurring themes that appear in the data. The important point of thematic analysis in narrative research is that the themes arise from the data produced by the research participants . In other words, the themes in a narrative study are strongly based on how the research participants see them rather than focusing on how researchers or existing theory see them.

ATLAS.ti can be used for thematic analysis in any research field or discipline. Data in narrative research is summarized through the coding process , where the researcher codes large segments of data with short, descriptive labels that can succinctly describe the data thematically. The emerging patterns among occurring codes in the perspectival data thus inform the identification of themes that arise from the collected narratives.

Structural analysis

The search for structure in a narrative is less about what is conveyed in the narrative and more about how the narrative is told. The differences in narrative forms ultimately tell us something useful about the meaning-making epistemologies and values of the people telling them and the cultures they inhabit.

Just like in thematic analysis, codes in ATLAS.ti can be used to summarize data, except that in this case, codes could be created to specifically examine structure by identifying the particular parts or moves in a narrative (e.g., introduction, conflict, resolution). Code-Document Analysis in ATLAS.ti can then tell you which of your narratives (represented by discrete documents) contain which parts of a common narrative.

It may also be useful to conduct a content analysis of narratives to analyze them structurally. English has many signal words and phrases (e.g., "for example," "as a result," and "suddenly") to alert listeners and readers that they are coming to a new step in the narrative.

In this case, both the Text Search and Word Frequencies tools in ATLAS.ti can help you identify the various aspects of the narrative structure (including automatically identifying discrete parts of speech) and the frequency in which they occur across different narratives.

Functional analysis

Whereas a straightforward structural analysis identifies the particular parts of a narrative, a functional analysis looks at what the narrator is trying to accomplish through the content and structure of their narrative. For example, if a research participant telling their narrative asks the interviewer rhetorical questions, they might be doing so to make the interviewer think or adopt the participant's perspective.

A functional analysis often requires the researcher to take notes and reflect on their experiences while collecting data from research participants. ATLAS.ti offers a dedicated space for memos , which can serve to jot down useful contextual information that the researcher can refer to while coding and analyzing data.

Dialogic analysis

There is a nuanced difference between what a narrator tries to accomplish when telling a narrative and how the listener is affected by the narrative. There may be an overlap between the two, but the extent to which a narrative might resonate with people can give us useful insights about a culture or society.

The topic of humor is one such area that can benefit from dialogic analysis, considering that there are vast differences in how cultures perceive humor in terms of how a joke is constructed or what cultural references are required to understand a joke.

Imagine that you are analyzing a reading of a children's book in front of an audience of children at a library. If it is supposed to be funny, how do you determine what parts of the book are funny and why?

The coding process in ATLAS.ti can help with dialogic analysis of a transcript from that reading. In such an analysis, you can have two sets of codes, one for thematically summarizing the elements of the book reading and one for marking when the children laugh.

The Code Co-Occurrence Analysis tool can then tell you which codes occur during the times that there is laughter, giving you a sense of what parts of a children's narrative might be funny to its audience.

Narrative analysis and research hold immense significance within the realm of social science research, contributing a distinct and valuable approach. Whether employed as a component of a comprehensive presentation or pursued as an independent scholarly endeavor, narrative research merits recognition as a distinctive form of research and interpretation in its own right.

Subjectivity in narratives

It is crucial to acknowledge that every narrative is intricately intertwined with its cultural milieu and the subjective experiences of the storyteller. While the outcomes of research are undoubtedly influenced by the individual narratives involved, a conscientious adherence to narrative methodology and a critical reflection on one's research can foster transparent and rigorous investigations, minimizing the potential for misunderstandings.

Rather than striving to perceive narratives through an objective lens, it is imperative to contextualize them within their sociocultural fabric. By doing so, an analysis can embrace the diverse array of narratives and enable multiple perspectives to illuminate a phenomenon or story. Embracing such complexity, narrative methodologies find considerable application in social science research.

Connecting narratives to broader phenomena

In employing narrative analysis, researchers delve into the intricate tapestry of personal narratives, carefully considering the multifaceted interplay between individual experiences and broader societal dynamics.

This meticulous approach fosters a deeper understanding of the intricate web of meanings that shape the narratives under examination. Consequently, researchers can uncover rich insights and discern patterns that may have remained hidden otherwise. These can provide valuable contributions to both theory and practice.

In summary, narrative analysis occupies a vital position within social science research. By appreciating the cultural embeddedness of narratives, employing a thoughtful methodology, and critically reflecting on one's research, scholars can conduct robust investigations that shed light on the complexities of human experiences while avoiding potential pitfalls and fostering a nuanced understanding of the narratives explored.

Turn to ATLAS.ti for your narrative analysis.

Researchers can rely on ATLAS.ti for conducting qualitative research. See why with a free trial.

Instant insights, infinite possibilities

Using narrative analysis in qualitative research

Last updated

7 March 2023

Reviewed by

Jean Kaluza

Short on time? Get an AI generated summary of this article instead

After spending considerable time and effort interviewing persons for research, you want to ensure you get the most out of the data you gathered. One method that gives you an excellent opportunity to connect with your data on a very human and personal level is a narrative analysis in qualitative research. 

Master narrative analysis

Analyze your qualitative data faster and surface more actionable insights

• What is narrative analysis?

Narrative analysis is a type of qualitative data analysis that focuses on interpreting the core narratives from a study group's personal stories. Using first-person narrative, data is acquired and organized to allow the researcher to understand how the individuals experienced something. 

Instead of focusing on just the actual words used during an interview, the narrative analysis also allows for a compilation of data on how the person expressed themselves, what language they used when describing a particular event or feeling, and the thoughts and motivations they experienced. A narrative analysis will also consider how the research participants constructed their narratives.

From the interview to coding , you should strive to keep the entire individual narrative together, so that the information shared during the interview remains intact.

Is narrative analysis qualitative or quantitative?

Narrative analysis is a qualitative research method.

Is narrative analysis a method or methodology?

A method describes the tools or processes used to understand your data; methodology describes the overall framework used to support the methods chosen. By this definition, narrative analysis can be both a method used to understand data and a methodology appropriate for approaching data that comes primarily from first-person stories.

• Do you need to perform narrative research to conduct a narrative analysis?

A narrative analysis will give the best answers about the data if you begin with conducting narrative research. Narrative research explores an entire story with a research participant to understand their personal story.

What are the characteristics of narrative research?

Narrative research always includes data from individuals that tell the story of their experiences. This is captured using loosely structured interviews . These can be a single interview or a series of long interviews over a period of time. Narrative research focuses on the construct and expressions of the story as experienced by the research participant.

• Examples of types of narratives

Narrative data is based on narratives. Your data may include the entire life story or a complete personal narrative, giving a comprehensive account of someone's life, depending on the researched subject. Alternatively, a topical story can provide context around one specific moment in the research participant's life. 

Personal narratives can be single or multiple sessions, encompassing more than topical stories but not entire life stories of the individuals.

• What is the objective of narrative analysis?

The narrative analysis seeks to organize the overall experience of a group of research participants' stories. The goal is to turn people's individual narratives into data that can be coded and organized so that researchers can easily understand the impact of a certain event, feeling, or decision on the involved persons. At the end of a narrative analysis, researchers can identify certain core narratives that capture the human experience.

What is the difference between content analysis and narrative analysis?

Content analysis is a research method that determines how often certain words, concepts, or themes appear inside a sampling of qualitative data . The narrative analysis focuses on the overall story and organizing the constructs and features of a narrative.

Free AI content analysis generator

Make sense of your research by automatically summarizing key takeaways through our free content analysis tool.

What is the difference between narrative analysis and case study in qualitative research?

A case study focuses on one particular event. A narrative analysis draws from a larger amount of data surrounding the entire narrative, including the thoughts that led up to a decision and the personal conclusion of the research participant. 

A case study, therefore, is any specific topic studied in depth, whereas narrative analysis explores single or multi-faceted experiences across time. ​​

What is the difference between narrative analysis and thematic analysis?

A thematic analysis will appear as researchers review the available qualitative data and note any recurring themes. Unlike narrative analysis, which describes an entire method of evaluating data to find a conclusion, a thematic analysis only describes reviewing and categorizing the data.

• Capturing narrative data

Because narrative data relies heavily on allowing a research participant to describe their experience, it is best to allow for a less structured interview. Allowing the participant to explore tangents or analyze their personal narrative will result in more complete data. 

When collecting narrative data, always allow the participant the time and space needed to complete their narrative.

• Methods of transcribing narrative data

A narrative analysis requires that the researchers have access to the entire verbatim narrative of the participant, including not just the word they use but the pauses, the verbal tics, and verbal crutches, such as "um" and "hmm." 

As the entire way the story is expressed is part of the data, a verbatim transcription should be created before attempting to code the narrative analysis.

Video and audio transcription templates

• How to code narrative analysis

Coding narrative analysis has two natural start points, either using a deductive coding system or an inductive coding system. Regardless of your chosen method, it's crucial not to lose valuable data during the organization process.

When coding, expect to see more information in the code snippets.

• Types of narrative analysis

After coding is complete, you should expect your data to look like large blocks of text organized by the parts of the story. You will also see where individual narratives compare and diverge.

Inductive method

Using an inductive narrative method treats the entire narrative as one datum or one set of information. An inductive narrative method will encourage the research participant to organize their own story. 

To make sense of how a story begins and ends, you must rely on cues from the participant. These may take the form of entrance and exit talks. 

Participants may not always provide clear indicators of where their narratives start and end. However, you can anticipate that their stories will contain elements of a beginning, middle, and end. By analyzing these components through coding, you can identify emerging patterns in the data.

Taking cues from entrance and exit talk

Entrance talk is when the participant begins a particular set of narratives. You may hear expressions such as, "I remember when…," "It first occurred to me when…," or "Here's an example…."

Exit talk allows you to see when the story is wrapping up, and you might expect to hear a phrase like, "…and that's how we decided", "after that, we moved on," or "that's pretty much it."

Deductive method

Regardless of your chosen method, using a deductive method can help preserve the overall storyline while coding. Starting with a deductive method allows for the separation of narrative pieces without compromising the story's integrity.

Hybrid inductive and deductive narrative analysis

Using both methods together gives you a comprehensive understanding of the data. You can start by coding the entire story using the inductive method. Then, you can better analyze and interpret the data by applying deductive codes to individual parts of the story.

• How to analyze data after coding using narrative analysis

A narrative analysis aims to take all relevant interviews and organize them down to a few core narratives. After reviewing the coding, these core narratives may appear through a repeated moment of decision occurring before the climax or a key feeling that affected the participant's outcome.

You may see these core narratives diverge early on, or you may learn that a particular moment after introspection reveals the core narrative for each participant. Either way, researchers can now quickly express and understand the data you acquired.

• A step-by-step approach to narrative analysis and finding core narratives

Narrative analysis may look slightly different to each research group, but we will walk through the process using the Delve method for this article.

Step 1 – Code narrative blocks

Organize your narrative blocks using inductive coding to organize stories by a life event.

Example: Narrative interviews are conducted with homeowners asking them to describe how they bought their first home.

Step 2 – Group and read by live-event

You begin your data analysis by reading through each of the narratives coded with the same life event.

Example: You read through each homeowner's experience of buying their first home and notice that some common themes begin to appear, such as "we were tired of renting," "our family expanded to the point that we needed a larger space," and "we had finally saved enough for a downpayment."

Step 3 – Create a nested story structure

As these common narratives develop throughout the participant's interviews, create and nest code according to your narrative analysis framework. Use your coding to break down the narrative into pieces that can be analyzed together.

Example: During your interviews, you find that the beginning of the narrative usually includes the pressures faced before buying a home that pushes the research participants to consider homeownership. The middle of the narrative often includes challenges that come up during the decision-making process. The end of the narrative usually includes perspectives about the excitement, stress, or consequences of home ownership that has finally taken place. 

Step 4 – Delve into the story structure

Once the narratives are organized into their pieces, you begin to notice how participants structure their own stories and where similarities and differences emerge.

Example: You find in your research that many people who choose to buy homes had the desire to buy a home before their circumstances allowed them to. You notice that almost all the stories begin with the feeling of some sort of outside pressure.

Step 5 – Compare across story structure

While breaking down narratives into smaller pieces is necessary for analysis, it's important not to lose sight of the overall story. To keep the big picture in mind, take breaks to step back and reread the entire narrative of a code block. This will help you remember how participants expressed themselves and ensure that the core narrative remains the focus of the analysis.

Example: By carefully examining the similarities across the beginnings of participants' narratives, you find the similarities in pressures. Considering the overall narrative, you notice how these pressures lead to similar decisions despite the challenges faced. 

Divergence in feelings towards homeownership can be linked to positive or negative pressures. Individuals who received positive pressure, such as family support or excitement, may view homeownership more favorably. Meanwhile, negative pressures like high rent or peer pressure may cause individuals to have a more negative attitude toward homeownership.

These factors can contribute to the initial divergence in feelings towards homeownership.

Step 6 – Tell the core narrative

After carefully analyzing the data, you have found how the narratives relate and diverge. You may be able to create a theory about why the narratives diverge and can create one or two core narratives that explain the way the story was experienced.

Example: You can now construct a core narrative on how a person's initial feelings toward buying a house affect their feelings after purchasing and living in their first home.

Narrative analysis in qualitative research is an invaluable tool to understand how people's stories and ability to self-narrate reflect the human experience. Qualitative data analysis can be improved through coding and organizing complete narratives. By doing so, researchers can conclude how humans process and move through decisions and life events.

Learn more about qualitative transcription software

Should you be using a customer insights hub.

Do you want to discover previous research faster?

Do you share your research findings with others?

Do you analyze research data?

Start for free today, add your research, and get to key insights faster

Editor’s picks

Last updated: 18 April 2023

Last updated: 27 February 2023

Last updated: 5 February 2023

Last updated: 16 April 2023

Last updated: 16 August 2024

Last updated: 9 March 2023

Last updated: 30 April 2024

Last updated: 12 December 2023

Last updated: 11 March 2024

Last updated: 4 July 2024

Last updated: 6 March 2024

Last updated: 5 March 2024

Last updated: 13 May 2024

Latest articles

Related topics, .css-je19u9{-webkit-align-items:flex-end;-webkit-box-align:flex-end;-ms-flex-align:flex-end;align-items:flex-end;display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-flex-direction:row;-ms-flex-direction:row;flex-direction:row;-webkit-box-flex-wrap:wrap;-webkit-flex-wrap:wrap;-ms-flex-wrap:wrap;flex-wrap:wrap;-webkit-box-pack:center;-ms-flex-pack:center;-webkit-justify-content:center;justify-content:center;row-gap:0;text-align:center;max-width:671px;}@media (max-width: 1079px){.css-je19u9{max-width:400px;}.css-je19u9>span{white-space:pre;}}@media (max-width: 799px){.css-je19u9{max-width:400px;}.css-je19u9>span{white-space:pre;}} decide what to .css-1kiodld{max-height:56px;display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;}@media (max-width: 1079px){.css-1kiodld{display:none;}} build next, decide what to build next, log in or sign up.

Get started for free

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Front Psychol

Methods for Conducting and Publishing Narrative Research With Undergraduates

Azriel grysman.

1 Psychology Department, Hamilton College, Clinton, NY, United States

Jennifer Lodi-Smith

2 Department of Psychological Sciences and Institute for Autism Research, Canisius College, Buffalo, NY, United States

Introduction

Narrative research systematically codes individual differences in the ways in which participants story crucial events in their lives to understand the extent to which they create meaning and purpose (McAdams, 2008 ). These narrative descriptions of life events address a diverse array of topics, such as personality (McAdams and Guo, 2015 ), development (Fivush et al., 2006 ), clinical applications (Banks and Salmon, 2013 ), well-being (Adler et al., 2016 ), gender (Grysman et al., 2016 ), and older adult memory decline (Levine et al., 2002 ).

Narrative research is an ideal way to involve undergraduate students as contributors to broader projects and often as co-authors. In narrative or mixed method research, undergraduates have the opportunity to think critically about methodology during study construction and implementation, and then by engaging with questions of construct validity when exploring how different methods yield complementary data on one topic. In narrative research in psychology, students collect data, as in many traditional psychology laboratories, but they collect either typed or spoken narratives and then extensively code narratives before quantitative data analysis can occur. Narrative research thus provides a unique opportunity to blend the psychological realities captured by qualitative data with the rigors of quantitative methods.

Narrative researchers start by establishing the construct of interest, deciding when coding narratives for this construct is the most effective form of measurement, rather than a questionnaire or some other form of assessment. A coding manual is developed or adopted, and all coders study the manual, practice implementing it, and discuss the process and any disagreements until the team is confident that all coders are implementing the rules in a similar way. A reliability set is then initiated, such that coders assess a group of narratives from the data of interest independently, compare their codes, and conduct reliability statistics (e.g., Intraclass coefficient, Cohen's kappa). When a predetermined threshold of agreement has been reached and a sufficient percentage of the narrative data has been coded, the two raters are deemed sufficiently similar, disagreements are resolved (by conversation or vote), and one coder completes the remainder of the narrative data. Readers are directed to Syed and Nelson ( 2015 ) and to Adler et al. ( 2017 ) for further details regarding this process, as these papers provide greater depth regarding best practices coding.

Narrative Coding in an Undergraduate Laboratory: Common Challenges and Best Practices

When are students co-authors.

Narrative coding requires heavy investment of time and energy from the student, but time and energy are not the only qualities that matter when deciding on authorship. Because students are often shielded from hypotheses for the duration of coding in order to maintain objectivity and to not bias them in their coding decisions, researchers may be in a bind when data finally arrive; they want to move toward writing but students are not yet sufficiently knowledgeable to act as co-authors. Kosslyn ( 2002 ) outlines six criteria for establishing authorship (see also Fine and Kurdek, 1993 ), and includes a scoring system for the idea, design, implementation (i.e., creation of materials), conducting the experiment, data analysis, and writing. A student who puts countless hours into narrative coding has still only contributed to conducting the experiment or data analysis. If the goal is including students as authors, researchers should consider these many stages as entry points into the research process. After coding has completed, students should read background literature while data are analyzed and be included in the writing process, as detailed below (see “the route to publishing”). In addition, explicit conversations with students about their roles and expectations in a project are always advised.

Roadblocks to Student Education

One concern of a researcher managing a narrative lab is communicating the goals and methods of the interrater process to student research assistants, who have likely never encountered a process like this before. Adding to this challenge is the fact that often researchers shield undergraduates from the study's hypotheses to reduce bias and maintain their objectivity, which can serve as a roadblock both for students' education and involvement in the project and for their ability to make decisions in borderline cases. Clearly communicating the goals and methods involved in a coding project are essential, as is planning for the time needed to orient students to the hypotheses after coding if they are to be included in the later steps of data analysis and writing. In the following two sections, we expand on challenges that arise in this vein and how we have addressed them.

Interpersonal Dynamics

A critical challenge in the interrater process addresses students' experience of power relationships, self-esteem, and internalization of the coding process. In the early stages, students often disagree on how to code a given narrative. Especially when the professor mediates these early disagreements, students might feel intimidated by a professor who sides with one student more consistently than another. Furthermore, disagreeing with a fellow student may be perceived as putting them down; students often hedge explanations with statements like “I was on the fence between those two,” and “you're probably right.” These interpersonal concerns must be addressed early in the coding process, with the goal of translating a theoretical construct into guidelines for making difficult decisions with idiosyncratic data. In the course of this process, students make the most progress by explaining their assumptions and decision process, to help identify points of divergence. Rules-of-thumb that are established in this process will be essential for future cases, increasing agreement but also creating a shared sense of coding goals so that it can be implemented consistently in new circumstances. Thus, interpersonal concerns and intimidation undermine the interrater process by introducing motivations for picking a particular code, ultimately creating a bias in the name of saving face and achieving agreement rather than leading toward agreement because of a shared representation of micro-level decisions that support the coding system.

Clearly communicating the goal of the interrater process is key to establishing a productive coding environment, mitigating the pitfalls described above. One of us (AG) begins coding meetings by discussing the goals of the interrater process, emphasizing that disagreeing ultimately helps us clarify assumptions and prevents future disagreements. If the professor agrees with one person more than another, it is not a sign of favoritism or greater intelligence. Given the novelty of the coding task and undergraduate students' developmental stage, students sometimes need reassurance emphasizing that some people are better at some coding systems than others, or even that some are better coders, and that these skills should not be connected to overall worth.

The next set of challenges pertains to students' own life settings. Depending on the structure of research opportunities in a given department, students work limited hours per week on a project, are commonly only available during the academic semester, and are often pulled by competing commitments. Researchers should establish a framework to help students stay focused on the coding project and complete a meaningful unit of coding before various vacations, semesters abroad, or leaving the laboratory to pursue other interests. This paper discusses best practices that help circumvent these pitfalls, but we recommend designing projects with them in mind. Some coding systems are better suited to semester-long commitments of 3 h per week whereas others need larger time commitments, such as from students completing summer research. It is helpful to identify RAs' long-term plans across semesters, knowing who is going abroad, who expects to stay in the lab, and assigning projects accordingly.

Building a robust collaborative environment can shape an invested team who will be engaged in the sustained efforts needed for successful narrative research. In one of our labs (JLS), general lab meetings are conducted to discuss coding protocols and do collaborative practice. Then an experienced coder is paired with a new lab member. The experienced coder codes while walking the new coder through the decision process for a week's worth of assigned coding. The new coder practices on a standard set of practice narratives under the supervision of the experienced coder, discussing the process throughout. The new coder's work is checked for agreement with published codes and years of other practice coders. The new coder then codes new narratives under the supervision of the experienced coder for 2 weeks or until comfortable coding independently. The most experienced and conscientious junior applies for an internal grant each year to be the lab manager during senior year. This lab manager assigns weekly coding and assists with practical concerns. Coding challenges are discussed at weekly lab meetings. More experienced coders also lead weekly “discrepancy meetings” where two or three trained coders review discrepancies in a coded data set and come to a consensus rating. Such meetings give the students further learning and leadership opportunities. These meetings are done in small teams to accommodate the students' differing schedules and help build understanding of the constructs and a good dynamic in the team.

The Route to Publishing With Undergraduates in Narrative Psychology

When coding has successfully been completed, researchers then have the opportunity to publish their work with undergraduates. When talented students are involved on projects, the transition to writing completes their research experience. A timeline should be established and a process clearly identified: who is the lead author? Is that person writing the whole manuscript and the second author editing or are different sections being written? We have considered all these approaches depending on the abilities and circumstances of the undergraduate. In one example Grysman and Denney ( 2017 ), AG sent successive sections to the student for editing throughout the writing process. In another, because of the student's ability in quantitative analysis and figure creation (Grysman and Dimakis, 2018 ), the undergraduate took the lead on results, and edited the researcher's writing for the introduction and discussion. In a third (Meisels and Grysman, submitted), the undergraduate more centrally designed the study as an honors thesis, and is writing up the manuscript while the researcher edits and writes the heavier statistics and methodological pieces. In another example, Lodi-Smith et al. ( 2009 ) archival open-ended responses were available to code for new constructs, allowing for a shorter project time frame than collecting new narrative data. The undergraduate student's three-semester honors thesis provided the time, scope, and opportunity to code and analyze archival narratives of personality change during college. As narrative labs often have a rich pool of archival data from which new studies can emerge, they can be a rich source of novel data for undergraduate projects.

In sum, there isn't one model of how to yield publishable work, but once the core of a narrative lab has been established, the researcher can flexibly include undergraduates in the writing process to differing degrees. As in other programs of research, students have the opportunity to learn best practices in data collection and analysis in projects they are not actively coding. Because of the need to keep coders blind to study hypotheses it is often helpful to maintain multiple projects in different points of development. Students can gain experience across the research process helping collect new data, coding existing narratives, and analyzing and writing up the coding of previous cohorts of students.

Most importantly, narrative research gives students an opportunity to learn about individuals beyond what they learn in the systematic research process and outcomes of their research. The majority of undergraduate research assistants are not going on to careers as psychologists conducting academic research on narrative identity. Many undergraduate psychology students will work in clinical/counseling settings, in social work, or in related mental health fields. The skills learned in a narrative research lab can generalize far beyond the specific goals of the research team. By reading individual narratives, students and faculty have the opportunity to learn about the lived life, hearing the reality in how people story trauma, success, challenges, and change. They can begin to see subtlety and nuance beyond their own experience and come to appreciate the importance of asking questions and learning from the answers.

Author Contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding. Funding for this article is supported by an internal grant from Hamilton College.

• Adler J. M., Dunlop W. L., Fivush R., Lilgendahl J. P., Lodi-Smith J., McAdams D. P., et al. (2017). Research methods for studying narrative identity: a primer . Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 8 , 519–527. [ Google Scholar ]
• Adler J. M., Lodi-Smith J., Philippe F. L., Houle I. (2016). The incremental validity of narrative identity in predicting well-being: a review of the field and recommendations for the future . Person. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 20 , 142–175. 10.1177/1088868315585068 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Banks M. V., Salmon K. (2013). Reasoning about the self in positive and negative ways: Relationship to psychological functioning in young adulthood . Memory 21 , 10–26. 10.1080/09658211.2012.707213 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Fine M. A., Kurdek L. A. (1993). Reflections on determining authorship credit and authorship order on faculty-student collaborations . Am. Psychol. 48 :1141. [ Google Scholar ]
• Fivush R., Haden C. A., Reese E. (2006). Elaborating on elaborations: Role of maternal reminiscing style in cognitive and social development . Child Dev. 77 , 1568–1588. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00960.x [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Grysman A., Denney A. (2017). Context and content of gendered autobiographical memories: the roles of experimenter gender and medium of report . Memory 25 , 132–145. 10.1080/09658211.2015.1133829 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Grysman A., Dimakis S. (2018). Later adults' cultural life scripts of middle and later adulthood . Aging Neuropsychol. Cogn. 25 , 406–426. 10.1080/13825585.2017.1319458 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Grysman A., Fivush R., Merrill N. A., Graci M. (2016). The influence of gender and gender typicality on autobiographical memory across event types and age groups . Mem. Cognit. 44 , 856–868. 10.3758/s13421-016-0610-2 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kosslyn S. (2002). Criteria for Authorship . Available online at: https://kosslynlab.fas.harvard.edu/files/kosslynlab/files/authorship_criteria_nov02.pdf
• Levine B., Svoboda E., Hay J. F., Winocur G., Moscovitch M. (2002). Aging and autobiographical memory: dissociating episodic from semantic retrieval . Psychol. Aging 17 , 677–689. 10.1037/0882-7974.17.4.677 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Lodi-Smith J., Geise A. C., Roberts B. W., Robins R. W. (2009). Narrating personality change . J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 96 , 679–689. 10.1037/a0014611 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• McAdams D. P. (2008). The Person: An Introduction to the Science of Personality Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. [ Google Scholar ]
• McAdams D. P., Guo J. (2015). Narrating the generative life . Psychol. Sci. 26 , 475–483. 10.1177/0956797614568318 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Syed M., Nelson S. C. (2015). Guidelines for establishing reliability when coding narrative data . Emerg. Adulth. 3 , 375–387. 10.1177/2167696815587648 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]

• Section 2: Home
• Developing the Quantitative Research Design
• Qualitative Descriptive Design
• Design and Development Research (DDR) For Instructional Design
• Qualitative Narrative Inquiry Research

What is a Qualitative Narrative Inquiry Design?

Tips for using narrative inquiry in an applied manuscript, summary of the elements of a qualitative narrative inquiry design, sampling and data collection, resource videos.

• Action Research Resource
• Case Study Design in an Applied Doctorate
• SAGE Research Methods
• Research Examples (SAGE) This link opens in a new window
• Dataset Examples (SAGE) This link opens in a new window
• IRB Resource Center This link opens in a new window

Narrative inquiry is relatively new among the qualitative research designs compared to qualitative case study, phenomenology, ethnography, and grounded theory. What distinguishes narrative inquiry is it beings with the biographical aspect of C. Wright Mills’ trilogy of ‘biography, history, and society’(O’Tolle, 2018). The primary purpose for a narrative inquiry study is participants provide the researcher with their life experiences through thick rich stories. Narrative inquiry was first used by Connelly and Calandinin as a research design to explore the perceptions and personal stories of teachers (Connelly & Clandinin, 1990). As the seminal authors, Connelly & Clandinin (1990), posited:

Although narrative inquiry has a long intellectual history both in and out of education, it is increasingly used in studies of educational experience. One theory in educational research holds that humans are storytelling organisms who, individually and socially, lead storied lives. Thus, the study of narrative is the study of the ways humans experience the world. This general concept is refined into the view that education and educational research is the construction and reconstruction of personal and social stories; learners, teachers, and researchers are storytellers and characters in their own and other's stories. In this paper we briefly survey forms of narrative inquiry in educational studies and outline certain criteria, methods, and writing forms, which we describe in terms of beginning the story, living the story, and selecting stories to construct and reconstruct narrative plots. 

Attribution: Reprint Policy for Educational Researcher: No written or oral permission is necessary to reproduce a tale, a figure, or an excerpt fewer that 500 words from this journal, or to make photocopies for classroom use. Copyright (1990) by the American Educational Research Association; reproduced with permission from the publisher. 

• Example Qualitative Narrative Inquiry Design

First, the applied doctoral manuscript narrative inquiry researcher should recognize that they are earning a practical/professional based doctorate (Doctor of Education), rather than a research doctorate such as a Ph.D. Unlike a traditional Ph.D. dissertation oral defense where the candidates focus is on theory and research, the NU School of Education applied doctoral candidate presents their finding and contributions to practice to their doctoral committee as a conceptual professional conference level presentation that centers on how their study may resolve a complex problem or issue in the profession. When working on the applied doctoral manuscript keep the focus on the professional and practical benefits that could arise from your study. If the Applied Doctoral Experience (ADE) student is unsure as to whether the topic fits within the requirements of the applied doctoral program (and their specialization, if declared) they should reach out to their research course professor or dissertation chair for guidance. This is known as alignment to the topic and program, and is critical in producing a successful manuscript. Also, most applied doctoral students doing an educational narrative inquiry study will want to use a study site to recruit their participants. For example, the study may involve teachers or college faculty that the researcher will want to interview in order to obtain their stories. Permission may be need from not only the NU Institutional Review Board (IRB), but also the study site. For example, conducting interviews on campus, procuring private school district or college email lists, obtaining archival documents, etc. 

The popularity of narrative inquiry in education is increasing as a circular and pedagogical strategy that lends itself to the practical application of research (Kim, 2016). Keep in mind that by and large practical and professional benefits that arise from a narrative inquiry study revolve around exploring the lived experiences of educators, education administrators, students, and parents or guardians. According to Dunne (2003), 

Research into teaching is best served by narrative modes of inquiry since to understand the teacher’s practice (on his or her own part or on the part of an observer) is to find an illuminating story (or stories) to tell of what they have been involved with their student” (p. 367).

• Temporality – the time of the experiences and how the experiences could influence the future;
• Sociality – cultural and personal influences of the experiences; and;
• Spatiality – the environmental surroundings during the experiences and their influence on the experiences. 

From Haydon and van der Riet (2017)

• Narrative researchers collect stories from individuals retelling of their life experiences to a particular phenomenon. 
• Narrative stories may explore personal characteristics or identities of individuals and how they view themselves in a personal or larger context.
• Chronology is often important in narrative studies, as it allows participants to recall specific places, situations, or changes within their life history.

Sampling and Sample Size

• Purposive sampling is the most often used in narrative inquiry studies. Participants must meet a form of requirement that fits the purpose, problem, and objective of the study
• There is no rule for the sample size for narrative inquiry study. For a dissertation the normal sample size is between 6-10 participants. The reason for this is sampling should be terminated when no new information is forthcoming, which is a common strategy in qualitative studies known as sampling to the point of redundancy.

Data Collection (Methodology)

• Participant and researcher collaborate through the research process to ensure the story told and the story align.
• Extensive “time in the field” (can use Zoom) is spent with participant(s) to gather stories through multiple types of information including, field notes, observations, photos, artifacts, etc.
• Field Test is strongly recommended. The purpose of a field study is to have a panel of experts in the profession of the study review the research protocol and interview questions to ensure they align to the purpose statement and research questions.
• Member Checking is recommended. The trustworthiness of results is the bedrock of high-quality qualitative research. Member checking, also known as participant or respondent validation, is a technique for exploring the credibility of results. Data or results are returned to participants to check for accuracy and resonance with their experiences. Member checking is often mentioned as one in a list of validation techniques (Birt, et al., 2016).

Narrative Data Collection Essentials

• Restorying is the process of gathering stories, analyzing themes for key elements (e.g., time, place, plot, and environment) and then rewriting the stories to place them within a chronological sequence (Ollerenshaw & Creswell, 2002).
• Narrative thinking is critical in a narrative inquiry study. According to Kim (2016), the premise of narrative thinking comprises of three components, the storyteller’s narrative schema, his or her prior knowledge and experience, and cognitive strategies-yields a story that facilitates an understanding of the others and oneself in relation to others.

Instrumentation

• In qualitative research the researcher is the primary instrument.
• In-depth, semi-structured interviews are the norm. Because of the rigor that is required for a narrative inquiry study, it is recommended that two interviews with the same participant be conducted. The primary interview and a follow-up interview to address any additional questions that may arise from the interview transcriptions and/or member checking.

Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member checking: A tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qualitative Health Research, 26 (13), 1802-1811. http://dx.doi.org./10.1177/1049732316654870

Cline, J. M. (2020). Collaborative learning for students with learning disabilities in inclusive classrooms: A qualitative narrative inquiry study (Order No. 28263106). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (2503473076). 

Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of Experience and Narrative Inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19 (5), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2018.1465839

Dunne, J. (2003). Arguing for teaching as a practice: A reply to Alasdair Macintyre. Journal of Philosophy of Education . https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.00331 

Haydon, G., & der Riet, P. van. (2017). Narrative inquiry: A relational research methodology suitable to explore narratives of health and illness. Nordic Journal of Nursing Research , 37(2), 85–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057158516675217

Kim, J. H. (2016). Understanding Narrative Inquiry: The crafting and analysis of stories as research. Sage Publications. 

Kim J. H. (2017). Jeong-Hee Kim discusses narrative methods [Video]. SAGE Research Methods Video https://www-doi-org.proxy1.ncu.edu/10.4135/9781473985179

O’ Toole, J. (2018). Institutional storytelling and personal narratives: reflecting on the value of narrative inquiry. Institutional Educational Studies, 37 (2), 175-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2018.1465839

Ollerenshaw, J. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2002). Narrative research: A comparison of two restorying data analysis approaches. Qualitative Inquiry, 8 (3), 329–347. 

• << Previous: Design and Development Research (DDR) For Instructional Design
• Next: Action Research Resource >>
• Last Updated: Jul 28, 2023 8:05 AM
• URL: https://resources.nu.edu/c.php?g=1013605

© Copyright 2024 National University. All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy | Consumer Information

Dr Karen Lumsden

trainer / coach / consultant / researcher

Narrative Analysis

Narrative analysis is a valuable data analysis technique in qualitative research. It is typically used in those studies which have already employed narrative inquiry as a qualitative method. Narrative knowledge is created and constructed through the stories of lived experience and sense-making, the meanings people afford to them, and therefore offers valuable insight into the complexity of human lives, cultures, and behaviours. Narrative analysis uses the ‘story’ as the unit of analysis, in contrast to thematic and other forms of qualitative analysis.

Narrative analysis is useful for practitioners and researchers who wish to focus on individual experiences, e.g. via collected stories and unstructured interviews.  Examples of possible applications include case studies; patients’ experiences of health care services or illness; life stories and experiences of social care clients; victims’ experiences of the criminal justice system.

This training benefits participants who wish to advance their knowledge of qualitative research methods. It explores the opportunities that narrative analysis offers in a range of applied and policy settings and contexts. It is relevant to researchers who have narrative data (or plan to collect narrative data) ready for analysis.

Share this:

The Narrative of Circular Economy and Sustainability -A Critical Analysis of Fashion Industry

• Original Paper
• Published: 12 September 2024

Cite this article

• Ruchi Gautam   ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0000-1551-7537 1  

Amidst growing environmental concerns, the fashion industry faces a pivotal moment marked by its substantial ecological footprint. This study delves into the intersection of circular economy (CE) and sustainable development (SD) within the fashion industry, emphasizing the urgent need for change. The research aims to identify implementation challenges while highlighting the timeliness of shifting towards sustainable fashion practices.

Methodology

This research employs a comprehensive methodology, incorporating both a systematic literature review (SLR) followed by real-world case studies. An extensive search was conducted across pertinent journals from 2010 to 2022 using Scopus, with keywords related to circular economy, sustainable development, and the fashion industry. Furthermore, eight secondary case studies were purposively selected and analysed.

Circular economy principles offer a promising avenue for advancing fashion sustainability. However, hurdles persist, including complex supply chains, mixed fabric recycling, inadequate infrastructure, and the lack of industry standards. Overcoming these challenges necessitates systemic changes, collaborative efforts, and technological investments. Nevertheless, embracing circularity presents valuable opportunities for enhancing resource efficiency and cultivating a socially and environmentally conscious fashion industry.

Significance

This study highlights the pressing need for a profound transformation within the fashion industry to mitigate its environmental impact. By adopting circular economy principles, the industry can significantly contribute to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Achieving this, however, requires substantial shifts in business models and industry practices.

Originality

The research stands out for its comprehensive approach, integrating a systematic literature review with real-world case studies. By analysing a diverse array of journals and cases spanning nearly a decade, it offers a comprehensive understanding of the current state of circular economy adoption within the fashion sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

In need of a sustainable and just fashion industry: identifying challenges and opportunities through a systematic literature review in a Global North/Global South perspective

Making Resilient Decisions for Sustainable Circularity of Fashion

The Awakening of an Environmental-Conscious Fashion Era

Explore related subjects.

• Artificial Intelligence

Data Availability

Yes on Request.

United Nations. (2019.). Facts and Figures | United Nations . https://www.un.org/en/actnow/facts-and-figures . Accessed 16 Apr 2023

Garcés-Ayerbe C, Torres PR, Perales IS, De La Hiz DIL (2019) Is It Possible to Change from a Linear to a Circular Economy? An Overview of Opportunities and Barriers for European Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Companies. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(5):851. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16050851

Article   Google Scholar  

Arruda EH, Melatto RAPB, Levy W, De Melo Conti D (2021) Circular economy: A brief literature review (2015–2020). Sustain Oper Comput 2:79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2021.05.001

Chen, X., Memon, H. A., Wang, Y., Marriam, I., & Tebyetekerwa, M. (2021). Circular economy and sustainability of the clothing and textile industry. Materials Circular Economy , 3 (1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42824-021-00026-2

The dark side of colourful textiles (2021) Down To Earth | Latest news, opinion, analysis on environment & science issues | India, South Asia. https://www.downtoearth.org.in/blog/water/the-dark-side-of-colourful-textiles-76505 . Accessed 16 Apr 2023

Berg A, Granskog A, Lee L, Magnus K. (2020). Fashion on climate. In McKinsey & Company . https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/retail/our-insights/fashion-on-climate . Accessed 16 Apr 2023

Koszewska M (2018) Circular economy — Challenges for the textile and clothing industry. AUTEX Res J/AUTEX Res J 18(4):337–347. https://doi.org/10.1515/aut-2018-0023

De Aguiar Hugo A, De Nadae J, Da Silva Lima R (2021) Can Fashion be Circular? A literature review on circular economy barriers, drivers, and practices in the fashion industry’s productive chain. Sustainability 13(21):12246. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112246

Ki C, Park S, Ha-Brookshire J (2020) Toward a circular economy: Understanding consumers’ moral stance on corporations’ and individuals’ responsibilities in creating a circular fashion economy. Bus Strateg Environ 30(2):1121–1135. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2675

Abdelmeguid A, Afy-Shararah M, Salonitis K (2022) Investigating the challenges of applying the principles of the circular economy in the fashion industry: A systematic review. Sustain Prod Consump 32:505–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.05.009

Remy N, Speelman E, Swartz S (2016) Style that’s sustainable: A new fast-fashion formula . McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/sustainability/our-insights/style-thats-sustainable-a-new-fast-fashion-formula . Accessed 16 Apr 2023

Arauzo-Carod J, Kostakis I, Tsagarakis KP (2022) Policies for supporting the regional circular economy and sustainability. Annals of Region Sci 68(2):255–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-022-01124-y

D’Adamo I, Lupi G, Morone P, Settembre-Blundo D (2022) Towards the circular economy in the fashion industry: the second-hand market as a best practice of sustainable responsibility for businesses and consumers. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(31):46620–46633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19255-2

Marshall D, O’Dochartaigh A, Prothero A, Reynolds O, Secchi E (2023) Are you ready for the sustainable bio-circular economy? Bus Horiz. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2023.05.002

Saizarbitoria IH, Boiral O, Testa F (2023) Circular economy at the company level: An empirical study based on sustainability reports. Sustain Dev 31(4):2307–2317. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2507

Kristoffersen E, Mikalef P, Blomsma F, Li J (2021) Towards a business analytics capability for the circular economy. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 171:120957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120957

Sobuj MSI, Khan AM, Habib MA, Islam M (2021) Factors influencing eco-friendly apparel purchase behavior of Bangladeshi young consumers: case study. Res J Text Appar 25(2):139–157. https://doi.org/10.1108/rjta-10-2019-0052

Juanga-Labayen JP, Labayen IV, Yuan Q (2022) A review on textile recycling practices and challenges. Textiles 2(1):174–188. https://doi.org/10.3390/textiles2010010

Niinimäki K, Peters G, Dahlbo H, Perry P, Rissanen T, Gwilt A (2020) The environmental price of fast fashion. Nat Rev Earth Environ 1(4):189–200. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0039-9

Ütebay B, Çelik P, Çay A (2020) Textile wastes: status and perspectives. In IntechOpen eBooks. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.92234

World Bank Group (2022) How much do our wardrobes cost to the environment? World Bank . https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2019/09/23/costo-moda-medio-ambiente . Accessed 16 Apr 2023

Amed I, Berg A (2021a). The State of Fashion 2019: an ‘Urgent awakening’ for the industry. The Business of Fashion . https://www.businessoffashion.com/reports/luxury/the-state-of-fashion-2019/ . Accessed 16 Apr 2023

Amed I, Berg A (2021b) The State of Fashion 2021 Report: Finding Promise in Perilous Times. The Business of Fashion . https://www.businessoffashion.com/reports/news-analysis/the-state-of-fashion-2021-industry-report-bof-mckinsey/ . Accessed 16 Apr 2023

Gazzola P, Pavione E, Pezzetti RR, Grechi D (2020) Trends in the fashion industry. The Perception of Sustainability and Circular Economy: A Gender/Generation Quantitative Approach. Sustainability 12(7):2809. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072809

Farrer J, Fraser K (2011) Sustainable’v’unsustainable: articulating division in the fashion textiles industry. Anti-po-des Des Res J 1:1–18

Google Scholar  

Hultberg E, Pal R (2021) Lessons on business model scalability for circular economy in the fashion retail value chain: Towards a conceptual model. Sustain Prod Consump 28:686–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.06.033

Leslie D, Brail S, Hunt M (2014) Crafting an antidote to fast fashion: the case of Toronto’s independent fashion design sector. Growth Chang 45(2):222–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12041

Bick R, Halsey E, Ekenga CC (2018) The global environmental injustice of fast fashion. Environ Health 17(1):92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-018-0433-7

Kara S, Hauschild M, Sutherland J, McAloone T (2022) Closed-loop systems to circular economy: A pathway to environmental sustainability? CIRP Ann 71(2):505–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2022.05.008

Palm C, Cornell S, Häyhä T (2021) Making resilient decisions for sustainable circularity of fashion. Circ Econ Sustain 1(2):651–670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00040-1

Watson D, Elander M, Gylling AC, Andersson T, Heikkilä P (2017) Stimulating Textile-to-Textile recycling. In TemaNord. https://doi.org/10.6027/tn2017-569

Fortuna LM, Diyamandoglu V (2017) Optimization of greenhouse gas emissions in second-hand consumer product recovery through reuse platforms. Waste Manage 66:178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.04.032

McDonough W, Braungart M (2010) Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. North point press

Stahel WR (2010) The performance economy In Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230288843

Book   Google Scholar  

Graedel TE (1994) Chemical mechanisms for the atmospheric corrosion of lead. J Electrochem Soc 141(4):922–927. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2054858

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Chertow M (2000) INDUSTRIAL SYMBIOSIS: Literature and Taxonomy. Annu Rev Energy Env 25(1):313–337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.313

Iacovidou E, Hahladakis JΝ, Purnell P (2020) A systems thinking approach to understanding the challenges of achieving the circular economy. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(19):24785–24806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11725-9

Franco MA (2017) Circular economy at the micro level: A dynamic view of incumbents’ struggles and challenges in the textile industry. J Clean Prod 168:833–845

Jajja MSS, Kannan VR, Brah SA, Hassan SZ (2017) Linkages between firm innovation strategy, suppliers, product innovation, and business performance. Int J Oper Prod Manag 37(8):1054–1075. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-09-2014-0424

Nikoofal ME, Gümüş M (2020) Value of audit for supply chains with hidden action and information. Eur J Oper Res 285(3):902–915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.02.024

Banerjee A. (2023). 20 Certifications and Standards for textile industry businesses. Online Clothing Study . https://www.onlineclothingstudy.com/2022/03/20-popular-certifications-and-standards.html . Accessed 16 Apr 2023

Front matter. (2021). In Elsevier eBooks (pp. i–ii). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-818758-6.09989-0

Kirchherr J, Reike D, Hekkert MP (2017) Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resour Conserv Recycl 127:221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005

Saha K, Dey PK, Papagiannaki E (2021) Implementing circular economy in the textile and clothing industry. Bus Strateg Environ 30(4):1497–1530. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2670

Blomsma F, Brennan G (2017) The emergence of circular economy: a new framing around prolonging resource productivity. J Ind Ecol 21(3):603–614. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12603

Atstja D, Cudečka-Puriņa N, Vesere R, Ābele L, Spivakovskyy S (2021) Challenges of textile industry in the framework of Circular Economy: case from Latvia. E3S Web of Conferences 255:01014. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125501014

Geissdoerfer M, Savaget P, Bocken N, Hultink EJ (2017) The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm? J Clean Prod 143:757–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048

Global Footprint Network (2014) Footprint basics: The ecological footprint framework. https://www.footprintnetwork.org/resources/footprint-basics-2/ . Accessed 16 Apr 2023

Textiles: Material-Specific Data | US EPA . (2022) US EPA. https://www.epa.gov/facts-and-figures-about-materials-waste-and-recycling/textiles-material-specific-data . Accessed 16 Apr 2023

Why fashion needs to be more sustainable (2021) State of the Planet. https://news.climate.columbia.edu/2021/06/10/why-fashion-needs-to-be-more-sustainable/ . Accessed 16 Apr 2023

World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2014 (2023) World economic forum. https://www.weforum.org/publications/world-economic-forum-annual-meeting-2014/

Gabrielli V, Baghi I, Codeluppi V (2013) Consumption practices of fast fashion products: a consumer-based approach. J Fash Mark Manag 17(2):206–224. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfmm-10-2011-0076

Lazarevic D, Valve H (2017) Narrating expectations for the circular economy: Towards a common and contested European transition. Energy Res Soc Sci 31:60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.006

Mion G, Adaui CRL, Bonfanti A (2021) Characterizing the mission statements of benefit corporations: Empirical evidence from Italy. Bus Strateg Environ 30(4):2160–2172. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2738

Sandin G, Peters G (2018) Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling – A review. J Clean Prod 184:353–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.266

ICAC; FAO (2015) Measuring sustainability in cotton farming systems: towards a guidance framework. https://www.insidecotton.com/measuring-sustainability-cotton-farming-systems-towards-guidance-framework

Schroeder P, Anggraeni K, Weber U (2018) The relevance of circular economy practices to the sustainable development goals. J Ind Ecol 23(1):77–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12732

United Nations (2016) Sustainable development goals report 2016.  https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2016/The%20Sustainable%20Development%20Goals%20Report%202016.pdf

Valverde J, Avilés-Palacios C (2021) Circular Economy as a Catalyst for Progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals: A Positive Relationship between Two Self-Sufficient Variables. Sustainability 13(22):12652. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212652

Fatimah YA, Govindan K, Murniningsih R, Setiawan A (2020) Industry 4.0 based sustainable circular economy approach for smart waste management system to achieve sustainable development goals: A case study of Indonesia. J Clean Prod 269:122263

Muiña FEG, Medina-Salgado M, Ferrari AM, Cucchi M (2020) Sustainability Transition in Industry 4.0 and Smart Manufacturing with the Triple-Layered Business Model Canvas. Sustainability 12(6):2364. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062364

Berberyan Z, Jastram S, Friedman BA (2018) Drivers and obstacles of ethical fashion consumption. In: LeifholdBecker C, Heuer M (eds) Eco-friendly and Fair: Fast Fashion and Consumer Behaviour, 1st edn. Routledge eBooks, New York, pp 36–48 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351058353-4

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Shirvanimoghaddam K, Motamed B, Ramakrishna S, Naebe M (2020) Death by waste: Fashion and textile circular economy case. Sci Total Environ 718:137317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137317

McHattie L, Ballie J (2018) Material Futures: Design-led approaches to crafting conversations in the circular economy. J Text Des, Res Pract 6(2):184–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/20511787.2018.1462687

Marques A, Martins IS, Kastner T, Plutzar C, Theurl MC, Eisenmenger N, Huijbregts MAJ, Wood R, Stadler K, Bruckner M, Canelas J, Hilbers JP, Tukker A, Erb K, Pereira HM (2019) Increasing impacts of land use on biodiversity and carbon sequestration driven by population and economic growth. Nat Ecol Evol 3(4):628–637. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0824-3

Savini F (2019) The economy that runs on waste: accumulation in the circular city. J Environ Planning Policy Manage 21(6):675–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908x.2019.1670048

Filho WL, Perry P, Heim H, Dinis MaP, Moda HM, Ebhuoma EE, Paço AMFD (2022) An overview of the contribution of the textiles sector to climate change. Frontiers in Environmental Science 10.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.973102

Nayak R, Akbari M, Far SM (2019) Recent sustainable trends in Vietnam’s fashion supply chain. J Clean Prod 225:291–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.239

The trends and trailblazers creating a circular economy for fashion . (2021) https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/articles/the-trends-and-trailblazers-creating-a-circular-economy-for-fashion . Accessed 16 Apr 2023

How recycled material could make fashion more sustainable (2023) World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2023/06/recycled-material-could-solve-most-of-fast-fashion-s-sustainability-problems-here-s-how/ . Accessed 16 Apr 2023

Shreya (2023) The powerful potential of sustainable materials in sustainable fashion. Medium . https://medium.com/@shreyasays/the-powerful-potential-of-sustainable-materials-in-sustainable-fashion-advantages-companies-and-310032805e55 . Accessed 16 Apr 2023

Dokter G, Thuvander L, Rahe U (2021) How circular is current design practice? Investigating perspectives across industrial design and architecture in the transition towards a circular economy. Sustain Prod Consump 26:692–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.032

Enes E, Kipöz Ş (2020) The role of fabric usage for minimization of cut-and-sew waste within the apparel production line: Case of a summer dress. J Clean Prod 248:119221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119221

The Jeans Redesign 2021 - Guidelines | Shared by Jeans Redesign . (n.d.). https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/Vision-of-a-circular-economy-for-fashion.pdf/ . Accessed 16 Apr 2023

Dan C, Østergaard T (2021) Circular Fashion: The new roles of designers in organizations transitioning to a circular economy. Des J 24(6):1001–1021. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2021.1936748

Hansen EG, Schaltegger S (2016) Mainstreaming of sustainable cotton in the German clothing industry. Environmental footprints and eco-design of products and processes (pp. 39–58). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0522-0_2

Moazzem S, Crossin E, Daver F, Wang L (2021) Assessing environmental impact reduction opportunities through life cycle assessment of apparel products. Sustain Product Consum 28:663–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.06.015

Wen X, Choi T, Chung SH (2019) Fashion retail supply chain management: A review of operational models. Int J Prod Econ 207:34–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.10.012

Da Giau A, Foss NJ, Furlan AD, Vinelli A (2019) Sustainable development and dynamic capabilities in the fashion industry: A multi-case study. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 27(3):1509–1520. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1891

Mishra S, Jain S, Malhotra G (2021) The anatomy of circular economy transition in the fashion industry. Soc Responsib J 17(4):524–542

Kumar S, Yadav R (2021) The impact of shopping motivation on sustainable consumption: A study in the context of green apparel. J Clean Prod 295:126239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126239

Hvass KK, Pedersen ERG (2019) Toward circular economy of fashion. J Fash Mark Manag 23(3):345–365. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfmm-04-2018-0059

Agrawal TK, Kumar V, Pal R, Wang L, Chen Y (2021) Blockchain-based framework for supply chain traceability: A case example of textile and clothing industry. Comput Ind Eng 154:107130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107130

Korhonen J, Honkasalo A, Seppälä J (2018) Circular economy: The concept and its limitations. Ecol Econ 143:37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041

Gregson N, Crang M, Fuller S, Holmes H (2015) Interrogating the circular economy: the moral economy of resource recovery in the EU. Econ Soc/Econ Soc 44(2):218–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2015.1013353

Jia F, Yin S, Chen L, Chen X (2020) The circular economy in the textile and apparel industry: A systematic literature review. J Clean Prod 259:120728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120728

Ghisellini P, Cialani C, Ulgiati S (2016) A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. J Clean Prod 114:11–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007

Bocken N, Boons F, Baldassarre B (2019) Sustainable business model experimentation by understanding ecologies of business models. J Clean Prod 208:1498–1512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.159

Pal R, Gander J (2018) Modelling environmental value: An examination of sustainable business models within the fashion industry. J Clean Prod 184:251–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.001

Dragomir VD, Dumitru M (2022) Practical solutions for circular business models in the fashion industry. Clean Logist Supply Chain 4:100040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2022.100040

Keßler L, Matlin SA, Kümmerer K (2021) The contribution of material circularity to sustainability—Recycling and reuse of textiles. Curr Opin Green Sustain Chem 32:100535

Kumar P, Singh RK, Kumar V (2021) Managing supply chains for sustainable operations in the era of industry 40 and circular economy: Analysis of barriers. Res, Conserv Recycl 164:105215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105215

Tura N, Hanski J, Ahola T, Ståhle M, Piiparinen S, Valkokari P (2019) Unlocking circular business: A framework of barriers and drivers. J Clean Prod 212:90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.202

Hina M, Chauhan C, Kaur P, Kraus S, Dhir A (2022) Drivers and barriers of circular economy business models: Where we are now, and where we are heading. J Clean Prod 333:130049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130049

García-Quevedo J, Jové-Llopis E, Martínez-Ros E (2020) Barriers to the circular economy in European small and medium-sized firms. Bus Strateg Environ 29(6):2450–2464. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2513

Bertassini AC, Ometto AR, Severengiz S, Gerolamo MC (2021) Circular economy and sustainability: The role of organizational behaviour in the transition journey. Bus Strateg Environ 30(7):3160–3193. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2796

Lawless E, Medvedev K (2015) Assessment of sustainable design practices in the fashion industry: experiences of eight small sustainable design companies in the Northeastern and Southeastern United States. Intern J Fash Des, Technol Educ 9(1):41–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2015.1116616

Linder M, Williander M (2015) Circular business model innovation: inherent uncertainties. Bus Strateg Environ 26(2):182–196. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1906

Agyemang M, Kusi-Sarpong S, Khan SA, Mani V, Rehman ST, Kusi-Sarpong H (2019) Drivers and barriers to circular economy implementation. Manag Decis 57(4):971–994. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-11-2018-1178

Hopkinson P, Zils M, Hawkins PN, Roper S (2018) Managing a complex global Circular Economy Business Model: Opportunities and challenges. Calif Manage Rev 60(3):71–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125618764692

Kirchherr J, Piscicelli L, Bour R, Kostense-Smit E, Muller J, Huibrechtse-Truijens A, Hekkert MP (2018) Barriers to the circular Economy: evidence from the European Union (EU). Ecol Econ 150:264–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028

Kumar V, Sezersan I, Garza-Reyes JA, González EDS, Al-Shboul MA (2019) Circular economy in the manufacturing sector: benefits, opportunities and barriers. Manag Decis 57(4):1067–1086. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-09-2018-1070

Olsson L, Fallahi S, Schnurr M, Diener D, Van Loon P (2018) Circular business models for extended EV battery life. Batteries 4(4):57. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries4040057

Upadhyay A, Kumar A, Akter S (2021) An analysis of UK retailers’ initiatives towards circular economy transition and policy-driven directions. Clean Technol Environ Policy 24(4):1209–1217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-020-02004-9

Fletcher K (2010) Slow Fashion: an invitation for systems change. Fash Pract 2(2):259–265. https://doi.org/10.2752/175693810x12774625387594

Pookulangara S, Shephard A (2013) Slow fashion movement: Understanding consumer perceptions—An exploratory study. J Retail Consum Serv 20(2):200–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2012.12.002

Zheng Y, Chi T (2014) Factors influencing purchase intention towards environmentally friendly apparel: an empirical study of US consumers. Intern J Fash Des, Technol Educ 8(2):68–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2014.990059

How brands can embrace the sustainable fashion opportunity . (2022) Bain. https://www.bain.com/insights/how-brands-can-embrace-the-sustainable-fashion-opportunity/ . Accessed 16 Apr 2023

Kant R (2011) Textile dyeing industry an environmental hazard. Nat Sci 4(1):22–26

Roberts-Islam B (2020) Why Does The Fashion Industry Care Less About Garment Workers In Other Countries? Forbes . https://www.forbes.com/sites/brookerobertsislam/2020/07/30/why-does-the-fashion-industry-care-less-about-garment-workers-in-other-countries/?sh=6d94771c2c0d . Accessed 16 Apr 2023

Yousaf A, Aqsa R (2023) Integrating Circular Economy, SBTI, Digital LCA, and ESG Benchmarks for Sustainable Textile Dyeing: A Critical Review of Industrial Textile Practices. Global NEST J 25(7):39–51

Sudarshan S, Harikrishnan S, RathiBhuvaneswari G, Alamelu V, Aanand S, Rajasekar A, Govarthanan M (2022) Impact of textile dyes on human health and bioremediation of textile industry effluent using microorganisms: current status and future prospects. J Appl Microbiol 134(2):lxac064. https://doi.org/10.1093/jambio/lxac064

Dissanayake D, Weerasinghe D (2021) Towards Circular Economy in Fashion: Review of Strategies, Barriers and Enablers. Cir Econ Sustain 2(1):25–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00090-5

Wren B (2022) Sustainable supply chain management in the fast fashion Industry: A comparative study of current efforts and best practices to address the climate crisis. Clean Logist Supply Chain 4:100032

This is how the fashion industry can reduce its carbon emissions . (2020). World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/11/sustainable-fashion-reduce-greenhouse-gas-emissions/ . Accessed 20 Apr 2023

Ting TZ, Stagner JA (2021) Fast fashion-wearing out the planet. Intern J Environ Studies 80(4):1–11

Tunn VS, Bocken NM, van den Hende EA, Schoormans JP (2019) Business models for sustainable consumption in the circular economy: An expert study. J Clean Prod 212:324–333

Rahman S, Yadlapalli A (2015) Sustainable practices in luxury apparel industry. In Environmental footprints and eco-design of products and processes (pp. 187–211). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-633-1_8 . Accessed 20 Apr 2023

Fashion has a huge waste problem. Here’s how it can change . (2020) World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/02/how-the-circular-economy-is-redesigning-fashions-future/ . Accessed 20 Apr 2023

Marks D, Miller MA, Vassanadumrongdee S (2023) Closing the loop or widening the gap? The unequal politics of Thailand’s circular economy in addressing marine plastic pollution. J Clean Prod 391:136218

Sustainable fashion solutions to combat ocean pollution (2024) Marine Conservation Society. https://www.mcsuk.org/news/combatting-ocean-pollution-through-sustainable-fashion-solutions/ . Accessed 20 Apr 2023

Rukhaya S, Yadav S, Rose NM, Grover A, Bisht D (2021) Sustainable approach to counter the environmental impact of fast fashion. The Pharma Innov J 10(8S):517–523

Fransen B (2023) The Circular Fashion Economy: A sustainable shift towards a greener future . EcoMatcher https://www.ecomatcher.com/the-circular-fashion-economy-a-sustainable-shift-towards-a-greener-future/

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff J, Akl EA, Brennan S, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw J, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder E, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, Moher D (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Jajja MSS, Asif M, Montabon F, Chatha KA (2020) The indirect effect of social responsibility standards on organizational performance in apparel supply chains: A developing country perspective. Transp Res Part E: Logist Transp Rev 139:101968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.101968

Erdiaw-Kwasie MO, Alam GMM (2023) Circular Economy Strategies and the UN Sustainable Development goals. Springer Nature

Roland D (2020) How Eileen Fisher became a model of sustainability in the fashion industry.  Fortune . https://fortune.com/2020/04/21/eileen-fisher-fashion-leadership-sustainability-interview/ . Accessed 20 Apr 2023

Yotka S (2020) “The Biggest Thing We Can Do is Reduce”—Eileen Fisher Shares a Vision for a Sustainable Future. Vogue . https://www.vogue.com/article/eileen-fisher-amy-hall-sustainabiity-horizon-2030 . Accessed 20 Apr 2023

Baskin B (2022). Why Eileen Fisher’s approach to sustainable fashion works.  The Business of Fashion . https://www.businessoffashion.com/briefings/sustainability/why-eileen-fishers-approach-to-sustainable-fashion-works/ . Accessed 20 Apr 2023

Eileen F (2021) 2021 Benefit corporation report. https://www.eileenfisher.com/ns/journal/benefit-corp-report-2021-FINAL-rc.pdf . Accessed 20 Apr 2023

Herndon K (2023) The pain of progress: our renew program reaches 2 million garments. https://www.eileenfisher.com/a-sustainable-life/journal/sustainability/renew-program-reaches-2-million-garments.html?loc=IN . Accessed 20 Apr 2023

Aallna S (2024) Growing better all the time: our regenerative organic certified® cotton. EILEEN FISHER. https://www.eileenfisher.com/a-sustainable-life/journal/sustainability/regenerative-organic-certified-cotton.html?srsltid=AfmBOopRAyB2s9uqUSYvru3ljWqxBLM5paXOEVBfrjcq5iQguNpXJ7ro

Assoune A (2021). Eileen Fisher. Panaprium . https://www.panaprium.com/blogs/i/eileen-fisher . Accessed 20 Apr 2023

Posts VM (2020) ETHICAL FASHION BRAND – EILEEN FISHER . Designerybypranavi. https://designerybypranavi.wordpress.com/2020/10/12/ethical-fashion-brand-eileen-fisher/ . Accessed 20 Apr 2023

For H&M, the future of fashion is both ‘circular’ and digital (2020) McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/retail/our-insights/for-h-and-m-the-future-of-fashion-is-both-circular-and-digital . Accessed 22 Apr 2023

Fashive. (2021c). How conscious is H&M’s new conscious collection? Fashive. https://fashive.org/how-conscious-is-h-ms-new-conscious-collection/ . Accessed 22 Apr 2023

Feria M (2023) Is H&M Sustainable And Ethical? Sustainly. https://sustainly.com/hm-sustainable-ethical/ . Accessed 22 Apr 2023

Robertson L (2024) How ethical is H&M? - Good on you. Good on You. https://goodonyou.eco/how-ethical-is-hm/

Pearson NO, Dontoh E, Pandya D (2022) Fast-fashion waste is choking developing countries with mountains of trash.  https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2022-11-02/h-m-zara-fast-fashion-waste-leaves-environmental-impact

Hendriksz V (2021) Case study on Primark sustainability, ethics, supply chain. FashionUnited. https://fashionunited.com/primark-sustainability . Accessed 22 Apr 2023

Hendriksz V (2021) (Re)defining sustainability: Closing the loop & Slow Fashion. FashionUnited . https://fashionunited.uk/news/fashion/re-defining-sustainability-closing-the-loop-slow-fashion/2016051120363 . Accessed 22 Apr 2023

Davis R (2023) Rachael Davis . https://www.textileworld.com/textile-world/knitting-apparel/2023/04/zara-partners-with-circ-to-launch-collection-made-using-recycled-polycotton-blended-textiles/ . Accessed 22 Apr 2023

LanzaTech and Zara Collaborate to Create a Capsule Collection Made from Recycled Carbon Emissions – LanzaTech (2021). https://lanzatech.com/lanzatech-and-zara-collaborate-to-create-a-capsule-collection-made-from-recycled-carbon-emissions/

Choi M, Choi M (2023) Zara uses recycling tech from start-up backed by Mount Nicholson co-developer Nan Fung. South China Morning Post https://www.scmp.com/business/banking-finance/article/3221919/circular-economy-zara-debuts-collection-relying-nan-fung-supported-start-ups-innovation-recycles . Accessed 22 Apr 2023

Stevenson M, Nhu QD (2023) Fast fashion’s waste problem could be solved by recycled textiles but brands need to help boost production . The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/fast-fashions-waste-problem-could-be-solved-by-recycled-textiles-but-brands-need-to-help-boost-production-213802 . Accessed 22 Apr 2023

Stylish and Sustainable: Can Zara’s Fast-Fashions be Both? - Technology and Operations Management (2016) Technology and operations management. https://d3.harvard.edu/platform-rctom/submission/stylish-and-sustainable-can-zaras-fast-fashions-be-both/

Maheshwari S (2022) Fashion Nova is fined for suppressing negative reviews. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/25/business/fashion-nova-reviews.html . Accessed 22 Apr 2023

Srauturier (2022) How ethical is Fashion Nova? - Good on you . Good on You. https://goodonyou.eco/how-ethical-is-fashion-nova/ . Accessed 22 Apr 2023

Assoune A (2022). Fashion nova. Panaprium . https://www.panaprium.com/blogs/i/fashion-nova . Accessed 24 Apr 2023

Saha N (2023) Is fashion nova fast fashion? Everything you need to know! Your Sustainable Guide. https://yoursustainableguide.com/is-fashion-nova-fast-fashion/ . Accessed 24 Apr 2023

Fashion Nova - Sustainability Rating - Good on you (2022). https://directory.goodonyou.eco/brand/fashion-nova

Sustainability (2024) OMNES. https://www.omnes.com/pages/sustainability . Accessed 24 Apr 2023

Feiam A (2023) 40 sustainable clothing brands to know in 2024 The Trend Spotter . https://www.thetrendspotter.net/sustainable-clothing-brands/ . Accessed 24 Apr 2023

Burney C (2024) The Interview: The CEO of OMNES on creating sustainable fashion for all and revealing new launches. TheIndustry.Fashion. https://www.theindustry.fashion/the-interview-the-ceo-of-omnes-on-creating-sustainable-fashion-for-all-and-revealing-new-launches/ . Accessed 24 Apr 2023

Waldow J, Waldow J (2022) How The North Face is approaching circular design. Modern Retail. https://www.modernretail.co/operations/how-the-north-face-is-approaching-circular-design/

Kemp A (2023) Levi’s prompts consumers to ‘buy better’ jeans for the planet. The Drum . https://www.thedrum.com/news/2022/09/21/levi-s-prompts-consumers-buy-better-jeans-the-planet . Accessed 24 Apr 2023

HT Brand Studio (2021) Levi’s® buy better, wear longer. Hindustan Times https://www.hindustantimes.com/brand-post/levis-buy-better-wear-longer-101619175793866.html . Accessed 24 Apr 2023

Zhang C (2020) Levi's Launches Denim Buyback Initiative "SecondHand" Hypebeast. https://hypebeast.com/2020/10/levis-denim-buyback-program-secondhand-used-jeans . Accessed 24 Apr 2023

Fashinza (n.d.) Manufacturing platform for apparel industry | Fast & Sustainable - Fashinza. https://fashinza.com/sustainability/learn/innovation-with-sustainability-patagonias-circular-business-model/

Patagonia: upscale, sustainable, and environmentally safe (2022) AIM2Flourish. https://aim2flourish.com/innovations/patagonia-upscale-sustainable-and-environmentally-safe#:~:text=Patagonia's%20sustainability%20programs%20are%20aimed,are%20made%20through%20recycled%20materials

Our quest for circularity (2021) Patagonia Stories. https://www.patagonia.com/stories/our-quest-for-circularity/story-96496.html#:~:text=Patagonia%20had%20been%20inspired%20by,those%20products%20again%20and%20again

US outdoor clothing brand Patagonia wins UN Champions of the Earth award (2019) UN Environment. https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/press-release/us-outdoor-clothing-brand-patagonia-wins-un-champions-earth-award . Accessed 24 Apr 2023

Climate goals - Patagonia . (2024). https://www.patagonia.com/climate-goals/ . Accessed 28 Apr 2023

Betti F, Gya R, Leal-Ayala D, Neike C, Moret B (2023) World Economic Forum, Capgemini, Rockwell Automation, Siemens, Cambridge Industrial Innovation Policy, & Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge. The “No-Excuse” Framework to accelerate the path to net-zero manufacturing and value chains [Report].  https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Industry_Net_Zero_Accelerator_2023.pdf

Gerasimos. (2023). Patagonia’s Sustainability Commitment: Creating Shared Value for the Environment and Society . SustainCase - Sustainability Magazine. https://sustaincase.com/patagonias-sustainability-commitment-creating-shared-value-for-the-environment-and-society/

Gardetti MA, Muthu SS (eds) (2020) The UN sustainable development goals for the textile and fashion industry. Springer, Berlin, Germany

Brydges T (2021) Closing the loop on take, make, waste: Investigating circular economy practices in the Swedish fashion industry. J Clean Prod 293:126245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126245

Fischer A, Pascucci S (2017) Institutional incentives in circular economy transition: The case of material use in the Dutch textile industry. J Clean Prod 155:17–32

Musova Z, Musa H, Drugdova J, Lazaroiu G, Alayasa J (2021) Consumer attitudes towards new circular models in the fashion industry. J Compet 13(3):111

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank Dr. Praveen Yadav for his help with access to database search.

The authors received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Jharkhand Raksha Shakti University, Ranchi, India

Ruchi Gautam

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

Dr Ruchi Gautam contributed to the study conception and design.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruchi Gautam .

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate, consent for publication, competing interests.

The authors declare no conflict of Interest.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Gautam, R. The Narrative of Circular Economy and Sustainability -A Critical Analysis of Fashion Industry. Circ.Econ.Sust. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-024-00417-y

Download citation

Received : 26 November 2023

Accepted : 02 August 2024

Published : 12 September 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-024-00417-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Circular Economy
• Fashion Industry
• Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
• Sustainability
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

Trump's claims of a migrant crime wave are not supported by national data

WASHINGTON — When Donald Trump speaks at the southern border in Texas on Thursday, you can expect to hear him talk about “migrant crime,” a category he has coined and defined as a terrifying binge of criminal activity committed by undocumented immigrants spreading across the country.

“You know, in New York, what’s happening with crime is it’s through the roof, and it’s called ‘migrant,’” the former president said at a rally in Michigan earlier this month. “They beat up police officers. You’ve seen that they go in, they stab people, hurt people, shoot people. It’s a whole new form, and they have gangs now that are making our gangs look like small potatoes.”

Trump has undoubtedly tapped into the rising anger over crimes allegedly committed by undocumented migrants that have gained national attention — most recently, the killing of college student Laken Riley in Georgia last week, after which an undocumented migrant from Venezuela was arrested and charged with her murder, and the much-reported fight between New York police officers and a group of migrant teens.

According to a recent Pew  poll , 57% of Americans said that a large number of migrants seeking to enter the country leads to more crime. Republicans (85%) overwhelmingly say the migrant surge leads to increased crime in the U.S. A far smaller share of Democrats (31%) say the same. The poll found that 63% of Democrats say it does not have much of an impact.

But despite the former president’s campaign rhetoric, expert analysis and available data from major-city police departments show that despite several horrifying high-profile incidents, there is no evidence of a migrant-driven crime wave in the United States.

That won’t change the way Trump talks about immigrants in his bid to return to the White House, as he argues that President Joe Biden’s immigration policies are making Americans less safe. Trump says voters should hold Biden personally responsible for every crime committed by an undocumented immigrant.

An NBC News review of available 2024 crime data from the cities targeted by Texas’ “Operation Lone Star,” which buses or flies migrants from the border to major cities in the interior — shows overall crime levels dropping in those cities that have received the most migrants.

Overall crime is down year over year in  Philadelphia ,  Chicago , Denver ,  New York  and Los Angeles. Crime has risen in  Washington, D.C ., but local officials do not attribute the spike to migrants.

“This is a public perception problem. It’s always based upon these kinds of flashpoint events where an immigrant commits a crime,” explains Graham Ousey, a professor at the College of William & Mary and the co-author of “Immigration and Crime: Taking Stock.” “There’s no evidence for there being any relationship between somebody’s immigrant status and their involvement in crime.”

Ousey notes the emotional toll these incidents have taken and how they can inform public perception, saying, “They can be really egregious acts of criminality that really draw lots of attention that involve somebody who happens to be an immigrant. And if you have leaders, political leaders who are really pushing that narrative, I think that would have the tendency to sort of push up the myth.”

“At least a couple of recent studies show that undocumented immigrants are also not more likely to be involved in crime,” Ousey says — in part because of caution about their immigration status. “The individual-level studies actually show that they’re less involved than native-born citizens or second-generation immigrants.”

Another misconception often cited by critics is that crime is more prevalent in “sanctuary cities.” But a Department of Justice report found that “there was no evidence that the percentage of unauthorized or authorized immigrant population at the city level impacted shifts in the homicide rates and no evidence that immigration is connected to robbery at the city level.”

Trump’s campaign claims without evidence that those statistics obscure the problem.

“Democrat cities purposefully do not document when crimes are committed by illegal immigrants, because they don’t want American citizens to know the truth about the dangerous impact Joe Biden’s open border is having on their communities,” Karoline Leavitt, Trump campaign press secretary, said in a statement. “Nevertheless, Americans know migrant crime is a serious and growing threat; and the murder, rape, or abuse of one innocent citizen at the hands of an illegal immigrant is one too many.”

Trump has been pushing the argument that immigrants bring crime since launching his first campaign in 2015, often featuring at his rallies the family members of those who were killed by undocumented immigrants who had been drinking and driving. And his arguments are not new — opponents of immigration have long tried to make the case that migrants bring crime.

National crime data, especially pertaining to undocumented immigrants, is notoriously incomplete. The national data comes in piecemeal and can only be evaluated holistically when the annual data is released.

The data is incomplete on how many crimes each year are committed by migrants, primarily because most local police don’t record immigration status when they make arrests. But the studies that have been done on this, most recently by the University of Wisconsin-Madison, show that in Texas, where police do record immigration status, migrants commit fewer crimes per capita.

In December 2020, researchers studying Texas crime statistics found that “contrary to public perception, we observe considerably lower felony arrest rates among undocumented immigrants compared to legal immigrants and native-born U.S. citizens and find no evidence that undocumented criminality has increased in recent years.”

Olympia Sonnier is a field producer for NBC News. 

Garrett Haake is NBC News' senior Capitol Hill correspondent. He also covers the Trump campaign.